Let's ban homosexuals first. They do not produce humans to take care of us when we are older and they use up mother earth's valuable resources. Save the planet!
50 comments
People who don't have children should be banned?
They do not produce humans to take care of us when we are older and they use up mother earth's valuable resources. Save the planet!
"They do not produce humans to take care of us when we are older and they use up mother earth's valuable resources."
Following your idiotic reasoning, let´s ban esterile people, or people who are too old to have children and didn´t have the opportunity for whatever reason to procreate. Please, USE THE BRAIN.
Actually, shouldn't you be encouraging it to help limit catastrophic population growth?
Redhunter, this one's for you!image
And walnut, I was going to suggest the Save a Piece, Green Peace Award! (working title) .. ;)
Everyone who takes part in society, as long as they aren't homeless, psycho, or hurting people are... get this... CONTRIBUTING. It's called the economy.
Save the planet... uhm, yeah. Because as we all know, one of the major problems of the early 21st century is massive under-population. At a head count of a measly 6.6 billion the human race is virtually extinct. Quick, go forth and multiply!! Multiply, for chrissakes!!
I have little doubt this guy isn't an environmentalist in even the shallowest sense. He simply put on his ass-hat to type this one, combining a "liberal" agenda piece (save planet) with a "conservative" agenda piece (ban gays) so he'd look like an incontrovertible genius to everyone else on the board.
@PassingThrough Redhunter, this one's for you!
LG people contribute more than their fair share in taxes, especially childless (schools, maternity, paediatrics etc), and often have a larger disposable income to keep the economy going. We are also disproportionately found in public servcice (teachers, nurses etc) In a way we form a resource "buffer" to allow people to breed.
All we ask is that we get an equal share back when we need it.
PS the next generation will produce the same proportion of queers as this one - our one kind will be looking after and funding us
PPs Jesus got his boyfriend, John, to look after his mother
Actually the planet's flora and fauna would thrive if the population were lowered. Many of those ultra-enviromentalist "tree huggers" actually encourage people to have less and less children. You FAIL.
Save the planet!
What comes next, banning of infertile people? We don't produce humans to take care of us when we are older, either.
We now have assisted living for the elderly, and more and more people stay healthy enough so that they can take care of themselves when they are old, too. All thanks to the advances in medicine, much of it done with the help of the Theory of Evolution.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
