WOMAN: The female human. For many generations has been inferior to its male counterparts. However, there is a reason for this. Men have been proven to physically, emotionally and intellectually outperform women. Want proof? Well the vast majority of the history's great artists, musician, athletes, inventors and intellectuals have been men.
31 comments
Get the fuck outta here. The only thing men can really do that women can't is write their names in the snow.
I love how he falls back on the "men have made all the accomplishments" cliche but of course, fails to mention that the reason so many of them were men was that men wouldn't allow women to participate, as well as leaving out all the accomplishments by women.
I have rarely been intellectually outperformed by men. I am not athletic, so any of his "superior physical abilities" doesn't bother me. Besides, one well placed jab to the eyes followed by a quick twist to the ball sack will have him re-evaluating his position, such as it is. As far as emotions go...which one of us is throwing a tantrum online, & which one of us is mocking them?
I think this moron took one too many hits to the head with a flying hockey puck. And...urban dictionary? Who takes that seriously? You might as well take WikiLeaks seriously.
And which are you, con? Great artist? Musician? Athlete? Inventor? Intellectual?...er....no, I won't embarrass you by asking that.
If the answer for your field of "greatness" is None of the above, stop posting this nonsense and make me a cuppa tea.
>men wouldn't allow women to participate
This is still proof of male superiority.
>I have rarely been intellectually outperformed by men. I am not athletic, so any of his "superior physical abilities" doesn't bother me. Besides, one well placed jab to the eyes followed by a quick twist to the ball sack will have him re-evaluating his position, such as it is.
You're really this delusional? Aside from the fact that the 1,000th ranked male tennis player in the world would double bagel Serena Williams, if women were able to fight off men (they aren't), how were they "oppressed" for so long? You can't have it both ways.
Hey little Tim Tim. Here's a bit of trivia for you: Before WWII broke out there was a Frenchwoman named Violette Morris. An athlete, she was skilled at many sports considered manly. Boxing, shot put, weightlifting, soccer, water polo... so good in fact she played on the mens team for a few of them. One of her true passions however was racing. Despite playing more physical sports with male competitors and doing quite a bit better than just holding her own French racing officials only allowed her to compete under the very assumption you make: that she would lose and put an end to the "foolishness" of women competing in manly sports. Again, while she was actively making chumps out of men. After consistently placing in the top three spots for several high profile events she kind of pissed off a few people with her roughhousing. Women were barred outright from some sports and Violette was barred from competing even in the sports that women were allowed to compete in. Let's just say that she had her revenge.
When women pushed for suffrage in Britain police came out with truncheons and bashed them over the head. The suffragettes responded by introducing the constabulary to judo. Tiny unarmed women stuffed bits of cardboard or straw in their dresses to soften the blows of billy clubs and soon floored Bobbies that came prepared to put down riots.
That's not exactly ancient history. Ancient history has even more overt skullcrushing ballbreakers.
Women can compete, women can fight, what women can't do is put up with your stupidity. That you can't admit your own stupidity does nothing to stop them from being better than you. Trying to get the rest of us from keeping them from being better than you doesn't make you any less pathetic. Cry some more.
Fucking Urban Dictionary. I miss the days when it was just infested with trolls and wannabe gangster kids instead of the toxic breeding ground for alt-right mutants it's become in the past few years. It's offically gone to full yahoo answers level of retardation, the difference being at least yahoo answers is occasionally funny, and is self aware and ironic enough to still be mildly entertaining, where as urban dictionary no longer has any redeeming qualities what so ever.
Please stop calling him an MRA. He's not a real MRA. Real MRAs are also feminists, and real feminists are also MRAs. You can't be one without being the other. Anyone who claims to be one without also being the other is by defination, sexist. Unfortunately, both mainstream feminism and mainstream MRA have become infested with nasty sexists who only care about their own gender, rather than actually trying to strive for equality and an open discussion of gender issues. Makes me fucking sick.
Hahahaha. You people are fucking nuts. You're actually trying to argue about whether or not men are physically superior to women.
The fastest women's 100 meter time is nearly a full second worse than the fastest men's time (and Bolt coasted at the end of his world record).
There is not one sport where women are better than men. Give it a rest.
As for tennis...the 55-year-old Bobby Riggs beat the 30-year-old then-women's world #1 in straight sets before losing to a 29-year-old King. That doesn't help your case.
All these sports records being brought up by a doubtlessly obese neckbeard who a elderly woman using a walker could probably outrun.
And please continue to spout off about "male superiority", Timmy. All while identifying as an "incel"; the biggest bunch of crybaby professional victims on the Web.
>All these sports records being brought up by a doubtlessly obese neckbeard who a elderly woman using a walker could probably outrun.
Yeah, 5'10" 125 pounds of obesity here.
That's, of course, completely off-topic. We're talking about Crimson Ghost's delusions of women not being insanely physically inferior to men.
>Of course it doesn't have anything to do with the fact that most societies through history were patriarchal.
And how did they become patriarchal? This is the part you guys never want to address. The fact that society was dominated by males is proof males are superior.
What's next...Usain Bolt is no better than the guys whom he dominated in races...he just didn't give them the chance?
Ratty- You're not a very good example of male superiority, nor was your "argument" very compelling. I encourage you to go back to your room & resume your Overwatch game, lest you make your mommy angry at you again & she stops buying you those nice Totino's pizza rolls AND takes away your phone privileges.
One last thing- I do love how you couldn't even be bothered to address me. Perhaps your tears of impotent rage were blinding you, rendering you incapable of seeing my name properly?
I think that Tim-Tim is the heir apparent to the Croat scroat's cardboard Burger King crown.
Between belittling women's achievements plus his attitude towards domestic violence in another thread, Timmy is giving all the classic signs of being an abuser. Not much wonder women avoid you Tim-Tim. If women really only dated "abusive assholes" like you whiny "incels" and "Nice Guys"TM douchebags claim they do, you would have no problem getting a girlfriend.
Oh, and I take back what I said earlier; you're a scrawny neckbeard who an elderly women using a walker would leave in her dust.
Asians: The Asia strain of human. For many generations has been inferior to its European counterparts. However, there is a reason for this. European have been proven to physically, emotionally and intellectually outperform Asians. Want proof? Well the vast majority of the history's great artists, musician, athletes, inventors and intellectuals have been European.
>You're not a very good example of male superiority, nor was your "argument" very compelling. I encourage you to go back to your room & resume your Overwatch game, lest you make your mommy angry at you again & she stops buying you those nice Totino's pizza rolls AND takes away your phone privileges.
Living with mommy jokes on an internet forum. How quaint.
Well Ratfucker, you seem intimately familiar with quaint. Shame you'll never be intimate with anyone other than yourself.
Having your pathetic existence pointed out by another party, a stranger no less, hurts doesn't it? It truly is a shame that you are nowhere near as clever as you seem to think you are. Again, I encourage you to go back into your rathole of a room & pout privately, rather than advertising to the entire planet what a pathetic little boy you are.
Side note- I don't think this is the Croat Scrote. The speech/typing patterns don't fit, & it hasn't mentioned rape. No, this is an entirely new Mind Virus host. Hopefully something can be done to prevent this vector from spreading the virus further.
You don't even need to invoke the name of anyone famous to put this pile of garbage where it deserves to be. Just WWII and the entry of women into the workforce to keep the homefront from falling to pieces is enough proof of that. Women were welding for the war effort, planning strict budgets and rationing, managing finances, managing the home, raising the kids, everything. The stuff men delegated and the stuff men claimed only they could do which gave them the right to dictate terms. Trying to shove women back under the collective thumb of men wouldn't have proven any kind of superiority and I am just aghast that large chunks of modern society seems to have completely forgotten that it happened in the first place.
>You're not doing anything other than proving one of the points we make repeatedly over on incels about how females perceive men who are born with unfortunate looks and don't get laid as a result.
Again Timmy, men with "unfortunate looks" have girlfriends, get married and have families. You just dismiss them as being "beta orbiters" because their girlfriends and wives don't look like the "Stacey" strawman you dipshits lust after and despise in equal measure.
I dispute the claim about "the vast majority of musicians". It's true if you want to limit it to instrumentalists, I guess, but in my book at least, a singer is just as much of a musician as anyone.
>Again Timmy, men with "unfortunate looks" have girlfriends, get married and have families. You just dismiss them as being "beta orbiters" because their girlfriends and wives don't look like the "Stacey" strawman you dipshits lust after and despise in equal measure.
"Stacey" was a creation of the ForeverAlone pussies. We don't believe in "Staceys" on r/incels because we realize that any woman who isn't physically deformed can still get laid whenever she wants. The standards of attractiveness for men are so much higher it's an absolute joke.
Many incels have been rejected by women who look absolutely repulsive. Hardly any of them go after anything better than a 5.
And no, men with "unfortunate looks" who get married are invariably wealthy. They're not "beta orbiters," they're "beta bucks." Beta orbiters are male "friends" whom the females keep around to do them favors, desperately hoping she'll turn into a romantic partner (she won't, unless he has deep pockets).
How's that superiority working for ya?
Hey, women are superior to me in looking sexually attractive to members of the opposite sex, I'll give you that. Totally irrelevant to this discussion, however.
Beta orbiters are male "friends" whom the females keep around to do them favors, desperately hoping she'll turn into a romantic partner scientifical term for "in the friendzone".
And yet didn't Rattface admit in another post that he's a loner and has no interactions with women?
And "pussies" and "beta bucks"? Please, continue to call other men "weak" all while identifying as an "incel"; amongst the biggest bunch of crybaby professional victims on the Web. At least r/foreveralone's users can own up to the fact that they're the reason they can't get a date and are open to advice on how to improve themselves.
Unlike you "incel" dipshits who refuse to listen to anything that disturbs your bitter echo chamber.
>Many incels have been rejected by women who look absolutely repulsive. Hardly any of them go after anything better than a 5.
And that has nothing at all to do with the potential abuser/stalker/school/workplace shooter vibe you "incel" manbabies give off, does it, Timmy?
>And no, men with "unfortunate looks" who get married are invariably wealthy.
Keep telling yourself that, Tim-Tim. Man, reading your drivel, I haven't seen this much projection since the last time I saw a movie in IMAX.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
