The historical fact of the matter is that evolution by natural selection is a failed science. It has a long and inglorious record of failed predictions that puts even Keynesian economics to shame. Evolutionists know this, which is why they prefer polemic to predictions and why the foremost evolutionary propagandist has adopted rhetorical tactics that are utilized by the devotees of another pseudoscience, anthropogenic climate change/global warming.
28 comments
Does it hurt your head, or feel real weird or something, to be that stupid? Maybe your under developed cerebellum can't feel it. That would be merciful, I imagine.
Hey VD, did it hurt your brain looking at all those big words like rhetorical, anthropogenic, and Keynesian?
What does evolution have to do with economics? Evolution, as scientists refer to it, deals with biology. Economics deals with money.
Does he even know what science is?
The historical fact of the matter is that special creation is a failed science. It has a long and inglorious record of failed predictions that puts even Austrian-school economics to shame. Creationists know this, which is why they prefer polemic to predictions and why the foremost creation propagandist has adopted rhetorical tactics that are utilized by the devotees of another pseudoscience, white supremacy/racialism.
The last I looked both Evolution and Keynesian economics were doing quite well with their predictions.
If you know of any "failures," present them.
This is the problem with making everything a political platform. As a conservative Republican you HAVE to deny Keynesian economics and science as an axiom. There's no room anymore for a conservative that accepts evolution, the Big Bang, or global warming. You have to deny them all or risk losing your conservative street cred. But none of those are matters of policy, they are matters of scientific FACT. You might as well deny atomic theory just because you are a Republican. It's very intellectually dishonest.
@Dizzy Dream
To political fanatics it's all one and the same. It's all part of some vast liberal conspiracy to destroy conservative family values. So biology, astronomy, civics, economics, it's all a package deal. I've literally been called a Marxist for defending evolution.
@dionysus
Well, you do know, the word "Marxist" has completely lost its original meaning, and now apparently just means "person I don't like"...
https://kiwifar.ms/threads/teddy-beale-aka-vox-day.14597/
What does the proof by the likes of Richard Lenksi have to do with the simple fact that you will never be able to participate in the process of human evolution, VD?
I mean... just your screename initials-wise is the reason why you'll never get your dick wet.
You will never spawn. That is the historical fact when you die: Alone .
"The historical fact of the matter is that evolution by natural selection is a failed science. It has a long and inglorious record of failed predictions"
Which failed predictions?
And don't trot out creationist misreprentations like 'once in a while, a zoo ape will spontaneously morph into a human!' or 'we'll find a transitional fossil, like a crocoduck, any day now!'
On the other hand, of course, is the little detail that we've directly observe evolution occurring, in real time, in living populations. Note these direct observations include speciation events, which by definition represent macroevolution.
KingOfRhye
@dionysus
Well, you do know, the word "Marxist" has completely lost its original meaning, and now apparently just means "person I don't like"...
But, But, Groucho was SO funny.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
