Darkness one night can be explained by natural phenomena like an eclipse or dark clouds of water vapor. Falling stars? Everybody knows that it's not stars but meteorites, even if the ancient author apparently didn't. He apparently didn't even know that the sun and smaller stars were all stars.
What's in that verse anyway that "proves" that the Sun is not a star? Nonsense is not evidence. Then even if stars were an extremely abstract concept for ancient humans, today we even have a good understanding of how they form and work, thanks to astrophysics. We also know why other gas giants aren't stars and we can distinguish rocky planets from gas giants from meteorites. Unlike that ancient author.
You would honestly study the sky and realize that your preconceptions and those of that ancient verse were wrong. Just like you could realize that scripture was wrong about many other things, rabbits, bats, insects, disease, Earth, history, nature, our origins, the origins of the biblical stories, etc.
In fact, your ignorance doesn't give any credence to the bible, it would have been less damning if the text was read as artistic metaphor rather than literally.
Reborn... empowered... by hot air for a brain? Or by alienating and exploiting victims with such nonsense?
