The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
(Talking about Epstein victims)
I, for one, would like to know HOW these women got to be within the Epstein orbit in the first place and what monies, if any, they received. They are forever the victims but it would be nice to have BOTH sides of the story. Some of them were old enough not to get entangled with Epstein etc....
Once again I am fantasizing about killing people to cope with the fact that I can't have sex.
The anger and pain I feel over the fact that I have been denied sex for my entire life and the fact that I didn't get to experience sex once at all in my youth is intolerable. I regularly have episodes where I feel sharp pains in my chest and my arms feel light and numb. The only thing that helps me is fantasizing about killing people. I have extended, elaborate fantasies about killing people. Sometimes they are cartoonish, like I imagine myself as Homelander and I level a city, then threaten to level another if the world doesn't give me hot women to have sex with. Other times they are more grounded, like I imagine punishing society by doing a mass shooting before killing myself on the day I finally decide I have nothing left to lose. In my fantasies, nobody is spared. I target the most vulnerable to incur the maximum degree of suffering on society. These fantasies help me get through particularly painful episodes because I escape into a fictional reality where I feel I have been delivered some measure of justice. There are two aspects to my pain. The first is the injuries I have already suffered. The experience of my life thus far at 31 years of age. My youth has come and gone, and I didn't get to experience sex once. I think about the countless number of cute girls I've known and met and come across throughout my life who I felt attracted to, none of whom felt attraction to me. It feels so gravely unjust to me that everyone else gets to experience mutual sexual interest, but I don't. For some reason I have been designated to be denied that experience. When I think about this, rage and anger wash over me. The second aspect is the fact that there is no light at the end of the tunnel for me. As I get older, I get even uglier. My hair gets thinner, my face sags further off my underdeveloped facial bones.
If you really want everyone to get along there needs to be global oppression of men. Once they become second class citizens racism would just fade away. After all, there's no such thing as an all female rape gang.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that he is rolling out a new screening program for “testosterone deficiency” among troops, calling it necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best.”
The screenings will be conducted annually as part of service members’ required medical screenings for those 30 and older, he said. Troops under 30 can volunteer to be tested. In a video on social media, Hegseth said receiving testosterone replacement therapy would be voluntary.
When asked about what conditions Hegseth was looking to address with the new policy, the Pentagon referred to Hegseth’s remarks in the video that talked about keeping troops “strong, resilient and capable” and that the rigors of the modern battlefield demand “maximum psychological and mental readiness.”
Over the past several years, special operations troops — and specifically Navy SEALs — have come under scrutiny for their use of testosterone and similar substances to enhance performance.
The death of a SEAL recruit during training in 2022 led to a discovery of substances in his possession, including testosterone, and revealed far more rampant drug use among the elite program than was previously acknowledged.
A year after the recruit’s death, the Navy said it would begin a drug-testing program to screen for “any hormonal substance, chemically or pharmacologically related to testosterone, that promotes muscle growth.”
Hegseth said his new initiative is “not about artificial enhancement.”
The Pentagon did not respond to questions about what research or academic studies underpinned the move. It also didn’t say if female troops would be able to be screened for lowering estrogen as they entered perimenopause.
i hate men btw, all daddies will be age regressed and forcefemmed and reraised as girls so they can do something better with their life than being a man
[From “The Vatican schisms from Christianity yet again”]
The first time it was tragedy. This time around, it is farce
The first time, the Pope coveted that which is Caesar’s
This time around, men’s assholes[…]
The latest Pope has just excommunicated the Roman Catholic priesthood’s few remaining Christians
The postChristian churches are all rapidly dying, while the Christian churches are rapidly growing
If you attend a postChristian, postModern, church, there is no one left except those with one foot in the grave
Pretty soon the Pope speaking exCathedra will be yet another letterhead owned by Harvard
Which is going to force the remaining Christian priests of the Roman Catholic to adopt the protestant Catholic position, the high Anglican position, that anyone with valid Apostolic succession who is in a proper relationship with God can validly give someone else apostolic succession, analogous to early anarchic period of feudalism, when any knight[…]could give someone else that right[…]
In related news, Hollywood just cast an angry plains ape as Helen of Troy, and displayed the ape looking and acting like an ape in their trailer. Obviously that is not going to entice viewers to go see the movie[…]
The Pope has been performing insults to Christians and Christianity and attacks against Christians and Christianity in the same way Hollywood, Gillette, Budweiser, and Jaguar have been performing insults and attacks against their customers[…]
We have just had a schism in Anglicanism over priestesses, Orthodoxy over Globohomo, and now we have a schism in Roman Catholicism over the latin Mass. The latin mass dispute is actually a lavender mafia versus straight celibates schism[…]High fertility, high fidelity, non buggery, portions of the Church, are SSPX
The papacy is happy to keep the low fertility part[…]as churches, monasteries, and nunneries empty out, this allows them to sell off their real estate and snort coke off the bums of ladyboys
I think it's worse than that. Niceness is detrimental to selection. Our culture fetishizes rude behavior from men, sanewashed under the label "confidence". Many women will go as far as, e.g., refusing to kiss any man, and disqualify all but those who go ahead and kiss her despite her refusal. Then be surprised that "all men" (who qualify) will also break other boundaries.
(I've been off the market for decades and I'm theorizing on vibes. Hopefully I'm wrong)
Let's go for serving beer in a bar.
Should men and women get paid the same for serving beer in a bar if they work for the same hours and if they both do the job equally well?
Well, of course, I would say Yes.
But so-called 'equality' fanatics, like the feminists, might well disagree, as they keep drilling down in search for 'inequality'..
They might discover, for example, the following.
1. They might discover that more men than women do this job. And from this they could conclude that 'equality' between men and women has not been achieved.
2. The statistics might show that the women tend to spend more of their money on clothes for the job than do men, and that, therefore, women should be paid more - often by sneaking the money back to them through the tax system.
3. The statistics might show that women take more days off work for childcare reasons or for hormonal problems and so they ought to be compensated in some way for this.
4. The statistics might show that women spend more time mopping up the floor than do the men ...
And so on and on it can go.
My point is that the search for 'equality' can never end, and that in the process of searching for this impossible goal, the stirring up of male hatred is usually a major consequence - and, indeed, in the case of feminists, it is a purposeful aim.
Furthermore, given that 'equality' can never be achieved (even in simple matters to do with pay) the never-ending search for it by the feminists in all sorts of areas will forever involve the stirring up of hatred towards men in all sorts of areas.
If the humon male population were reduced to 10% of its current size, then females could “do something”. Until then, no. We’re a captive, sentient, suffering population. Too bad about us, eh?
Patriarchy is born out of “egalitarianism”, the need of the male to forcefully get what is not his, to allow the inferior to survive and breed.
patriarchy is and has to be framed as the revolt of the inferior, who is inferior because it covets what the superior has, and in a predatory-parasitical fashion abuses the superior’s eusocial and agapic tendency towards forgiveness, generosity, and reciprocity for its own low needs.
if we truly were a blank state spoiled by system of oppression born out of the recursive ripple-like effect of initial differences in physical strength… why female secret service agents, who are stronger than the president, don’t rule the world? how come i enacted harm my pets or my little brother? it’s just a laughable idea, and a malicious one that is used to justify and enact oppression in the first place.
male wolves and killer whales are larger and stronger than their females: not a single one of them has ever been observed raping their female, let alone enacting the thousands of forms of abuse male humans enact…
most first-wave feminists were eugenicists because eugenics is the solution to these problems, even if it makes many people uncomfortable. you’d have to ask yourself why you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about this subject.
Ladies, could we benefit from Man-Hate Threads for different races of men, like "White Man-Hate Thread", "Muslim Man-Hate Thread", "Indian Man-Hate Thread", "Australian Aboriginal Man-Hate Thread", etc.? That way, the racial aspect of male atrocities could be documented more precisely. Some would obviously be more active than others. Just suggesting because this topic causes a lot of disagreement and keeps coming up.
>inb4 "THAT'S TOO MANY HATE THREADS!!!"
Men deserve it
A far-right Christian podcaster has gone viral after he completely lost his mind when a guest highlighted that his misogynistic worldview is contradicted by his life because his wife has children with three different men.
On a recent episode of the Whatever podcast, The Crucible host Andrew Wilson, who used to go by the name “Big Papa Fascist” and holds Christian Nationalist worldviews, crashed out when a young woman named Charlie pointed out his double standards. “I will never be able to convince you of my worldview, but the reason is not because I’m not a great orator, or I don’t make good points… Charlie, I just think, honestly, you’re too fucking stupid to understand,” said Andrew, as seen in the viral clip below.
“So, Andrew, can I sell you on my worldview? Your wife has three baby daddies and has been married twice before,” said Charlie, who was introduced in the episode as a leftist debater. “And you lick snizz,” he said, interrupting her. “You’re a fucking d*ke, don’t talk shit about my wife, you stupid bitch. Shut your fucking mouth. Shut your stupid bitch mouth.”
Charlie was unable to get out the rest of her point for a brief moment, as Andrew continued to throw homophobic slurs at her. “Is she morally inconsequential in comparison to your ditch licking?” he said, as he repeatedly talked over her and insulted her.
If men ain’t entitled to sex. Then women isn’t entitled to safety
We all know that men try to achieve immortality (Gyn/Ecology, Great Cosmic Mother) whereas gynocentric women tend to have a more accepting idea of the process of birth, growth, decay and death. I think female identified women also know intuitively when it’s the right time to create life and when it’s the right time to end it, or not create it at all.
IMO because males and females are literally different species (even according to mayl scientists) “EI” would look different for each of them. Or maybe it only applies to females and not at all to males, since they’re sort of like a large virus/parasite/not actually human in the first place. They’re just masquerading.
(Cannabis refugee)
if human males were reduced to 10%, women could do something, but then we wouldn’t have to. we wouldn’t be oppressed, and feminism would be obsolete. we could do other things, but doing feminism, and trying to upend male supremacy would be unnecessary. can you imagine?
you are one of the elders who told me about women’s land mary. you saved me so much time.
(Marysunshineredux)
I have been many times to the magical Women’s Lands here in Australia. The few moments of my life that were worth living.
I know this website is generally pro-lesbian so there is a moral pressure to pretend they have a male equivalent for equality's sake, but you all need to stop this 90s fag "men have an ironclad innate sexuality" nonsense immediately.
Biologically there's no such thing as a man who's "gay" or "straight". They are social self-IDs, not objective responses to stimuli or even real world sexual behaviors. Any man can be conditioned into anything with the correct stimuli + enough time and repetition. Men also get more flexible and sexually "complex" with age, i.e. the longer they've been alive. Before technology the average male would not have encountered such a rapid escalation of sexual stimuli so early, so access to porn provides a truly brutal fast-forwarded model of male sexual hyperfunction beginning in childhood and extending past his reproductive prime.
Before someone mentions conversion therapy and inquires why it doesn't work - it's because coomditioning is a one way street, like time and entropy. You can't genuinely reverse the complexity of conditioned sexual responses to "youthful " vanilla default any more than you can reverse aging - at best it'll be a performance/mimicry. A moid factory reset is currently not possible, you can't put toothpaste back in the tube. Because of this, for example, a coomer who's into tranny zoosadist gloryholes can't be coomed into being vanilla by being repeatedly exposed to LESS distressing and stimulating content, much like you can't revert a fent addict into a codeine addict by having him do a weaker opioid. Even if he does eventually make an effort to stick with it, he will always be thinking about fent.
The relapse rates among nofap coomers are consistent with this reality. There is no way out. It is irreversible damage.
Mothers are Sluts and I am Fucking Sick of Their Bullshit. A Contrarian Mother’s Day Post.
Even in a non-patriarchal context, unless non-technological parthenogenesis has been achieved, creating a pregnancy would necessarily entail procuring sperm, and that normally means that a male somewhere has achieved orgasm which is usually considered pleasing to men. Human reproduction itself in every context may therefore be dependent on (or at least inexorably linked to) male-pleasing.
However, in a patriarchal context, the male-pleasing is even more clear and even more problematic, especially where and if mothers think that they are better than non-mothers, and that they hold a position of legitimate power and authority over anyone and Holy Shit, mothers do think that, don’t they? Mothers think they have a legitimate claim of authority over everyone, including their own children, other people’s children, and importantly over child-free women, who mothers regard as overgrown babies no matter how old or experienced we are. But this claim of authority is not based in anything legitimate, and maternal authority is therefore not a legitimate authority at all.
To wit, in my estimation, under the current paradigm, women become impregnated, and thus become mothers, under the following conditions: by engaging in heterosexual sex, which for females is a sexuality rather defined by pleasing men; through rape, which is also pleasing to men and which many men find indistinguishable from sex; and via patriarchal reproductive technologies, where women let Big Medicine and Western medical doctors torture and experiment on them, where males are known to enjoy torturing females, males, and nonhuman animals and they do it for sport, and have elevated torture to an artform. Women can also become “mothers” by stealing other women’s babies, which hardly cements their claim of legitimate authority over anyone.
[UFC President] Dana White says that men should NEVER talk about their mental health struggles publicly:
“Talking about it publicly, I just feel like it opens the door to make young men think that it’s OK to just f**king go, ‘Oh, I’m having mental [health issues] (White says in a whiny voice).’”
“Handle it behind closed doors. Don’t show that weakness to anybody.”
“I am unapologetically masculine. What is toxic masculinity? Who has it? Who’s too masculine?”
being with a man permanently irrevocably changes a woman, s***n has mind altering capabilities, having kids with an xy changes you forever since your body changes forever and part of his dna is now permanently attached to you, and the higher the number of men they've been with, the less value a woman has on the dating market, impacting her life forever
#no such thing as femdom#no such thing as casual straight sex#feminism#blackpill feminism#blackpill lesbian#daily blackpill#black pill feminism#radblr#radfem#terfblr#terfs do interact#terfs please interact
Men are not human, women who love and defend men are compromised. Relationships with moids are degenerate. If women were smart they would have reduced the moid pop and domesticated them millenia ago.
It is not feminism that will redeem women but a catastrophe, but unlike what moids believe they will be the victims after centuries of over playing their hand.
A White House official continued with attacks on Senate candidate and Texas state Rep. James Talarico’s (D) masculinity on Thursday evening, saying that he’s “transitioning to a woman,” that his blood is soy milk, and that he has less testosterone than Black Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX)[…]
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said earlier this week that Talarico is the Democrats’ “first transgender senate candidate.” The DNC’s X account called Miller an “ugly fuck” in response, and Stephen Miller’s wife, Katie Miller, had a public meltdown over the vulgarity of the response
But Miller isn’t letting up. Last night, he went on Fox News and told host Jesse Watters – who has a long history of discussing his personal insecurities with masculinity on air – that Talarico is “clearly transitioning into a female”
“When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn’t come out; instead, soy milk comes out,” Miller said flatly as Watters laughed hysterically. “This man has less testosterone than Jasmine Crockett. It is a mind-boggling choice”
Miller continued, joking that Talarico “doesn’t belong in the Senate but in a cabaret show”[…]
Miller then said that Texans are “some of the toughest, roughest, strongest men and women,” so they will naturally vote for “a real conservative, patriotic, god-fearing, and truly be loved statewide figure” like Paxton instead of “somebody with that much soy” like Talarico
When Savanna Stone first started publicly sharing her support for U.S. President Donald Trump, she says it was a dealbreaker for some members of her extended family[…]
But what Stone said next was surprising
"I don’t even like Trump anymore, so it’s crazy"[…]
She was invited to be a keynote speaker at the Turning Point USA Women’s Leadership Summit, a three-day gathering held on the first weekend of June in San Antonio, Texas[…]
She says she doesn’t think women should vote, and that the U.S. should adopt a one-vote-per-household election system. Women tend to support more liberal candidates, she argues, so changing the voting system would result in a more Christian and conservative America
"That’s just one of the opinions that I hold, because I think that it would be better for society"[…]
"Now, is that a hill I'm going to die on and run for office and try to complete? No," she said. "That’s Ideal Savanna’s world; that’s not our current world"
Several women at the conference told CBC News that they'd be open to the idea, even if it meant losing their own right to vote — all in the pursuit of a more conservative country
"I think [Stone] has a very big point," said Foxworthy, the stay-at-home mom whose family recently moved to Texas
Foxworthy said she’s voted in every single election since she was 18 years old, and she plans to vote in the midterms coming up this fall. But she is open to the strategy
"If my husband is the head of the household, I am the neck, and we work very cohesively together," she said. "If he was voting on behalf of our household, I would be fine with that"
She said she'd even be comfortable if it meant her daughter lost her right to vote, as well[…]
KayElah Gardner said she'd give up her vote if it meant banning abortion
"I feel like with my mindset, I would want to put my vote in," said the 19-year-old nursing student from San Diego, Calif. "But … I think getting rid of that would actually help women more"
context: this was in response to a reasonable feminist man.
Oh seriously what a load of crock. First off this has nothing to do with feminism which is literally women being treated and seen as you know fucking human beings. it’s also very clear you’re NOT an ally so GTFO with that shit. The fact you started with “well feminism” shows the lack of good faith in your post and the fact you just want to come at women. Also you don’t get to come to a space for women and blame women for the actions of men. Saying that women are responsible for men being red pilled and misogynistic. That shit has been around since the beginning of time long before women even had a voice. So try again.
Women don’t have to coddle men because they get their feelings hurt for their own damn actions. Women have every right to feel the way we do and say it out loud. You’re lucky we only want equality and not revenge. If men don’t want to be called garbage don’t be garbage. Don’t be Misogynist pricks. It is MENS RESPONSIBILITY to fix this. It’s MENS responsibility to teach young men how to act. This isnt hard. Yet you guys still can’t figure it out and as usual you blame women instead of looking at yourself and doing and being better. Tale as old as time!
Also misandry isn’t a fucking thing either. Women are rightfully reacting to centuries of oppression from men. Women don’t oppress men. Women don’t control men. Women don’t control and regulate men’s bodies. Women don’t enact laws that hurt men. Women didn’t make men property. Women aren’t taking us back to the 1800 in current time.
So instead of sitting here playing the victim, which you’re not, stop and say to yourself hey why do women, feel the way they do about us? What are WE doing that makes women feel unsafe, not want to be around us, and so on. I’m so sick of reading shit like this.
[From “A Passing Thought”]
The ideal role of woman is the cheerleader. The satanic inversion of the cheerleader is the critic
It’s fascinating to observe the way in which women not only fail to understand their power over men, but how they sabotage their own well-being by not only giving in to the inversive role, but doing it without even realizing they are doing so
The key, I think, is to understand that every man who isn’t an optimist with a gambling problem is perfectly aware of the fact that he could fail. It’s very, very easy to not do anything, to not try to succeed. Which is why it is imperative for the women in a man’s life to grasp that not only does a man have no need for a negative voice to balance his moments of optimism and inspiration, but that piling more negativity on top of his natural concerns, fears, and worries all but ensures that he will never take the risks required to level up
There are men who don’t need cheerleaders and who are basically impervious to criticism. I’m one obvious example of that, as my habit of devoting myself to things that literally no one wants or is asking for tends to demonstrate. But even I respond well to cheerleading and bristle at negativity and unhelpful, insubstantial criticism
And since so many people can’t seem to grasp what “unhelpful, insubstantial criticism” is, allow me to explain it to you. Before your criticize anything, ask yourself one question:
1) Is there anything that can be done about it now?
If the answer is no, then keep your mouth shut and say something vaguely polite and positive. Because nothing you say can change what is already done
Those doctors do not think they are kind. They don't care. As sooner we understand that the better. If it is necessary take him from the country and the computers (if it's possible go to China or a country that internet is high regulated). If he is older invite him for a vacation after organized everything. That is the way I will do it because fifteen years had passed and our children continue being harassed with all these new "ways" and we experienced a rise of the trans indoctrination. I was watching casually a movie the other day and I realized that a "she" was called "my son" by the Mother and "he" by the school principal. I recognize trans people just fine, and we have to do that, pay attention to the details. I was thinking that if the entertainment business and everything including video games and manga-anime used androgen and trans people as "normal" way of life, we are losing the battle. Immediately I stopped watching the movie, a thing we all can do when we recognized normalization of madness. It is different if the topic of the movie is the struggle of a confuse person regarding his or her acceptance of what she or he is, but outside that we don't need those characters in any action movie, or any movie at all, as another characters that also are now coming up in stories movies and don't add anything to the story line. Also I noticed that in ads, where men are cleaning and bathing the babies, of course men can do that if it is necessary as a woman can be a soldier but it is unrealistic that a woman can bit up a man in the same level of training. But I see that too, unrealistic scenes where I guess they want to "empower" women making women trying to be men and doing things that men are better at doing. That reminds me the daughter of one of my friend that got into the army because she wanted to be strong ( and she is) but very soon she realized that is not like in the movies. She was bitted a lot by men during practices and the army cannot do special treatment because you are a woman, that would be discriminatory so she learned soon enough her limitations, also she learned better ways to defend herself, extra techniques that men don't need to learn because of their strength. That is reality so let's keep it real every second. Yes! We are limited by nature and men cannot get pregnant!
1. Men want to have intercourse with every attractive woman they see. They're obsessed with planting the seed
but care little about the onerous moral and financial responsibility of fatherhood. Nature is wise.
If men did consider the consequences, they would never have sex.
2. The Illuminati have undermined heterosexual reproduction in order to replace us with robots. Feminism = depopulation.
3. Generally speaking, female self esteem depends on their value to men. Feminism convinced them that men are the enemy and families are "oppressive."
4. Wives and mothers are loved because of the sacrifices they make for their husbands and children. Do modern women think sex can replace that?
<...>
Comments for "Our Sex Drive is Our Stupidest Instinct"
<Tony>
But we can't get away from it because our owners want us to keep bringing new slaves to replace us in the plantation. That's the whole purpose for it. Generation after generation ad infinitum
<James>
Sex would have been perfect if we had been given a way to "turn off" the sex drive. Origen castrated himself, but that seems a little excessive.
The heart has a mind of its own, but so do the endocrines. IMO, the vast majority of people should never reproduce. Primarily because they're idiots.
I wish to God that my parents had never reproduced. IMO, humanity should have stayed on the land, kept its numbers small, and cared for the soil as though our lives depended on it. Because they do. Unfortunately, humanity has chosen to do the exact opposite and is now paying the price.
Graduating from feminism to misandry is the best pipeline
To begin, let me kindly say in all holiness that I love and admire women. A woman is the greatest and most precious creature that God ever made. I wouldn't want to live in a world without females. That being said, there's nothing as ugly as a woman who has become a feminist. According to 1st Samuel 15:23, feminism is equal to Satanism, on par with witchcraft and idolatry, “For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.” In God's sight, a rebellious wife is in the same boat as a witch!
Feminism is NOT a good thing, it is corrupt. The wicked argument was that women being pregnant all the time held them back from prospering in the workplace. Well, amen, that is how God intended for things to be. 1st Timothy 5:14-15, “I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. For some are already turned aside after Satan.” False prophets (bad messengers like the serpent in Eden) are going to lead women astray, and that is why they need to have power (authority) over their head, signified by wearing long hair and head coverings (I admire Arab women who wear burkas). The Bible commands women not to be put into power. Women will destroy the people they lead.
The real deception of feminism is promising women liberty but bringing them into bondage. The deception of feminism is calling it “feminism” in the first place; it should be called SATANISM!!! Feminism enslaves women! Satan is at the helm of the feminist women's rights movement! Women need power (authority) over their head, lest they be led astray and deceived by false prophets.
[From “Women want fried ice”]
Women want what they do not want, and do not want what they do want
So it is fortunate that they do not act in a rational or goal directed manner[…]
Everyone longs for and seeks the ancestral environment of survival and successful reproduction[…]
It is the intention of nature and the will of nature’s God that resources shall be transferred from men to women[…]
No one will plant trees or build on land he does not own, so for the necessary transfer of resources to take place, women must be the property of men, and children must be the property of their mothers and fathers, the boys till they are old enough to become independent, the girls till they are old enough to become the property of their husbands
For a strongly K selected species, male ownership of women has to be part of the system[…]
For women, successful reproduction was accomplished when they were owned by a man, and used as his instrument of reproduction. In the ancestral environment, before agriculture, the stable isotope ratios in the bones indicate that humans lived primarily on meat, including the meat of other predators. We were the apex predator[…]And when I say “humans” were the apex predator, I mean of course, men[…]
Then we switched to agriculture. And when we were switching to agriculture, the sex disparity in reproduction went right up — with far fewer Y chromosome lineages being part of the reproduction pool than mitochondrial lineages. Which indicates that women lived off land that belonged to some man or to the men of a patrilineal clan[…]
If women responded rationally to the incentives of female emancipation, we would probably be in even worse shape than we are, because it is female irrationality that makes it possible to personally unemancipate women[…]
The reason that women do not like the Damsel in Distress trope is that men fantasize about winning righteously and virtuously, while women fantasize about the winners getting hold of them
This study largely validates the theory of the case that femcels describe when it comes to the cultural power of lookism and pretty privilege on women’s lives and destroys the rival theory of male incels that lookism primarily affects them. These findings make it extremely clear that lookism impacts the lives of women, NOT moids, and thus the suffering of male incels is, in fact, more or less entirely owed to their sparkling personalities and behaviors, NOT their outward appearance like they disingenuously claim.
The fact is that millenia of male sexual selection (moids largely controlling who fucks who and thus gets to reproduce what sets of genes) has rendered the average woman attractive to her average male counterpart, but not vice versa: most moids are on the ugly side to most women, so women learn to develop comparatively low standards when it comes to the physical attractiveness of their partners. Under male sexual selection, the female sex is not only held to higher standards of beauty, but also more or less her entire social worth is determined by her outward appearance.
EDIT: Look at that, I's made ten posts here. Another life goal achieved!
#bio essentialism#i hate moids
Lee Majors at Infostormer had an interesting piece the other day. He asked whether Sophie Rain, the most popular whore on OnlyFans, is a Jewish psyop.
<...>
In addition to that, almost every story of Sophie Rain that appears in the mainstream media is sure to mention that she is a Christian (AKA a traditional Catholic). The truth is she is anything but. However, by claiming to be a Christian, she sends a message to millions of young impressionable girls that they can claim to be "Christian", while whoring themselves out on OnlyFans.
Finally, almost every story about Sophie Rain that appears in the mainstream media makes note that she is a virgin and dating black rapper NLE Choppa. So now she's promoting race-mixing. And a virgin? Please.
<...>
Keep in mind that before he died at the young age of 43, Leonid Radvinsky, a Ukrainian Jew, owned a 75% stake in OnlyFans. According to Wikipedia, a 2023 report by The Lever claimed that Radvinsky donated $11 million to AIPAC. His heirs continue to hold a majority stake in OnlyFans.
<...>
Could the reason why Sophie Rain is so heavily promoted in the mainstream media be to turn young white women against marriage, motherhood, and men of their own race, while simultaneously emasculating white men of all ages and turning them into wimps and cowards? Seems like a fit to me.
You can complain all you want about Donald Trump, the Deep State, the Illuminati, or whatever, but if you're reading or watching porn, YOU'RE THE PROBLEM, not them.
Of course, all of this begs the question: where are the parents? Sophie Rain's parents deserve to be horsewhipped. If parents were being horsewhipped, prostitution would evaporate overnight.
Naturally, that's never going to happen. Not when the men of America are too pathetic and too faggotized to break their porn addictions. Here's your future America: Girls will continue to degrade themselves, society will continue to sink further into the abyss, and souls will continue to fall like snowflakes into hell.
[From “Having Emma Fourreau being raped by Slavs in an Ukrainian brothel is my new artistic idea”, translated from Franch; Emma Fourreau protested against the Canon français]
Radical left white women want to shine brightly in the eyes of Blacks and Arabs[…]
Usually, I recommend a one-way trip to Africa for these tramps for niggers, but for Emma Fourreau, I have a more ambitious, or rather, more suitable idea
I'd like to reserve her for military brothels in Eastern Europe
Russians, Ukrainians, it doesn't matter: the only way to cure her is to have her brutally raped by Slavs returning from three weeks on the front lines under drone strikes. I'm talking about entire companies[…]
These kinds of white bitches are starved for Aryan virility, which is becoming increasingly rare in our part of the world. Frustrated, they resort to taking revenge on the abdicated white man by siding with the invader
Virility, in its ultimate expression, is rape. It has been this way since the dawn of time, and it will remain so for millennia after you and I are dead[…]
There are some very interesting genetic studies on this subject, which reveal that rape was the norm for tens of thousands of years, to the point that a prehistoric man typically had 20 or 30 wives, all taken from weaker tribes during wartime
This is why women are so obsessed with rape and, although they don't readily admit it, why they fantasize about being raped[…]
The policy I advocate can reform in a very short time a number of white women currently obsessed with the Negro penis[…]
There's no way I'm reforming a 45 or 50-year-old left-wing sow! I'd rather sell them off on the African market where I'd always find enough presidents or ministers to trade their underground riches for our most rabid obese sausages[…]
After a few months behind enemy lines in Ukraine, Emma wouldn't go a single day without Aryan killers. She would become a fervent supporter of the most total white racial violence
I think BPDemons would mostly stop existing without males, too. Most BPDs have been understandably conditioned to feel insecure, because their attachments legitimately are insecure, and/or they were raised by mothers who were conditioned the same way. Obviously after living like that for enough time, you can’t ever go back to normal, but I bet if you disappeared men from earth, BPD would be “cured” within 2 generations.
BPD should be renamed born with penis disorder, because it’s a male patterned operative. Excessive fixation on external validation and acceptance, phobic of rejection, neurotic about maintaining attachments, constant shit testing to ensure security. Basically, describing a small gamete’s default relationship with a large gamete. BPD is just NPD without leverage, and NPD is what scrotes get when you artificially give control off the egg over to the sperm.
Misogyny and patriarchy basically flipped the roles of the sexes and forced women to be dependent on transactional male validation, which can be revoked at any point for any reason, and often is, and usually only manifests in exploitation. Males offload their BPD on women whenever they get the chance, and upgrade themselves to NPD. Remove males and the world will heal in more ways than you can imagine.
Most of the problems we have in society is because we have a massive male surplus nowadays, which is highly unnatural. In a healthy more natural setting there are 5-10 women for every man. The bulk of low value men are supposed to be culled off before their 25th birthday through wars, fights, accidents, suicide, injuries that turn fatal etc. I don't know why we try to preserve moid lives by offering them modern medicine, draft dodging opportunities or suicide prevention, society would objectively be far better if most men were culled. Low value men offer nothing to society and are a massive financial and societal burden as well as a sexual and safety burden to women and girls. They are literal leeches.
[From “The sluts get voted the abolition of sex in marriage”, translated from Franch]
The far-right, powerfully reinforced in parliament by the National Rally of the dreadful Marine Le Pen's, abolished marriage[…]
They also, incidentally, legalized sham marriages
The National Assembly has adopted in first reading the bill aimed at ending the notion of “conjugal duty” in marriage[…]
The concept of marriage is simple: in exchange for exclusive sexual access to a woman during her youth (for the purpose of her biological continuation), a man secures her lifestyle and social status for the rest of her life
Now, a man who gets married must pay without being able to ask for anything in return. According to this new definition of asexual marriage, you might as well marry your mother or your sister
That's the level of insolence women will display in 2026
If you make the mistake of getting married, a slut can refuse to sleep with you the very next day. You won't be able to go back and divorce without paying the infamous alimony
In this vaginal tyranny, a man must guarantee the same standard of living to the tramp who dumped him
Facing a sex strike the very next day is of course an extreme hypothesis here, but on the scale of several months to a few years it is virtually guaranteed[…]
Regardless of race or religion, the all-powerful state will persecute any man who asks for something in return[…]
White men are solely responsible for this situation. They loudly support the rise of the Sluts Era and have become their willing lackeys. Because of these feminist men, society is collapsing
The birth rate is plummeting while capitalist democracies import Third World immigrants to accommodate the nihilistic behavior of Western sluts. Is it any wonder that French cities are being absorbed into Dar al-Islam at breakneck speed?[…]
You must opt for a common-law partnership with a notarized cohabitation agreement for a few hundred euros
I’d like to think that those of us with a radfem consciousness have the ability to Spin/See much further beyond what any male identified patriarch could figure out. I’m thinking of gyn/ecology, how Daly basically “saw” into the past, what wasn’t accessible by a surface-level reading of the media, and how she (and others, like Dworkin, who predicted a coming gynocide in RWW) also Saw into the future. Any male identified male will use whatever info he has access to in service of his peepee, and his peepee is the limit of his universe, what he conceive of, what he can fathom, what he can imagine. Same goes for male identified women – men’s peepees are the limits of their universe, what they can perceive in this world and worlds past and future worlds, what they can fathom, what they can imagine, what they can create, how they can think, how they can act.
Absolutely, the hu(man) revolt against encroaching technology is being pushed in the various algorithms, certainly mine. At this stage, I think the most likely resolution will be a quiet reinstatement of the status quo after this flurry of male outrage. In the testeric chaos, many women will feel compelled to make themselves useful by serving one male side or another, which is imo, the probable reason that males engage in these hype sessions in the first place, whether they are conscious of that or not. As you say, therefore babiez.
Anyone still under the impression that AI/Chatgpt etc, is ‘human’ or intelligent, will probably wake up once the hype has blown over and perhaps a good portion of the population will continue to use AI to summarise wiki articles for them in a soothing voice. While that usage is destructive to critical thinking skills and possibly social skills (though I’m less confident commenting on that), it does not exactly match the imminent threat that would cause men to go to war on the clankers, while women make themselves useful by upholding the human tradition of marriage and babies. These men make me sick. Women’s traditional role is not compatible with freedom. It is compatible at best with material comfort and status.
Also, if any of these men are at the point of crying about robots or have just felt wretched forever ‘for no reason’, I have a tentative theory that they may be naturally miserable because of a subconscious awareness of how dangerous they are to women. Thus, it will probably always remain a great mystery to them. But as far as I’m concerned, that mystery is solved. Women have obvious reasons for being miserable, if they are even at the point of admitting that they do feel miserable. But unfortunately most of them either loudly buy into the pseudo-freedom of material excess, or they sit in sleep mode like robots(!) next to some windbag. And being highly educated does not exclude a woman from being a man’s robot, far from it.
And when this happens, the men, sick of being stifled, move onto a new wilderness, a new business, a new venture. There is no female Elon Must in all of history, no female Einstein, no female Thomas Edison, or Thomas Aquinas, nor Christopher Columbus, Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart or Sir Edmund Hillary.
On the other hand, there very much is a female Florence Nightingale, as well as Mother Theresa of Calcutta, Mother Angelica of EWTN, as well as St. Catherine of Siena and St. Catherine of Alexandria, not to mention a female St. Mary, Mother of God.
But once the men conquer the wilderness, we need women to civilize us. Men without women live like bears on futons with dirty laundry piled nearby, eating cold leftover pizza, and with empty beer cans in the fridge.
We have seen what men act like in civilizations which lack the female touch: in olden days, in China and Turkey, where men had many wives and concubines, and women were chattel, the civilizations were legendary in their love of conquest and cruelty and barbarism.
Military bases or (in olden days) universities where large numbers of unmarried males were gathered were Spartan or Corinthian in their spirit, either ruled by strict discipline, or famous for their dissipations.
Modern universities, now co-ed, have lost that character, but also lost any intellectual freedom, danger, zeal or zest that accompanies intellectual frontiersman.
[From “Immigration as a Psychopathic Boundary Attack”]
Two days ago, there was a videotaped attempted beheading by a Sudanese illegal immigrant in North Belfast[…]
The official census in Northern Ireland is taken in the years 2011, 2021, with the next official census taken in 2031. From 2021 to 2021, though, the population of ostensible asylum seekers from Muslim countries, primarily from Syria and the Sahel (Somalia, Sudan, etc.) has tripled, and continues to increase. Both these areas feature populations that are decidedly non-assimilative[…]
Immigration of this type is never in the interest of the lower class/caste groups that are expected to absorb these different groups[…]Various Collapse Narratives – stories told by elites wanting to drive collapse- are inevitably spun by the press regarding these types of immigrant groups, almost always in a positive light. But the obvious reality is that had those people not been imported into the country, that particular crime would not have occurred[…]
The problem as well, at least in the Northern Ireland situation, is also the differential treatment of women inside Islamic cultures[…]The deeper problem inside the Matrix is not Islam itself. It’s the fact that the Islamic faith pairs perfectly, in its persecution of women, with the desires of white females inside the British and Irish governments to conduct pogroms of manipulative reproductive suppression against other potential white offspring[…]
Front and center were women, armed with the same message, not decrying the violence perpetrator — the Sudanese dude that attempted to saw off his victim’s head
Quite the opposite. These women were attacking alpha males inside their own immediate community[…]
The protective boundary that formerly existed around the original community is shrunk down, at best, to the individual, which is hugely relationally destructive, and detrimental to social cohesion. And that leads to a scale-up of psychopathic behavior
As a 29 year old man (basically oldcel status) I'm here to tell you:
Your life will NOT get better whatsoever.
If "foids" don't like you now, they never will. It's deeper than looks - your genetics determine what you are made of. Gravitate towards video games and reflection? No woman wants that. They would rather be beaten to death by a Chad who masters his outside environment rather than be with a nerd who retreats inward.
If you're not popular with people now, you never will be. If you're only popular as a joke, the joke won't be funny 10 year from now. You will be forgotten.
In other words, the circumstances of your birth were wrong but grifters will convince you that you need to pay them $$ to change it. It won't work. And people will laugh at you for "self improving" out of it (even though faggots told you to self improve).
People genuinely hate your genetics. Women will look at you with disgust or pretend to be interested only to turn the tables and report you or get you in trouble somehow because soyciety told them it's empowering.
You will be discriminated against at every job you will ever have. People will throw you under the bus and use you as a negative example to boost their career. No one will care. People will bully and torture you for fun and no one will defend you and you can't defend yourself either.
You will be told 25432 cliches in your life by normies and Chads which you will have to nod along to lest you be labelled ungrateful. You will have to act like what they say is profound and you cannot say anything to challenge this or they will fall apart and hate you.
You will be exposed to hypocrisy every waking minute but you cannot ever expose it or you'll be nailed to the cross metaphorically.
You will be gossipped about by your neighbors and your family, who will avoid you like the plague no matter how much you try to appease them.
I'm not posting this diatribe to depress you but rather to prepare you if you are someone like me.