I refer you to the proof above... X (jumping out of a burning building) is independent from Y (voluntary euthanasia/assisted suicide). This has already been established, so could you please establish a case for voluntary euthanasia/assisted suicide without referring to independent circumstances.
It is also odd that you have taken a moment in time and applied the outcome of the event to the moment previous to the outcome of the event, when in reality we would not know the outcome of the event in the situation you described because it hadn't happened yet. This is faulty reasoning; However, I'll bite: if we did know the outcome of the event (that we would inevitably die) what difference would it make if we jumped or if we stayed? Suffering is inconsequential either way because the process of dying would be indiscriminate.
11 comments
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
