1 2 3 4 5 | bottom
Quote# 134691

The degenerate society we live in does not care when a femoid cheats on its male partner as they would automatically get a free pass and a tons of excuses would be given in its place as to why it cheated on him. Some being: "he wasn't giving it the attention it needed!", " it was innocent mistake; we all mistakes. Just let it go..." and so forth. This has come to a point where society itself will blame the man solely for the cum dumpsters actions, yet if a man cheats on a femoid he will only get prosecuted for his actions. There will be no one to say how it was the wife's/girlfriend's fault for him for cheating on it or how if the bitch had given him enough attention this wouldn't have happened.

The punishments I propose for cheating skanks is as follows: the cunt will be first shaven bald and would be forced to stand in a public area fully naked for an entire day without any kind of food or water. The pedestrians then will be encouraged to take pictures of the slut, in which, they will have the chance to post the naked pictures of the cuntrag on social media with hashtags like #cheatingslut, #uselesscumdumpater, #homewrecker and etc. This is to prompt humiliation inside it make it realize what it did was wrong. And when it is all said and done the femoid will be taken to a specific area where the cum dumpster will be stoned alive, which will serve as the ultimate punishment for its wrongdoings.

Lookismisreal, Incels.me 9 Comments [11/30/2017 8:39:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 134690

Why are we Incels? Most of you will say that it is because of our looks: which is exactly right. But however, we should also remind ourselves the other reason why we are Incels: femoids. Yes, femoids. They are the cause to our insatiable suffering and torment we experience every single day. They are the cause why we are deprived of sexual intercourse and intimacy and left to rot in this god forsaken society. They are the reason why society as a whole doesn't care about male virgins and their problems. Femoids are to blame for everything.

If cum dumpsters actually cared and had some sort of empathy they would date their Iooksmatch or even date down like how most men did, and still do, since the beginning of time. But do they? Of course not. Every cunt out their is a hypergamous slut who wants to ride on Chad or Tyrone's cawk. They would rather die than settle down with an Incel man, even though they have every single opportunity to provide us with the salvation that we so rightfully deserve. It is an injustice to an extent that society itself should be blamed for encouraging femoids not to go for their Iooksmatch. If society forced cuntrags to go for men in their own footing like in the days of the glorious patriarchy, most men in this day and age wouldn't be forced to be Incels. But instead, society enables femoids by giving them access to internet and dating applications which not only solely benefits cum dumpsters, but brings Incel men more closer to their demise.

So, next time when you think why you are an Incel do not forget that society and femoids has a huge role to play it in as well. They would rather mock, shun, and bully us than attempt to help us out. That's how cruel and cold they are.

Lookismisreal, Incels.me 6 Comments [11/30/2017 8:38:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 134687

Now I'm not advocating that we go out and acid-face every woman out there. Heck, we shouldn't even acid face all non-virgins. That would be too extreme. But as a statement, all legitimate whores should have acid thrown in their faces so that they become 0/10 in looks.

These treacherous whores love to go around and whore away their ability to pair bond. A lot of them will even cheat on their "boyfriends" and husbands. And this sort of behavior is glorified and encouraged.

That is why it is time to take them off their pedestal. Because whores operate 95% based on their looks, the best way to knock them off their pedestals is to throw acid in their faces so that they can no longer practically practice their degeneracy.

Also, to anyone who agrees, read Isaiah 3:16-26 and 4:1 out of the Holy Bible. It is a story about how God punished the conceded whores of Zion by making them ugly. Sure enough, they stopped their behavior and begged for a man to marry them.

ItheIthe, incel.life 6 Comments [11/30/2017 2:41:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Antiincel

Quote# 134677

You don't have to marry her to get fucked over.

- Cohabitation can be considered a "marriage-like" relationship, leaving you open to divorce raping and alimony in some states/countries

- She can trick you into paying for her debts (call it pussy magic)

- Unintended pregnancies and even spermjacking (stealing your jizz from a used condom) happen and that can leave you with a kid, who she will get custody of if you split up and you'll have to pay child support

- She can cheat on you and leave you for Chad, or Stacy

Damn you guys are really bluepilled on relationship pitfalls.

BlackPillDealer, Incels.me 9 Comments [11/29/2017 9:46:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134669

Females are shit to hang out with. They are quite boring and often have a terrible "normie" sense of humor. That's why they always expect men to carry the conversation, be funny etc.

You'll end up having to separate the two. Someone to hang out with and someone to have sex with.

I've got news for you boyo, girlfriends aren't free. She will expect you to pay for a ton of shit.

There's an old saying, you don't pay prostitutes for sex. You pay them to leave after.

BlackPillDealer, incels.me 5 Comments [11/29/2017 1:56:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134648

[Note: "The Futurist" is referred to by other commenters as Imran Khan, the username of the political blogger announced in the OP to be retiring from the blog. Said blogger wrote The Misandry Bubble and is MRA commenter TFH (who now posts on Dalrock as Anon)]

[Quotes are across multiple comments]

Diesel,

There are several flaws in your reasoning :

1) You seem to be equating blacks with all non-whites.
2) IQ is a very flawed and overrated measurement. Remember that the test has been revised many times to ensure that women can score the same average IQ as men, even though 100% of all innovations that move civilization forward are by men. Along those lines, since Asians have higher IQs than whites, that screws up the conclusion you are drawing.

You have to recognize that blacks are very different from Asians. Plus, most Muslims are Caucasians (and many of them are white/whitish). It seems that you don't know this, and you see all non-whites as African blacks.

I guess it would be too much for your ego to handle the rest.

Why? I already pointed out the major flaws in your points. If IQ was that important, women would invent just as many technological wonders as men. Not to mention that only blacks have a lower IQ. All other races are about the same (if anything, Asians are higher).

...

One of the other reasons for WN is the wide variance we see in white talents and appearance. With women, it is true that most 9s and 10s are white or near-white. But a substantial percentage of white women are also 4s and lower. The median is not the only thing, it is the variance (note that most Asian women fall within the narrow range of 5 to 8, with very few outside of that range). Similarly, among white men, the most excellent men who built civilization are white. Yet, there is a subspecies of underachievers that is quite visible. Most hardcore manginas and radical gay activists are white. It is almost like the white race has bifurcated into two different tiers. This is why WNs want intra-white loyalty to be higher (and why successful whites are quick to eject WNs from their company), because when one has nothing in common with successful people than shared ancestry from Europe, they want that to matter more.

Most successful societies did make it easy for K-selected men to marry. The problem is that the inverse correlation between male traits that move society forward and male traits that women are attracted to is virtually exact, which is why any full democracy starts to attack any and every pillar of civilization over time, since ultimately, women would rather live in prehistoric times rather than a high-tech society.

The Futurist, Singularity2050 4 Comments [11/28/2017 11:25:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 134640



99% of all the problems in the world today come from the fact that men in America and western Europe don’t smack their women.


Spartacus, The Daily Stormer 5 Comments [11/28/2017 11:21:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: pyro

Quote# 134632

Everyone knows and agrees that women are 100% to blame for all rapes – that’s a scientific fact. Only Jewish extremists and small-souled bugmen could disagree with something so reasonable.


Adrian Sol, The Daily Stormer 10 Comments [11/28/2017 2:17:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: pyro

Quote# 134630

I remember reading that the brilliant Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, basically admitted that if he had been able to get laid, he probably never would have retreated to living in the wilderness and doing the bombings.

How many tragedies do you think could have been prevented if not for women controlling the sexual marketplace?

I mean, we can speculate all day. Maybe 5'9" Adolph Hitler was really just dictator coping for some hot Jewish cunt rejecting him.

FemaleInventionsLOL, Incels.me 4 Comments [11/28/2017 2:17:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134628

I'd rather spend the rest of my life staring at a wall than ever acknowledging a woman's existence ever again. Seeing a woman is just a constant reminder that I will never garner one's affection. Chad gets to know what it's like to be admonished by a woman, but not me. No woman has ever romantically loved me, and none ever will.

This is why I want to be locked in a cage. If I can just sit in a cage for the rest of my life I will essentially forget that females exist and my pain will be lessened. Either that or give me a lobotomy.

ItheIthe, Incels.me 10 Comments [11/28/2017 2:16:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134618

When a TIM wants to be a "woman", who does he look to for inspiration? Females. If biology doesn't matter, why do they want the physical characteristics that result from being female? Think curvy hips, breasts, voice pitch, petite shoulders, etc? If being female alone doesn't make someone a woman, why do TIM's still look to females for their goal appearance? What is passing? Resembling a female while being male.

Why do they want all the things that are associated with the female sex either biologically (periods, pregnancy, etc) or traditionally (dresses, nail polish, lingerie, makeup, etc)? I think the answer is simple: because they even know womanhood is not an identity. Womanhood is being female. And throughout time, being female has carried definitive physical characteristics from biology as well as social differences that have endured thousands of years. Womanhood has never been an identity; it's a state of being for XX-conceived humans=FEMALES.

nightqueenandvervain, r/GenderCritical 3 Comments [11/28/2017 2:13:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134616

Fuck I'm on mobile and my post deleted. Anyway, the difference is very important because it's the difference between who the movement is for and who it isn't for. Feminism is for females, the black panthers arenfor black people, and so on. If men are allowed to take any degree of control they will inevitably ruin it. If white people were leaders or organizers they would ruin black panthers too.

Seen so called feminist men freak out way too many times to give them any benefit of the doubt. Any activists knows the people who are being affected most have to be the people with the most voice and control. Allies are important to give support and visibility. Look at how straights are ruining LGBT by claiming queerness and kink and bdsm are part of the umbrella. LGBT isn't for gays anymore because straights ruined it.

IceIceKitty, r/GenderCritical 3 Comments [11/28/2017 2:12:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134580

I think I like your blog, I know it centers around women and excludes men, does it also exclude transwomen?


I believe that humans are monogendered. This is because males are quite literally mistakes of nature and there is more than enough science to back this up. Men are about as developed as a ape or lower and there natural violence, hypersexual attitude and other negative emotions make them too different from females to be considered ‘’human’’. I am and always will be a firm believer in the extinction of all males to make the world a better place and I would ( if I could ) do the same for many other annoying pests on this godforsaken planet. My blog also excludes anyone who is ‘’transgender’’, males being literal animals aside, transition between genders is not possible via a bit of plastic surgery, true gender transition would require complete bodily reconstruction at a molecular level which is currently beyond any countries scientific and technological reach., Transgender individuals are just men who believe they can somehow become ‘’equal’’ to women by calling themselves such, not to mention that trans people commit a vast amount of sexual crimes.

comradejordan, Tumblr 9 Comments [11/28/2017 5:56:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 134577

Men are not human to begin with.
The defining feature in what is and what is not human is ‘’Does it know right from wrong’’, since males do not know what is right from wrong they are not human.
And also, all men are pedophiles, and therefore every pedophile is male.

comradejordan, Tumblr 8 Comments [11/28/2017 5:55:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 134436

Cupid is depicted as child with a bow and arrow and has been a part of many famous sculptures and paintings. His naked presence was accepted a the part of a masterpiece. But that would be unacceptable today. His presence would be could child porn. Cupid’s other name was Eros. Today it is the reign of stupidity, naked children are not acceptable, what they do, think and feel is thought impossible. We want children to be asexual not sexual. We want them to not think about anything sexual. A girls starts menstruating, it is time when she has reached the age when she actually can give birth to a child, but she is too young. A boy has an erection, he is told if he masturbates he will go blind. What kind of insane world is this?

Jeddy, Political Correctness (PC), Taboos, Dogmas, Religion make even the Intelligent blind, irrational, "stupid". 2 Comments [11/28/2017 5:52:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: jed kewl

Quote# 134548

Following this quick introduction, I am going to reprint a post from M3, but first I want to explore the idea that we are never going to come to any agreement, culturally, about what rape actually IS. All we can agree on is WHOSE version of the truth will be privileged, and that requires us to examine what the consequences are, and who is in the best position to deal with those.

The Continuum Hypothesis in mathematics can be boiled down to essentially this: a mathematical axiom can be absolutely true in one situation, and absolutely false in another. It’s a bit more complicated than that in strictly mathematical terms, having to do with creating sets of real and natural numbers that are not necessarily correspondent with either natural or real numbers and it’s sufficiently complicated that it drove mathematician Georg Cantor crazy.

No, really. He died in a sanatorium, unable to resolve the conundrum he created.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor

Here is a really quick and dirty demonstration of how the Continuum Hypothesis works in real life. In Grade three you learn some very simple Euclidian geometry:

1. All the angles in a triangle add up to 180°

2. Parallel lines never meet



Easy, peasy, right?

Wrong.

Get in sailboat and sail in a nice big triangle around the Pacific Ocean (or any ocean you like).

Oh dear. Looks like all the angles in a triangle can easily add up to >180°. And ALL of them can be right triangles, too.



Take one run completely around the globe, and have your friends take a parallel course, and you will cross paths. The distance around the globe is finite, but the lines never end.



Everything you learned in Grade Three is true, as long as you are working on a plane. Curve the space, and everything is false.



Mathematical axioms can easily be BOTH true and false at the same time, which is way of saying NEITHER true nor false.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticGeometry.html

And honestly, I think that’s where we are at with rape culture. I sincerely believe that most women who claim they were raped TRULY believe they were. They are operating in Euclidian space. Of course, there are point blank liars and false accusers, and the number of those may actually be pretty high.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/why-would-edmontons-karen-smith-lie/

But the rest of the ladies, the so-called “one in four” really, truly, deeply believe they were raped. And as long as we use their definition of rape, they were.

But an alternate definition is available, and I think it’s one that most men use: every adult human is responsible for their own decisions, no matter how drunk or impaired they are (either by intoxicants or socialization or fear or resignation). Men are operating in non-Euclidian space.

And if we use that definition, then virtually none of the sexual encounters women describe as rape qualify as actual rape.

If we assume that the spaces we operate in are vastly, completely different, then both definitions of rape are TRUE, and both are FALSE at the same time. That leaves us only to consider consequences.

Who pays in terms of real, measurable, economic and social loss? Cupcake who thinks she was raped has some therapy bills to ruck up for, but the accused risks his entire life. He can be jailed. His life can be utterly destroyed. He can be barred from certain occupations for life. Even an allegation later proven to be completely false can have ruinous consequences.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348532/The-woman-accused-stranger-Facebook-rape--ruined-victims-life.html

Women demand the right to have their definition, and only their definition of space apply.

It’s like setting sail across the ocean believing plane geometry to be the only truth. When those parallel lines cross (and they WILL cross), you better hope it’s not a Supertanker you erroneously believed would never cross your path.



Following this post is M3, writing in depth about how our perceptions of rape, hinging on agency and responsibility, are just so different.

Different spaces, indeed.

Lots of love,

JB

Andrea Hardie, judgybitch.wordpress.com 19 Comments [11/27/2017 6:10:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: dxdydz

Quote# 134563

Isnt that just dreadful. So women won't be helped, because of transwomen and their endless selfishness. I want to know, if transwomen are women, when they will start behaving like women, and start giving support, instead of just demanding it? I remember a lesbian saying, there was a rally and afterwards, it was the women doing the cleaning up, while the gay men and the transwomen sat about and chatted. Requests for assistance were refused, because 'they arent that kind of woman".

It made me so angry. They see real women as drudges, child-bearers and themselves as glamour pusses, and like any misogynist, they assign more value to the latter. And furthermore, if you get 'misgendered' it shouldnt bother you. If your identity as so strong the law needs to be changed to accommodate you, then surely, its strong enough to ignore misgendering. Plus, if the ones who are completely male-bodied are really women, they would use male toilets...because women care about other women's safety.

They can use a male toilet in safety, they should do so, so that men cant pretend to be trans..or so toilets wont be made gender-neutral. Its what women would do...and where did transwomen used to go, before all this? they went right beside us and we didnt notice, because they were really trans and coded female. And now, they are complaining that the Women Weinstein assaulted are 'marginalizing' them by speaking up. They are actually say the me too hashtag is transphobic, because they dont get harassed and it would validate them if they did. so therefore..what? women should shut up?

secondtidalwave2, r/GenderCritical 3 Comments [11/26/2017 2:13:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134561

If you actually believe this, then you're not paying attention. The current party line of trans activists is that transwomen are biologically female and were indeed born biologically female, and transmen are biologically male and were born biologically male. They have not only erased the definition of "woman," but they have now erased the definition of "female." This has multiple immediate consequences: We can't talk about female genital mutilation because any genitals can be female. MRAs love this because they can swoop in to any article about FGM so much easier to cry about circumcision and do their "WHAT ABOUT THE MEN???"

We can't talk about female reproductive health because that can refer to any reproductive organs. Prostate cancer can be a female reproductive health issue. We can't talk about female infanticide or female-selective abortion because we don't know how those babies or fetuses would have identified -- maybe they were really male? We can't talk about girls being denied education because some of those girls might be boys.

We can't talk about shared female experiences like menstruation because there are none -- males menstruate and females don't menstruate. We can't talk about the poisonous way that females are socialized into the inferior sex caste because some of those females are really males and some of what people think are males are actually females, so there is actually no such thing as female socialization. By extension, there is also no such thing as male socialization, because some of those males are actually females and some of what people think are females are actually males. There can be no female-specific spaces, sports teams, colleges, scholarships, clubs, music groups, work places, jails, homeless shelters, domestic violence shelters, or rape crisis shelters, because people who appear to be female may identify as male and so be actually biologically male, and those who appear to be male may identify as female and so be actually biologically female.

This fantasy land of magical thinking has made it fully impossible for women to discuss anything related to female oppression. It has made it impossible for women to have anything for ourselves. Your activists come in and trounce on every. fucking. conversation. we try to have and language police, tone police, demand to be centered, and demand that we change actual reality to fit their desires. This is pure male entitlement and it's utter bullshit. We are saying no, and people socialized as male can't handle it when women tell them no. That's why /r/terfisaslur is filled with transwomen threatening women with death, rape, mutilation, assault, and even cannibalism.

And it's not "bad experiences with certain people." It's pretty much all trans activists who behave this way. Trans people outside the activist community are often normal, nice people and many of us call them friends, myself included. But your activists are toxic, poisonous narcissists. They are violent misogynists who are going to eventually tank your whole movement with their increasingly unreasonable, unstable, and ridiculous behavior.

AdamanteusAtrox, r/GenderCritical 5 Comments [11/26/2017 2:12:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134547

(In response to this)

As I wrote on reddit: Considering that rape is a crime against women, the female definition of rape is actually the correct one. It makes no sense to apply male logic here. For more:

http://www.mikraite.org/In-Defense-of-Feminism-tp570.html

To expand on this, women have no more idea of what makes them happy than children do. If you allow children to freely pursue their own happiness, they will conclude that unlimited candy is the answer which will just make them sick and miserable. It is much the same with women as endmylifeasap showed:

https://voat.co/v/Incels/1317042

When women complain about rape, it is because men have failed to organize society in a way that meets women's needs. In a sane patriarchal society, women do not complain about rape. And this is why the female definition of rape is the most relevant.

fschmidt, v/Incels 6 Comments [11/26/2017 6:50:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134546

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape - This definition is also consistent with Common Law ("Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will") and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can't rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape - Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn't believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman's father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape - I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don't differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals - this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you're a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don't believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn't yet widely used in law but and police officers and judges who don't use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it's slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape- Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn't be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

Caamib, v/Incels 7 Comments [11/26/2017 6:50:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134538



NEETsupreme, v/Incels 10 Comments [11/25/2017 11:48:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134537

True beauty lies within, right guys?


NEETsupreme, v/Incels 4 Comments [11/25/2017 11:48:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134536

Reply to "Incels are single because they are horrible people."

[An image of Charles Manson with his would-be wife Afton Elaine "Star" Burton.]

Chempergrill, v/Incels 5 Comments [11/25/2017 11:41:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134535

The problem is quite simple:

Men are attracted to women who are on their level, and above, but women don't go like that. Women are only attracted to the top 20% of men. Women will never date someone on their level, or even a few levels above them, only the absolute best.

Women would rather have a small share of an alpha man than a beta man to herself. So that's what they do. They share the chads.

When they hit the wall they panic and realise they are actually subhuman scum and then settle for the nearest beta willing to support them while they continue to share chads dick with a 100 other women. They then cuckhold the beta with chads children.

TLDR women have unrealistic expectations regarding the partners they deserve, while men have realistic ones.

absolutionist, v/Incels 7 Comments [11/25/2017 11:38:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 134534

Oppressing physically attractive woman tries to explain that she is a true incel.

I feel extremely angered over a conversation I had with a woman who is attractive, but only has eyes for chads. I'm not sure how I began talking with her, because only 0.1% of the female population actually notice me. After I had conversed with her for around 5 minutes, she explained to me that she was an incel herself and how guys don't notice her.
I couldn't believe this cruel woman because I, a perfect man with redeeming qualities, stood right in front of her and she wouldn't consider dating me. She is a middle eastern woman, and only wants middle eastern chads.
I've tried numerous times to get her attention but she sees me as a beta male, I fear I will never beat a chad unless I become one. I've began taking steroids to help me grow big muscles and I also take penis enlargement pills to get a bigger dick. Hopefully this works. Will update in the future.

Hotspot909, r/IncelSafeHaven 6 Comments [11/25/2017 11:38:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
1 2 3 4 5 | top