Secondly a day has always been the same as obviously the Earth's rotation hasn't changed since the Lord created it, and the plants wouldn't have survived millions and billions of years without a sun as indicated in Genesis.
40 comments
DAYS WERE ONLY 18 HOURS LONG back in the Proterozoic era, some 900 million years ago. Charles Sonett of the University of Arizona has studied records of ancient tidal deposits preserved in rock strata. Like tree rings, the periodicity of tidal sediments, or tidalites, provide an accounting of ancient times. Sonett's data, collected in Utah, Indiana, Alabama, and Australia, shows that long ago the day was shorter, the year longer, and the moon much closer. Indeed, as the moon recedes from the Earth (at a rate of 3.8 cm/year) it continues to slow Earth's rotation, thus extending the day further. (C.P. Sonett et al., Science, 5 July.)
And that's your science lesson for the day, Jordan.
Therefore, from your logic and from the evidence we see, we can safely assume that Genesis is wrong... Unfortunately, you can't quite grasp that...
Wow, man, I hope your density doesn't turn you into a micro-black hole.
Of course, if it did, the Hawking radiation would pretty much instantly annihilate him anyway, if I recall correctly.
Yay!
*bashes head against desk*
Do you people EVER get it? On any level??
No one has ever said that days were once millions of years long. Whoever wrote Genesis was using figurative language, which I'm well aware you fundies know nothing about, seeing as how you take everything completely literally, thereby missing the whole point every time. As in evidence from your post. QED.
Well, refuting day-age creationism is a good start, but not by offering creationism as the alternative!
(and yes, as pointed out elsewhere, the Earth's rotation is slowing as the retrograde orbit of the moon affects the tides and the tides slow the Earth little by little - about 10% in the last 400 million years)
A day is normally defined as the time from one noon to the next. How do you define a "day" when the sun hasn't been created yet? Is it the time that will elapse between one noon and the next in the future when the sun is eventually created? The Bible doesn't say. What biblical authority is there to make such an assumption? The Bible just says God separated the light from the dark and called the light and the dark one day. It doesn't say how long the light and the dark lasted. Without the sun, "24 hours" would have no meaning, since an hour is defined as one 24th of the period from one noon to the next, and there's no sun to define noon. The whole thing doesn't really make sense.
They wouldn't even have survived ONE day if they were created before a sun. It'd be like trying to grow plants in a meat locker.
Seriously...if God created the universe, then God must have wanted the universe to work this way. Scientists aren't trying to disprove God. If anything, they're just trying to understand God's creation.
> Secondly a day has always been the same as obviously the Earth's rotation hasn't changed since the Lord created it
The earth's rotation slows down every single day. It can be measured. It takes about 1.5 years for a day to become 1 second longer.
> the plants wouldn't have survived millions and billions of years without a sun as indicated in Genesis.
And no one said they could.
I doubt they would survive even one or two days.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.