[Um, how is having to allow gay marriages tyranny? Because it sounds like you have a very warped view of what tyranny is...]

First of all its not marriage, the definition of marriage is one man, one woman. Secondly, forcing these state judges to do something that's not right is a form of tyranny, which is something gays are getting used to doing. It's absurd that 1 percent of the population is getting so much attention and making such a mess out of society, but it is appropriate for these government officials to be standing up to it

[Your definitions are all fucked up.

Secondly, the state can do what it wants; religion doesn't have any play in how different communities that are non-religious have equal rights as the religious.

The State can "force" these judges to do it because these judges are not the fucking law, the Federal Government is.

Are we done with this strawman argument or are you going to keep pumping up misinformed bullshit?]

It's unconstitutional to change marriage definitions, as it fringes on the rights of actual married people, religious institutions, and already exists precedents. When the supreme Court rules against fake marriages, read what they write and perhaps you'll understand. And if they don't rule against them, the resulting protest of millions of people will teach THEM how America feels.