This is what happened: I slipped on a wet floor, banged my head on something and woke up in an emergency room with a concussion and virtually no short-term memory.

For two weeks I contemplated the 24-hour news channels and I was unfortunately somewhat healed by the time Hurricane Katrina ambushed the Southeast.

(I say "ambushed" because apparently officials in Louisiana didn`t know it was coming.)

Interestingly enough, I now feel compelled to re-evaluate my life, my purpose as it were—and I know what I want to do with the time I have left:

Repeal the 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Why? Because time and consequence have proven that some women are not capable of handling the awesome responsibility of voting.

Look, it was the 1920s and I agree it was worth a shot. But the skills of a politician rarely include prophecy. So factoring the cataclysmic events of the 1940s was undoubtedly impossible.

What happened in the 1940s you ask? The four greatest threats to American civilization gnawed their way into the world, that`s what.

I am talking of course about Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Blanco, Kim Gandy and Hillary Rodham. I will explain why—umm, let me see—because they are full of it.

Ladies, we just have to give up the vote. The brain power of Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin would be missed at the poll booth, but so would theirs.

Admittedly, without women the conservative side of the aisle will lack a certain équilibre. And frankly the White House Christmas Card will seem dowdy without Condi`s legs.

But think about the benefits—Blanco, Pelosi, Gandy and Rodham would no longer be able to highjack the U.S. Constitution and warp it into some deformed manifesto for social equality and civil rights—oops, I mean women`s (sort of) rights.

Hey, desperate times call for desperate measures.