Darwin is another word for evolution. The human genome project does not say what you think as I have linked. Nor does Miller's claim about DNA stand up to modern science. Science confirms Scripture. Actually, evolution is devoid of scientific confirmation.
10 comments
No, Darwin was just the first to formulate a theory about evolution. There were many other people thinking along those lines at that time.
Science can confirm that many different religious texts EXIST. That is all. None of them has one iota of evidence confirming any of the contents (with exception to things like the city of Rome and the country of Egypt do exist).
Evolution has literally mountains of evidence in its favor, and many things Darwin just speculated about (as they didn't know as much then as we do now), science has since confirmed.
Your deluded blathering does not stand up to modern science.
Meanwhile in a certain church in Britain, Westminster Abbey:
image
A certain mouse has been evicted .
The Church of England agrees that Evolution is proven scientific fact , don't bother them about it.
This thread is laughable, except for the sad fact that such ignorant boobs share my planet. I suspect if you ask the church mouse "WHAT science confirms scripture?", he would suddenly change the subject.
Darwin is another word for evolution.
Darwin is the name of the man who discovered evolution. It's not synonymous with evolution.
Science confirms Scripture.
Except for the world being created in 6 days 6,000 years ago, talking snakes & donkeys, people coming back from the dead, a magic all-powerful being living in the sky, the earth being flat and covered with a dome, goats having striped offspring because they looked at striped rods, insects having four legs, being able to see all nations (kingdoms) of the world from the top of the tallest mountain, etc.
Actually, evolution is devoid of scientific confirmation.
If it weren't for scientific confirmation, evolution wouldn't be a scientific theory. That's just how science works.
So science has confirmed that the city of Tyre was completely destroyed and never rebuilt (despite having a sizable population right now), that bats are birds, that painted sticks affect the breeding results of goats, and that leprosy can be cured with dove's blood?
In which scientific publication was this revealed?
“Darwin is another word for evolution”
No, it really isn’t. We know so much more than Charles did. But he was first.
“The human genome project does not say what you think as I have linked.”
Heh. “DARWIN” doesn’t say what you say it says, either.
“Nor does Miller's claim about DNA stand up to modern science.”
Show your work.
“Science confirms Scripture.”
It cannot confirm the magic bits, though.
Since is limited and cannot discuss the supernatural.
“Actually, evolution is devoid of scientific confirmation.”
Except for the repeatable observations, the predictions, the falsifiability, and general acceptance by the entire network of scientists. But, you know, other than that, it’s like for surely not scientific.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.