There's no such thing as a mother's love. They don't have love to give.
1:10 AM · Mar 21, 2025 · 24.9K Views

[…]They see males and females worshiping together as equals. On top of all that through head coverings our women show all present that their position as a woman is also redeemed. No longer are they at war usurping and longing for the man’s position of authority (Gen 3:16). Instead they’re content in the role God ordained for them in Genesis 2.[…]

[regarding an incident where an eight-year-old girl was sexually assaulted at the mosque]

People say 8-year-old girl, 8-year-old girl. My dear friends, there are girls whose bodies are like those of older women, and their bodies are curvy and thick.

Our grandmothers, in the past, used to get married on and off for 9 and 10 years, and ask anyone
in the countryside or Upper Egypt who got married when she was six.
The master of people, the Messenger, married Lady Aisha when she was 9 years old, meaning she was of this girl's age and the marriage was permissible.

I am not saying that this man is innocent or justified, but I am saying that the reasons are
that there is no such thing as a child whose mother and father are the reason...

If everyone was upright, there wouldn't be these things. Everyone is involved in them, from
the mother to the child to the weak-willed man.

(Video about should the age of consent be lower)
If you consider science, specifically biology and psychology, 12 or 13. Intergenerational relationships are natural. It's better if one partner is older in case of pregnancy. The older partner has more ability to take financial or at least behavioral responsibility. If you make it a taboo and force it underground, then that's when it creates problems like prohibition.

(Okay I was wrong. Not the whole comment section is crazy.)

Bro I agree the law is wrong. Aisha was 9 but Aisha hit puberty exceptionally early, not to mention she was born 1400 years ago. 3 year olds back then were toughening up in the desert not watching baby shark.

Most 9 year olds today don’t have periods and aren’t psychologically mature.

you are projecting things

Western hypocrisy

teenagers are having tons of abortions due to casual sexual intercourse and you are here preaching that it is pedophilia ?

it is marriage and it is good to be married young

Authored by Devvy Kidd Not AI

Since Donald Trump was legally and honestly elected last November, brainwashed lunatics, insane maniacs in this country whether they be ignorant, empty headed female hosts on the propaganda box (The View top of the list), college students, and their America hating professors and the Democrat/Communist Party USA have been in meltdown the likes I’ve never seen in my adult life and I’ve been in the trenches full time for 31 years.

Hysteria by females running to get tubal ligations so they can’t have children because Donald Trump won the presidency, both the popular vote and electoral college! Trump is Hitler and he’s going to take away a woman’s reproductive rights when those pathetic brainwashed females don’t even know what they’re talking about.

The Democrat/Communist Party USA must be destroyed once and for all; leave that “party” if you truly love this country, freedom and liberty. Not to promote the Republican Party because if you honestly reflect back decades, when they held the majority in Congress with a GOP president, all they did was keep funding fraud, waste and kick the can down the road while ignorant Americans began the predictable destruction screaming to protect “our democracy”.
<...>
That’s where this country has been headed for decades and the Soviet-style propaganda being drummed into people’s brain and students in public schools (the younger the better) has birthed insane lunatics running governments from city councils, mayors, governors, state legislatures, Congress and the White House. From “woke” to out and out idiocy, what we’ve seen and been shoved down our throats is almost beyond words.
<...>
The bottom line is the evil forces, domestic terrorists behind the curtain are itching for conservatives and constitutionalists to do what they are doing. Another set-up like Jan. 6th. And, I believe they’re recruiting the brainwashed, ignorant and useful fools to carry out their plans.

Brighteon Broadcast News, Mar 21, 2025 – BOOT the corrupt judges that are TERRORIZING America!

- Music Video Introduction and Interview Announcement (0:00)

- Gut Health Program and Interview with Mellow Cat (4:11)

- Radical Left Attacks and Judicial Interference (6:06)

- Trump's Aggressive Stance and Radical Left's Violence (9:15)

- White College Educated Women and Trump Derangement Syndrome (11:49)

- Special Report on Vaccines and Bio-Weapons (22:24)

- Book Review: 20 Mechanisms of Injuries by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny (27:37)

- Chemtrails, HAARP, and Full Spectrum Dominance (34:42)

- Mayor of Boston's Defiance and Trump's Response (1:04:21)

- Interview with Maxime Bernier: Canada's Populist Movement (1:06:18)

- Maxime Bernier's Political Journey and Platform (1:23:50)

- Canadian Media Bias and Political Campaigning (1:26:55)

- Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Canadian Politics (1:30:39)

- Economic and Energy Policies in Canada (1:35:29)

- Immigration and Cultural Integration in Canada (1:49:57)

- Trade Relations with the US and Global Politics (1:58:50)

- Financial Challenges and Future Prospects (1:59:22)

- Cultural Preservation and National Identity (2:06:05)

- Conclusion and Final Thoughts (2:07:52)

Consensual, underaged sex does not cause significant damage, physically or psychologically, period. When are people going learn this? That just because one is below a certain age, they somehow someway more susceptible to “damage”? Unless by “damage” you mean to the negative reactions brought on by the teen girl or boy who was caught in the relationship. Maybe he or she got a slap on the wrist by their parents or got scolded to their room for the night. Maybe they weren’t allowed to have that slice of chocolate cake for dinner. Maybe he or she got grounded and couldn’t use their phone for a week or two. Sure, they call “damage”, I call it “laughable”. Whatever the case is, the teen gets to move on and resume his or her life, while the real victim are teacher who rot in prison for years for victimless sex.

If an article is going to claim “abuse” or emotional damage for a victim(s), please, for the love of God, ask the willing “victim(s)” what they thought of the encounter before you assume. I guarantee you that I will be right 99% of time that no damage was ever garnered in the first place. When will there be a day where the system will have handle out a copy of the Rind 1998 study to every judge on the bench? Soon?

The Court has NO LEGAL RIGHT to decide "what is best for the people."
--- The Courts MUST make decisions based upon the language and INTENT of the law when it was made, which would NULLIFY 99% of everything the US gov IS Today!
--- The US Constitution can ONLY BE CHANGED THROUGH THE AMENDMENT PROCESS, not through reimaginations of Intent and redefining language.
--- Laws MUST be assessed using the language and legislative Intent of the period in which that law was made/passed.
--- Judges are PROHIBITED from 'interpretating' laws.
....
@Holly Silver
"Morals and the constitution seem to be interpreted by the times."
That is EXACTLY CORRECT!
And just as Blacks were NOT citizens of the Union back in 1788 when the Constitution was ratified, Women are NOT Citizens today!
--- Black Males were granted citizenship 'privileges and immunities' under the 14th Amendment.
NEVER has an Amendment been Ratified giving women of any race, citizenship.
....
SO DO I!
If the SCOTUS abides by Its Oath,
It will Prohibit all females from voting or holding any Office under the United States on the grounds that they are NOT US citizens.

After conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the Supreme Court’s March 5 majority decision to uphold a lower court order requiring President Donald Trump’s administration to pay USAID contractors for work already completed, right-wing influencers lashed out — calling Barrett a “DEI judge” who was “chosen solely because she checked identity politics boxes” and claiming “the power has gone to her head”[…]
•Right-wing influencer Mike Cernovich wrote that Barrett “is evil, chosen solely because she checked identity politics boxes. Another DEI hire.” In a separate post, he wrote, “Amy Coney Barrett is a psychopathic Covidian. She was our DEI hire and now we pay the price”[…]
•MAGA influencer Jack Posobiec declared that Barrett is a “DEI judge”[…]
•Fox host Mark Levin lamented that “Barrett deceived people into thinking she was a reliable constitutionalist,” adding, “The power has gone to her head.” Levin also wrote that “Roberts and Barrett are political justices[…]
•Pro-Trump “prophet” and streaming host Lance Wallnau asserted that Barrett is “NOT one of us” because she was “glaring at Trump” during his address, and suggested Trump’s next Supreme Court nominee should be “a strong male evangelical.” Wallnau posted: “She’s NOT one of us. Notice her glaring at Trump. No more female University professors! They’re overwhelmingly liberal. I’m serious. I may be jet lagged but I think she’s a democrat. We always go with Catholics but never Evangelicals. Next one - a strong male evangelical”

Joel Webbon and his co-hosts complained about women having abortions, using birth control, and holding positions of power[…]
During the livestream, titled “Women Must Be Removed From All Public Service,” one of Webbon’s co-hosts, Wesley Todd, claimed that, in order to end abortion once and for all, women would have to be prohibited from having “sex without consequences”

“But, you cannot have a society where it’s generally expected that you can have sex without consequences,” Todd said. “And that is your right that any given woman, you have the right in your early twenties to go to college, to experiment, to have fun, do all of these things, and face no consequences”

Todd claimed that the “whole thing, all the way back to the beginning, has to be thoroughly reset”[…]
“So you end abortion with the force of law,” he said. “I think you put, Republican Party platform, women will not hold public office. We’re about to talk about that in another segment. Teaching the place of the woman is in the home. So through the law with abortion, through the law with politics”[…]
“But still, with societal expectations, you teach, teach, teach, teach, teach,” Todd continued. “Hormonal birth control, off the shelves. It’s not abortion, narrowly speaking, but it is a way of you should have consequence-free sex. You shouldn’t experience the results of your action. So you teach all the way back”[…]
Webbon and his co-hosts also discussed whether there are any circumstances in which women should hold leadership positions. In doing so they compared statements by Scottish Reformed theologian John Knox[…]with ones from Swiss theologian Henry Bullinger who made exceptions for hereditary monarchs

Webbon told his co-hosts that he agreed with the quotes that they read, but said that for the foreseeable future he was in agreement with Knox[…]
“And so I think if you’re living in a generation like that, then I’m gonna go with — I gotta go with my Scottish boy John Knox”

On This Past Weekend, a podcast hosted by stand-up comic Theo Von, conspiracy theorist Candace Owens defended convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein. Owens claimed that the disgraced former movie mogul was “wrongfully convicted” and complained that he “took the fall for the Me Too movement”[…]
Owens[…]said she’s planning a new video series to defend Weinstein

Owens boasted of her steadfast opposition to the Me Too movement, which saw people speak up about sexual harassment and sexual assault, often by powerful figures in media like Harvey Weinstein. She said this was the impetus for her to revisit Weinstein’s case

“I believe it is the case,” Owens told Von

When asked if she believed Weinstein was “innocent,” Owens said she believed he was “wrongfully convicted,” and that “there is a difference between being immoral and being a person who abuses their power” and “being a cold blooded rapist”

Owens signaled her intent to go through text messages and emails of Weinstein’s accusers in order to undermine their credibility, telling Von she was “shocked” by “what these women were saying after their rapes.” She added that she would not speak to someone who raped her in that way

Owens also complained that Weinstein “took the fall for the Me Too movement,” and defended another accused rapist: former Today host Matt Lauer

“But I just believe in justice,” she said. “If I hate you, I will still defend you if I think you’re wrongfully convicted. I hated Matt Lauer, and I was like, come on, guys. Calling him a rapist because he had an affair with his intern? I mean, women are just all always so hopeless”

[Blackpill] A man cannot be raped or sexually assaulted

It is impossible, impossible for a man to be raped or sexually assaulted. The mere concept is a frabricated lie by feminism and retarded foids who dont understand the differences between male and female. Which is exactly what feminism and retardarion is: lack of biological understanding.

In order to have sex, a man's cock must be fully erect. This can only happen from sexual stimulation and not under pressure or stress. Unlike foids, who's holes can (and should) be fucked any time one desires, nature created men to only have sex when aroused. Just like for reproduction, only a male orgasm is necessary and not that of a foid.

The new age thinking of "men can be assaulted and raped by a female" is retarded babble. Just as foids have the mind virus of having sex and then later faking regret for monetary gain, cucks and fags have adopted this same lie and foid mentality. Any "man" who whimpers like a pathetic faggot and lies how he was "raped" needs to be publicly shamed, humiliated and beaten for buying into foid lies. The primary objective of these beasts is to further demonize sex and shun male sexual experiences. Foids must be silenced over these topics.

You expect me to have sympathy for a "man" whom some Stacy found so attractive, she had to allegedly """rape""", he was aroused enough to have penetrative sex and now he's the """victim"""? Fuck off and die. Cucklords and foids get the axe.

edit: I'm speaking purely about foids on male incidents.

[From “I’ll be Back Soon, Friends.”]

I apologize for taking a break here

I actually haven’t really taken much of a break, as I’ve been working, but I want to be posting on this website regularly, and I want to make sure that by taking some break time, I am not sending a different message[…]
To be clear, again, because apparently it was not previously clear, I will not be doing regular news updates as I did before, but will write some essays and humor stuff. For example, I almost wrote something about that beautiful gorilla losing her show and how sad I felt seeing her tears, but then I forgot about it. I’ve also been following the Ukraine drama, and have things to say about this

I also have some hilarious jokes, such as in relation to this:
image
[Screenshot of article on Boston Mayor Michelle Wu]
I would say something like “I’d leave that mayor clueless after verbally trampling her Constitution, if you catch my drift”

I would also make edgy “suggestive” comments about other Asian female public figures

Everyone would find it hilarious and very original

I will also obviously need to comment on the downfall of Vologdomor Zyelendskyysisy, which appears to be impending. As well as the other thing. I forget what it was, but there was something else. Maybe that plane crash? They still haven’t released the identities, so I assume if the male was a male (and not an f-to-m trans), he was black

But I’m working on other things, including an autobiography of Elvis. You heard that right. I’m writing an Elvis biography in the first person, which in the canon of my lore, he finishes while sitting on the toilet and dying. It’s going to be really cruel to Priscilla, who truly is the villain of that story. I will publish it without permission from the family, because what are they going to do, sue me?

Freedom from religion, redistribution of wealth under the UN principle of sustainability, “science” by consensus (e.g., gender identity), deflected accountability (e.g., guns kill; people don’t), centralized power, sanctuary status, reverse discrimination, slippery cultural norms/ethics, earth servitude over stewardship, tyranny of technocracy, defund police movement, etc.—none of these components of progressivism deliver promised utopia.

Biblical Christianity alone holds the answer. For that reason, the unconstitutional Johnson Amendment intended to muzzle Christians and deny them their First Amendment right to free speech must be resisted and overturned!
<...>
Imagine government without Christian influence. For many, 21st-century Seattle comes to mind. When Christians bypass civic duty, the church suffers escalating persecution from without and spiritual deception from within. More often than not, moral relativism trumps biblical mandate. Given misplaced love of money and pleasure, many are preoccupied with materialism. Youth are seduced by scripturally-forbidden, yet culturally-celebrated alternative lifestyles and “oppositions of science, falsely so called”—i.e., gender dysphoria protocols. Young girls are compelled to forgo modesty along with a fair chance at competing in women’s sports.
<...>
Even so, while nobody will mistake Washington state for a hotbed of political conservatism, it turns out voters moved ever so slightly to the right—this, according to numbers from the recent November 5 general election. According to the Washington Secretary of State’s Office, Trump garnered 39.01% of the vote in Washington, compared to 38.77% in 2020. That’s a gain of almost one-quarter of a percentage point.
<...>
It appears that folks are waking to the query, “Is there not a cause?”

[From “Iraq: It is the Law That 9-Year-Olds Should be Married, Because That is True and Just”]

This is the law in Islam, and it is the correct law

Why should a girl be 10 years old with no husband?

That is pathetic decadence

The Guardian

Iraqi MPs and women’s rights groups have reacted with horror to the Iraqi parliament passing a law permitting children as young as nine years old to marry, with activists saying it will “legalise child rape”

Under the new law, which was agreed yesterday, religious authorities have been given the power to decide on family affairs, including marriage, divorce and the care of children. It abolishes a previous ban on the marriage of children under the age of 18 in place since the 1950s#
For Shia Muslims, which make up the majority in Iraq, the lowest age of marriage for girls will be nine years old, while for Sunnis, the official age will be 15

Fifteen?

What sort of ultra-cuckodry is this?

How many men do you want your wife to have fucked by the time you marry her?

The age has to be nine

Anything beyond that is pure sickness and totally evil

(The whole comment section is crazy)

Even in this very day and age there are many societies. Young girls in remote African villages work and are mature, while their western equivalents still play games.

Islamically a girl can marry once she’s hit puberty and is mature.

She must consent to the marriage, and the father must consent.

In the west a child is allowed to cut off their genitalia because it’s their choice, they can have group sex as teenagers and it’s legal, but God forbid a teenager wants to get married to a mature man and every party consents. That’s immoral!

International Women's Day ( March 8) is a longtime Communist propaganda tool. What does it say when an official Soviet holiday is enshrined in our mainstream culture? Clearly, Communism isn't dead; it has just morphed into other forms like Feminism, CRT, BLM and Woke.

It confirms Norman Dodd's famous claim that Ford Foundation President Rowan Gaither told him, in 1954, that the agenda was to "socially engineer" US life so that "that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union" as part of banker-controlled world government.

Every year the supposedly capitalist media echo the old Soviet bromides about women's oppression, and every year I post this rebuttal.

"Women's Day" pretends to celebrate women but the poster near my Winnipeg home shows an ugly, surly shrew brandishing a hammer. She looks demonically possessed. The caption reads, "if I only had a hammer.."

She'd what? Hit men over the head? Tear down society?
<...>
Through its feminist surrogate, Communists have stripped women of a secure and honored social identity as wives and mothers and made them workers and sexual commodities, hostages to the economy, psyops like the caronahoax and the ravages of age.

Obviously, this day is not about recognizing women for their grace, beauty, charm, and intelligence. It is about cultivating a false sense of grievance and entitlement in order to manipulate them.

They used the same tactic with Jews, Blacks, students and workers and harnessed these groups to their agenda. The ultimate goal is to concentrate all wealth and power in the Illuminati (Masonic) central banking cartel which is colonizing the whole world. The real meaning of "change the world" is the establishment of a totalitarian New World Order.

International Women's Day is hate against women and society perpetrated by the traitorous banker colonial establishment, which includes most "feminist" politicians, educators and the mass media. Women who participate are dupes and "useful idiots."

The sense of respect in the government is gone now because you've allowed black females to be part of it.

They've encouraged black women to go OUT OF CONTROL in the homes toward men and children, toward white people, against authority and common sense.

Hell on Earth.
1:13 AM · Mar 7, 2025 · 8,903 Views

[Hypocrisy] Not being allowed to r@pe is a form of oppression. There I said it.

Foids are allowed to lie on men, bully and harass men, murder kids, and be parasitic leeches with impunity but Im not allowed to act on my most basic natural instinct?

This is a form of gender discrimination and total societal injustice!

In other words...complete bullshit.

[several screaming Pepe emoji]

Still from the same poster that claim 12 can’t safely carry a baby to term.

HungryRobotics

Disclaimer, in use this subreddit to guess based on what I know about whatever it is. So, since I'm not looking, I won't have any sources to cite, be able to back up arguments much further than presented or guarantee you won't fail your test of you use my answers

Contrary to the idea...not long ago I checked the numbers...the carry babies to term and have them quite well... There isn't much of risk increase at all.. their bodies...amazing and resilient (no, you are never going to ruin that pussy with that)

But, do keep in mind, young and inexperienced mother's, especially without a solid strong support system and accepting wonderful community are going to have anton of other problems...

School, post pardum depression, trouble with their social circle, work and income..met.

And the babies themselves are at high risk for attachment disorders.

UnbannableMrRipley
Biologically... 12 is middle-aged... when the average life span was 30... women were married and had children at 13... IF, a girl becomes pregnant at 12 (GOD FORBID) it has been proven many, many times that they can carry a baby to term. It is actually far more dangerous to have a baby at 40 than at 12.

Gjgp27
The ultimate take down of feminism, hehehe.
But seriously, tell me of the several successful matriarchies who are not only well known, but had lasting influence and power for generations. Tell me of the communities full of women that are boomingly successful. There's so many, right?
Meanwhile, I can tell you of several instances where matriarchal influence has done nothing but hinder a society or group.
The effiminization of the Christian church is what led to the downfall of its substantial impact, also displayed in its push for emotionalism and lack of intellectualism. For instance, go to a Christian bookstore and what will you see more of: group 1; Christian historical books, theology books, hermeneutics, and apologetics, or group 2: women's devotional books?
The black community is notorious for being filled with and ran by some of the most bottom barrel women, and is it doing any better for reversed gender roles and shaking off the patriarchy? Hell, some ghettoes look like third world countries.
In the white world of Dunham esque liberals, stats show kids become better not only with fathers, but that single fathers produce better kids than single mothers. Also, many women who choose to shrug off traditional family values engage in acts that get them several unsavory "accomplishments": tattoos, bastard kids, shacking up while complaining that their man "won't marry them", and getting relationship advice from women who have no men, can't interact with men, and or hate men.
So, feminists, tell me again how going against the Patriarchy is good for society?

those_eyes
Women act like men should automatically respect them but they don't realize they need to earn respect.

[From “ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Taliban Officials for Getting Sluts Under Control”]

Jeez

These ICC people are ridiculous

It’s now an international war crime to get sluts under control?

It’s deserving of the same kind of attention as a genocide?

AP

An Afghan women’s group on Friday hailed a decision by the International Criminal Court to arrest Taliban leaders for their persecution of women

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan announced Thursday he had requested arrest warrants for two top Taliban officials, including the leader Hibatullah Akhundzada[…]

Just absurd

It doesn’t matter, the Taliban wasn’t going anywhere that would enforce this

But it’s just gross that simply enforcing the norms of sexuality, which were the standard for every civilization on earth until a few years ago, would be considered the same as the crimes of Bibi Netanyahu

Few-Day-9744
Matriarchal societies don't exist, human society is by nature patriarchal.

ElectricalStomach6ip
its by nature neither, but patriarchy immerged with agriculture.

Few-Day-9744

It's by nature since men are biologically dominant, physically stronger, historically leaders being the norm and women being the very rare exception, and men by nature being more active and able in situations of need, conflict, or distress than women.
If you don't like it then i guess you prefer your fantasy over nature.

Few-Day-9744
Saying you studied something isn't an argument, so my point still stands.
Learn the most basic aspect of a debate you startrek loving onlyfans incel, I'm sure you, a poster of science fiction memes, is totally more educated in regards to human nature outside his mom's basement if you could only drag yourself outside of it.

[Serious] Evrything wrong with Japan today could have been prevented if it was fully Christianized.

Thanks to Christianity, adultery would be looked down upon.
Thanks to Christianity, hypergamy would be lower, and that would increase birth rates.
Thanks to Christianity, Japan wouldn't be seen as a strange Asian country, but rather as a country of fellow Christians. That would have made the relationship between Japan and the USA less hostile during World War II.
Thanks to Christianity, pedophilia and loli culture would be considered degeneracy.
Thanks to Christianity, the percentage of women working in the porn industry would be lower.
Thanks to Christianity, romanticism would be the norm; therefore, the relationship between husband and wife would be normal and not purely financial. (In Japan, the husband is only expected to provide for the family, and the wife is expected to take care of the children. They don't make love and sleep in different beds.)

This is nonsense. It is the Biblical duty of wives to satisfy their husbands.

You people are seeking to take everything away from men, from entertainment to video games. If at the very least your bastardized modern-day version of Christianity cannot guarantee to men that their wives have a duty to satisfy them, as Christianity traditionally did for hundreds of years, then your bastardized modern-day version of Christianity will not have men.

In the ideal world, men would be perfect. Men would be like Jesus. Men would be completely celibate. Men would not marry. As Paul said, it is good for a man not to touch a woman at all (1 Corinthians 7:1) and his guidance on marriage was merely only a concession/permission, not a commandment (1 Corinthians 7:6), because celibacy is preferable and inherently less sinful than sex even within marriage, which is at best just a distraction from prayer and devotion.

However, Paul recognized that a compromise was necessary. There was something extremely obvious to Paul that is apparently not obvious to "Christians" today: most men are not able to withstand celibacy and they have natural uncontrollable lustful urges. Something must be done about this. And something had to be done about this in the first century. Otherwise, Christianity wouldn't have ever attracted men and it would've died off in the first century.

And so:
Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. (1 Corinthians 7:3)

If women are not fulfilling their Biblical role to act as dutiful wives and "personal porn stars" for their husbands, whether that's due to letting themselves go, rejecting marriage in favor of hypergamy, career-chasing, or whatever it is women do to fuck up the sexual marketplace, they are equally as culpable for the sins of lustful men who cannot find wives to fulfil their Biblical role.

I'm talking about the bitch from my origin story (part 1). [Note: IDK where part 1 is]

She ruined my life.

It's gone.

Everything is gone.

All over...

Because of her...

Why did she do this to me?

WHYYY???????????????????????????????????

WHAT GAVE HER THE RIGHT!?????

WHAT ??????

I lost my hair cuz of that bitch!

You know the first game I ever finished was one I made for her 21st birthday...

The only thing good thing about it is that if I had ended up dating and marrying that whore, I would've had to put up with cringe woke propaganda all my life.

hope that bitch gets raped by a drunk abo(she's in australia now, so hopefully this will happen).

A poster claim 12 year olds can’t safely bear a child to term and two comments disagree
kwantsu-dudes
Your premise is faulty. Carrying a child as young as 12 isn't really that unsafe biologically speaking. It may provide a few more complications that most within a society would like to mitigate, but it's not to any high degree unsafe as a metric of health.

lol_camis
They are though. Preteens have and can delivered a child. When it comes to evolution, it's all about your ability to survive long enough to have a child and pass on your genes. Obviously modern society has moved on from the physical ability to have a child and more towards the mental maturity to have a child. But biologically speaking it's entirely viable.

It’s very obvious that if Intergalactic had featured a normal white male protagonist, as was the standard for video games up until the day Donald Trump won the 2016 election, the response would be overwhelmingly positive. In fact, if it had simply been an attractive woman, the response might not have been as good but they would not be facing this avalanche of hatred they are facing now.

These companies all know this, and they hire Jewish perverts like Druckmann to push this stuff anyway.

While Disney has made a move to pull back on “woke” in order to make money, as evidenced by their decision to contract the Chinese to make their shooter game, some of these companies appear heavily committed to it and will go bankrupt before giving the public what it wants.

It is a little bit scary when you think of supposedly profit-driven corporations being willing to sacrifice hundreds of millions of dollars in order to push a social engineering agenda. Although the popular explanation is that this has something to do with BlackRock owning such large percentages of the stock in these companies, that explanation has not ever fully made sense to me, given that unless they owned a majority of the stock, the rest of the shareholders would be pushing back against this agenda.

Corporations sacrificing profits in order to emotionally and psychologically abuse the public is certainly much worse than any of the “out-of-control capitalism” dystopias portrayed in science fiction. In fact, we are presently in a kind of dystopia that was never predicted by science fiction authors.

A teenage girl was recently compelled to publicly apologize for her pregnancy at True Vine Apostolic Church in Hampton, Virginia. The incident, captured on video and shared widely online, has drawn sharp criticism and prompted broader discussions about shame and accountability within religious communities

The video, originally posted by journalist Jemele Hill, shows the visibly emotional girl standing before the congregation. “I want to apologize to everybody in here because I am pregnant,” she says tearfully. “I’m sorry y’all. I just hope that y’all all forgive me.” After her remarks, the congregation applauded, and she requested prayers as she stepped away from the podium

The church’s pastor, Bishop Terry Jackson, then addressed the congregation, making his position clear. “If you sin, you don’t wait till the baby come to repent,” he said. “We ain’t gon’ condone your sin now… Ain’t no baby showers going on. That’s what you lose out on.” Bishop Jackson emphasized the importance of repentance and stated that no member of the church should attend a baby shower for a child born out of wedlock

Reactions to the video have been mixed, with many expressing support for the teenage girl and condemning the church’s actions. Television personality Sunny Hostin offered her support, writing, “I will host the baby shower. Pls contact me sweetheart. Your baby will be celebrated and loved”

However, a woman identifying herself as the girl’s grandmother, Dee Myles, defended the church’s approach. In a Facebook comment shared by The Neighborhood Talk, Myles wrote, “We were not forced or manipulated to stand before the congregation. My daughter willingly approached the congregation and was welcomed and embraced with open arms.” Myles also expressed frustration over the public backlash, stating, “You all are interrupting my peace and causing more damage than good”

A "sectarian" bill that could potentially legitimise child marriage in Iraq has passed into law reportedly without a vote in the parliament

The parliamentary website said "the proposal to amend the Personal Status Law" and "the second amendment of the general amnesty law" were both passed on Tuesday[…]
The new law will require a Muslim couple to choose either the Sunni or Shia sect when concluding a marriage contract

They can then choose that sect to represent them in "all matters of personal status" rather than the civil judiciary

Previous versions of the bill - typically shelved after public outcry - explicitly called for nine-year-olds to be legally married, something legal experts have warned could be permitted under Jaafari jurisprudence, an interpretation of religious law followed by some Shia[…]
MP Mohamed Anouz told AFP that a revised version of the bill reinstated clauses of the old law that set the age of marriage at 18 or 15, with the consent of legal guardians and a judge[…]
Women's and civil rights campaigners have warned about the impact of the legislation on women and families[…]
Previous versions of the bill have included rules preventing Muslim men from marrying non-Muslims, the legalisation of marital rape and banning women from leaving the house without their husband's permission

The latest version is considerably less explicit, but campaigners fear its passage would allow religious authorities to introduce new rules through their establishment of the Personal Status code

The draft requires Shia and Sunni endowments to submit a "code of legal rulings" to parliament six months after ratifying the amendments, stipulating the Shia code would be based on Jaafari jurisprudence

"All marriages have to be registered as Sunni or Shia by this amendment. Thus, sectarian division enters all households," said Yanar Mohammed, president of the Organisation of Women's Freedom in Iraq, another group within Coalition 188

(feministfang)
Listen! I don’t give a fuck how these ugly brown men are treated in the west. Stop showing sympathy for them. Everybody knows what happened in india a few days ago. These are your poor "victim" brown men that some of you think are better than white men. I literally smirk whenever something bad happens to them. I feel happy when Muslim men in india get lynched by mobs. I love it when these men kill each other out of hate. They all deserve it. They deserve worse. And i hope they all burn in hell for eternity.

(eclecticworldblender)
as long as we’re getting rid of a male, idk man w. silver lining.

[From “Democrats’ “Man” Problem: Trump Is an Alpha, and Liberal Beta Males Can’t Compete”]

Democrats have, apparently, a man problem[…]
Democrats have long relied on young voters as part of a winning coalition[…]
To the point here, however, the shift among young men — and some other male demographics — was striking. Men 18-29 voted for Biden over Trump in 2020 56 to 41 percent. Yet this was almost precisely reversed in 2024: 56 percent of young men supported Trump[…]
Moreover, other male, traditionally Democratic coalition groups saw a similar shift. Hispanic men voted Trump 50-49; the president also won 24 percent of black men, a figure unprecedented in modern times. The latter support appears to have only grown, too. Why, a recent poll found that Trump enjoys a 42-percent approval rating among black men[…]
Say what you will about Trump, he’s a man’s man. Also, the irony about liberals is that they once stereotyped conservatives as tightly wrapped nerds who’d outlaw fun if they could. Yet this has proven to be projection. Harking back to what James Carville said, the Democrats have become Dork Central[…]
It’s all part of the feminization of society and of education in particular. This has been discussed for decades, too, notably in Christina Hoff Sommers 2000 book, The War Against Boys. And is it any wonder that these beleaguered boys, now men, are rebelling against those who warred on them?

As for the women, the male/female voting gap among young people is wider than ever[…]
These women, like all women, are hard-wired to desire and respect strong men — whether they know it or not[…]
This makes sense, too, from a species-perpetuation standpoint. For finding a strong man who provides safety maximizes the chances a woman and her offspring will survive and prosper[…]
A study years ago already found that stronger men tend to be conservative[…]
The GOP has become the party of and for manly men — and the women who love them

The patriarchy is a child-centered society. It is interested in birth and survival rates of children, and that is why males were drafted. Male disposability led to more children.  The patriarchy comes from difficult times, it was born in hard times, it is a very social system, an efficient system, and it’s a survival mechanism.
We know it leads to successful societies because many of the major cultures that dominate the world today have a patriarchal history. And we can see this most clearly through the fact that the world’s major religions like Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Confucianism all come from cultures which support the patriarchy. All of these religions and the cultures that support them speak of female obedience to her husband and male responsibility and dominance over to his family.
Most of the world’s major cultures have patriarchal roots, this is a map showing the major religions of each country as it was in 1960. It is taken from Hans Rosling’s talk on religion and babies.

Since people who share the same religion also often share common cultural practices with respect to structuring family life, and the cultures associated with the major religions in the picture above are all patriarchal, we can see that the patriarchal way of structuring society has had a lot of success.
[…]
What happens in such a society is that men do not take care of or even know their kids. Women work and take all the steady, easy and good jobs. Men, who only need to take care of themselves, take the unstable and unreliable jobs, the hard jobs.

SimplyChristian is a bogus ministry which focuses on prudishness and doesn’t see the need for providing traditional healthy masculinity, instead being able and willing to cuck themselves to the źioni$t idea that healthy men of God should be chaste.

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
EXECUTIVE ORDER
January 20, 2025

Sec. 2. Policy and Definitions. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:

(a) “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female. “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

(b) “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

(c) “Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.

(f) “Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true. Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body.

(g) “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
EXECUTIVE ORDER
January 20, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers. This is wrong. Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system. Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.

This unhealthy road is paved by an ongoing and purposeful attack against the ordinary and longstanding use and understanding of biological and scientific terms, replacing the immutable biological reality of sex with an internal, fluid, and subjective sense of self unmoored from biological facts. Invalidating the true and biological category of “woman” improperly transforms laws and policies designed to protect sex-based opportunities into laws and policies that undermine them, replacing longstanding, cherished legal rights and values with an identity-based, inchoate social concept.

Accordingly, my Administration will defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.

America and a lot of the West is in end times, enjoy your days because big change is coming when Rome burns

very few West nations are making babies, the women are just getting older and angrier, too much decadence, corruption, multi culturalism, lies and loss of overall value

If you look at humans as a pack of dogs or monkeys or whatever animals then you must give the more primitive cultures credit....look at humans and look at your own people objectively.....primite culture they do basic thing. Take some people like Burundi in Africa and all the ethnic wars or extreme Arabs or ISIS in the Middle East.....they breed a lot, they also hate the other group or they kill or a war with everone else.....nobody beats them and as long as they keep poping out more babies than their enemy, if they can keep poping our kids to replace the lost soldiers they will never lose

Eventually all this will fall because the West can't keep doing charity and Empire building forever....and all these places Iraq, Palestine, Israel, Egypt....all these places will fall when the West can no longer hand out aid and chairty....for the past few decades the West has been fighting against mother nature....but eventually all these numbers come back, you can't argue with figures and facts and eventually mother nature will re-balance itself

I find it amusing how most Femenists target Western men, when Western men had done lots of things for womens cause and womens lib....at the same time these same Femenists refuse to fight real women haters and women killers like ISIS and the extreme arabs of the middle east....they would rather bash the western man, a much softer tamer more civilized target […]

Matriarchies don't work because of simple natural selection. Natural selection picks the civilizations whose women do absolutely nothing but pop out babies 24/7 as the ones to produce the next generation of humans. Virtually any social movement that was against reproduction ironically was wiped out within a few generations.

@cable_extreme said:
@superadam: how are matriarchies agaisnt reproduction?

It takes a woman nine months to have a child. It takes a man five minutes to a couple hours. Because of this difference, women have to dedicate themselves to doing nothing but reproduction for a society to flourish, reproductively. Whereas men do not.

@cable_extreme said:
@superadam: for the 9 months out of thier lives that they are pregnant

Someone has to raise the child to adulthood, and that can take like 14-18 years. Its virtually impossible to raise a child and support yourself and the child, at the same time. That's why most single mothers are on welfare and collect child support. Its also very difficult to support yourself while your going through a pregnancy. Patriarchy simply makes the most sense reproductively.

The Spiritual Meaning of Eye Issues

When issues arise with the eyes and our vision, we may want to consider how we are “seeing” things and ourselves.

Vision changes are common enough, especially as we age or during major hormonal changes, like with pregnancy. We can also get styes, dry eyes, cysts, and all kinds of other issues in and around our eyes. Of course, it’s a good idea to talk to your doctor, ophthalmologist, or other healthcare practitioner to address any eye issues directly, but let’s also think about the spiritual meaning of issues surrounding the eyes.
[…]
In the Hindu chakra system, the eyes are connected to the sixth chakra, ajna, which is located between and just above the eyes, in the location of the metaphorical third eye. This is the energy center related to seeing, both inwardly and outwardly. It represents our intuition—our ability to know and understand the world literally as well as intuitively. One of the best ways to support the sixth chakra is to sit in meditation, allowing your mind to quiet enough that you can see, hear, and feel inwardly.
[…]
Seeing is related to a very masculine, rational, logical way of knowing. We trust what we see with our own eyes, sometimes to the detriment of other forms of knowing. Knowing with touch, smell, taste, and other subtler forms of perception are often more related to the feminine—the unseen powers of the universe. When we over-focus on seeing at the cost of knowing, we may be privileging logic over intuition and, by extension, masculine energy over feminine energy.