[accusations and proof of never answering simple questions]
none of that matters...all that matters is that ToE is exposed for being a piece of garbage...after that I honestly could care less, as I hate science.
51 comments
Guess you should get your fundy ass off that computer, since that was created with science.
While you're at it, pray any life threatening diseases away too, since modern medicine uses the science you hate so much.
Fuck, I wish you morons would just get the fuck out of my country and move to Iran.
"I hate science."
Well, duh.
How can you possibly hate science, never having actually used or experienced any real science?
P.S. I don't believe you could care less, as your lack of experience with science doesn't seen to bother you at all.
"...after that I honestly could care less, as I hate science."
You despise the process but are more than willing to reap the benefits. Hypocrite. People like you should be banned from using anything more technologically advanced than a sharp stick.
as I hate science
So.... you hate the computer, the internet, telephone, light, cathode ray tube, micro processors, mouse, optical interfaces, computer coding, electricity, etc, etc, etc?
Face it. You're in denial about your secret paranoia that dolphins will evolve thumbs and team up with the Ragdoll Hemmingway cats to come after you in your sleep to kill you. They're both nocturnal predators, y'know, one with excellent night vision and one with sonar.
Ahh oh so fundy, hating things that you do not understand.
"all that matters is that ToE is exposed for being a piece of garbage"
Good luck with that. We'll be waiting, but not holding our breath.
You, Sir/Madam, are an official "Asshat" by not only proclaiming that it's "garbage" without real evidence, but by using your ignorance of the subject to debate it's proof!
Good day to you!
So, you hate and/or don't care about science.
If you know nothing about science, then you cannot make a rational judgement about scientific topics, such as the theory of evolution.
Now, STFU fuckstick.
after that I honestly could care less , as I hate science.
I'm not one given to violence or fundamentalism, but I think I could perhaps be forgiven for occasionally having the sentiment that people who spout phrases they've heard somewhere that sound vaguely astute, but don't even stop to consider what they might actually mean, should have their tongues ripped out and then be beaten to death with their own keyboards. Most particularly this goddamn plague of brain dead "could care less" parrots that seems to be sweeping the internet.
At any rate, while it doesn't justify such action, it does pretty much prove that the writer isn't really thinking very hard about whatever they're writing, somehow functioning, perhaps, at an instinctive, barely conscious level. Newspeak, in other words.
thats because you don't know shit about it sport, i mean you think butterflies have wombs and you see with eye lasers
you haven't exposed anything but your own ignorance about.. well everything
after that I honestly could care less, as I hate science.
Brain_In_A_Jar: << I'm not one given to violence or fundamentalism, but I think I could perhaps be forgiven for occasionally having the sentiment that people who spout phrases they've heard somewhere that sound vaguely astute, but don't even stop to consider what they might actually mean, should have their tongues ripped out and then be beaten to death with their own keyboards. Most particularly this goddamn plague of brain dead "could care less" parrots that seems to be sweeping the internet. >>
Brain_In_A_Jar: I'm afraid that this particular linguistic atrocity goes back farther than the Internet. I first heard it in about 1972, thinking it was just one person's stupid error, and I was appalled when I soon was hearing it from all over the place. I still don't grok how in the heck this expression ever got traction at all, let alone managed to insert itself as, apparently, the dominant way of expressing the exact opposite of what the words state. It just boggles my mind.
And this from the guy who espouses a truly warped mixture of Lamarckism and panpsychism as his supposed "explanation" for inherited change in organisms. According to his wacky theory, DNA is a "follower rather than a leader" in change, and organisms right down to single-celled prokaryotes are capable of altering their genomes wholesale by an act of will. I kid you not.
That someone can persist with the masturbatory fervour that this individual does in [1] propagandising for such scientifically illiterate garbage, and [2] denying reality on an epic scale, testifies just how pernicious, verminous and pestilential the doctrine centred world view is. Only someone subjected to a truly scary level of brainwashing, to the extent of totally destroying any capacity to think for oneself, could give credence to the errant nonsense that this individual peddles, and moreover continues to peddle alongside the galactically hubristic assertion that the world's scientists have all got it wrong, and that he has got it right.
Get off the internet then, you stupid git!
If you want to actually expose ToE as a piece of garbage, you have to study Biology for ten-twenty years, to become knowable enough to find any possible flaw that can't be rectified.
"I hate science."
That computer you're using? It was created by science. The one mainly responsible for the development of the digital computer was the scientist Alan Turing. Also an Atheist and a homosexual:
image
He's dead - and is having the last laugh.
>:D
#390347
I'll bet he hates science because his Jr. High School science teacher gave him an F, and he's been bearing a grudge ever since.
1/25/2008 2:45:39 AM
I came here to post this, as this is what I read into it to
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
