Since the population of mankind is a "closed" population - no humans can migrate to and from earth, only the rate of births and deaths can increase or decrease the human population.
Therefore, the way to control the population growth is through the increase of the human mortality rate by legitimate means. Not through the crimes of abortions, infanticide, euthanasia and etc; but through the automatic DEATH PENALTY for the broad spectrum of deeds that are high crimes in the sight of the true GOD. This principle of population control has never been addressed by demography. It is the cornerstone of proper human population control which the builders have rejected.
Some of the high crimes which God requires the human society to vigorously enforce the death penalty upon are: blasphemy against the true God; idolatry; breaking the Lord's day; dishonor to parents; murder; adultery; incest; homosexuality; bestiality; rape; kidnapping; seeking to destroy the righteous; putting to death the innocent (such as putting innocent embryos and fetuses to death in abortions); seeking to overthrow God's appointed authority, etc.
This principle of controlling the population would positively affect the economic prosperity of nations, positively affect the health and increase the life expectancy of lawabidding citizens, properly educate the human race, positively affect the family structure, overwhelmingly reduce crime, etc. Every legitimate aspect of the human society would benefit greatly.
113 comments
"This principle of controlling the population would positively affect the economic prosperity of nations..."
Not through the crimes of abortions, infanticide, euthanasia and etc; but through the automatic DEATH PENALTY This principle of population control has never been addressed by demography.
Where you wrote 'population control', you meant 'bloodthirsty barbarism'. That might explain why demographers aren't rushing to address it.
People like you are making this planet a worse, more hateful place to live. Please, hop off at the next stop. We'll live in peace here while you fuck up somewhere else with your brutal, undeveloped mind and its asinine ideas.
Adopt the ten commandments??? If memory serves me correctly, there's something in there about "Thou shalt not kill." Well, I guess that demolishes this "decorous practice" of killing everyone who doesn't subscribe to your narrow-minded religion.
"Not through the crimes of abortions, infanticide, euthanasia and etc; but through the automatic DEATH"
Mr. Lee:else to work on the Sabbath, which is just as bad as working on the Sabbath.
Glass houses...
So let me see if I got this right.
So, instead of increasing education with the intent of preventing unplanned pregnancies and reducing the number of new children produced, you propose that we kill everyone that you disagree with. I see.
"Therefore, the way to control the population growth is through the increase of the human mortality rate by legitimate means. Not through the crimes of abortions, infanticide, euthanasia and etc; but through the automatic DEATH PENALTY for the broad spectrum of deeds that are high crimes in the sight of the true GOD. This principle of population control has never been addressed by demography. It is the cornerstone of proper human population control which the builders have rejected."
Thank you, sir, for highlighting how retarded the Bibble is! And in a strikingly convincing manner, too. In fact I only know it to be satire because nobody who actually believes that kind of thing is allowed contact with anyone except the nurse who gives them the happy pills.
Thou shalt try real hard not to kill unless the object of thy wrath reveres a different invisible man than thou, or his speech offends thee, or he proves thee wrong, or he has a bigger dick then thou, or...
This principle of controlling the population would positively affect the economic prosperity of nations, positively affect the health and increase the life expectancy of lawabidding citizens, properly educate the human race, positively affect the family structure, overwhelmingly reduce crime, etc. Every legitimate aspect of the human society would benefit greatly."
Wow. Just...wow. This is like every horrible fundiesm thrown into one and then amplified.The only bright spot is that Robert T. Lee would be one of the many, MANY people put to death because he's judging his fellow man. I seem to recall a certain "Let he without sin cast the first stone" line from the bible...and I seriously doubt you can say you're not sinning when their own bible says only god can judge man ;)
We have to control the population by killing people! Not by the crimes of killing people, but by the legitimate killing of people in Gawd's name. I've got a better idea. If you want to control the population, let people have access to birth control, and stop encouraging them to pop out fifteen sprogs at a time. But then you wouldn't get to murder people, would you, you scary motherfucker?
Some of the high crimes which God requires the human society to vigorously enforce the death penalty upon are: blasphemy against the true God; idolatry; breaking the Lord's day; dishonor to parents; murder; adultery; incest; homosexuality; bestiality; rape; kidnapping; seeking to destroy the righteous; putting to death the innocent (such as putting innocent embryos and fetuses to death in abortions) seeking to overthrow God's appointed authority, etc.
Ever consider that you would be among the first to be righteously executed for "seeking to overthrow God's appointed authority" by trumpeting all this hateful craziness in his name?
I've always been for capital punishment (anyone ever hear of a man killing again after being executed?), but come on, teenage rebellion is neither crime nor sin.
I often joke about how the religious care for people from conception until birth, but Robert T. Lee turned my joke into a fact. He says it's horrible to kill embryos (despite the fact that half of all pregnancies result in miscarriage, which he must consider abortion by God), but freely confesses that he's perfectly happy with killing babies for crying.does say that mass murder as a "punishment" for non-crimes would bring health, prosperity, and even education, but the first bit really struck me.
The good news is that if his plans were carried out, Robert T. Lee would be one of the first people "executed."
He lists "breaking the Lord's day" as one of his capital crimes.
Here's a screenshot of his web page. You'll notice he was busy at work updating it on February 23rd, 2003.
image
February 23rd, 2003 is a Sunday.
image
The prosecution rests.
Quote:
Back in the late 1970s, MAD Magazine ran a parody of a Moral Majority dictionary. Among the terms defined in this parody dictionary was this:
blasphemy against the true God; idolatry; breaking the Lord's day; dishonor to parents; murder; adultery; incest; homosexuality; bestiality; rape; kidnapping; seeking to destroy the righteous; putting to death the innocent (such as putting innocent embryos and fetuses to death in abortions) seeking to overthrow God's appointed authority, etc.
So you are saying that all the following people should be killed?:
So we should kill everyone who: is gay, gets an abortion, disobeys their parents, reads Harry Potter, is not Christian, eats seafood, commits adultry, covets anything, masturbates, works on Sunday, says "goddammit," watches any movie not rated G, holds hands with someone of the opposite sex, wears jeans without possessing a penis, dates outside their race, votes Democrat, jaywalks, fails to use a turn signal, has sinful thoughts, etc...
It´s actually a good way to depopulate the planet, moreover, not to find executioners at all. Besides, laws are meant to be fullfilled, NOT TO BE BROKEN. If too many people break the law, it is not valid. So, please, do a little research on other ways to control population growth.
if putting to death the innocent merits a death penalty, then the people responcible for executing the people this fundie wants killed, would be guilty of a capital crime.
I say we put this guy at the top of the "to do" list.
In that case, you're relativising life. Let me explain. If you're going to kill people to control population growth, you can't do it for those infringing certain rules. They're actually set to be fulfilled, not as a type of demographic corrector. They're, thus, to be meant to be obeyed and, if not, to be exemplary. If you say that they're a demographic regulator, you're admiting that some people's life is more worthy than others.
This sends shivers down my spine.
Oh, and dont forget... one of the ten commandments is 'thou shalt not kill'.... gasp?
Well, I guess that's ONE way to solve overpopulation... *headdesk*
Does this guy even realize how many people he's condemning to death? And that he'd have to conquer the world to enforce it, because no country will do it willingly?
No, that would not work. You would probably drive us extinct if you were in charge (thankfully, you would have to be more intelligent for that to happen).
See, everything in human nature is a crime against gawd, so why don't you just STFU and move to the mountains somewhere, where you can allow your schizophrenia to fully develop.
And remember, medication is really just poison!
lawabidding
Sorry, we've determined that anyone this stupid can't possible be qualified to decide to end another life for any reason whatsoever. Please turn in your driver's license, Social Security card and passport and proceed down the hall where the nice lady in the white uniform will give you your quiet pills and some apple juice.
Not through the crimes of abortions, infanticide , euthanasia and etc; but through the automatic DEATH PENALTY for the broad spectrum of deeds that are high crimes in the sight of the true GOD. This principle of population control has never been addressed by demography. It is the cornerstone of proper human population control which the builders have rejected.dishonor to parents ; murder; adultery; incest; homosexuality; bestiality; rape; kidnapping; seeking to destroy the righteous; putting to death the innocent (such as putting innocent embryos and fetuses to death in abortions); seeking to overthrow God's appointed authority, etc.
Do I see a small contradiction here?
And I guess you see yourself as “pro-life”, aren’t you?
PS: re: breaking the Lord's day : Isn’t there a story in the gospels about Jesus healing people on the Sabbath and getting into trouble for it? Why do you want to kill your savior?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
