CCC #fundie

CCC #fundie alternatehistory.com

I wasn't talking about the physically handicaped, I was talking about people with negitave inheritable conditions. They shouldn't be allowed to breed. It's in the best intrests of humanity.

Also, the overwhelming majority of mentally handicaped persons are just that, handicaped, and thus a burden on the collective.

And morality is strictly a social construct. There is no such thing as "good" or "evil". Reality transcends morality, always.

People shouldn't be allowed to just up and "have" children anyways. All humans should be produced with perfect genes. The new humanity will be smart, pretty, superhumans truly worthy of life.

52 comments

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

Hello, Adolf. We did not miss you at all. Now go back to Hell.

PS:

I was talking about people with negitave inheritable conditions.

Which would be EVERYONE. Someone clearly knows absolutely nothing about genetics.

And morality is strictly a social construct. There is no such thing as "good" or "evil". Reality transcends morality, always.

Language is strictly a social construct, too. Stop using it.
Also, if being ideas renders value judgements invalid, why should we follow your proposal? After all, if there is no such thing as good and evil, why would negative genes propagating be a bad thing?
Anyone who declares morality invalid and that there is no such things as good and evil is in truth admitting that they know that they are evil, but do it anyways.

All humans should be produced with perfect genes. The new humanity will be smart, pretty, superhumans truly worthy of life.

You fail biology forever. Please eugenicise yourself immediately.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

This guy is wrong in saying that humans need perfect genes, however it is true that people with severe genetic physical or mental disabilities that can be inherited should not be allowed to reproduce because using common sense, it is burdensome for society if the severely disabled are allowed to produce more severely disabled people. So advocating for humane Eugenics does not make one a Nazi because the severely disabled can be humanely taken care of by their families or if their families are unable to, in humane institutions.

It is also common sense that convicted felons should lose both their voting and reproductive rights to prevent the felons from being able to raise future criminals.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Skidie

crime is not being transmited genetically

Or perhaps politically?:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=137905&Page=1#2148486

@Jerkob

Recently in Britain, Tommy Robinson was arrested for filming and reported outside the court where Muslim child rapists were on trial for their crimes. In Britain’s Orwellian police state, he was arrested for reporting on a crime

Stupidity is contagious. Certainly Ignorance:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/29/edl-founder-jailed-contempt-court-broadcasting-tirade-facebook/

The founder of the English Defence League has been jailed for 13 months after broadcasting on Facebook outside a court.
Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who also uses the name Tommy Robinson, was arrested outside Leeds Crown Court amid fears his hour-long live online tirade could jeopardise a trial.
Only now can it be revealed that he was jailed last week for 10 months for contempt of court and a further three months for breaching the terms of a previous suspended prison sentence. He admitted the offences

There's an extremely good reason why TV Tropes has the entry entitled 'Did Not Do The Research'.

But then, why let Alternative Facts get in the way of Fake News by the Alt-Shite: a.k.a. Black Propaganda.

Because Reality is why your 'Hero' is proven to be the worst president of the US: and the occupant of the White House of the day is representative of it's supporters.

A very different reception the previous occupant of the White House received when he came to Britain between 2008 & 2016; even the First Lady here during our Olympics in 2012. A 'Hero' who daren't do the same; even for the opening of a $1 billion embassy on the Thames Embankment: which had been authorised during Dumbya's administration.

But then, a certain 'Hero' Did Not Do The Research'.

Because perish the thought that he would have to admit that he was wrong, eh...?!

A wrong president, a whole lot of wrong voters. And boy, how wrong they've been proven to be.

image

Alt-Shite thinking. Just say No, kids.

The above YouTube commenter realised he was wrong. I bet he's not the only one since 20th January 2017.

PROTIP: The Daily Telegraph is a very conservative newspaper.

When even they are destroying the image of a lawbreaking Nazi, then what does that say about those who are apologists, nay, supporters of such?

Despite all her failings, I'll say this for Theresa May Not: at least her Conservative government in late 2016 officially declared neo-Nazis in Britain to be equated with ISIS: Terrorists. Several Nazis arrested late last year.

National Front - whatever's left of them - annihilated in a previous general election; one of their 'kind' only got 86 votes in the Hull East constituency here. BNP bankrupt: but, then, what else is new. EDL - founded by Jerkob's 'Hero' Tommy Robinson - no longer exist. UKRAP dead: or will be in a year; six leaders in 18 months & their annihilation in the local elections recently made sure of that. A Customs Union making Nige FaRAGE's 'work' all for naught; even the ultra-Protestant DUP have put a spanner in the works re. Ireland.

The image of Nazi group Britain First destroyed when their bigotry was reTweeted: by Jerkob's 'Hero' Donald Fart. When even he was bitchslapped by Theresa May Not for this retarded example of Did Not Do The Research, then the rightists know they have problems.

Oh, I'm afraid that the people of Britain have found the white shite... er, I mean right wanting: and they're no longer wanted.

Good.

Otherwise, why didn't Mosley & his Browntrousers succeed: before WWII...?! [/"The Man in the High Castle"]

I suggest a certain someone does some research: Who is the Home Secretary post-Amber Rudd being sacrificed (PROTIP: do some further research on the word 'Windrush') by Theresa May Not.

And why.

old comment by Skide

@Jacob Harrison

Even you can`t defend thse sick fucks, I see. Good, they do not deserve any defence.

As for your castrating felons idiocy, they may or they may not, you don`t know this and I`m getting sick and tired of authoritarian idiots like you trying to legislate your shity view of the world and of humanity. With your degenerate idea you`d have a ton of innocent folks whose only criume was being black while in public or hell, smoking harmless pot castrated because you care nothing about your fellow humans and have no fuckin empathy whatsoever, psycho.

Also fuck you hearty, I was a pole and I would much rather live in country with some risk of a terrorist atack but one that accepts science, medicine and embraces us all as one humanity(the multiculturalism you so hate). Scared tribalists not unlike you made the decision for me, denying me and a lot of others the ability to live in a free society if we want to take the risk.

Right now you must`ve heard of the Toronto attack, curiously despite our large muslim minority, the only perps of terror attacks over here seem to be disgruntled white boys... Curious, eh? Curious how Italy, Greece and Spain have no terror attacks by muslim extremists despite taking in a fuckload of refugees.

I could exlain to you how in France and GB those attacks are usually commited by either local converts or second and third gen of people who came to these countries in the sixties and seventies. I could but fuck you for not having even enough empathy to take in survivors of a bloody war, you beast.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

1. And in my post I proposed how reforms can be made.

2. Innocent folk would not be castrated. There would be strict bureaucratic guidelines on how the person has to be proven without a doubt guilty of the crime.

3. Smoking weed is not a harmless crime. It is an addictive drug and in health class in public high school, we were taught about the harmful effects of smoking weed. Those who smoke weed promote the smoking of weed to others.

4. I care about my fellow humans because I know that my ideas are for the greater good of society. I also have done work for neighbors and have helped the elderly. So you can’t call me a psycho.

5. So you wish denying other Europeans safety from terrorism?

The terrorist attacks in Europe are still committed by Muslims who are influenced to commit terrorism by their religion and Imans. And in Germany and Sweden the migrant rape and crime crisis and in Germany there is the 120db women’s march against open borders. If the crisis is fake, then how come so many WOMEN are protesting open borders.

The migrants come from barbaric cultures that practice the horrible Sharia Law which oppressed women so it baffles me that you as a woman want to let people from those countries in.

The vast majority of Muslims, the practicing Muslims, want some form of Sharia Law. Europe has Sharia courts to accommodate for that, instead of regular courts.

old comment by Skide

@Jacob Harrison

Oh I do and I will, psycho. We don`t want your greater good and we don`t want no part in it, got it? Our freedoms are more important than your false sense of security.

Please don`t get me started on pot, dipshit. You flaunt all the scientific knowledge we have of it just cause it makes you uncomfortable since it conflicts with some prior knowledge you had and people like you are not keen to change their opinions once established. The only thing remotely true about it is that it`s somewhat addictive, not even on the level of alcohol or smokes but it is. So is chocolate and sugar and to me personally any tasty food on account of my exceptional palette. By your dumb "logic" I`d need to constantly fast or just eat utter tasteless crap to avoid getting addicted, yet even you will have to admit that being somewhat addicted to kim-chi pork dumplings is a lughable malady. You don`t get to forbid something just for the addictive properties. Smoking pot(well, vaping it perfectly) should by all means be promoted since it reduces stress and has a lot of positive health effects. It also makes people chill and really unreceptive to your fear mongering shite.

Again, if my and others freedom is on the line then yes I would, fuck off. Freedom is simply more important than safety, real or imagined. Think otherwise? Find your own damn country but you do not get to force it on others, period

Not even gonna address the rest of your drivel, there is no rape crisis and if you had any actual knowledge that wasn`t just troll articles from breitfart, you`d know it. But don`t take my word for it, dickwad, there`s a poster here from Sweden, lovely lady who will certainly be happy to correct your misconceptions... If she bothers with you in the first place.

@moose

Well from his latest it really looks like he`s a little off-brand nazi. Proud of the methods, ashamed of the title.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

1. Many scientists, and the teacher in a PUBLIC high school beg to differ on weed. It is more addictive and harmful then regular junk food.

2. Many people are concerned for their safety and their families safety so to think that they deserve to risk dying in terrorist attacks for the cause of freedom is phycotic.

3. Here is a link to a video made by a Slovenian woman about the crisis in Sweden and it contains footage of Muslims calling for killing Jews. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D3ClAeKhazo

4. The definition of a Nazi is a Hitler supporter so you can’t call me a Nazi since I despise Hitler for his crimes and am glad the allies won WWII. You can’t compare me to Nazis because I don’t endorse anti Semitism or genocide at all.

old comment by Skide

@Jacob Harrison

It`s why I called you an off-brand nazi. My statemant stands.

Actually read some research on pot that is not from the eighties, before you open your mouth on the subject, eh? There is a good reason why a lot of countries have legalised it and mine is doing so this year across the board. It is healthy for you, specially if vaped or eaten in food. A teacher in a PUBLIC school has no freedom in the subject else they would be accused of promoting drug you because of your country`s sick war on drugs policy. Not to mention you most probably took said teacher out of when you were in school. Medical knowledge advances in time, shocking, I know.

Oh and lastly if you revere safety over freedom, get the fuck out of america, you are not wanted here. Freedom sometimes comes with some dangers but we all accept it in the west, aside from you and your fascist cronies apparently but you all can move to a choice of countries specially made for you like Russia, Poland, China or dare I even say Saudi Arabia. I moved when I could not stand my old country`s policies and overbearing fascism, I put my money where my mouth was, you can move as well.

After all if you wish to trade freedom for safety, you deserve neither, not my words.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Skide

A certain someone should realise that if one is an apologist for a Nazi, that makes one a Nazi.

Otherwise, why didn't Chuck Yeager endorse the friend of the Alt-Shite: Nazis (PROTIP: Chrissy 'Crying Nazi' Cantdoverywell), who reTweeted the bigotry of British Nazis?

His refusal to endorse Donald Fart can't have been purely because of Jerkob's 'Hero' being a bed-wetting, lily-livered, 'Bone Spur'-ed Draft Dodger, eh...?!

Douglas Bader continued to fly Spitfires for the RAF: when he didn't have any legs, so what's Trumpo's excuse?

Yeager continued to fight the bigoted Nazis when he was shot down: on the ground with the Resistance. So if there's anyone who is Antifa, it's him.

ReTweeting the bigotry of British Nazis, Donald Fart? If one is an apologist for Nazis, that makes one a Nazi.

Yeager's refusal to endorse someone's 'Hero', don't forget. He being as Antifa as it's possible to be. He did more than just punch Nazis.

Bigotry = Nazism, don't forget.

Charlottesville. Therefore the Alt-Shite = Terrorists.

What happened to Labour MP Jo Cox: by the white rightist Thomas Mair.

That's terrorism in my book. 'So you wish denying other Europeans safety from terrorism?', to quote a certain someone verbatim. Jo Cox was a European. White. The woman murdered in Charlottesville: White. Therefore bigoted thinking has no right to exist.

And if it takes an 'Orwellian Police State' to legislate this kind of unjustifiable thinking out of existence, to ensure our safety from white rightists who won't hesitate to deny the right to life of anyone not exactly like them: even those who are white, then it can't happen soon enough, says I.

Timothy McVeigh. Eric Robert Rudolph. Anders Breivik. Dylann Roof. James Fields. Thomas Mair. Murdercrime. Tommy Robertson, Thoughtcrime. Doubleplusungood, Room 101.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

1. Actually, I live in a Democrat state where marijuana is legal and the harmful effects of it were still taught in public school.

2. I believe in freedom but you need a balance between freedom and the rule of law, and immigration in order to protect the freedoms and safety of people. It is not a good idea to accept migrants from barbaric Islamic countries that do not have freedoms because then they take their barbaric religion with them.

3. I agree that Poland crossed the line in restricting freedoms and I proposed how to force Poland to allow certain freedoms on Fstdt forums. And it contains information that you and others will find shocking.

http://forums.fstdt.net/index.php?topic=7846.0

I never said that Poland is a good place to live. I am saying that Sharia Law is a lot worse than the tyrannical Polish government. Good for you for leaving Poland.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

And I have already explained that if one is a white bigot, that makes one a Nazi.

Just ask the white families of those murdered by white bigots.

Robinson is a bigot. Why shouldn't his right to think the way he does be legislated out of existence? Section 5 of the Public Order Act. Acting in breach of a suspended sentence; his actions in breach of the law.

I'm not a bigot. I don't have a criminal record for so much as spitting on the pavement.

Someone can't work out that simple equation.

Tommo is clearly too retarded to do so. As is anyone who agrees with him.

A certain someone can always disagree with his speech, behaviour: and thinking.

I do. Completely. Someone now has no excuses. Disagree with Robinson's words, actions & thoughts: Yes or No. My answer is Yes.

Your call.

old comment by Skide

@moose

You can add Alek Minassian to that list, as well as the good old Rogers, those incel fucks wanted recognition, let them have it. They deserve to stand in the same row as all those other monsters. All white, male, disgruntled and bigoted.

@Jacob Harrison

Again, federally it is not and at least be honest, we both know how outdated the curriculum is on pretty much everything, even the more important subjects, as i said you have all the research staring you in the face, you gonna believe some grade school teacher over it? If pot`s legal in your state then again, you know full well it doesn`t cause problems for people aside from some cases of overeating and probable indigestion after. Again the bare fact of something being addictive is no grounds for controlling the substance. Else would you imprison me for overindulging in kim-chi dumplings or not? You could do the brain scans if you wanted and they would show you all the chemical effects of a stimulant when I eat them, all the release of endomorphins and such so no, it`s not an eggzageration in my case. Do I deserve prison time or not?

Better yet, we both know pot has a lot of healing qualities, for me it literally ends my back pains, helps me sleep soundly(and sleep is a big issue for me cause my brain doesn`t shut down to standby mode when I sleep, it`s a terryfing condition you wouldn`t want to experience and I wouldn`t wish it on you), it relaxes me without any adverse effects unlike booze(which it by the way makes me crave much less), acts as a painkiller and breaks my social anxiety, something you can`t see on the web but in real life I tend to be quite an anxious person. It is literally a medicine for me as well as a drug of choice. Why would you deny it to me? Why woudln`t you want to look at all the current, relevant research before forming an opinion, hell ,why woudln`t you actually ask people who use it how are they doing.

ps. Cute comparison, yes you are fundamentally right here but what you`re doing is comparing black death to cholera. Neither is an acceptable alternative for a country.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

@Moose

No, to be a Nazi, you have to be a white supremecist. I am not a white supremist/white nationalist. I believe that culture is more important than race, and that immigrants must assimilate into the culture of the country they immigrate to. And despising practicing Muslims is not racism because Islam is a religion not a race.

@Skide

1. Pot is addictive enough to cause overindulgence which causes medical problems. You can easily balance overreacting with exercise and eating healthy food as well. You really have to try hard to become obese.

2. And it is Sweden and Germany that have the Black Death. Again, if the rape crisis is not real, then why are there so many women marching in Germany in the 120db movement against open borders. And again, here is a Slovenian woman’s video showing footage of Muslims calling for killing Jews, and talking about the crime and rape statistics in Sweden. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D3ClAeKhazo

And the fact that people who criticize Islam and who against Islam by drawing Muhammad, get killed or have to have extra security, shows that Muslims are more violent than other religions. I would be pissed at someone for blaspheming against Christ, but I would not kill them for it. People getting killed for blasphemy by today’s standards is a grave violation of the human right to life.

old comment by Skide

@Jacob Harrison

Cute, overindulgence in food can lead to medical problems, still no buisness it is of yours to forcefully prevent others from it or do you go into macdonalds and force fat folks out of there at gunpoint?

Obesity is actually rare amongst stoner community, no idea why you would mention it in the first place.

Saying what you just did about actual medical grade anxiety is one of the most ignorant and unempathic things you ever said and that says something. No, you can`t balance it out with some sweat, it doesn`t work like that and an adult in this day and age should fuckin well know it.

Yes, the rape crisis or whatever you call it is not real, the rape statistics in Sweden are high because unlike most countries they do have a much higher discovery and conviction rates for it.

I`m not gonna defend islam to you, it is basically a willing slave cult but so is your catholicism, both of you want to control others not like you, it`s just that they are more willing to go to the logical and violent conclusion whereas your crowd prefers to do suff in gloves from behind the government and tries to dress it up as "greater good" just like you did several posts ago.

old comment by The Angry Dybbuk

As others have pointed out, everyone has some negative heritable traits. Science barely understands most of them, nor can geneticists test for the majority of them at current.

Beyond that, your personal philosophy does not nor shall it ever get to be the benchmark for who can have children. People with heritable physical handicaps are capable of deciding on selective implantation, donor sperm/eggs, choosing not to bear, or choosing the natural route. That is their exclusive business. They are aware of the pain and cost of being handicapped far more than you.

Your ridiculous assertion people should be born intelligent and “beautiful” (whatever that means to you, I guess) goes far beyond any argument for the public weal.

No one can be guaranteed a fair life even with strong genes. Illness and accident are still factors that will mar people. But in your half-baked teenaged fantasy world they'd be fixed by super-tech or would volunteer to die or something else equally implausible.

As a Malthusian, I think there are a great many people who should not have children and many more who should keep their numbers at replacement value. Explaining the why' of my philosophy and suggesting a reward for voluntary long-term BC (or sterilisation, if they'd prefer) for those people who admit they'd make unfit parents is as far as I would ever presume to go, and it's further than I'm comfortable with really.

For reasons I won't explain here, we've chosen not to have kids despite our wanting them. The loss of posterity is a genuine sacrifice and those who choose to make it in service to positive eugenic goals should be honoured rather than being held in contempt by ignorant brats like the one responsible for the OP.

And before anyone comes at me with the accusation I consider some people useless breeders - I've faced that claim before the answer is a strong no: All persons alive are worthy of dignified treatment and are born into a raft of inalienable human rights. All persons can be useful. All persons can contribute. And most people are capable of changing from their former ways (if they were criminals, etc.)

Measures to halt overpopulation and eventually toreverse it must, above all, be humane; else we'll get a societal nightmare that we ourselves created in our failure to learn from the past in our failure to recognise the individuality of every human being.

And what CCC fails to understand most, maybe, is he could easily become a target of his own 'utopia.'

old comment by Swede

So, everyone ought to have their complete genetics checked before they can breed? You can't know whether you have "negitave inheritable conditions" unless you do that, ya know. Some things need to be present in both mother and father to manifest.

What about the negative inheritable condition of bigotry and stupidity?

The overwhelming majority of physically handicapped people are also just that. Where's the difference?

Yes, there is good; that which benefits society, and evil; that which harms society.

Why do you have to be worthy of life? If there is no good or evil, then there ought not to be worthy or unworthy either.

You're clearly not s-m-r-t enough to be part of this "new humanity", dolt.

old comment by Skide

@Thanos6

No, but seriously dude, you are wrong on this one. A murderer can be a sadistic sociopath but it can also mean a woman who finally snappoed at her abuser after years or decades of homely torture and given herself in, for one in my old country this was the number one casue of incarceration among women. The first example cannot be rehabilitated with our current level of technology and understanding as we cannot cure sociopathy(as to whether we should, there was a really good episode of Voyager about it and I personally believe that if we could, then yes it is our duty to do so) but the second one needs no rehabilitiation in the first place, if anything trauma counseling. See, rather deep issue for a blanket statement like you made.

old comment by Thanos6

@Skide:

a woman who finally snappoed at her abuser after years or decades of homely torture and given herself in

I'd call that "self-defense," not true murder.

On the other hand, there's Donna Hylton. Quoting Wikipedia, "In 1985, Hylton and two accomplices drugged and kidnapped 62-year-old Long Island real-estate broker Thomas Vigliarolo, and held him prisoner for 1520 days. While imprisoned, three men and four women, including Hylton, starved, burned, beat, sexually assaulted, raped, and tortured Vigliarolo. Hylton delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarolo, leading to her capture.[2] She was convicted of second degree murder and two counts of first-degree kidnapping, and sentenced to 25 years to life. She served 27 years, after losing appeals."

And where is Hylton now?

"She has advocated for the "humanitarian" release of aging prisoners.[4]

In 2016 it was announced that Rosario Dawson was attached to a movie version of Hylton's life story titled A Little Piece of Light. The film is in development, in search of a screenwriter and director.[5]

In January 2017, Hylton was a featured speaker at the Women's March on Washington.[6][7]"

That disgusts me beyond words. She never, never, never, never should have been let out of jail.

old comment by Thanos6

@Pharaoh:

What's extraordinary about her? We're discussing murderers, she's a murderer.

And I doubt she's changed. She just knows how to hide it better. She certainly shouldn't be celebrated.

But if you want more examples:

Richard Biegenwald. Robbed a store, killed the owner. Sentenced to life but released after 17 years. Went on to kill at least 5 more people, possibly 7, and suspected in rapes as well.

Robert Alton Harris. Beat a man to death. Was paroled after just 3 years. He and his brother then abducted and killed two teenagers.

Phillip Carl Jablonski. History of rape. Killed his girlfriend and was released after 12 years. Murdered four other women.

Those are just the first three examples I found. Murderers and other violent criminals are too risky to ever let out of jail.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

1. I am saying that it is much harder to become obese than it is to get medical problems from weed, and yes Overindulgers are capable of exercising and also indulging on healthy food to balance their indulgence on junk food. And obese people can be prescribed healthy diets by their doctors. And if you ask a doctor about weed, most would not recommend using it.

2. And the video, shows the statistics on how most of the rapes are committed by Muslim migrants.

3. Ugh, you didn’t even click on the link to what I posted on Fstdt forums, on the recent significant thing that happened to my Roman Catholicism. http://forums.fstdt.net/index.php?topic=7846.0

But you admitted that Muslims are more violent than most Christians. Christians tend to use legal non violent means, to get moral legislation passed and the moral legislation does not interfere with the rights of women and other religious groups the same way Sharia Law does.

@SpukiKitty

a. I understand fleeing a war zone. But why can’t the Muslim refugees go to neighboring Middle Eastern countries since they have similar culture and religion? I support taking in Christian refugees because they are not as much of a threat.

b. Yeah because there are different Muslim sects that kill each other.

c. Which is why Muslims are victims of their own violent religion

d. Yes, you pointed out that most big terrorist attacks are committed by Muslims born and raised in Europe, because of their barbaric religion, so it baffles me that you think it is a good idea to accept more migrants from the same barbaric culture, where their children can become future terrorists.

Yeah you pointed out that there are some good Muslims out there, but that does not change the fact that there is a strong correlation with Islam and terrorism.

And that image of good and bad is wrong. First of all, the majority of historians conclude that Adolf Hitler was not religious.

Second, Malcolm X was not a “good Muslim.” He was part of the radical organization, the Nation of Islam and was racist against white people. The Republican Christian Martin Luther King was the far better civil rights activist because he was non violent and opposed judging people by the content of their color and opposed racism in all it’s forms. That is why there is a holiday named after Martin Luther King and not Malcolm X.

@Pharoah Bastethotep

Here is a video made by the Slovenian woman on how big the 120db women’s march is. The 120db women also stormed a #Meetoo event in Germany and were kicked out, being called Nazis for being concerned about migrant rape. WTF?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MxCsnykY_PM

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

@Jacob Harrison

Or how about giving sociopathic murderers the death penalty to bring justice to the victim’s families,

You are confusing revenge for justice. Two wrongs don't make one right.

Sociopathic murderers deserve death not rehabilitation.

How very Christian of you.

An eye for an eye.

...would make the entire world go blind.

PS:
And those 120dB gals seem rather tinfoily with all that talk about "imported" violence. And of course, they are Not Racist But use phrases firmly revealing themselves as neonazis, such as that disgusting un-word Überfremdung. This is clearly not a legitimate movement, but a deliberate atttempt to create a mass hysteria from xenophobia and female paranoia.

PPS:
Further research reveals that the campaign is astroturfed by the Neonazi Identitarian Movement, with both at least five of the eleven postergirls and Martin Sellner, the man who launched the campaign and owns the site, being notorious members. Furthermore, one of said women, Annika S. (appearing under the pseudonym Franziska), also maintains a back-to-the-kitchen antifeminist blog, and Sellner blames "mass immigration" and "islamisation" on women's suffrage.

CCC #fundie alternatehistory.com

52 comments

Confused?