J.James, that comes close to a serious post so here goes:
Cut and Paste: Joyce and Lincoln started off with a fairly long RNA molecule. Given that nothing like RNA appears in MillerUrey experiments, this already shows unjustified interference from an intelligent investigator. In fact, not even the building blocks, ribonucleotides, appear in such experiments, and they do not spontaneously form RNA. In fact, there are numerous chemical difficulties with obtaining RNA by blind undirected chemistry, the only sort allowed on the hypothetical primordial earth, as chemical evolutionist A.G. Cairns-Smith points out in his book Genetic Takeover4 (see extract at Cairns Smith: Detailed criticisms of the RNA world hypothesis). And it’s a huge step from RNA to the genetic code, its major use today.
Not even the building blocks, nucleotides, appear in such experiments, and they do not spontaneously form RNA
Furthermore, this paper didn’t demonstrate replication but ligationjoining two small RNA pieces. So this research already assumed not just one but three RNA strands. For this to be relevant to chemical evolution, the two pieces just by chance had to have pretty close to the complementary base pairs of the first piecenatural selection could not be invoked before reproduction.
I've met Jonathan Sarfati. He can play chess blindfolded against multiple opponents. If you google a sentence from the quote it will probably take you to the article.
In summary, you've got naught, nada, zip, zero, zilch.
I like to help you understand what's wrong with you but that's big.
