Porn involves the dehumanization of others, mainly women, solely so men can masturbate. This is what it is in a nutshell, and it should not exist. It requires the exploitation of others, often trafficked women, just so men can masturbate to the images. It is poison and has no place in any society. It is not "free speech" but a human rights violation.
9 comments
Is there porn that uses trafficked slaves, children, dehumanizes the victims, and shows brutal (not BDSM rape-play) rape? Absofuckinglutely.
Will you find such things in the local erotica store? Pornhub? Google? One of the hundreds of paid sites? Maybe? But its unlikely. Legit sites do monitor content.
See, the pornographers that make such bile mentioned above know it's illegal so it gets shared on the dark web, paid in bitcoin, etc. And usually monitored by police. Tor has been cracked for a while now.
The vast majority of wankers wanking it are on a free porn version of YouTube and they're watching 30 yo actors pretend to be high schoolers. Relax.
Because, of course, no woman can ever like (hetero) sex. All women must be holy nuns who would get a heart attack from seeing, even for an attosecond, any part of anything even slightly phallic, because, of course, (hetero) sex is a horrible, daemonic curse, which the horrible, daemonic malezzz impose on the pure wombyn, to spoil their pure bodies and destroy their abilities of partheogenesis, thus preventing the emergence of glorious lesbian paradise.
Or something.
So, people willingly participating in an industry that harms no one (and being paid for it, mind you) are part of a human rights violation? Bullshit. Just because you don't like porn doesn't mean that it's an atrocity. And what's wrong with men masturbating?
Also, women watch porn. Or does that fact simply not exist in your world?
I'm pretty sure those women get paid for participating, as well as the men. Not to mention that there is a lot of homemade, voluntary, amateur porn out there. Yet I don't see the participants complaining.
@ D Thomas- From what I've read, porn is one of the few industries where women command a much higher pay. Modeling would be the other one.
My biggest beef with porn is that too many performers in mainstream porn are too fake looking. My car has less plastic parts than a porn star, even the men, who frequently look like juiced up meatheads with bad tattoos. That stuff just ain't hot.
Does she think only men enjoy porn? And what about pornographic drawings? How am I violating a woman's rights if the woman in question is fictional?
image
Nico Robin: Deserving of tremendous respect because of the burdens and hardships she has endured. Also smokin' hot. Hell yeah, I can masturbate thinking about her and respect her as a person as the same time. And if I can do it with a fictional woman, I can do it with a real one. If you think it's impossible, that says far more about you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
