1 2 3 4 5 10
Quote# 123766

"No is because you don’t actually feel sorry for these people. To things like you stories of horrific assaults are just wank material for you."

I do feel sorry for people who get unjustified sentences due to maniacs like you and I don't wank on stories of horrific assaults. In fact, even as late as 2013 I COULDN'T GET IT UP WHEN A WOMAN I COERCED INTO SEX WAS THRASHING BELOW ME WHEN I TRIED TO PUT IT IN HER, despite the fact that 1. she came to my home 2. we already arranged what prize she should be given 3. she even blew me to get me hard to finally put it her 4. we even joked around later that day. This changed drastically later but what you don't understand is that most "horrific assaults" done to women today is caused by feminism, which made decent men unable to get consensual sex. That's why they must resort to rape - because consensual sex in the West is basically impossible to get unless you're really, really evil. There's exceptions but they're extremely rare.


" Hell one of your pedophile friends on you Wordpress blog asked a women victim to detail her date rape"

And what is wrong about this? Unlike maniacs like you, I don't fetishize rape to be some greatest crime and trauma on Earth. Oh, wait, neither do you if the rapist isn't a white male, and you'd let your mothers and sisters be raped by classes you see as underprivileged. But let's get back to this. This woman was under no obligation to reply so what? Btw, you know who also asks this of women who claim to have been raped? Institutions like courts do. Another thing you'd like to do away with !

"I made sure to spread his profile around to people who are willing to contact him and tell him what he outta do."

Where? To my e-mail? Nobody is even sending me any hate mail these days. Everybody knows I just get a kick out of it.

"Because of people like you I have the job that I have, out of all the hundreds of kids I’ve seen only 36 were abused by “child molesters.” "

If that's true I'd fear for the safety of anybody working with or being around such an insane, hysterical person. Adults, children, whatever. You are the ones with skeletons in your closet, I am probably not talking metaphorically. Just look at your post.

" The rest were attacked by pedophiles, pedophiles who caused lasting physical and mental injuries. Injuries so horrific some adults don’t even recover let alone a 3-year old who is repeatedly raped."

This isn't what Eivind is talking about, but now that you mention it I'll be honest - I'm not sorry. Regardless if kids were male or female, not sorry. I hate 99,9 percent of modernist Westerners and want only the worse for them. If some get abused, traumatized or even killed I don't care, no matter what the age. They would or are to grow up as bad, bad people. You are a grown up Westerner and you're a bad person. And so will/would they be.


" Pedophiles who drove 15 of these kids to kill themselves, deaths that I personally witnessed..... I’ve witnessed countless other suicide attempts by crazed victims who want their nightmares to stop....t. She killed herself when she was 10 years old not too long after I walked into an old run down shed after hearing her screaming and crying and telling the two pedophiles raping her to stop. Because of your kind she’s dead. I held her while she died and I will not forget that. I was 15-years old when she died, I still have the clothes I was wearing when she bled out. Her blood is still soaked into them and some days I have to struggle to not break down sobbing at that memory."

Holy shit I laughed so hard at this. This story continues here and here

http://theliterarylink.com/gretel.html

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm053.html

Also, how does a 10 year-old kill herself so efficiently? Tell me more about it. Or those 15 suicides you've witnessed.

" Your kind is a blight that must be purged. If only Hitler had killed you all, if only he could’ve killed you all, if only he didn’t target Jews and Romanis."

So aside from being utterly psychotic you also lack basic knowledge of history and think 2017 world was just like 1937 world ? Had Hitler gone after pedophiles (not that me and Eivind are that) he'd kill no more than couple of hundred of people at best even including countries he conquered, at even that's probably an overstatement. He'd have to kill just convicted ones who were convicted due to actual crimes the kind of which you describe and there were really a few people like that in 1930s. It was notoriously hard to even track who is homosexual without special lists at the time and many of the names were people who were set up for some reason while some gays were protected as long as they were useful (Ernst Röhm being a prime example of this).

". I hope someone finds you and kills you and each and every one of your baby raping friends too. "

I have never raped a baby nor has any friend that I know of. I think same goes for Eivind... You, on the other hand...

"Your kind is one without remorse or sympathy, you’re incapable of understanding right from wrong or caring about the pain you cause others."

... support blacks, Muslims or any other group you think lacks privilege raping and killing even newborns because they're Sacred according to you and cannot be held accountable. I know this and you know this. I know it in the way you write phrases like "far-right" or how you mention Trump. At the same time you want white males to have no fair trials, no hearings, just off to prisons with them. So why don't you just admit what you're all about? Because, believe me, I know what you're all about. I know you. You cannot pull the veil over my eyes. I will never stop fighting you because I know what you are. Don't forget that.

"People like you destroy lives."

Good.

"What makes you think you deserve anything good in life?"

Nothing, given that I never said this. What makes you think white males will go along with your idea that they must be exterminated but Sacreds can do as they like? What makes you think modern Western women deserve not to be raped by them?


"’m not a religious man, religion is false. But if Hell is real I hope you burn there, I hope you suffer every imaginable horror and humiliation both known and unknown."

Funny, exactly something I think about you and your kind.

" The day is coming when we’ll be able to openly kill your kind again. I can’t wait for this to happen."

There was never a day when you could have killed "our kind", given that people like me and Eivind were a majority even 50 years ago in most places. Hell, I mentioned 14 year-old eight graders with fuck buddies around 12 years ago. Nobody had a problem with this. It was seen as normal. That you equate those like Eivind and me with people who rape babies while you actually support babies being raped, just by appropriate groups of people, is why you're such a laughingstock.

No, pal, the kind of people who it will be legal to kill again soon are your kind. Liberalism didn't appear for the first time in history and always ended up with slaughter of liberals, before or after they destroyed the society which nourished them. You will be exterminated by Muslims you so worship and people like me.

You are guilty of most vicious crime in the history of the world, and that is feminism. I know what it did to me and many of my friends. There will be no forgiveness.

caamib, Eivind Berge's Blog 24 Comments [1/19/2017 10:33:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123765

Obviously you are not going to read this, because even though you keep patting yourself on the back about how open minded you are and how you refrain from cutting off contact with those who disagree with you, how you love all of humanity and want to maximize utility, you are in fact isolated in a self imposed bubble and blinded by hatred, self imposed ignorance, crimestop, and ignorant prejudice, which hatred and ignorance will quite likely get both of us killed, you more likely to be killed than me, because I lie low, have more than one passport, and more than one identity, while you hang out with totalitarians even more murderous, cruel, hateful, and intolerant than yourself. You know this, and at the same time you refuse to know it. You say it, and you deny it.

You are a very very smart guy – except that crimestop makes you very stupid. You think yourself a very good person, but have sold your soul to evil that is likely to devour you and all of western civilization.

And here is a good example of self imposed ignorance, willful stupidity, and self imposed isolation from outside thought.

" The emancipation of slaves, the end of dueling and blasphemy laws and the divine right of kings, women’s suffrage and participation in the workforce, gay marriage—all these strike me as crystal-clear examples of moral progress, as advances that will still be considered progress a thousand years from now, if there’s anyone around then to discuss such things. "

Obviously I disagree strongly with all of those things. I hope that Trump will make himself King to be succeeded by his sons, and so does pretty much everyone who uses the phrase “God Emperor Trump”. Which is a lot of people, many of them very smart people. You may think you are right, but if you think they are crystal clear, you are just suffering from ignorance and self imposed stupidity. You will not listen, and will not understand, why some people argue we need a King, that we are suffering from chronic Kinglessness.

If gay marriage is crystal clear and will be recognized as crystal clear in a thousand years, why was it not crystal clear eight years ago? Answer me!

Take my favorite topic: Female emancipation. Men and women very much want to form families and want those families to last into their old age. My wife was eighteen in my eyes all her years, except near to the very end, and even though I sometimes have some pleasant youthful female companionship, I still sometimes find myself shaking and weeping when I remember my wife.

If you look at any successful family, no one is equal. Dad is in charge, mum picks up the socks. In principle, it is possible to form families in a society where men and women are equal, by freely contracting out of equality, but in practice, it is hard, and I see how hard it is for my sons. We have prisoners dilemma with few iterations, so the natural equilibrium between men and women is defect/defect. To prevent defect/defect, to ensure cooperate/cooperate, requires heavy handed coercive intervention by state, family, and society, and this heavy handed coercion necessarily bears far more heavily on women than on men. If you want a society where men and women know sexual love, or if you want a society which has above replacement total fertility rate, women just cannot be allowed to follow their pussies. And this requires a lot of supervision and coercion, primarily keeping women under control, rather than keeping men under control. For most women this requires that they be subject to the potential threat of physical discipline by the men in their lives. For a great many women, this requires that they be subject to the actuality of physical discipline by the men in their lives. So women should never have been emancipated, and some “violence against women” is legitimate, proper, and proportionate. Women, like children and dogs, need discipline and supervision and are never happy if they do not get them. A spoiled child, or a spoiled woman, or a spoiled dog, is never happy. The dog and the woman bark all the time.

And, in case you have not noticed, we still have blasphemy laws – except that these days you cannot blaspheme against magic Negroes. For reasons I have explained at length, all societies need blasphemy laws, and prohibiting people from blaspheming against something like holy oil or the flag, causes considerably less harm and suffering than prohibiting people from blaspheming against John Lewis. All your objections to Trump are objections to blasphemy. What is supposedly crystal clear to you is in fact something you do not believe in the slightest. Elsewhere I argue that we should venerate holy oil from Mount Athos because of all the things we might venerate, that is likely to cause the least collateral damage.

Jim, Jim's Blog 16 Comments [1/19/2017 10:32:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123764

[From the article "French resistance"; redirections include "Allied forces in France" and, formerly, "Terrorist conspiracy against the French State"]

The French resistance refers to the bands of mostly communist terrorists and non-French ethnic minorities (Jews, Armenians, etc) in France during World War II who conspired against the legal government of France, (which had relocated from Paris to Bordeaux and then Vichy) as well as the Military Administration in France, an interim authority governed by National Socialist Germany following the conclusion of the Battle of France and the Armistice requested by the French Government in 1940.

The best known of the terrorist groups were those who from 1942 onwards became increasingly serviced by the London offices of the renegade Charles de Gaulle, who, supported by crime figures such as Guy de Rothschild and the intelligence services of the British Empire, conspired to undermine the Franco-German armistice signed by Maréchal Philippe Pétain.

Aside from the factional and small Gaullist forces, who operated almost completely in the 'occupied' zone, there were also some openly terrorist elements. One of the best known of the latter organisations was the Francs-Tireurs et Partisans (FTP), which was attached to the French Communist Party. Many of their members were Jews and other foreigners. The National Council of the Resistance was the coordinating body between these various groups. There were some elements who while supporting the French State based at Vichy were hostile to the German administration in the occupied zone for nationalist reasons. The latter group included figures such as François de La Rocque and Charles Maurras.


Poster exposing the communist Jews and foreign terrorists who claimed to be "French liberators"


Metapedia, Metapedia 12 Comments [1/19/2017 10:32:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123763

Counterintuitive tendencies of women are those that work contrary to what beta conditioning teaches men. For example, "Be less accepting of women, and women will be more accepting of you" is contrary to the idea that accepting women for who they are (as opposed to qualifying them) will help one get laid.[1]

Examples

Buying women stuff, especially before sex has occurred, makes them more likely to make a guy wait for sex.[2]

When a woman says "That's so sweet" it means "I have no respect for you." When a woman says "You're an asshole" it means "I don’t know why I’m attracted to you."

References

1. CH (23 May 2016). "The Patented CH “How normal are you?” Opener". Chateau Heartiste.
2. CH (9 November 2011). "The Unpalatable Truth About Giving Women Gifts". Chateau Heartiste.

Article "Counterintuitive tendencies of women", Kings Wiki 9 Comments [1/19/2017 10:32:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123762

(Super cool things: I’m gonna be a panelist at an asexuality conference in a few weeks!!)

But you use a homophobic slur to describe yourself. I’m utterly disgusted and ashamed to have you represent me. It’s people like YOU who ignite Tumblr ‘aphobia’ with your homophobic actions and forced inclusion. People like YOU are the reason young asexuals are told to kill themselves on this site, and why the ‘ace positivity’ tag is constantly flooded with posts mocking asexuals.

You are vile.

rad-barron, Tumblr 3 Comments [1/19/2017 10:32:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Ivurm
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123760

Access to reproductive healthcare and rights has been increasingly under fire since President-elect Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. In the two months since the election, federal and state lawmakers across the country have introduced aggressive anti-abortion bills.

The Texas GOP opened its new session in mid-November with a bill that would force people to bury or cremate fetal remains. On Wednesday, legislators took the war on reproductive rights a step further.

Republican Rep. Tony Tinderholt introduced a bill titled “Abolition of Abortion in Texas Act,” which would both ban and criminalize the procedure altogether by making abortion — and the provision of the procedure — a felony.

The bill recognizes “the rights, powers, and privileges of all unborn children at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth,” and categorizes the fetus as a “living human child.”

In turn, abortion would be treated as a criminal homicide, except in cases where the individual’s life is at risk due to complications during pregnancy. This also means that anyone who has an abortion or provides the procedure could face felony charges and lose their right to vote.

The proposed bill would be at odds with the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling and seems unlikely to pass. University of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson told the Texas Observer, “This is a latter-day attempt at nullification of federal law or Supreme Court decisions, and it’s not going to work. Period.”

Levinson added, “There is simply no doubt whatsoever that it is unconstitutional under current law.” However, that it was introduced in the first place is telling of the fight ahead for basic reproductive rights and the Texas GOP has made their platform very clear.

In their agenda for the new session, the Republican Party of Texas stated that abolishing abortion and “stopping the murder of unborn children” are among their priorities.

Tony Tinderholt, Raw Story 9 Comments [1/19/2017 10:31:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123759

Female love is an emotion that is very temporary and situational. According to kaotic, "Love dies out in an LTR and all you're left with is if they complement your life or not. In the majority of times, a woman is 'annoyed' or 'isn't haaaaapy' or 'it just isn't there anymore'. Men gradually erode their own foundation of game and frame and lose everything."[1]

Netanderthal Man writes:[2]

The reason people accept the existence of unconditional love script is childhood. Your parents loved you with all their hearts and the template for what love is supposed to be was set during those early years. You loved them back in the same unconditional manner. And it was great. But your woman is not your mom. She is a fickle-minded person who’s most likely looking out for a prettier branch to grab right now.
Make no mistake, even when a woman is deeply “in love” with you, her love is not unconditional.

Most likely she’s madly in love with you because you are the man who rocks her world.

Keep being that man if she makes your life better, or discard her if she doesn’t. So, she loves you because you’re the best high-quality man she can get, but this sooner or later be subject to change. If at some point she feels she can get a man perceived as higher quality than you, her love for you will decrease exponentially. This is what we call conditional love—a woman’s love.


Smartphones are reducing women's ability to love even further.[3]

Article "Female love", Kings Wiki 5 Comments [1/19/2017 10:31:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123758

Ever since Russia's non-invasion and peaceful reunion with the overwhelmingly Russian peninsula of Crimea, several leading luminaries of the West's PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) have launched "Putin is like Hitler" accusations. From the big mouth of the Hildebeast:

"Now if this sounds familiar, it's what Hitler did back in the '30s."

From the gaping posterior of that useless royal eater, Prince Charles:

"And now Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler."

America's British poodle, David Cameron, yapped:

"We run the risk of repeating the mistakes made in Munich in '38 (appeasing Hitler). We cannot know what will happen next."

America's northern poodle, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (ex):

"We haven't seen this kind of behavior since the Second World War."

On Russia hosting the 2014 Winter Olympics, the faggy-ass Senator Lindsey Graham whined:

"If you could go back in time, would you have allowed Adolf Hitler to host the Olympics in Germany? To have the propaganda coup of inviting the world into Nazi Germany and putting on a false front?"

The ever-warmongering and certifiably insane Senator John McCain:

"If Putin is allowed to go into a sovereign nation on behalf of Russian-speaking people, this is the same thing that Hitler did prior to World War II. "

The diabolical global manipulator Zbigniew Brzezinski:

"(Putin is ) a partially comical imitation of Mussolini and a more menacing reminder of Hitler."

The bow-tied egghead sophist George Will:

"This is more than merely the fascist mind; its ethnic-cum-racial component makes it Hitlerian. Hence Putin is “unpredictable” only to those unfamiliar with the 1930s."

Adolf & Vlad got nothing handed to them.

Putin inherited a ransacked, poverty-stricken, demoralized and dying nation (in 2000). So did Hitler (in 1933).

Pre-Hitler Germans and pre-Putin Russians --- left starving and desperate by the International bankers (cough cough).

Putin stripped the Globalist Jewish Oligarchs of their power and privilege. So did Hitler.

Putin has defied the New World Order and condemned the sovereignty-killing model of what he terms, "the uni-polar world". So did Hitler, who openly referred to it as "the world conspiracy."

Putin turned the economy around in dramatic fashion. So did Hitler.

Amazing recoveries forgotten by history.

Putin rebuilt Russia's deteriorating military. So did Hitler.

Putin is a defender of traditional morality and Christianity. So was Hitler.

Both men understood that the greatness of a people is to be found in its morals and families.

Putin is admired by the overwhelming majority of his people (90%). So was Hitler (99%).

Putin is a man of high culture and refined intellect. So was Hitler.

Putin has been unjustly vilified by relentless western propaganda. So was Hitler.

The Piranha Press always attacks good men.

Putin is being relentlessly baited by western-backed puppet governments (Georgia, Ukraine, Baltic States). So was Hitler (Czechoslovakia, Poland).

Marshall Smigly of Poland and Poroshenko of Ukraine -- troublemakers emboldened by the UK & US.

Putin peacefully liberated ethnic Russians (Crimea) from the oppression of foreign governments. So did Hitler (Sudetenland).

The people of the Sudetenland and Crimea were overjoyed when they returned to their respective motherlands.

Putin has made every effort to preserve and promote peace. So did Hitler. ( It's true!)

Men of reason and culture --- not warmongers!

About the only difference between Putin and Hitler is that Putin has not been able to consolidate power and cleanse Russia's elite class of the traitors in their midst. Let's hope he can "purge" them soon and really become like Hitler.

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 11 Comments [1/19/2017 10:31:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123756

And during my “6-Days” scheme, I’m gotta be a great painter, too. Their blood is my ink. I’m gotta paint all the walls and floors into many, many, many, beautiful blood flowers scattering all over the entire deep underground bunkers, caged and NO WAY OUT. You know what? I’m gotta be Peter the Hottest Immortal Boy, the Executioner, during my “6-Days” scheme. I’m gotta love it and enjoy it. So, lovely. And, the entire deep underground bunker system is going to be my lovely hide-and-seek playground, the killing ground, the hunting ground, the slaughtering ground, and I’m the immortal hunter and executioner. They’re gotta fall in prey at my hand with my sword. Oh, baby, No Way Out. And, their blood is gotta be just like a geyser spitting out hot water, spotting all the walls and floors, and all the spots will turn very beautiful blood flowers on the walls and floors over the entire bunkers. See, I’m a great painter, and I love painting with their blood. Their blood is my ink. And, I’m gotta be grinning all the way from beginning to end, from the Day 1 to Day 6. And, I’m gotta be Peter the Hottest Immortal Boy at that 6-day campaign. I’m gotta love it, my new nickname. And, their horrified screaming is going to be the best ever musical opera I’ve ever attended so far, the best ever, horrified screaming echoing around the deep and caged bunkers, no way out, echoing around me. Oh, baby, I’m gotta be loving their horrified screaming. The first thing is I must make sure all the possible entrances and exits have been collapsed. This is a must, and the first step. And, I must be very fast, less than 30 minutes, the shorter the better, before they figure out what’s going on, before they manage to escape and get out of their lovely bunkers.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 5 Comments [1/19/2017 10:30:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123755

Day 4, the “Sausages and Hot Dogs” Day.

I’m gotta kill all the banking cartels.

How am I gotta kill them?

I’m gotta slash every single one’s belly’s surface, not too hard and not too firm, just slightly and lightly, at a lightning speed. I wanna make a long, narrow crack on each one’s belly’s surface. A crack, a long, narrow cut, just so capable of letting all the intestines to run out of their big belly, just like Niagara Fall’s water running down to the bottom, most of their intestines running out of their big bully. And, of course, bleeding so bad, and no medical teams, because I already killed all the servants at the Day 3, the “Spaghetti and Ketchup” Day.

And then, when most of the intestines running out and falling down on the ground, I’m gotta cut off one of their feet, to collapse each one of them on the ground, bleeding so bad in pain, in fear, in shock, and of course, I’m invisible, so that they can’t see me.

I wanna see them, each one of them, collapsing into their intestines with blood, without a foot, crawling like worms drenched in blood, their blood, screaming.

And, their long intestines look like yummy long sausages and hot dogs, so that the Day 4 is the “Sausages and Hot Dogs” Day.

And, without any medical treatment, they all are gotta bleeding to death, slowly and gruesomely. And, all of them will smell their blood and intestines while crawling among their intestines, and they will be all drenched in their blood.

No Way Out.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 2 Comments [1/19/2017 10:30:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123754

Day 3, the “Spaghetti and Ketchup” Day.

Day 3, the third day,

This day, I’m gotta kill all the servants, except for the banking cartels.

How am I gotta kill all the servants?

I’m gotta grab and grip their neck and throw each one of them into the wall, smashing their heads with the wall, oh baby, all the servants’ heads are gotta be just like spaghetti spilled over the edge of a dining table and then falling upon the ground, all spaghetti with ketchup scattering all over the ground.

I’m gotta smash all the servants’ heads into blood spaghetti with ketchup, all beautiful blood spaghetti flowers all over the walls in the deep bunkers. I’m a painter, and my painting pen is all the servants’ heads, and my ink is their blood. And, of course, I’m invisible. So, all the men and women will all see someone suddenly being gripped by something so powerful and then being thrown into the wall, and turned a corpse without a head, because heads are smashed into very beautiful blood spaghetti flowers all over the wall. And, of course, feared screaming will cramp and fill with all the deep bunkers, echoing around the bunkers. I’m gotta love their feared and horrified screaming echoing around me. That gotta be the most beautiful music concert that I’ve ever heard. I’m gotta love it.

With my immortal force, I’m pretty sure I can do it.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 2 Comments [1/19/2017 10:30:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123753

After collapsing all the possible in and out entrances and exits of the banking cartels’ bunkers, which may takes within one hour, I’m gotta fly through all the way descending into their core control panel room, just to see their panic. And, of course, I must be very fast to collapse all the “doors” just within one hour, the shorter the better. I wanna cage all the banking cartels and their servants in the deep bunkers, no way out.

Me, invisible all the way fly through all the floors and layers down descending into the core control panel room. I wanna see their panic.

And, at the Day 1, I wanna cut off all the men and women’, young and old, index finger and middle finger and ring finger, of their right and left hands, except for the members of the medical team.

Why do I want to cut off all some of their fingers? Because when people get panic, sometimes, they shoot dead others. The only way those persons down there in the bunkers can die is to be slain by my sword, not being shot dead by others. I don’t want any of them to be able to use guns at all. So, I must cut off all the index fingers, middle fingers, and ring fingers, because there’re gotta be some professional and trained combat men and women down there who are able to use guns with their middle fingers or ring fingers. So, I decide to cut off all the index, middle, ring fingers at the Day 1.

So, I call the Day 1 is the “Fingers” Day.

Why do I let go of the members of the medical team? Because all the wounded need medical treatment for their cut-off fingers. So, I will let go of the doctors and nurses down there, because I need someone to take care the wounded.

So, After all exits are collapsed, after all men and women’ fingers cut off, except for the medical team, those brilliant banking cartels will know something is very wrong, because they all know they have no way out. And, they will figure out something invisible is around them, something is stalking and attacking them. Something invisible and intelligent is attacking them down there in the bunkers, their caged bunkers. I want them to know and grasp my very existence down there in their caged bunkers. Why? Because something invisible, which is cutting off their fingers, is going to horrify all of them to mental death. Those banking cartels know exactly something invisible is attacking them and this something is with them in the caged bunkers, no way out. This fear will be the most horrified fear. I want all of them to be in the most horrified fear in the Day 1, the “Fingers” Day.

When something invisible is attacking and cutting off people’s fingers, and those banking cartels can’t see this something invisible, which is me, Peter the Immortal and Invisible Boy. They know something is dangerous and is attacking them, but they can’t see this something. They gotta be very feared.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 1 Comments [1/19/2017 10:30:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123751



A meme has never described me so perfectly.

rockytop-conservatarian, Tumblr 6 Comments [1/19/2017 10:29:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Ivurm
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123750

Locker room banter between men is as old as time. I just love how the dems condone the murder of the unborn, men wearing dresses and lipstick and using the woman's restroom, releasing Muslim terrorists and traitors whose leak of military intelligence resulted in the deaths of our soldiers, but dare make a comment about a woman, that is off limits. By the way, another officer was murdered in the line of duty, and for that we owe Obama and the democrats for their continual degrading and demonizing of our law enforcement. Nothing will please me more then eliminating more democrats in the next election.
Just turn on a number of TV programs, and listen to what those in Hollywood put out. Girl bending over in a bar, oh, I would like to hit that fine ass. Girls walking down the street, men making derogatory comments as they pass by. Do you honestly think men don't talk like that? Those athletes that you mention, tell me, they are anti-Trump and pro Hillary, right? Or are they the same ones who disrespected our flag and anthem?

Lindy, The Hill 7 Comments [1/19/2017 10:28:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123748

Love is an emotion of fondness and admiration.

Definitions

Roosh writes, "Philosophers and poets have given many wonderful definitions of love, but to keep it simple, there are only two main components: 1. Mutual attraction 2. Lack of other options".[1] According to Cato's Letter No. 112, fondness for posterity is nothing more than self-love.[2]

Illimitable Men writes, "Women’s love is admiration built upon respect. Women are drawn to men of experience and power. Man’s love is respect built upon desire. Men are drawn to women of innocence and vulnerability. When a woman no longer admires, and a man no longer sacrifices, love is lost. It is a delicate balance, for respect is lost when either fails in their capacity. Man sacrifices, woman admires, that is love."[3] He continues:[4]

The epitome of a woman’s love is infatuation. To define it, this is a lust for your power and an obsession with how your character makes her feel, secondary to your power. It is put crudely: opportunism and emotional self-appeasement alchemised with lust.

Man oft forgets that love does not flow upward in the sacrificial sense. He makes the mistake of thinking that because he can love a woman without lusting for her, that a woman can do the same. She cannot, because her love is not based on sacrifice, it is based on the appreciation of man’s sacrifice met with lust. The more man sacrifices for a woman, the more likely he is to fall in love with his investment. The more a woman sacrifices for man absent of animal lust, the more repulsion she feels for him, interpreting her need for investment as a shortcoming on his part. And so there it is, unspoken in word but detected in sentiment; woman expects man to love her more than she loves him, reinforcing the hierarchy of love. Female sacrifice is predicated on lust and mental entrapment. Male sacrifice is expected, and freely given.


Pragmatic approach

André du Pôle writes:[5]

In a relationship, whoever loves the other most is dominated whereas who loves less has more room to take action. If a man falls in love, he falls in the sense that he gets dumbed down, pedestalizes the girl, who in turn will get bored and look for a more challenging partner. Thus, seduction must be used to stir love in women: they must love us as well as their children. Both as a mistress and a mother, both as sexual and nurturing, a woman exerts love.

In men, love must be exerted in a more distilled and thoughtful form: when we protect our dear ones, toil for them, care about their interests, these efforts are an expression of love as well—although this form of love must be more distant as to allow ampler room for action. In any case, the feminine element must love the most and more directly.


Article "Love", Kings Wiki 3 Comments [1/19/2017 10:28:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123746

Abu al-Qasim Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Abd al-Muttalib ibn Hashim (570 - 8 June 632) was a prophet of Islam. He recited the Qu'ran.

Article "Muhammad", Kings Wiki 5 Comments [1/19/2017 10:27:31 AM]
Fundie Index: -2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123736

Western culture has progressively eroded the foundations of the traditional family for at least sixty years. Many on the left claim that the institution of marriage and traditional values are simply a relic of religious prejudice and a symbol of oppression. Part of the problem that allowed such frivolous conspiracy theories to spread was a lack of a comprehensive and objective explanation for why traditional monogamy was instituted in the first place by its defenders on the right. Appeals to divine authority, though effective with some populations, will simply not be sufficient to persuade the minimum number of people necessary in a secular culture to allow it to stay the dominant form of social organization it needs to be to support a thriving civilization. Though religious appeals for monogamous culture should not be thrown out, a secular defense of traditional culture needs to be built up to compliment the arguments of religious authorities.

One of the most useful consequences of a monogamous society is that it unleashes the creative and industrious potential in the largest number of men in society, thereby creating the foundations for a thriving and advancing civilization. In an age of free love, better described as pre-modern love, a significant portion of a man’s energy has to be expended fending off poaching attempts by other males or preventing capricious dalliances on the part of his mate. This is energy that would be much better utilized if directed towards building civilization.

However, the pro-civilizational effects of traditional values are not the only benefits worth considering. Rather than being neutral, the current system of soft polygamy (effective, but not institutionalized polygamy) has active negative attributes. Polygamy benefits men with high sexual market value and young women, but hurts men of middling to low SMV and older women. As high status men take multiple women out of the market place, the supply of women decreases for all other men.

One of the important solutions offered by traditional monogamous values is the prevention of men like Elliot Rodgers from being marginalized in the sexual market place and becoming deranged and violent. In cultures that allow the practice of polygamy, you generate a large underclass of men with no access to women. This leads to an increase in violence, crime, and excessive risk-taking by the frustrated men who are programmed by evolution to do whatever they can to secure reproductive success at any cost to themselves or society. From the standpoint of natural selection, everything is secondary to reproduction. If your current culture reduces your reproductive fitness to near zero, it is a rational, if morbid, instinct to try to disrupt that culture on the part of young men. If you “kick a friendly dog enough times, you get a nasty dog“.

The prevention of this kind of violence is one of the key reasons for having an institution of monogamous marriage. By monogamous marriage, I am not referring to the pale shadow of the institution that exists today. I refer to an institution that provides large disincentives to both men and women against breaking their vows, which is what existed through most of history. Monogamous marriage subordinates the hypergamous instincts of women to the interests of civilization. Those interests ultimately being to create order and general prosperity, which are more beneficial to women than their unbridled pursuit of the highest SMV males. Ironically, monogamous marriage and its motto of “one man, one wife” was probably the earliest egalitarian ideal. Though this ideal is often proven false in practice due to the innate differences between people, in the case of monogamous marriage it has proven the most conducive organization for advancing a prosperous and stable society. We throw that institution away at our peril. I don’t expect this warning to be heeded though, so you can expect many more Elliot Rodgers in the future.

Here is his chilling last video and his autobiography/manifesto.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 3 Comments [1/19/2017 10:23:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123734

Here again is the disturbing quote from Mr. Johnson: “I’m just not afraid of death. I don’t believe in anything, so therefore I’m not afraid what’s gonna happen afterward.” Oh, that is so foolish! I promise you that Mr. Brian Johnson will believe in God, the Holy Bible, Hell and judgment the very second that he enters Christless into eternity, leaving his earthly body behind. The rich man in Luke 16:19-32 didn't care either about spiritual matters, until he woke up in the fires of Hell in torments. But by then it was too late. One day soon, if Brian Johnson doesn't repent of his unbelief and come to Jesus Christ as His personal Savior, he will find himself in the fires of Hell begging God for a second chance, for mercy, but it will be too late for him (Luke 16:31). No doubt he will blame the Devil for his spiritual blindness, the way of the sin-cursed world, his heathen religious upbringing, and everything else he can think of when he feels the singeing flames of a scorching literal Hell, but IT WILL BE TOO LATE.

My friend, the “HIGHWAY TO HELL” is real, it is real, it is real. The world mocks and jokes, laughing as they foolishly sing “I'm On A Highway To Hell,” and they truly are. May I say, NOBODY IS LAUGHING IN HELL!!! (MP3 sermon by Evangelist Phil Kidd). All men ought to fear God, but especially those who have not accepted God's free grace for salvation. Eternal life is a free gift by faith in Christ Jesus, please don't leave earth without Him!

It's ironic, interesting and even indicting, that Mr. Johnson has made tens-of-millions of dollars singing, “I'M ON A HIGHWAY TO HELL” throughout his career. Johnson has a net worth of $90,000,000.[1] For a man who claims that he doesn't believe in anything, he sure sings a lot about Hell, fire and damnation. AC/DC has performed literally thousands of Rock concerts since the 1970's, making the world a more horrible place to live with their poison to men's souls. In their heavy-metal music AC/DC glorifies the sins of prostitution, fornication, violence, alcoholism, blaspheming God, et cetera. Their lyrics are sexually suggestive, explicit and shameful, paying their dues to Satan in a Rock 'N' Roll band. Oh, what a tragedy! Life is short, Hell is hot, and eternity is forever!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 8 Comments [1/19/2017 10:23:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123730

In one of many experiences I have had with this phenomenon, I was out with my friend and a group of people he knows including the heroine of this anecdote. The first point where I could see that this young scold was troublesome and prone to quarreling with her neighbors was when she brought up a contemporaneous debit card hacking thefts from Target and other stores in order to perform a vitriolic diatribe. Being keen to participate in the group discussion, I made the innocuous observation that while the hacker’s actions were wrong and deserving of punishment, the technical mastery he required to accomplish the crime was undoubtedly impressive. That a person engaged in criminal activity could demonstrate impressive skills was too much of an abstraction for her and thus provoked her to reveal her quarrelsome nature in the form of various insults towards me. Fortunately, another member of the group mollified her by explaining that a person may simultaneously have concepts with both positive and negative connotations associated with them without there being a contradiction. The emotional “reasoning” of many females seems to stumble when confronted with this fundamental, yet subtle, truth. However, though the third party adequately explained that being impressed by something doesn’t mean you condone the act, I am not convinced that it was anything more than a mere Pavlovian response to the attitude of multiple peers which doused her temper rather than a true comprehension of the nuance involved.

Later that same evening, we were all sitting around a table and out of blue our heroine pointedly asks me “What were the longest relationships you were in?” Seeing no immediate need for subtlety or outright dishonesty I responded frankly that “2 years was my longest relationship, but to be fair it wasn’t with an American woman.” Dear me, this was not a tactful thing to say to the common American scold as they will in their solipsism invariably interpret any comment or statement to be descriptive of their own person. Though there were signs she was getting ever so huffy, to my discredit I was hopelessly oblivious to the volcano preparing to erupt before me. Responding to her quite earnest desire for clarification, I elaborated on the fact that I find most American women difficult to get along with for anything longer than a fling given that so many are common scolds (though I did not use this terminology at the time). To this her barely contained rage erupted with a rabid desire for acrimonious verbal combat, yet her rage was too great to craft more than a small sum of suitable slurs and so she simply stomped off somewhere to succor her now sore psyche.

Of course this would not prove to be the end of this anecdote. Our resident white knight decides to step up to defend our heroine’s fragile ego since she found herself lacking the skill to patch this bit of cognitive dissonance. Sir lancelot starts by trying to lecture me about what kind of opinions I am allowed to have and what I am allowed to say. Not being a pussy and possessing an acute loathing of white knights, I was quick to assert that he had no authority to lecture me or to define the acceptable range of opinions I was allowed to possess. Our heroine’s knight in shining armor was so prepared to defend her “honor” that he had the audacity to threaten me physically if I couldn’t be otherwise cowed. Though, or perhaps because, I made it clear I was prepared to accept his challenge to fisticuffs, the tense moment eventually passed without coming to blows and the night continued without further incident. To escalate this absurdity to even greater heights, Sir Lancelot did all this despite his Guinevere being foreign born.

Probably all men, or at least all American men, have experienced this sort of situation as a result of the unruly and irrational emotions of the common American scold. The question is, when the institution of patriarchy is restored because of necessity, what can the new order do to reduce the number and severity of the disturbances to the public peace caused by such women and their valiant saviors? I think that English common law, as detailed in the introductory poem and links, sets a fine precedent of how such socially disruptive backbiters can be disabled. When a queen of histrionics and her knights of the unstable are identified, the punishment used to correct the bad behavior should be focused on public shaming and minor physical discomfort. Such chastisement is an appropriate response to the indignities caused by common scolds because the guilty would likely be easily reformed for the public good with only a few treatments. This is especially true of the most egregious version of the common scold currently in existence, which are of course the feminists who acrimoniously agitate for social norms that destabilize and eventually destroy civilisation. A few public dunks on a cucking stool for the most heinous of these harpies would humanely cure them of their hysteria and thoroughly deter any other would-be agitators.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 8 Comments [1/19/2017 10:21:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123744

The male desire to own women is part of masculine psychology. Ownership of women can include the right to sex on demand and to the woman's faithfulness. Women have a complementary desire to be owned by men.

Article "Male desire to own women", Kings Wiki 28 Comments [1/18/2017 3:07:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123743

Objectification is when someone treats another person like an object. Drexel Scott notes, "Generally, we love and appreciate our tools for helping us to build better things in our grand designs in life. A woman’s role in a man’s life is to provide her sexuality, femininity and childcare duties so that the man’s work in the external world will be supplemented and it brings them both to new heights of happiness and satisfaction."[1] CamelJockey notes, "The only women that against the objectification of women are unattractive women that no one wants to objectify to begin with. Pretty girls love being objectified. The ugly ones are mad they never get any attention. It's not that they're against the objectification, they are jealous of the objectification they're not getting." TrulySovereign notes, "Or has been stated here many times before, they do not like being objectified by men that are below the SMV male they are trying to attract."

Article "Objectification", Kings Wiki 13 Comments [1/18/2017 3:07:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123742

Narcissism is the pursuit of gratification from vanity or egotistic admiration of one's own attributes. According to Illimitable Men, "All people with narcissistic personality disorder are narcissists, but not all narcissists have a personality disorder. A healthy dose of narcissism is a performance-enhancer, for it improves one’s effectiveness by amplifying their self-love, confidence and boldness."[1] According to Bonecrker:[2]

women do not ever want to hear anything about you (sad but true). Women always find this offensive and think the guy is narcissistic (a projection of what they actually are) even if his talking about himself is brief and in context to the situation. On the other hand, if you spend all your time asking leading questions about her and then fleshing out the details of her life, only pausing to add various compliments to her, she will think you are the most brilliant conversationalist in the world, even though you have basically said nothing. You can do this for hours and hours and she’ll never even think to ask anything about you. It’s downright bizarre and disturbing, once you’ve experienced it. But not as bizarre and disturbing as the effect it has on how they see you.


Illimitable Men notes that "whilst narcissism is a suit well-worn on a man, it is one ill-fitting for a woman. Whilst women are inherently drawn to male narcissism as overconfidence is the linchpin of good masculine game, female narcissism is unattractive to the majority of men. In women it manifests as bratty, spoiled 'hot girl behaviour' and men, especially top-tier men, don’t want to feel like they’re babysitting an overgrown child."[3]

It also notes, "Being grandiose never hindered a man’s chances of getting laid."[4]

The two types of narcissism are infantile and grandiose.

Heartiste advises, "Be narcissistic. There is no greater divergence than that between a woman’s stated disapproval of male narcissism and the rapidity with which she jumps into bed with a male narcissist."[5]

Article "Narcissism", Kings Wiki 15 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123741

Consent is willingness to engage in an activity.

Informed consent

Feminists often argue that sex with a woman is rape unless she not only consents but is able to give informed consent. Arguably, "informed consent" means being informed enough to be a responsible member of the pussy cartel – a whore who knows her price and who won't undercut other women.

Article "Consent", Kings Wiki 9 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123740

Allah is the god of Islam. He is said to be a continuation of a Mesopotamian moon god that was retained after the conversion of the Arabs to Islam.

Article "Allah", Kings Wiki 18 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123738

Sexual property, under patriarchy, is what wives are recognized as. Adultery is a crime against sexual property.[1] In the Jewish faith, women were seen as man's sexual property, but equal in comradeship, homemaking and parenthood (e.g. Fiddler on the Roof).

Carole Pateman notes, "The patriarchal construction of sexuality, what it means to be a sexual being, is to possess and to have access to sexual property. . . . In modern patriarchy, masculinity provides the paradigm for sexuality; and sexuality means sexual mastery. The 'individual is a man who makes use of a woman's body (sexual property); the converse is much harder to imagine."[2]

Stanford M. Lyman writes, "A nearly unbounded wrath is sometimes aroused by the appropriation of another's sexual property. Treated in the classic sociological essay by Kingsley Davis as jealousy, this emotional state and its attendant response are also understandable as an angry reaction to lost self-esteem. . . . Of all the types of properties over which dominion is sought, sexual property seems to evoke the most intimate connection to self-worth. The bonds of love or affection express not only one's own feelings toward the other, but also an implicit reciprocal image of these feelings toward oneself. . . . Sexual property above all others is likely to engender vanity and pride in, and satisfy a fundamental need of, its possessor. Accordingly, an attack on one's sexual property usually cuts a deep wound in one's self-esteem. . . . A jealous regard for one's own dearly purchased prize in the marketplace of love may arouse the most intense fears, deepest insecurities, and ultimately his most ferocious wrath as a threatened possessor fights to preserve his pride, passion, and property. And precisely because jealousy arises out of the most significant elements of self-esteem, its fury might know no bounds."[3]

Thus, it should come as no surprise that when wives refuse to fulfill their proper roles as sexual property, their husbands sometimes get angry, as she is essentially appropriating herself.

Article "Sexual Property", Kings Wiki 14 Comments [1/18/2017 3:06:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 10