rainafaye2000 #fundie forums.abcnews.go.com

[Creationist explaining evolution to atheists:]

Well I am sorry if I feel that evolution is silly. I mean come on. Do you even think about it. Lets see a long time ago in a galaxy far far away. Just kiding. Really a long time ago earth was a molten rock. As its heat dissapted oceans became filled with primordial "SOUP" This soup presented ideal conditions for the orgin of life. It all started with a simple cells. Eventually this led to multicell organisms? Right which turned into fish. OK After a while these fish got bored living in water and wanted to get dry. So as the little fish struggled so hard to get ashore. Finally by george it developed cute little legs. And became things such as frogs, salamanders, etc.... Ok now things are moving up in the world. So then Amphibians evolved intor reptiles. Then reptiles into mammals and birds. Well Darwanism claims that fish turned into land creatures by evolving little arms and legs. Now let me ask a question. If that were true wouldn't there be fossils of fish with arms and legs??? Yet we do NOT find that. In fact all organisms appear in the fossil record fully formed. There are no transitional stages.. SO WHY IS THAT???? I am sorry but the truth is that fossil records do not support evolution. What about the Coelacanth? Wasn't that supposed to be extinct for like millions of years according to evolutionists? Then in 1938 a fisherman caught one near Africa. After examining the coelacanth it was found to be 100% fish. It had no amphibian traits. Still evolutionist claim that amphibians turned into reptiles. Again no fossil records....... There is no fossill record of reptiles being transformed into birds. OK SO NOW WHAT ABOUT THE HORSE. Horse sequence. This by the way is discredited. Eohippus actualy turned out to be a rodent. Horse evolution would want a person to believe that a gradual changes occured from 4 toed fox size creatures to todays much larger one toed horse. And I say again there are no transitional forms...... And by the way Archaopteryx was a true bird. And again there are no transitional stages here. Just a fully formed Archaopteryx. Evolution is not visible in the fossil records. And science is supposed to be based on observations??????

[Later:]

I was trying to explain the silly ideas behind evolution. Charles Darwin had the IQ of a horse fly.

36 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.