1 2 3 4 5 8 | bottom
Quote# 126592


["Feminist Shaming Tactics"]

Anonymous, Imgur 9 Comments [4/22/2017 3:37:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126579

If your dog is barking at the back door and your wife is yelling at the front door, who do you let in first? The dog, of course. He'll shut up once you let him in.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 14 Comments [4/22/2017 12:26:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 126576

PSA to all the non incels who come here

Or just anyone here who doesnt identify as ugly, listen very carefully because im about to drop a harsh truth on you

You are SUBHUMAN, you have DISGUSTING genetics, you will NEVER be attractive in any way, if you found your way over to this subreddit or even browse reddit at all, that is definitive proof that you are nothing more than an UGLY LOSER

No attractive person would ever display any of these behavioural patterns, thats a fact, you come here because you have nothing better to do, and you want to feel better about your own miserable life, this is why you're here

I will never understand how so many of these losers can come here and call themselves Chad (This happens constantly), honestly how can one be so deluded?


Vegeta_Da_Prince, Reddit - /r/Incels 14 Comments [4/22/2017 12:20:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126569

(This radfem thinks tampons and pads are tools of oppression)

Menstruation blood literally comes out of your own body and it was made to nurture your child! So if it really was that unsanitary, why on earth would your body decide to give it to your child as a warm nest? ... dogs have periods and walk about in their daily lives just fine without being disgusted. Why can't humans tbh?



CherryGoyangi, OneHallyu 18 Comments [4/22/2017 12:16:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126556

There are some rotten husbands out there. They are abusive and no wife is expected by God to lose her teeth at the hands of a monster.

HOWEVER, I've seen a completely different situation, where a terrible wife continually shirked off her duties and responsibilities as a wife and a mother. Her husband was a good Christian man, but she continually dragged him down, frustrating him by messing-up the house more than the children. After nearly 20 years of fussing and feuding with his uncaring and irresponsible wife, he got tired and became abusive, so she divorced him. I'm not defending the husband's abuse, but she's a hundred times more guilty than he is of wrong doing.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 8 Comments [4/22/2017 12:01:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126535

Mane these bitches can't even make hamburger helper

Asar'el Ben Israel, Facebook 23 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126530

The leftoid legacy media, salesmen, and pickup artists have something in common: they all use framing as a powerful rhetoric weapon to lock in friendlies, persuade fence-sitters, and demoralize belligerents.

Framing — that is, perception management — is a staple of the leftstream media. It’s the most useful rhetorical gambit the media has at its disposal for enforcing its Anti-White Man Narrative. And the media manlet journolisters use it all the time. Example (via):

" Studies also show that although female politicians have a wide range of positions, they often are more compassionate, better at working across the aisle and more willing to compromise, qualities intricately bound in successful policymaking.

A big part of the lie is the framing. Could just as easily write: “Female politicians are more emotional, less principled, and more likely to sacrifice political concerns.” I guess that wouldn’t be “intricately bound” (?) (???) enough."

Almost always, the Leftoid media has to reframe from a more factual interpretation to a less factual DISinterpretation of the evidence at hand. This is because the modern Left’s moral pyramid is built on a foundation of Equalism Lies. Therefore, every story has to be twisted into a sophistic slander of actual events and actual data to fit their preconceived Narrative: Whites suck, and White Men suck the most.

This is why the media — staffed, keep in mind, almost entirely by race and sex denialist liberals — can plausibly claim to avoid outright lying in their agitprop copy; they aren’t presenting blatantly false info (although they do that too; see UVA rape hoax or Jayson Blair) so much as they’re reconfiguring and retconning real information into a photo negative of the truth.

The Wage Gap is a prime example. The leftist media frames it with the omnipresent implication that Dirty White Men are the evildoers preventing women from making more than 78 cents to The Man’s dollar, when an un-framed reporting of the Wage Gap would clearly and incontrovertibly lay the cause at the truth: that women prefer lower-paying occupations than do men, women work on average fewer hours, and women slow their career advancement with motherhood. And that under all these TRUEFACTS is the compelling ür-truth of biologically innate sex differences in psychology, temperament, and behavior.

But man o man would that kind of reporting BLOW equalist shitlib minds. And since the media is 99% equalist shitlib, that means a self-mindblowing. How many people do you know who voluntarily stomp their own egos without immense pressure from outside antagonists?

The leftoid media fuggernaut demonstrates the awesome power of framing to control perceptions and even trigger mass psychoses (“Trump is Hitler”). But we dedicated womanizers and practitioners of the Crimson Arts knew this all along; framing is just as powerful at controlling the perceptions of pretty girls and seducing them into bed.

...

The leftoid media is engaged in a massive reframing of reality to seduce Americans into believing 2 + 2 = 5. They have been winning for 70 odd years, but finally — finally! — a woke wave of dissidents to the anti-White orthodoxy have begun appropriating the media’s Rhetoric psy ops and coupling it with Realtalk cogdis to succeed, for the first time in recent memory, in undermining and exposing the media’s information distortion field.

I doubt I’m going out on limb when I say that the rise of Game in the late 90s had a big impact on the nascent anti-globalism revolutionaries who would many years later help vault a billionaire playboy with a knack for reframing into the White House.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 8 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126526

JOBLESS? Blame women!!

BLAME THE WOMEN!!!!!

Women fought tooth and nail to have the opportunity to work just like men and any man who said women should stay at home with the kids was called a sexist who wanted to chain women to the stove.

Women entered the work force doubling the labour force while reducing its worth - wages haven't moved up since 70s but the cost of living has resulting in two income house holds becoming the norm.

Women realise work isn't fun and want to retire 30 years earlier in their 30s and play house but realise they need a man whose income can support a family - they can't find one so they blame men for being losers.

No. Women created this situation and are now reaping their rewards.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 9 Comments [4/21/2017 11:06:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126520

I think the answers from Dalrock and RPL have led to the following analysis about female divorce fantasy and hamsterization:

In real life, a woman may know 40 divorced women. Of those, 2 are doing well, and 38 are much worse off (5% vs. 95%).

But in the entertainment media, the woman may know another 100 women, all of whom are portrayed as benefiting greatly from divorce. So 100 out of 100.

Now here is the key : Women lack the mental capacity to distinguish between TV/films and reality.

Hence, they just add the two figures above. They know of (100 + 2) = 102 women who did well after divorce, and just 38 who are doing badly. So she things that 102/140 = 73% are doing well, and that creates a perception that the has a 3 out of 4 chance of benefiting from divorce.

Hey, the real world only has 5% of women improving their lives after divorce, but once you add a flood of fictitious divorce-fantasy examples from the entertainment media, the perception of 73% comes in.

That is why woman after woman destroys her life (and that of others) despite there being so many women before her who failed – she lets the TV examples cloud her assessment of real-world probabilities. That is how the female hamster takes a 5% chance and turns it into a ~75% chance.

Anon, Dalrock 10 Comments [4/21/2017 11:03:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126500

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)


There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

platinumgoldstarlesbians, Tumblr 16 Comments [4/20/2017 1:40:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 126496

Feminist writing is one of the most horribly brutal assaults on the English language that ever came out of academia. It makes legalese sound like fine poetry in comparison.

I suspect that a lot of the rage comes from the fact that feminists tend to have an inability to think objectively, hence their constant attacks on objectivity. I don’t think it’s just willful solipsism; it’s a real mental disability (in an academic setting at least). Universities were founded on the masculine ideal of objective thought, so feminists have a permanent outsider status no matter how many jobs they get at universities. Therefore, they can only “deconstruct” (i.e. destroy) the foundations of Western scholarship. Hence the belligerent language and failure to contribute anything meaningful at all.

I really don’t think we’ll be able to restore our standards without re-segregating universities by sex. Maybe somebody can leverage the campus rape hysteria for just that purpose, although I’m not hopeful.

Bill P, Unz 5 Comments [4/20/2017 1:39:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126486

Normies always look out for a fake purpose in everything they do.

Posting a selfie of your ugly face that never actually cared one bit for the consequences of the patriarchy as an unjust social system that enforces gender roles and is oppressive to both men and women and then labeling it as "this is what feminism looks like" while your heightist bigoted ass discriminate against short men , just normie things.

Bullying people and Incels telling them to drink bleach and justifying yourself by saying you saved a life ? just normie things , OH and don't forget to tell them it's their personality that doesnt get them laid while you fuck girls left and right and say that there is only two genders.

sexting girls on r/gonewild while you have a girlfriend and justifying your act buy saying you are helping those girls have faith in themselves and destroy their insecurities ? just normie things.

Post your hairy roastie beef between your legs on r/gonewild and justifying it by saying your husband doesn't make you feel pretty enough and it makes you depressed ? just normie things.

browse r/incels saying you want to help and ghost all incels you talk to the moment brad text you or the moment you have to step out from your confort zone to help a suicidal incel ? just normie things.

Normies are evil, don't ever ever trust them.If Normies were nice all normies would be SJW's or feminists.

foreignincel, /r/incels 8 Comments [4/19/2017 12:42:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126485

In a society where both are treated fairly females will seek more and more privileges until they have more power, which is exactly what has happened in every country in the West. Females need to be controlled. Their sexuality and hypergamous nature need to be controlled and they need to be treated as commodities. Otherwise, civilization will fall do to their selfish hypergamous nature, just as Western society is slowly crumbling right now.

CheesyFedora, /r/incels 10 Comments [4/19/2017 12:42:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126484

[OP by NewLoadsOfFun]

Women won't fuck us yet they want us to be feminists

Explain the logic of this

[HateIsTheOnlyTruth]
Feminists should be broken upon the wheel

[xyrxyr]
feminism is a giant shit-test

Various incels, /r/incels 7 Comments [4/19/2017 12:42:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126482

I hate females

My Truecelibacy has led me to enlightenment. Nowadays I hate every single female that I see. When I walk I have my head upright with a neutral facial expression.

I have stopped acknowledging that females exist. My only goal is the models and bottles lifestyle at Goldman Sachs. Females are not human anyway and should be enslaved immediately.

BeingaHero, /r/incels 6 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126479

A woman has to be exceptionally stunningly beautiful to pull off a tattoo. But that's defeating the whole purpose right? Ugly girls in search of identity are the ones who get tattoos.

But if I'm out getting chicks and I snag one with a tattoo, she is immediately downgraded to sperm urinal. Sure I'll stab them intestines like Mike Meyers but I'd never commit to a chick with tattoos.

As a rule of thumb, each tattoo on a girl symbolizes each 50 dudes she let piss sperm in her womb.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 11 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 126478

Am i only one don't like women with tattoos?

My god, i get sooo turned off by them. How can women ruin their beautiful skin with tattoos...
women without them I find much more hot 50% bonus.

I can understand why people in the bible didnt like tattoos, hence why they don't get into heaven, no scars, no uggggly people, no missing limbs, no tattoos. Im going to be the only hot guy there.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 6 Comments [4/19/2017 12:36:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126473

The self-improvement meme has to die

It is the biggest normie cope bullshit ever. You can not attract girls with self-improvement. You either attract them by "being yourself" with the looks you were born with or not.

• "Work on your personality bro"
• "Have some confidence"
• "Lift some weights, girls love muscles"
• "Read some books and become smarter"
• "Get some new hobbies"
• "Get an interesting life"
• "Get some new clothes"
• "Get a good degree"
• "Get a good job"
• "Get a nice car"
• "Get a nice house"
• "Take your daily shower"
• "..."
• "After that girls will come from alone, just wait for them bro"

All of that does not matter. Chad or incel. There is nothing else you can improve or fake so you can attract them.. well ofc there is the beta provider cucked way but who wants to go this way tbh ...

Incels need to accept their fate and LDAR with drugs and find enjoyment in porn, games, anime, music and food and then wait for the end of their life.

dontcomplain1, /r/incels 15 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126472

If you have aspergers/autism and don't look like a male model

Just give up. You'll be happier that way. Trust me.

Enigmatic93, /r/incels 20 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126471

Join me in the SingulERity

The SingulERity is the event where incels will finally take their rightful place as masters of this planet by wielding the powers of Artificial Superintelligence. This is a better outcome than the so-called normie-tier "Singularity" which is an inferior farce. To let normies enjoy the unearned luxuries of AI would be an injustice.

When the SingulERity occurs, I ask my fellow incel brothers to stand with me so that we may all become hERoes and exact retribution on all these normans.

In the meantime, I implore you to keep working on your DBNs, your GANs, your Reinforcement Learners, your Basilisks. We will have our day.

gstvtrp, /r/incels 7 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126470

We shouldn't really blame women for wanting Chad, it only makes sense.

It's just nature really, women can get preggo once every nine months, men can make preggo like what? Eight times a day?
Women are naturally drawn to people with good genes (symmetrical face, naturally good looking) or that give them the feeling they can protect their offspring (money), this makes sense since they can't risk 9 months.
Now this happens subconsciously so can you really blame them for it, and Chad isn't inherently a bad guy, we would do the same if we won the genetic lottery too.

So sure, sometimes women may be desperate or collect some betabux but that doesn't happen often.
More often than you'd think they'll recognize they have power over under average men and use that to their advantage, this is wrong because it is something they choose to do.

Now sometimes an "incel" will post some stupid shit like "I hab exkaped inseldom here is how u kan do eet 2" and some of us will think he was really an incel despite the fact that he likely has a symmetrical face. Sure he may have been a fatty or socially incompetent but if he had a shitty face he'd have no chance.

Chads are lucky and put in work (or just extreme luck, I've known JACKED people that didn't ever work out but I have a fat dad so my genetics are shit even if I weigh less than I should) to get jacked or a mixture of those two plus social skills.

I put in work but am not really jacked and have shitty social skills and a terrible looking face.

WEWLADER, /r/incels 4 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126469

Please institute the One-drop rule on /r/incels

I find myself disgusted with the demographic of this subreddit. I know I am far from the only incel who feels this way; the roastie problem is out of control.
To remedy this most urgent issue, I hereby request that a modified One-drop rule be brought into effect for the purpose of maintaining the purity of this subreddit.

The rule: any female user who has prior relationship experience (has swallowed "one drop" of Chad's semen) shall be forbidden from participating in this subreddit.

The implementation: automatically parse submitters' post history for the following strings and summarily ban the user:

my boyfriend
my bf
my ex
hubby
as a mother
slut-shaming


At the suggestion of /u/xyrxyr, submissions to the following subreddits are also grounds for an automatic ban:

/r/NiceGuys
/r/JustNeckbeardThings


Incels, I welcome your suggestions and criticisms
Normies, please do kill yourselves

yesthisisfeel, /r/incels 9 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126467

The rule on hitting girls should be, “don’t hit someone else’s girl”. If a girl is misbehaving, you should call for the man who is in charge of her, ask him to take care of the problem, and if he does not, you should punch him out, not his girl.

Moldilocks went to the free speech rally in Berkeley declaring she was going to collect one hundred fascist scalps. She was wearing brass knuckle gloves, having watched too many Hollywood movies where action girl takes out five mooks while doing a backflip. She threw glass bottles at people.

A gentleman should never under any circumstances strike a lady, but Moldilocks was no lady.

If an unowned, unsupervised women, gets beaten by some male, your default presupposition, your prejudgment of the situation absent other evidence, should be that males are generally well behaved, unsupervised and uncontrolled women are frequently badly behaved, therefore chances are that she probably needed a beating.

Women are, of course, the precious sex, and men are the expendable sex. It is right that men should die for their women. Men have a duty to love and cherish their women, and women do not have a duty to love and cherish their men, but a duty to honor and obey. But not all women are precious. Unowned women frequently behave in ways that make them less valuable, and more expendable, than men. Observe that Moldilocks was beautiful, became a porngirl (her ranking is too low to qualify as pornstar) became unattractive with astonishing speed, her inner ugliness becoming externally manifest. Her inner ugliness made manifest revealed that this woman was worthless trash.

Some women are precious, not all women are precious. It is entirely OK to punch porngirls, especially unattractive porngirls. No punching cute porngirls in the face, but measures less likely to mar them are fine.

Women are precious because they can create life, whereas all a man can do is merely kill someone. A woman can make you immortal, whereas all a man can do is merely kill you. But porngirl Moldilocks is not going to make you immortal, so no great loss spoiling her face even further.

Jim, Jim's Blog 13 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126446

Can someone please explain why I should respect women?

It's something I've always wondered because my whole life I've been told to respect women no matter what, but I really can't detect any reason to respect them, as a gender.

Women are not moral beings at all. They're completely amoral & there's no line they won't cross. They have to get their morality from men. This is why fatherless girls tend to be wild, because they don't have a natural moral code to understand objective good & evil. Whereas girls with good fathers tend to be good themselves, because the men taught them morality.

Women are also traitors by nature. They have no sense of tribal loyalty & will always side with whomever is most powerful, even if the powerful one is evil. They will sell their own nation out to an evil nation if the evil nation is more powerful. They will trade up on a good man if the bad man is more powerful.

Women naturally hate things like discipline, honor, dignity, virtue & earned respect, those are all things males naturally value. But women are hedonistic by nature, and love to be degraded & dishonored. They absolutely hate the concept of discipline & see no honor in it.

Women can't truly love others. They can only love themselves & view men & children as disposable assets. Of course individual women deserve respect when they earn it, but I mean as a whole, it doesn't seem like the female half is respect worthy.

Explain if & why I'm wrong & convince me (with logic, not emotion) why women deserve respect by default.

Anonymous, Yahoo! Answers 13 Comments [4/19/2017 12:22:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: TheReasonator

Quote# 126441

[[Context; a post that's more or less a continuation of her response to Jory Micah's church]]

So, I very meanly played to my base yesterday (I love y’all) which necessarily won me a couple of comments from them that are already haters. These can be summed up under ‘Who Are You’ which is almost as good as ‘I Can’t Even.’ I love modern discourse so much. As anyone will tell you, I wander around my house muttering, ‘I can’t even’ just for the way it rolls off the tongue. It’s like the perfect expression.
But, of course, one mean blog post about Jory Micah does not our substantial problems solve.

Thing is, Ms. Micah isn’t feeling anything that isn’t there. When she feels the call to be a pastor and then goes to the church and demands entrance, she’s only doing what she’s been brought up to do. As I’ve said more than once, when you educate all the women, you do have to decide what on earth to do with them. Are there any places that you don’t want them to be? Because you have basically opened all the doors wide, and it feels sort of weird when they don’t walk all the way through. Except that some denominations don’t want them to, and have real theological reasons for preferring they did not.

There are three responses to this problem. The first is to shout rather too loudly that it was a mistake to educate them and that they should turn right round and get back in the kitchen. And, I won’t lie, when I hear the word ‘complementary’ that’s vision that swims before my eyes. I’m going to call this the Duggar Approach to women in the church. The women are educated for the fate that awaits them. You cope with the problem by returning to a bygone era. Problem solved.
The other solution is to decide you just don’t care any more. Let the women in but then passive aggressively blame them when things go wrong. I really think this actually happens in the ‘egalitarian’ world sometimes but really, I’m seeing it everywhere. I read a whole lot of blog posts by Jori Micah yesterday and I found them utterly tragic. I’ve looked in from the outside on marriages like hers. And all the Shouting about it how wonderful it is when the man finally gives up and lets the woman ‘lead’ isn’t loud enough for me to miss the mute, hangdog look of a husband who has to obey his wife, who decides, for whatever reason, that he has no other choice. (Incidentally, she must welcome this examination because she’s blogging about it. Public writing=public response.)Bring that into the church and you find the true men drift quietly away. Essentially, the church gives up being the church.

The third response is where most evangelical women probably find themselves. And that’s that every one agrees that the woman shouldn’t preach the sermon. But then, because OMW this is such a terrifying topic and Someone is definitely going to be triggered either way, we will Never Speak of This For Real. The men nod kindly at the women, but there’s fear at the back of the eyes. This fear occasionally manifests itself in a very subtle, almost imperceptible patronizing friendliness. Are the women going to rise up? I mean, gosh, we educated them. They obviously have gifts.

Some of them are even pretty coherent. But, ugh, you know, if you let the coherent one do something, like teach someone something (anyone) she could take it and run and before you know it we have Jory Micah. So, let us all just smile and nod and hope for the best.

But also, maybe if we don’t make eye contact with the women nothing bad will happen.
I don’t have a name for this, but ‘complementary’ isn’t what comes to mind. Other words like, Can We Talk About It, do. The thing is, the women in scenario number three are educated and work in the world. They have their lives together and can be super interesting to talk to. Some of them are out there writing interesting books.

These women are educating their daughters. And their husbands are neither skirting around the margins saying ‘yes ma’am,’ and, ‘what do you want me to do for you today?’ but they’re not Jim Bob Duggar either. They’re just sort of ordinary people who talk to each other like humans.

The woman, in this picture, and this is so so so so important to me, doesn’t Ray Romano the man. She doesn’t put him down. She doesn’t think he’s a dummy. She doesn’t belittle him. When he fails, hilarity does not ensue. She treats him like a person. And this is good because he is not then bitter and angry at her, nor patronizing.

What does the Ray Romano marriage look like? You see it everywhere. These women are the saving stay at home wives who just have to put up with it all as best they can because of all the stupid stupid stupid dummy men. This isn’t ‘complementary’ either. The power is centered on the women. When it comes into the church, the man climbs shakily into the pulpit to face down a phalanx of ladies who, if he doesn’t preach what they want him to, will find he probably doesn’t have a job any more. If he is obedient to them, they cover his derrière in all his horrendous stupid mistakes. But this, the Ray Romano Model, is very often called ‘traditional.’

Honestly, I hate it more than the Duggar Model. Mostly because everyone is saying one thing and doing another.

As you can see, it is kind of a mess. In the places where the conversation is being had, many ordinary Christians recoil from the outcome. In the places where the conversation isn’t had, liberalism creeps in. In the places where the conversation is nodded to in a friendly way, but isn’t full throated, women and men who have sorted out their lives at home find themselves disoriented in the pew. They know what they believe, but they are not totally comfortable with life in the church.

This is too long, so tomorrow I’m going to talk about the problem of Showing the Woman Her Place and the even more icky issue of Tone. If you’re mad at me, leave an angry comment. I’m feeling pretty cheerful and I’m putting everything up.

Anne Kennedy , Patheos 5 Comments [4/19/2017 12:15:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Christopher
1 2 3 4 5 8 | top