[In response to a piece speaking out against a John McCain attack ad that sensationalized Barack Obama's position on sex education.]

It is telling that the latex-only crowd is trying to hide the real content of sex ed for 5 years olds by claiming that it is all about protecting children from pedophiles. The reason they do this is because if parents actually knew the real agenda and topics covered in the so -called "age appropriate" sex ed they would be appalled. Why didn't Mr.DiNorcia also mention that a discussion of homosexuality(he refers to this only as "a respect for diversity") and masturbation are part of the guidlines for children as young as 5? He didn't becasue he knows that parents would reject this type of liberal sexual agenda being promulgated on innocent children. So while the condoms-for-kids crowd and Obamma hide behind the "protecting kids from pedophiles" spin it is true that these curriculum guidlines from SIECUS turn out to be the real agents of pedophilia.