Show post
John Howard #sexist #homophobia #transphobia #ufo #wtf wehuntedthemammoth.com

Congress needs to protect people from exploitation by giving them full information about their reproductive rights. Males only have a right to produce with their own genitals, they don't have a right to gestate a baby in a box or make eggs from stem cells.

[...]

[M]y comment was about the future. Trans women will never be allowed to gestate, even with future technology from aliens. Congress will ban it and end gay marriage so kids are taught the truth about the future and their reproductive rights.

Show post
QuickshooterMk2, McChuck #homophobia #fundie stonetoss.com

[on homosexuality]

it's (((normal))) now...
but a few dozen years ago it was nothing more than a disease of the mind
thanks to the kikes, it's no longer classified as a disease (soon pedophilia will be classified as "normal" as well)

image
image

Absolutely roaring at the idea that people who legit think like all yall exist.

get used to it kike, the goyim are no longer asleep and all of your tricks and sodomite degeneracy will come to an abrupt end

image

McChuck:
Forbidden -> Illegal -> Legal -> Accepted -> Admired -> Mandatory
Degenerates have to share their insanities with the rest of the world. It makes them feel all warm and gooey inside.

Show post
Roy Batty and Andrew Anglin #conspiracy #homophobia dailystormer.name

[From "Childhood Ruined! Turns Out Mr. Ratburn was a Gay Pedo the Whole Time"]

The Gay Mafia will stop at absolutely nothing.

Nothing is safe from their clutches.

I don’t know how we’re going to salvage all these beloved shows after the Reclamation Wars.

Too many shows have been infected with The Gay.

We may have to go full Kaczynski and burn all the media, all the flash drives and the CD-ROMs to prevent the infection from resurfacing after the purges.

The PBS cartoon “Arthur,” which has been airing since 1996 and is based on an even older series of children’s books, has just decided that the teacher, Mr. Ratburn, is a homosexual.

Yikes.

Retconning a character to make it homosexual in order to get publicity and praise is a very Rowling-esque move.

The character’s creator, Marc Brown, has been writing children’s books for his entire life and still works on the show. He’s from Massachusetts and isn’t Jewish.

Something doesn’t add up here.

Since he still participates in the making of these cartoons, I can only assume that he’s recently been infected with The Gay.

On some level, I think I get what the author is doing here. And he should be commended for his public service. He’s sending the people a warning.

Arthur is a third-grader, and given the fact that most homosexuals prey on children, we’re surely not supposed to believe that Mr. Ratburn never tried to fiddle his aardvark pecker.

This revelation certainly makes the cover of “Arthur’s Teacher Trouble” look ominous.

Someone needed to point out that a lot of these teachers working at schools now are homosexuals, closeted or otherwise. And these kids need to know that they’re in a complete and total danger zone when they enter school, and not just from the n-words and the lying hos and the school shooters.

There is no money, no prestige and no sense of cultural duty associated with becoming a teacher anymore. Only dumb women and gay men do it now. Gone are the days of the well-learned and respected schoolteacher who would put dunces in the corner where they belonged, and who would beat the girls with a switch for gossiping.

Even the well-meaning college kids don’t do it anymore. They try Teach For America for a couple of semesters and drop out of the program out of frustration because they just can’t deal with uppity n-words all the time.

The only people left are the kind who like having unfettered access to children.

I’m glad that the good folks at PBS are taking it upon themselves to teach children these valuable life lessons and to keep a wary eye on the pedo at the head of the class, scribbling away on the blackboard.

Kids nowadays are in more danger than they know.

Show post
jerichoneric #homophobia #fundie reddit.com

'll put this as best as I can. I'm an odd man out in the FF community. I don't like canon characters in the first place, but I feel like if you are gonna do them you do them as close to canon as possible. I can't stand outside random shipping.

So when it comes to this I feel it's basically the number one F U to the character. Most often it's done to fulfill some sort of ship and not because it actually adds to the character or makes a good character.

To a degree, I get what's going on here. I for one grew up on the original PJO books. Never had anything about Nico's sexuality so when I wrote him he was straight and that character was MY character that's what he meant to and was to me. The second series not only felt like a betrayal to the original series (seriously so many retcons and plot holes) that whether it was intended or not in the first series I saw the Nico story as a retcon.

Same time I'm also a catholic and honestly I don't support the whole LGBT idea (It's not like I'm out there stopping anyone. I can disagree. If you're gonna do something in your home I can't stop you, but I also have the right to keep it out of my life.) So if I find a character I like and they turn out to be in that category yes I have ignored it or changed it. Partially because if I portray it as wrong I'd get even more flack.

There was a time when I genuinely sat down and thought about whether or not I supported these ideas and in the end, I don't see them as positive or useful in any way, so they are either negative or not important. I'm certainly not going to support them then in my work. At best I see it as a mental disability where the body has reactions to the same gender instead of the opposite. It's not a crippling disorder, but it just sounds like a disorder to me. (You can be happy while having a disorder. Plenty of people here are on the autism spectrum or adhd or plenty of other challenges, but they aren't things to parade around like they are distinctly good. At best they are not bad.)

TL:DR I don't support the LGBT, so I make everyone straight, but typically avoid canon characters so I've only done it twice. Deal with it. My right to disagree is just as strong as yours. I'm not stopping you from doing anything, so you can't stop me.


[.

. As someone who is both on the autistic spectrum and gay: those two are not even remotely the same. One of these has caused major issues in my life, makes me depend on other people for help, causes disruptions in my relationsips with other people, among other things that I'm not going into here.

Being gay has done none of those things. I don't want to say it enhances my life, either, because it's just something that I am. It's an inherent trait that I can't change, just as much as I can't change that my eyes are blue or that I'm really short.

. ]

I know its inherent. But you decide whether or not to engage. Same way there are ways to lessen symptoms of other conditions. I was on medication for years to gelp with my adhd and aspergers. Now ive developed the self control and communication skills that I dont need the medicine. I still get distracted and find it hard to talk when shouted at, but im high functioning now.

Im not saying a gay person is bad I just see it as a more negative condition. In the same way youd treat a disorder i feel homosexuality should be treated. The discrimination where people were stoned or institutionalized is cruel, but it doesn't mean i think the condition is good.

If there was a cure id see it as a universal requirement.


Show post
Wulfram #homophobia forums.skadi.net

Most people who "support" gays are actually opposed to it underneath, but dare not say anything for fear of being accused of ignorance, a typical leftist ploy. As a result their children are now going around espousing genuine feelings of toleration, simply because their parents were fearful that the child would repeat their "ignorant" words around school.

This is what I was talking about earlier, that social environment is the culprit behind homosexuality. The more tolerant our society becomes the more gays you are going to see, when before the influence of leftism you almost never heard about it. The few gays that ran around in the old days were raised in degenerate households.

Show post
Random-animezing #homophobia #transphobia random-animezing.tumblr.com

The Problems With The LGBT Community

Honey, this was all very well said and I wish more could approach this as calmly and thoughtfully as you. I wish the “friends” I’d had who were lost to the LGBT cult would’ve been able to, or that I could’ve found this video sooner and shown it to them before they burned all their bridges with the people who really cared about them: friends, families, even significant others. It might’ve really, truly helped them. I hope your voice reaches a lot of folks within the community and beyond it.

This is the sort of thing that will help people on all sides be kinder.

Show post
Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming #wtf deviantart.com

image

Cute but, kill yaoi fangirls? That's...sick. Like, the bad sick.

.-. Seriously, there's no reason to kill us for liking something you don't.

But its those rapid fans who try to force us to like it. And then they even cross the line by making straight characters gay for their own enjoyment. And one even called me a Homophobe for not enjoying yaoi and not getting turned on by it.

Show post
Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming #wtf deviantart.com

Please do not put up any starry sky M/M pairings utterly sickening and makes me want to throw up then stab you with a knife. I am not a homophobic nor am I close minded. But making straight characters gay is crossing the line. They are meant to be straight so keep it that way and forget about your sickening fantasies.

Would you rather us right a starry sky heterosexual pairing fic? I don't mean to be cheeky...well yes, I do but still. I find it annoying when nitpick on yaoi when it's usually hetero pairings (especially when a girl inserts herself into the story so she can be with her favorite character) that does the starry sky junk.
But again, it's not even just gay pairings you should be pissed off at. ANY pairing that has an ungraceful and trite writing strategy like that is usually asking for some dislikes.

So you're saying all anime should only have male and gay couples? I don't even see what's so attractive about yaoi. The entire logic is warped on the yaoi fandom. How can you love two men when you know they will never love you back because they're gay? It makes no sense to me. It's rather sad than sexy. You can't visualize yourself or your characer with them because they love the same sex. While in normal pairings you can change the girl's image to fit yourself or your character and pair them.


Show post
Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming #wtf deviantart.com

image

[


I have to agree with you on some aspects. Yaoi 'fangirls' can be a bit overbearing at times, but there was no reason for being so . . . violent about your opinions. From my point of view, it looks like you're contradicting yourself when you say that you're not a homophobe, but then you call yaoi 'revolting,' 'gross,' and 'sick.'

It also doesn't help your case that you've also told yaoi-fans to 'GO FUCKING DIE IN HOT LAVA!'
Just saying.

]


Yaoi=fictional people that gay and also sometimes those fans use real people who are straight (daniel radcliffe) and turn them gay for their fantasies.
Homosexual=Real people in life who are gay and not made up nor are forced ending up gay because of fangirls.
You see my point now?
I just hate yaoi fans...they always ruin perfectly good fandoms by turning straights into gays for their own pleasure.


My feelings were legitimately hurt by this. Is this how people who like yaoi seem to you? There are people, such as myself, who enjoy yaoi and are completely normal and reasonable. Though honestly, I don't associate with the word 'fangirl' because I find the undertones of that word offensive.
Why is it that when you pair up a non- canon yaoi couple you get more hate than if you were to make a hetero couple that canonically would never rightfully happen?


few words of advice:
Oh go cry me a fucking river why don't you.
I have the right to hate and complain as well as rant about thinks I hate as much as the next person does.

You don't get it do you? Yaoi and
Homosexuality aren't even the same thing. I don't even know where you got that idea from!?
Those rapid fangirls keep turning STRAIGHT characters into gay characters and they do not own the characters they never got permission from the creator of the characters! So yeah I'm against that.


Oh really sure I'm a yaoiphobe but I'm not against reality homosexuality its just that you people always make uncanonical pairings.


And? People make uncanon hetaro parings? What do you have against them? People also make uncanon human/animal but you're not complaning about that.

And you came from the complaints section of the forum thus your complaining c: Have a nice day.

Show post
innocent_butungu & Administrative_Worth #sexist #homophobia #transphobia np.reddit.com

image

(innocent_butungu)

Can lesbians be incel? I'm honestly not sure, we need some high-IQ-cels to conduct a scientific study.

If lesbians existed, probably. But reality is lesbians do not exist. Lesbians are just etero girls going bisexual for shit and giggles.

The only true lesbians are basically FtM trans without gender dysphoria

(Administrative_Worth)

Reminder that women can get women easier than us. And most have already at some point.

So fucking true. Women's preference for fuckng goes chad, chad-lite, and high tier stacies. Stacy's becky's. 5.5/10 guys, Dogs, and then genetic trash both male and female. Male, below 3.5 women see you as trash, foids, below 2.5 you're genetic trash.

Show post
Pastor Roger Jimenez #fundie #homophobia youtu.be

And look, no normal, natural, hair-legged man thinks it’s anywhere near normal to go to bed with another man. It’s unnatural. It’s not normal.

You say, “Well, do you think that sodomites are pedophiles?”

Yeah, I do.

You say, “Well, you, weren’t you sad when they died in Orlando?”

No, I’m not sad when pedophiles and rapists die! It doesn’t break - I don’t shed a tear over it!

“Why”, you say, “why?”

Because I know what they do. Because I know what they can produce.

Show post
Wahaha philmchawk #homophobia #transphobia #sexist voat.co

Who invented the concept that human life has an inherent value anyway? Used to be tranny, faggots and other mentally ill people were just killed off. Entertainment in Rome was literally death games. What happened?

Women got the right to vote/more power. Women are lower in foresight and higher in empathy so they try to "help" them.

Show post
Pastor Patrick Boyle #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

Look at verse number 14. You say, “I thought we were in church; we’re not supposed to hate anything.”

Well, we hate the things God hates, amen! And we love the things God loves. And God hates homos, amen. God hates the faggots and the queers and the LGBT crowd.

And you say, “Well, I don’t like it”.

[A couple of people can be seen getting up and making their way towards the exit, although many more people in the congregation are responding with “Amen”s.]

Well, God hasn’t changed. And God’s not changing. And if you don’t like it, there’s the door, amen. We hate homosexuals around here because God hates them, amen. And if anybody else feels compelled to follow those out, follow ’em out, amen. We’re gonna believe that all the way until Jesus comes back, and capital punishment for everybody that’s a homo, amen.

Show post
Godofwarlover #homophobia #wtf deviantart.com

If you want a LGBT character, write them LGBT or whatever from the beginning, not change them, because it already ruined Marvel comics and DC comics, made me hate Legend Of Korra, and I also have a hard time watching The Loud House due to the SJWs deciding to worship Luna Loud for that one characteristic. And I find it sad that the only merchandise of the Babadook besides the film and a defictionalization of the book is a dildo, not an action figure or a plushie, and I find that really creepy also. That would be like making a sex doll of either Samara or Sadako of Ringu/The Ring or Kayako from The Grudge/Ju-On. I just really wish this meme would go away, because it's becoming as annoying as fuck, just like Darude-Sandstorm and Cory In The House anime. We live in peculiar times, that's all I know

Show post
czakal #sexist #homophobia #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

Spain is bucking the euro trend of moving to the right for some reason. I have noticed increased feminist activity, LGBT activity (a record number of young spaniards – 15 % identify themselves as such, more than in many other euro countries), pro-immigration activity (large demonstrations in favor of migrants even though the country is under migrant invasion), a general move towards liberalism in society. Yes, there is Vox now, but that party is only getting 10 % support.

Something is wrong with that country. There is too much left wing activity, even though the country is under siege by migrants coming from Africa. This country is far from becoming another Italy.

Even before several years i knew that there is something wrong, and i wondered why is that. Social surveys indicated more liberal and pro-immigration views than in many other european countries.

Show post
Stirling Newberry #homophobia lists.torproject.org

Greypony just attracts a bunch of script kiddies who have no business running HS relays. All of those morons that run instances with Greypony are lazy and cheap who don't want to pay for server colocation and don't want to pay their dues on their mailing list or by getting known.

This isn't a welcoming community don't you get it!!!! You earn your keep and when youre granted the ability and permission to run an exit they will grant you the permission to run the EXIT.

Obviously Conrad doesn't deserve his Freedom of Speech on here because it's the torproject's property and they can take it away from him. He doesn't deserve to speak because he's probably a closeted homosexual given the fact that he was in the Navy.

No one cares about Greypony or freebsd Conrad. Just give it up. Greypony is like the crap that gets stuck in your dick after you're done vigorously fucking a girl in the ass for 10 hours. You'll get a sliver of impacted shit on your dick and that's Greypony a sliver of annoying impacted shit.

Show post
Godofwarlover #homophobia #wtf deviantart.com

men are becoming feminine and pussies and women becoming masculine and butch, when back then such things would have been ridiculed. I know I am going to get chewed out for this since people think I am making fun of the LGBT, but I think the gender roles are being reversed, and if I were homophobic, biphobic, transphobic, etc., I would have gone on a huge ass rant in the style of Fred Phelps, Steven L Anderson, and both Theodore and Walid Shoebat by saying how all the LGBT people deserve to die and burn in Hell, but I am not like that, because for one I have a gay guy for a friend and two bisexual friends and I don't call them anything bad or anything like that. I just don't like the pandering that is happening in the world, and that is all

Show post
Godofwarlover #homophobia #racist deviantart.com

Marvel And DC have become so politically correct that they are now changing things in their comics just to appease the SJWs and other politically correct people since that is apparently the new market now. For example, they changed Thor's gender, made Gamora, Ice Man, Jubilee, and X-23 into LGBT, and they are also changing super heroes' ethnicity as well, and also changing their costumes to be less revealing since that is apparently sexist. I'm alright with them being LGBT, another ethnicity, another religion and all that if they were originally written that way, but the SJWs are now the new customers and they all want their money since that is the true God people worship. It makes me worried about the entertainment industry when people keep doing this just to please certain people. And I hope to God that when I get published (If I get published that is) that I don't have to go through this bullshit

Edit: I just found out Hercules and Wolverine are a gay couple now. (I know in the Greek legends Hercules was bisexual, but Wolverine? I need to go get drunk now)

Show post
karmamiakat #homophobia #transphobia karmamiakat.tumblr.com

im sorry about being a bitch lately about the whole pride thing. People who have known me on my blog and DA page know I’m a huge anti yaoi and yuri person. I’ll be short about it , I think it’s ignorant for acting like you know better than the authors and creators, being I am a writer and would hate it for my own characters. The most annoying and number one thing is that it’s shoved in my face, especially this month and the Winx fandom is worst when it comes to this. “Headcannons never hurt anyone…” True but when it’s f@$^ing shoved in my face whenever I search my favorite show and people act bitchy, acting like everyone agrees with them, it’s like you might as well be hitting me over the head with it! So naturally if people going to keep shoving it in my face, it’s only natural I wanna shove my hatred of it just as far. Also, if LGBT is supposedly equal to straight folks, why do you need an entire month to celebrate who date/have it with? It seems more like Pride Month is propaganda than it is about equality, like Autism awareness. All of a sudden people care about that for just one month? Bull dust! Note when you comment calling me “white cis male”, I’m grey-asexual, Japanese Native American decent, am a woman and autistic. I choose to not parade about it because that’s not what equality is you idiots. I look forward to your comments!

Show post
Gl_towers #homophobia antiyaoi.livejournal.com

For one thing, when I picture a straight guy being uncomfortable around gay men, I wouldn't think he was homophobic. I would think he was a guy. Most striaght men don't like the idea of being gay, or have others thinking that they're gay. It's normal to feel that way, and there's nothing wrong with it. Being uncomfortable does not equal homophobic.

When you said that it made you stomach turn, that doesn't mean you're homophobic. It just means you're straight. I don't think you should be ashamed for feeling that way. If you got turned on when thinking about to people of the same sex together; it may mean you might have gay tendecies, especially if you got all hot and bothered thinking about yuri, but you don't. It's your biology talking, and just because your biology isn't the same as some one who is gay doesn't make you a bad person. Just like being gay doesn't make them a bad person.

You'd be homophobic if you hated someone just because they were gay, without even knowing them. You'd hate anything that would be associated with homosexuality. But you don't. You have friends who are gay. It's like watching your friend eat pickels with mayo and peanut butter. The thought of eating that may make your stomach churn, but does that mean you dislike your friend any less for eating it? No.

So don't worry about it. You're normal.

Show post
Dutchdigidestined #homophobia dutchdigidestined.tumblr.com

my stance on gay-ness (is that a word?)

Gay/Lesbian In Real Life: Good for you, do whatever the hell you want. It’s a free world and as long as you’re happy, I’m happy.

Fictional Gay: GARBAGE, THE WORST THING IN THE WORLD

Fictional Lesbian: THE BOOBS ARE TOO SMALL!

Show post
David J. Stewart #fundie #homophobia #sexist jesusisprecious.org

We are at war as God-fearing Christians against the ungodly homosexual community—who are using ungodly lying propaganda disseminated through the ungodly lying media, to portray Sodomites as victims, claiming that God made them “that way,” and Christians who reject them are on the same plane as ruthless Nazis, bigots and the racist Ku Klux Klan. This is a classic dishonest and ruthless method used by ungodly Communists to sway public support in favor of their sinister cause. Remember, the Devil is a lying, murdering, thief (John 8:44), who comes only to kill, steal and destroy (John 10:10).

The churches are under Satanic attack!

1. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot Zionism (i.e., the sinful praise and support of present-day manmade Israel) out the door!
2. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot the LGBTQ agenda out the door! Sodomites are God's enemies (James 4:4; Romans 1).
3. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot feminism out the door! A woman preacher is a sin! Beth Moore and Joyce Meyer (and thousands more) are pulling on the same rope as the Devil!
4. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot Calvinism out the door! That includes kicking out John MacArthur, Ray Comfort, Paul Washer and Jon Piper, who all teach the heresy of Lordship Salvation (which is Calvinism)!
5. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot false repentance out the door!
6. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot counterfeit Bible versions out the door!
7. Every New Testament Bible-believing church needs to boot Martin Luther out the door! Luther taught sacramental salvation up until his death. This unsaved man is responsible for leading millions of people into Hell with him, and is no hero of the faith!

Show post
Alex Jones #conspiracy #homophobia youtube.com

(Transscript of video)
In the interval [?] the Pentagon just tested a gay bomb on Iraq, they considered it, they didn’t [?] consider using it, they used it on our troops, in Vietnam, they sprayed PCP on our troops - Jacob’s Ladder - ha - you think PCP - some horse tranquilizers or something? They got some stuff that’ll whack your brain permanently.
[pause]
Brain chips in the troops. They give the troops special vaccines that really [?] nanotech that auto[?]-re-engineers their brains.
[pause]
Now there is the gay bomb.
[pause]
Look it up for yourself, this is what do you think tap water is, it’s a gay bomb, baby.
[pause]
And I’m not saying people didn’t naturally have homosexual feelings, I’m not even getting into it, quite frankly, give me a break. You think I… I’m, like, shocked by it [?] [incomprehensible] bashing it because I don’t like gay people. I DON’T LIKE THEM PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER! THEY TURN THE FRICKING FROGS GAY!
[pause]
Do you understand that?
Ungh! [bangs paper on table] Ungh! [bangs paper on table]
Crap!
I’m sick of being socially engineered! It’s not funny!

Show post
Lemmingwise #wingnut #homophobia kiwifarms.net

The expansion of free speech to also cover obscenity, porn and sex is a relatively new idea, first defended by hustler magazine.

To use the oxford definition, see below.

It was conceived and is intended to cover opinions and political ideas/speech and to protect the airing of such.

When you think about it a little, there is very little reason to put sexual content on the level with opinions.

Now I don't particularly mind what people do in their bedrooms or what pictures people draw, but I do think there is a negative link on the health of a society in general and the degenerate things it permits. Allowing little boys on billboards that also strip for money and acting like effeminate drag queens has a negative effect on society beyond the abuse against that kid, it has a demoralizing effect that is comparable to the broken window theory.

And contrary to the people that generally defend the vilest of porn as supposedly being free speech, they are generally not open to hearing the opinions about this, particularly not when you start with one of the holy cows, homosexuality and its link to both disease and pedophilia. I don't know if people are born gay, that seems to be true. I do know that abused kids are more likely to be gay and that there is an active recruitment of that type (the vagina monologues famously had the glorification of such a moment of an underage girl and an adult woman; the fact that it wasn't shouted off stage shows how far people are misled on this. The scene was removed a decade later or so.

Perhaps the line "it was a good rape" was a little too on the nose coming from a 13 year old character. But this was a prizewinning and much applauded play.

There is also the infamous article "can we just admit that we do want to convert kids?" article. And you can discover that that's how it works today. Just go to antifa meetings, to marxist feminist meetings, go to gay bars and genderqueer parties. I saw it in real life before I started studying the statistics.

To get back on track, obscenity despite what US courts decided in their case against hustler, shouldn't cover obscene content. I think everybody in their heart knows that tits being removed off facebook is not the same thing as conservative pages being removed off facebook. One is a speech issue, the other is a obscenity issue.

Now how does that tie in to CP vs a terror attack?

Well I'd have to prove that CP is obscenity, but it is by definition, it's in the P (even if definitions of porn are hard to make, just try to put the right line between boobtwitchers and female twitch streamers) of pornography. I don't have to exactly identify the line to be able to broadly state that some barrier should exist that separates camwhores and female game streamers.

Then I'd have to prove that sharing the terror attack is speech. I have the presumption that people should be able to see it so that they can both learn from it politically and practically. You'd want the protections of freedom of speech to be broad, because the temptation to silence others lies in almost everyone's hearts. That's about the best I can make the argument, if someone else can make it better, let me know.

Finally, besides the freedom of speech, there is the issue that sexual release gives a huge dopamine rush that if it came from a drug, it would be a controlled substance. A dopamine rush means that all the thoughts and actions you did prior become more firmly rooted in your brain. There is no "one time" exception in the bedroom. If you discover something you like, you're going to want to do it again. And, I find that you can even condition partners to associate that dopamine rush with specific sexual activities and make them like that and ask for that.

Do you really want some percentage of people to habituate themselves to having sexual release in regards to the abuse of children? I think this is the strongest argument against CP.

Definition of freedom of speech in English:
freedom of speech


NOUN
mass noun
The power or right to express one's opinions without censorship, restraint, or legal penalty.
‘the move would further harm freedom of speech in the region

Show post
Pastor Steven Anderson #fundie #homophobia youtu.be

If you keep reading that Sodom and Gomorrah story every year of your life, you’d think eventually it’s gonna sink in! You’d think if they just read Romans 1 thirty more times, it’s gonna sink in! But they don’t care about the truth! They don’t care what God’s word says! They don’t care about the victims! They don’t care about their children! All they care about is their own safety because they’re afraid of being persecuted! Bring on the persecution, because I’m not gonna pander to this faggot agenda!

Show post
Pastor Patrick Boyle, #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

Hello everybody, Pastor Boyle here from Revival Baptist Church in Orlando, Florida with a very important announcement to make. We’re gonna be hosting this June 14th, 15th, and 16th a conference exposing the reprobates. The name of our conference is “Make America Straight Again”. That’ll be a Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, the 14th, 15th, and 16th of June, and we’re gonna have preachers like Pastor Tommy McMurtry, Pastor Steven Anderson, Pastor Roger Jimenez, Pastor Aaron Thompson, and many others who have already been known for making a vocal stand against the sodomites and their filth that they’ve been spreading in to the homes and families across the world and the United States of America. And we’ve chosen this place and time because this is their Gay Pride Week in Orlando, and they’re gonna be out proud of who they are and daring someone to say something, and we’re gonna go ahead and take them up on it, and this conference is gonna be explaining our view, or rather, God’s view on it.

In fact, the verse that we’ve chosen is Ecclesiastes 1:15, and the Bible says, “That which is crooked cannot be made straight”, and another verse that follows that is Ecclesiastes 7:13, and the Bible reads, “Consider the work of God: for who can make that straight, which he hath made crooked?” And God’s asking the question, once someone’s been turned over, who can then bring them back? And the answer is no one. And this is gonna shock some people, but don’t be too surprised. This same doctrine - it’s nothing new - this same doctrine was once thundered in pulpits all across the United States of America just a generation or two ago. Well, we’re bringing it back up. We’re opening our Bibles. We’re gonna blow the dust off this doctrine and expose it for what it is, and I want you to be there. If you can be there, get time off work, drive in, fly in, we’ll make accommodations, be here for it. That’s June 14th, 15th, and 16th.

[The rest of the video shows clips of the pastors who will be speaking at the conference making appallingly vile homophobic remarks, often to the cheers of their congregations.]

Show post
catchaway #fundie#homophobia rr-bb.com

As far as gay couples or singles adopting; What are we thinking? Being gay is being sexually deviant to begin with. Why do we think that they are not going to molest their adopted children? I think though,that molestation would be more of a problem with the men. I think that women gay or otherwise, have an innate sense of just wanting to rear children.

When my oldest son was just 3 years old, my gay brother asked if he could take a walk with him. Now as far as I know my brother has never molested any children. At first I didn't find the request strange and let my son go with him. After all they were just taking a walk around the neighborhood. While they were gone though, I got this terrible feeling. It may have been the Holy Spirit giving me warning or just maybe my over sense of protectiveness. But I decided that if they were not back in a few minutes I was going after them. They did come back in just a few minutes, but I never got over that feeling. I determined right then and there that I would never let my young son alone with him. Now, if I could feel that way about my own brother, who I love, then something is just not right. I just don't trust gay men to not try and molest little children.

Show post
Dore Love, Youtube #homophobia youtube.com

The LGBT community shows their true colors

Preaching the love of God in a predominantly LGBT neighborhood while getting mobbed and attacked for preaching GOD so loved the world.Dorre Love

(=Later comment=)
Pinned by Dorre Love

I would just like to praise GOD and thank everyone for their prayers,kind words and contributions that helped me replace the equipment that these people destroyed. I am honoured and humbled by the love and support my family in Christ have displayed. I have a new found respect for the people of GOD. GOD bless you family.

Show post
Canadianjeepney #homophobia #wtf antiyaoi.livejournal.com

Actually, if you think about it, there is a lot of hypocrisy yaoi fandom, as the characters they subject their fetishes to are usually STRAIGHT, NOT GAY! SUCH FORCED PAIRINGS ARE AKIN TO RAPE! Also, the fandom is also highly mysoginistic (by bashing any females who are in the story, KH and GW yaoi fandoms being major culprits of this). So a yaoi fangirl/fanboy accusing us non-yaoi fans of being anti-gay, close-minded, homophobe (and any other crap)is like a POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK! (see wikipedia for what it means if your wish)

Show post
Miriamthebat #homophobia antiyaoi.livejournal.com

Are Yaoi-Haters homophobic?
This isn't flame bait; it's an essay.

I've been adamantly anti-yaoi for a long time now. When I started off getting into various fandoms, I honestly didn't care much about the yaoi aspects and just ignored or went along with it. But over time for various reasons, I grew to dislike it, and eventually became flat-out disgusted by it.

And it bothers me, because as much as I hate yaoi, I am very much supportive of gay rights. I have many gay friends who I care about, and I believe that they deserve the equal rights in marriage, adoption, and everything else as much as any straight couple gets. Yet the idea of two men having a sexual relationship, even just KISSING, makes my stomach churn.

The hell is wrong with me? I'm a straight female and an atheist with no moral influences against it. And it's only yaoi too; I'm utterly neutral to yuri and lesbian relationships. It doesn't disgust me, but it doesn't turn me on either.

It makes me wonder about something that worries me. If I support gay rights but am disgusted by the idea of gay relationships, am I actually homophobic and thus a hypocrite?

Right now I'm active in an online role play community (based on Final Fantasy VII) where the majority of the members are gay. Not that there's anything wrong with that... but it often becomes frustrating. I love the community, but as one who hates Yaoi, when stuff I don't like appears before me I have to pretty much look the other way or grit my teeth and bare it. Every once in a while someone sends me a picture or a RP log that makes me want to puke a little. I really wish I could say "You know, I really don't wait to see this..." but I'm afraid of the backlash and accusations I'll get.

One of the leaders of the community is a gay man who is extremely sexist against women. He likes to talk trash about them behind their backs and exclude them from things. I'm one of the people subject to this, and every time he does an assholeish thing to me, everyone tells me that it's not because of something I did, it's because I'm female. He acts the same way towards the lesbians in the community, too. Everyone in the community allows it and no one really considers it a bad thing, just this guy's "quirk".

Really, prejudice against women by gay men being accepted by a community that preaches equality wasn't something I ever imagined before. I guess there are all kinds of people in this world.

The gay rights movement is a strange thing. Even though the main drive is love, equality, and peace, there's this hidden aspect of counter-bigotry that sometimes shows up. I think it's most obvious through all the hatred put out by rabid yaoi fans over shallow things like anime pairings and smutty drawings, but there's more to it than that. When a group of persecuted individuals gets big enough, they become quick to defend themselves by attacking back.

I'm trying to be very careful about what I say here because I don't want people to get the wrong idea. It's like walking on eggshells, really. I can't really understand my reason for being disgusted by yaoi, because I'm a woman and I'm non-religious. When you consider a straight man who's uncomfortable around a gay man, what pops into your head? You usually think of the straight man as being a closed-minded, dangerous homophobic religious bigot, or some kind of goofball flailing around comically while trying to affirm his masculinity. When you think of a straight woman uncomfortable around a gay man, you usually think of a homophobic religious mother worried that the gay man will touch her children or spread teh ghey to them. Oh, and gay men and lesbians just have a fabulous time with each other with no problems whatsoever.

But those are all stereotypes and real life does not work that way.

Show post
Pastor Tommy McMurtry #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

We’re supposed to see that life. We should look at those - you know, I don’t think you ought to go watch the Gay Pride Parades, OK - but if you do watch a Gay Pride Parade, and you see the disgusting stuff that goes on, when you see all the cross-dressing, what that’s supposed to do to us, that’s supposed to disgust us and scare us into saying, “You know what? I don’t want to reject God.” And that should be a warning, when you see those two guys out in public holding hands or whatever, that ought to be something to point your kids at that “That’s why you don’t reject God. Because you’ll be like that!” But unfortunately, we’re not repulsed by that because it’s been made to look good through Hollywood and the news media. We’re being told, we’re being brainwashed in our schools that that’s normal, that there’s nothing wrong with that, but that is supposed to be a warning to us. That’s supposed to be a warning to all who would reject God to be careful because rejecting God will lead to some horrible places, and right there is it.

Show post
Cloudsgirl7 #wtf #homophobia deviantart.com

I'm sick of it. I'm not saying that there are not people who hate yaoi who are homophobes(or BECAUSE they're homophobes...assholes), but more times than not, those rabid yaoi fangirls are quick to jump the gun and call someone who hates -- or even just dislikes -- yaoi a "homophobe". Why? Because we don't just turn characters GAY even though they're not? Because we don't think that no one can be friends; they have to be IN LOVE with each other? Likewise with RIVALS -- people who HATE each other? Alright, you can be a butthurt yaoitard and say bull like that if I can call you a hetero-phobe. :) Because, for cases like me, you're just blowing things out of purportion.

So, yes, as my watchers know, I hate yaoi. I don't hate the fans(though many of them I can't STAND), though. And I wouldn't go all violent on this issue. Cannon yaoi? Whatever, at least that's how the characters ARE. And don't give me that "don't like, don't look" crap AGAIN. It's EVERYWHERE.

So some butthurt fangirl said that they see just as much "anti-yaoi" stuff as their crappy yaoi. Oookay.... *COUGH*Liar*COUGH* Well, frankly, I'd say they're a troller. There are plenty of them. I've had this case at least twice before. There was this one fool who saw fit to pointing out my "faults" in my arguments. I later saw that they had the nerve to comment on an anti AkuRoku stamp, saying, "They're more than friends. :)" Really. You tell me. Was she NOT trying to pick a fight? They whine about trollers when they do the same goddamned thing. Or "stalk" like the last person mentioned.
Say, are you here right now? I bet you are. Don't like this? Go ahead. Comment. :|
(No, I'm not actually trying to pick a fight.)

Man, you've gotta be kidding me. A group against the "Anti-Yaoi" group? You butthurt fools. I know that there are homophobes in the group, but we don't want 'em here. If I could, I'd personally give 'em the boot.

So yes, I hate yaoi, yuri, crack pairings(taken seriously, anyway), incest, and pedo. (Last two are especially disgusting.) Of course, the worst kind of yaoi/yuri/slash is real person stuff. OH MY GOD. What is WRONG with you people?! Those are real people with real feelings! How would you like it if you were paired with someone you knew/are friends with/hate?
OKAY, some people who know me may argue about my OCxCannon pairings, saying they're crack/not as likely as (possible) Cannon pairings, but you know what? First of all, I don't force my thoughts on anyone. Second, I try to make those pairings work; I WILL NOT turn the Cannon characters into someone they aren't. Which I'm sure is much different from yaoi pairings.

Oh, yeah, and get this through your thick skulls, intolerant rabid fangirls; THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YAOI AND SHONEN-AI. I'd suggest learning it.

But believe me, there are plenty of hetero pairings that I hate/dislike, regerdless of weither or not they're Cannon. And I don't hate all other OCxCannon pairings -- even when they involve a Cannon character that I have such a pairing for.
Off the subject, but I'd like to add...unless it fits in with the anime/manga/game...ENOUGH with the damn furries. Don't get me wrong, I like furries, but Jesus! Enough's enough!

Show post
Kensuke_Takahiro #homophobia #wtf #fundie reddit.com

Homophobia directly leads to attacks on gay people, should the homophobic person be so inclined.

I think its worth to acknowledge that this statement is not absolute truth but an estimation based on average reported instances.

For all we know we could have a way bigger population of homophobes that we don't know about simply because they didn't report or get reported. Could be they haven't been caught or just that they don't act on it. And TBH if they don't act on it shouldn't they be allowed to have their opinions and be able to express them amongst themselves? I'm not saying sympathize with racists but acknowledge that in a way there are many communities that can be taken the same way. Loli-lover? Pedophile. Anime weeb? Degenerative. Gun enthusiasts? Fascist/Nationalist. Etc.

Now I'm not saying these labels are exact but they do illustrate the point that any community can be ostracized and villainized. Thus its important to tolerate all communities with a few ground rules.

Simply put, there will always be someone who disagrees with any community. The methods we use to silence said communities can also be used against us. Thus we must express tolerance except towards the individuals who act directly to harm others, meaning we must not punish the community as a whole for the actions of the individual.

Show post
benmcd #fundie#homophobia raptureforums.com

There is also a strong element of bullying in pushing the homosexual agenda. Just like the men of Sodom, modern homosexuals are into forcing everyone to conform. you don't conform, you risk losing your job/home etc. Just look at how they go after bakers and artists to force them to promote their agenda.

Show post
various TERFs #sexist#homophobia np.reddit.com

[Note: Comments in the thread “Actually, no, I won't date or waste my energy on 'Trans Men' or 'Non Binaries'.” by ToughTelephone]

(scienceisarealthing)

Where? Your sentiment is hardly new. It gets posted here daily. What you say is true, but I don’t see anyone here supporting TIFs unquestioningly. I see people pointing out that young GNC lesbian women are victims of transactivism and patriarchy, but that’s not the same thing.
Radical feminism is about tearing out the roots of oppression, and the root is patriarchy, not female victims of the system. Fuck Aunts and handmaidens, but they are the symptom, not the disease. This isn’t letting them off the hook, it’s just not playing the patriarchy’s game for it by never looking beyond the puppets to the dudes pulling the strings.

OP is right, unfortunately I don't have specific links but I have seen often on this sub where women here are berated for not being sympathetic to misogynistic TIF’s or considering them our “sisters”. It's not tearing down female victims of the system to not sympathize with women who actively harm other women.

The vast majority of women have some level of misogyny just from living under patriarchy. I wish all women could wake up from it and question those beliefs. I am sympathetic to confused women who are told to transition without being given other option for healing. The system is broken, thanks to the idiot activists and those in the medical industry wanting to profit. I’m sympathetic to people who suffer from all kinds of illness.

I’m not sympathetic to people who think they are better than other women because they are men now.

I have not seen someone being berated for not accepting a TIF. what kinds of threads does it come up?

I agree we should have sympathy for gnc women who are socially pressured into transitioning or felt they had no other option. I've seen threads (sorry don't have specific links) where women were told they were infighting, tearing apart the sisterhood, or being manipulated by the patriarchy, (and other things along those lines) for not supporting sexist, maladjusted TIF's.

To me, it seems like guilting women into performing emotional labor for misogynists with personality disorders, and I think it's a symptom of female socialization to have endless sympathy towards people who hate us and even want us dead. I think we can all agree we want feminism to benefit all women, even the horrible ones, but there's a limit to the amount of patience & attention women should give to manipulative, harmful people.

(georgiaokeefesgrotto)
Not from me. I've seen the Tifs and their idea of women as 'junk and udders'. I welcome them back into womanhood if they smarten up but many are cruder than truckers in a rest room on a long haul. Eff them.

(1984stardusta)
“The only reason everybody is talking about transgenders is because white men want to do it.”

Chappelle received lots of criticism for rhis joke, and more, for pointing that Mexicans or blacks wouldn't get the same treatment, genderism is a white problem.

I see no problem in people dressing up or behaving like the opposite sex, this is far from new, but I can't accept a bunch of privileged white men endorsing violence against women they will rebrand as TERFs and advocate for punching into silence. Normally women who identify as men won't do the same, so it is easier to talk with women.

But I can't start a conversation with anyone who will acuse me of feeling hate against a whole group, this is a coward accusation, without burden of proof, deeply ingrained in privilege of narrative and self entitlement from whom is so spoiled by their lack of real problems that they need to turn any dissenting voice into an imaginary enemy, they need to destroy competition, they need to be the leader of oppression Olympics even if it means to demean women.

So, being a person of color is a hard life, adding to the equation the false accusation that black women are killing white men when we don't say they are women whenever they feel like to be called so is unbearable.

Right? As a woman I’m tired of being silenced for saying anything about the trans community that isn’t “these people are the best people in the world”. This has a horrible effect on my mental health and view of self. Why are these bizarre new groups that everyone wants to talk about protected to the point that it’s hate speech to criticize or even question anything about them or what they say and do?

About transcommunity?

I can't say anything about myself.

When I say I am a biological woman I am offensive to who is not a woman and wants not only self identify as such, but also take leadership, precedence and dominance over my objective reality. On the same vein I should not use words as menstruation, breastfeeding and vagina but I need to accept meekly to be called a menstruator, and listen about chest feeding and fronthole.

I need to teach my kids to hide what they know about human biology, because I was taught it was replaced by wishful thinking.

I need to teach them to hide their knowledge, and shrink their passion about this subject to fit obscurantism.

And I need to pretend that black women and black men are subjected to more likelihood of being murdered then white men, even when they wear dresses.

I

(SCREECHES_AT_HERSELF)
I couldn't agree more. In my experience, trans men & female nonbinaries are commonly emotionally abusive, narcissistic, and hold some really gross beliefs. Some FTMs even go as far as to become stereotypical "women have it easy, it's men who suffer!" MRAs.

People like that are not worthy of my energy. They might be biologically female but that doesn't mean I owe them anything.

As for dating... I'm not attracted to male secondary sex characteristics (even if they're artificial) so no, I'm not interested in trans men. Plus the whole misogyny and "your personality dictates your sex" things are huge dealbreakers anyway.

Begone with this stupid belief that us women should have unwavering compassion for everyone, especially people who view us as lesser. No, I won't support trans men. No, being nonbinary is no better. No, I'm not going to get on my knees and kiss the toes of that "gender critical TIM" that people all think is such a gift to feminism.

(greynose_algebra)
I transitioned several years before I discovered radical feminism and became gender critical. I don't know if you would rather not hear what I have to say, but for what it's worth, I think your points are valid and I get where you're coming from.

No one is obligated to include trans people in their dating pool. No one is obligated to support/lift up/perform emotional labor for anyone at all.

No one should have to waste their time or energy on emotional vampires, no matter what their sex or gender-feelz.

You're not a bad feminist.

(Enjolraic)
It would depend on their beliefs on gender. I'm Internet friends with a TIF and she believes that biological sex is real and she's against calling women TERFs or advocating for violence against us. Basically she's a gender critical trans person. But she's a Marxist, and ideologically sound Marxists are hard to come by these days. Most TIFs seem to believe in tumblr politics, hate radfems and expect gay men to date them just because they cut their hair. Even if I was physically attracted to one, I would want nothing to do with someone with a completely different world view to mine.

I'd never want anything to do with NBs. It's one thing to have dysphoria about your sexual characteristics or be transed because of homophobia, but the entire notion of 'non-binary' is based purely on sexist stereotypes.

(Lemortjoyeux)
Some of them are just predatory as TIMs, usually the GAI BOIZ type who are basically straight women who wanted more oppression points or were so obessed by yaoi they decided to live out this fantasy. They get angry when only other TIFs date them because gay men don't take that bullshit. Local horrible TIF in my city is also a YouTuber spewing lies and distracting from others arguments because she doesn't have any argument other than "not accepting my gender identity hurts my feelings". God I hate her and she's one of the main reasons I don't associate with the local gay community.

(thewilloftheuniverse)
The only Transman i personally know was a friend from high school, who is a second generation Desi. I was especially struck at the fact that the male name she took was "Todd," exchanging her Indian female name for a white male name.

At the time it only made me confused and sad for her. Now it makes me angry too.

(Burnbookburner)
I know a Todd TIF... do you think they realize any grown man named Todd is a huge red flag?

(CatLadyActually)
How so? Is it like Chad?

Show post
natsumihanaki20 #fundie natsumihanaki20.deviantart.com

1# Homosexuality is inborn


There's no proof that homosexuality is inborn. All of the studies often used to prove that homosexuality is inborn are fallacious. Why? Well, let’s begin with LeVay’s brain study. When looking at the methodology of the LeVay study, one of the key problems is that the study has never been reproduced. Another problem is that out of nineteen homosexual subjects used in the study, all had died of complications of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). AIDS has been shown to decrease testosterone levels, so it should be expected that those who suffered from that condition would have smaller INAH. Furthermore, in a scientific environment where controls and standards are a necessity, LeVay did not possess a complete medical history of the individuals included in his study. He therefore was forced to assume the sexual orientation of the non-AIDS victims as being heterosexual, when some may not have been. Also, there’s brain plasticity which is a fact acknowledged by most scientists. Given that we know today that the brain exhibits plasticity, one must ask if the act of living a homosexual lifestyle itself might be responsible for the difference LeVay noted? Another study often used by gay activists as a proof that homosexuals are ‘born’ that way is Bailey and Pillard’s Study. In this one there isn’t much to explain as the whole fallacy of the study can be proven with this one statement: If there was in fact a “gay gene” or “a gay combination per se” then all of the identical twins should have reported a homosexual orientation. This observation suggests that there is no genetic component but rather social component in homosexuality. In fact, more adoptive brothers shared homosexuality than non-twin biological brothers. If there was a genetic factor in homosexuality, this result would be counter to the expected trend. The other fallacious study we will be covering here is Dr. Alan Sanders’ study of x-male chromosome. Dr. Alan Sander’s study fails for this one reason: the results exhibited on the gay men were never compared to that of heterosexual males. Another thing as to why homosexuality cannot be inborn from an evolutionary standpoint is that: Being gay is a disadvantage as if gay people where everywhere this race would not produce offspring. Besides, there's no proof that homosexuality is caused by hormonal misbalances such as low testosterone, such claims are naught but mere hypothesis and thus, invalid. In fact, low testosterone has been associated with low sex drive and infertility so, there really isn't any ground for such hypothesis. So even if it did exist at one point it would be dissolved within a few generations. Things will evolve or die, since we are still here chances are it evolved away if it even existed. As you can see there's no study that even suggests that homosexuality is inborn.

2# Homosexuality is not harmful, it is just fine

Nowadays, there’s this myth that homosexuality is not harmful and an equal to heterosexual relationships; however, this couldn’t be further away from the truth. Homosexuality is a very harmful practice that results in many illnesses, it’s kind of like smoking a misbehavior that feels good but destroys your body. How can this be true? How can homosexuality be harmful when so many LGBT are such wonderful people? Well, let’s begin with how gays have shortened lifespan. Yes, homosexuals have shortens lifespan and this isn’t just my word as there are studies to back my claims. It isn't just the 1997 study that pointed to this grim truth, according to the article you attached, the 1997 study is fallacious because the lifespan of gays should have improved over time thus, so it shouldn’t be valid today. However, other recent studies have reported similar findings. Such studies include an study done by Paul Cameron and Kirk Cameron of the Family Research Institute and who held a poster session and presented the study at March, 2007 Eastern Psychological Association convention in Philadelphia. The facts of the Cameron's studies were these: the lifespan of homosexuals is 20 years lower than that of straights. They found that in the Canadian database, a decline in homosexuality was evident by the fourth decade of life. Those who identified themselves as homosexual constituted a relatively stable fraction of adults only for those aged into their mid-40s (e.g., one of every 47-48 adults). Thereafter, their proportion dropped regularly, down to one of every 234 adults in old age (65+), resulting in an overall estimate of 1.4% of adults who ‘were. In both the table and abstract done by the Cameron a precipitous decline in the homosexual population following middle age was noted. Taking a look at the statistics and studies regarding homosexuals, both old and new, it becomes evident what’s the real reason as to the reduction in homosexuals’ lifespan. Unlike what most pro-gay activist like to claims this reduced lifespans is not due to discrimination or stigmatization because these studies were conducted in countries were homosexuals are not persecuted, there's very little disapproval of homosexuality, and were homosexuals even enjoy special rights. The reason for this statistics is the nature of homosexual sex itself is harmful, and many of the harmful acts committed in such relationships are not committed by straights as often as by homosexuals. Like Diggs said the anus is not made for penetration and anal sex is extremely harmful for both homosexuals and straights. However, straights have the option to indulge in traditional sexual intercourse which is way safer than those homosexual practices. There's no such thing as safe homosexual sex for all the practices involved in their so called making 'love' ritual have been proven to be dangerous practices that often result in many illnesses. The use of a condom reduces the chances of HIV; however, it does not eliminate the risk especially during anal sex practiced mostly by homosexuals as 1 in 27 condoms will break during anogenital homosexual sex. Also, there’s no scientific evidence that condoms prevent the transmission of Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Herpes simplex virus. The prevention of the these three STDs has not been absolutely quantified, because no one is suggesting that a person known to have one of these treatable infections have regular intercourse with an unaffected partner. Though, health professionals assume the usage of condoms reduces the risks of getting these diseases; however, as to what extent condoms prevent these diseases are unknown. Back to anal sex, this kind of sex is extremely dangerous and harmful. The use of artificial lubricants doesn’t make this practice any safer, in one study involving nearly 900 men and women in Baltimore and Los Angeles, the researchers found that those who used lubricants were three times more likely to have rectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Even after controlling for gender, HIV status, city, condom use, and number of sex partners in the past month, the association between lubricant use before receptive rectal intercourse and rectal STIs remained strong. Another study that subjected popular over-the-counter and mail-order lubricants to rigorous laboratory tests discovered that many of the products were toxic to cells and rectal tissue. Thus, lubricants don’t really make anal sex safer if anything it makes anal sex more dangerous. Anal sexual intercourse as Mr.Diggs noted does increase fecal incontinence as shown in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009–2010) done by Alayne D Markland and others which included 2,100 male participants. Anal sex is also known to increase anal cancer and it’s no surprise taking into account anal sex is done mostly by homosexuals that, gay and bisexual men are 17 times more likely to develop anal cancer than heterosexual men. Other physical problems associated with anal sex are: hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma, retained foreign bodies. Oral sex practiced amongst heterosexuals and homosexuals but particularly among homosexuals is dangerous as well. Fisting is far more dangerous than anal intercourse; results of fisting can include infections, inflammation and enhanced susceptibility to STDs. Rimming a practice done by most homosexuals which increases the risk for Hepatitis A or B, gonorrhea, syphilis, and herpes/genital warts, though low, the risks are still there especially when most people perform unprotected oral sex. Another illness that is very prevalent among homosexual communities is Shigella, it can be transmitted through person-to-person contact, oral-anal sex, or sucking or licking of the anus (anilingus or "rimming"), may be especially risky.Many shigellosis outbreaks among MSM have been reported in the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, and Europe since 1999. Frottage, when done naked or simply if the infected skin of a partaker rubs against the uninfected skin of the partner, can result in STDs transmitted by skin-to-skin contact which include: Herpes, HPV, genital warts, mononucleosis, Molluscum Contagiosum, and syphilis. Also, another risk of frottage is clothing rubbing on a lesion as it can irritate it risking either a secondary infection or a disease spreading through self-inoculation. Tribadism includes the risks of frottage as well. There is almost no published research addressing the question of whether fingering is transmits STDs or not. However, common sense says it should be extremely low but still, fingering is not risk free from STDs. The usage of latex condoms does not completely eliminate the risks of STDs during mutual masturbation and other forms of sexual contacts as it is not 100% effective and there’s also the risk of developing latex allergies. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that while men with same-sex attraction make up only 2 percent of the total population, they accounted for 63% of all newly-diagnosed HIV/AIDS cases in 2010. Despite what gay activist would like to believe, HIV among msm seems to be increasing as in 2014, gay and bisexual men accounted for an estimated 83% of HIV diagnoses among males and 67% of all diagnoses (CDC). When into account that gays are about 1.6% or 2.3% (counting bisexuals) of the population, according to a recent survey done by the National Health Statistics Reports (2014), it can be concluded by using basic math that being gay drastically increases your chances of getting many illnesses. In 2014, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men accounted for 82.9% of all male syphilis cases and 61.2% of all syphilis cases in the US. In your article it was claimed that over time Homosexual’s ailments would become less common but it seems the opposite is happening as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention(2014) noted that the number of cases of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis is increasing among men and particularly the msm populace. A study done by Damien Stark(2007) resulted in indicating that MSM were more likely to have multiple parasites in their stool compared to non-MSM (43.5% versus 8%; P < 0.001). In a sexual health survey of MSM in Vancouver, 18% of men had been diagnosed with genital warts, 62% were infected with a strain of HPV, and screening for anal cancer detected abnormalities in 64% of HIV-positive men and 34% of HIV-negative men (suggesting anal cancer may be present). What’s more, it seems most homosexuals infected with HIV are unaware of their infection! A CDC study found that in 2008 one in five (19%) MSM in 21 major US cities were infected with HIV, and nearly half (44%) were unaware of their infection. Another study conducted by Marc Martí-Pastor,Patricia García de Olalla, and others (2015) concluded that an increase in cases of STIs was observed in 2015, most of which affected mainly msm. The Marc and Patricia’s study revealed that 66.8 % of the HIV cases were men who had sex with men (MSM), 45.5 % of the gonorrhea cases were MSM.74.2 % of the syphilis cases were MSM and 95.3 % of the LGV cases are MSM. Homosexuality increases the risk to HPV as shown by the statistics presented in the journal Cancer (2004): 60% of gay men without HIV, 90% of gay men with, have human papilloma virus infection in their anal canal. A study conducted n 2002 by Susanne L. Dibble and others concluded that lesbians are at a higher risk of developing ovarian cancer. HPV (human papillomavirus) is common in WSW as HPV can be transmitted through skin to skin contact. A study published by the Gay and Lesbian Association concluded that lesbians have higher rates of breast cancer. The lesbians that chose not to do the screenings do them for the same reasons straights chose not to. Since oral-genital sex is a frequent practice of women who have sex with women, genital herpes transmission with both HSV-1 and HSV-2 can occur. A National survey from 2001-2006, reported that 30% of women who reported having same-sex sexual contact in the past year, had positive blood tests for HSV-2. This finding is contrasted with women who report no same-sex sexual contact, among whom 24% had positive blood tests for HSV-2. Other diseases abundant in homosexuals include: Hepatites A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Proctitis, HSV, BV, HEP B, Giardia lamblia, Amebiasis, and mental disorders. The tendency of gay men to acquire many of these plethora of diseases, contrary to what most gay activists suggest, isn’t due to discrimination as public acceptance of gay/lesbian relations as morally acceptable grew slowly but steadily from 38% in 2002 to 56% in 2011 and is now holding at the majority level; the problems with the American LGBT community aren’t also due to lack of knowledge about ‘safe’ homosexual sex practices as since 2013 in The Real Education For Healthy Youth Act, an act that promotes homsosexual sex education by providing federal fund solely to programs that educate about ‘safe’ homosexual sex partners, has been in place. Also, there have been numerous LGBT education programs receiving federal funding before and many school districts teaching about safe homosexual sex education that date back prior the 2013. On the web there’s also a plethora of websites that cover safe gay sex available to homosexuals of any age, when you write the word ‘safe gay sex’ on Google you will get 36,100,000 results many of which cover on ‘safe’ gay sex practices with tips. So, it can be concluded that the many illnesses present on the homosexual community are more due to the harmful nature of the homosexual lifestyle and homosexuality per se rather than due to discrimination or lack of homosexual sex education. Homosexuality is asexual behavior, not a characteristic like a skin color, and when looking at all this statistics we can determine that homosexuality is a harmful sexual behavior such as smoking is a harmful behavior.

3# Children of gays parents do as well as those of straights

Children raised by homosexual parents don’t fare as well. Studies that indicate that children from homosexual households fare as well as those with heterosexual parents are fallacious. Such studies usually have relied on samples that are small and not representative of the population, and they frequently have been conducted by openly homosexual researchers who have an ideological bias on the question being studied. In addition, these studies usually make comparisons with children raised by divorced or single parents--rather than with children raised by their married, biological mother and father. They have also used selective recruiting instead of using random samples. And usually the reports are given by the parents instead of the kids themselves. Studies that prove kids under the care of same sex parents don’t fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents include: Regnerus(2012), Allen(2013), and Sullins(2015). Most of these studies have random samples with numbers that are representative of the children raised in same sex households.

4# Homosexuality cannot be changed

there's evidence that shows intervention to change ones' sexualities are actually pretty successful.Robert Spitzer conducted a study on 200 self-selected individuals (143 males, 57 females) in an effort to see if participants could change their sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual (2003, 32:403-417). He reported some minimal change from homosexual to heterosexual orientation that lasted at least five years (p. 403). Spitzer observed:

The majority of participants gave reports of change from a predominantly or exclusively homosexual orientation before therapy to a predominantly or exclusively heterosexual orientation in the past year (p. 403).
In summarizing his findings, Spitzer declared: “Thus, there is evidence that change in sexual orientation following some form of reparative therapy does occur in some gay men and lesbians.” He thus concluded: “This study provides evidence that some gay men and lesbians are able to also change the core features of sexual orientation” (p. 415).
Six years earlier, the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) released the results of a two-year study stating:
Before treatment, 68 percent of the respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22 percent stating that they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment, only 13 percent perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, while 33 percent described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual (see Nicolosi, 2000, 86:1071).

The study also reported:
Although 83 percent of respondents indicated that they entered therapy primarily because of homosexuality, 99 percent of those who participated in the survey said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable (p. 1071).

These data are consistent with the ongoing research project of Rob Goetze, who has identified 84 articles or books that contain some relevance to the possibility of sexual orientation change (2004). Of the data reported, 31 of the 84 studies showed a quantitative outcome of individuals able to change sexual orientation. These studies are not mere speculation as they have numbers to back up their results. These studies are more than enough proof that homosexuality can be changed.

#faggots #gay #homosexuality #homosexuals #lesbian #religion #statistics #yaoi #yuri #antigay #boyslove #homophobe #homophobia #lgbt #misconception #myths #science #study #truths #boys_love
Once again God is right and humans are wrong.

Show post
Lady Checkmate #fundie#homophobia#wingnut disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Man massages teen's back at airport, hands him money"

(Fox News cut and paste as usual: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/12/31/police-man-massages-teens-back-at-airport-hands-him-money.html)

(NOTE: This IS a disturbing story, but it is being submitted due to Lady Checkmate's completely over-the-top response)

Lady Checkmate:
"Alarming content"? The alt-left child-rapists are at it again, trying to seduce a child and introduce him to gay-play with intentions to probably rape him later. Not to mention the pedophile tried to pay the child off.

Show post
anti-marxistcult #sexist#wingnut#homophobia anti-marxistcult.tumblr.com

In 1947, sociologist Dr. Carle Zimmerman wrote a text called "Family and Civilization." He identified eleven 'symptoms of final decay' observable in the fall of both the Greek and Roman civilizations. See how many characterize our society:

1. No-fault divorce

2. "Birth dearth"; increased disrespect for parenthood and parents

3. Meaningless marriage rites/ceremonies

4. Defamation of past national heroes

5. Acceptance of alternative marriage forms

6. Widespread attitudes of feminism, narcissism, hedonism

7. Propagation of antifamily sentiment

8. Acceptance of most forms of adultery

9. Rebellious children

10. Increased juvenile delinquency

11. Common acceptance of all forms of sexual perversion

Show post
Angrybrownwomxxn #fundie angrybrownwomxxn.tumblr.com

“Transition the gay away” is the Left’s (including “feminists”) answer to the rightwing’s “pray the gay away”.

It should also be noted how both the rightwing and the leftwing (that includes you too, “feminists”) reserve most of their vitriol and contempt for lesbians–homosexual females– particularly butch lesbians. Apparently what unites KKKonservatives, liberals, leftists and “feminists” is their hatred for butch lesbians, tomboys and androgynous bihet women, especially if they’re neither sexually/physically nor romantically attracted to anyone with a dick, “ladystick”, “gircock”, neovagina or just simply XY chromosomes. Nevertheless, this “why don’t you just transition” mantra or “hey, your son is playing with dolls, make ‘em transition” or “your daughter seems kinda butch, make 'em transition” is lesbo/homophobia and gay/lesbian erasure wrapped up in liberal and “feminist” rhetoric and activism.

#homophobia #lesbophobia #genderqueer theory is homophobic #genderqueer theory is anti-lesbian #gay erasure #lesbian erasure #trans ideology is the new McCarthyism #gay NOT queer #lesbian NOT queer #Gay and Lesbian #Liberation

Show post
Agudath Israel of America #fundie#homophobia jpost.com

[New Jersey outlaws conversion therapy for LGBT minors.]

Agudath Israel [of America] is “deeply disappointed and saddened that the State of New Jersey now prohibits therapists from treating minors who have made a personal choice to seek help overcoming same-sex attraction,” Agudath Israel said in a statement on Tuesday.

“The new law tramples on the rights of mental health therapists to engage freely in their profession, and it unfairly denies teenagers seeking therapy for issues that are troubling them the ability to obtain professional help.”

Calling it “constitutionally suspect” and a “threat to civil and religious liberties,” the haredi organization compared the New Jersey law to a similar measure in California “that has been challenged in court and whose implementation is currently blocked.”

Show post
John Howard #homophobia salon.com

Marriage certainly does approve of sex and procreation of offspring and it always should. Same-sex couples, like siblings, should not be approved to conceive offspring, it would be unethical and should be prohibited in each case. Donor gametes should be prohibited for everyone, it is not a right of marriage.

I'm not ahead of science, people that claim a right to procreate with the same sex are ahead of science, and it would be unethical and should not be allowed. It is unnecessary, and there is no right to, and it would not be "fun" for the subject of the experiment. People should not be created as experiments for "fun"!

Show post
Family Policy Network #fundie #homophobia gaybeer.com

Anheuser-Busch may be the most aggressivly pro-homosexual beer company in the world. They not only spend a fortune on advertising in homosexual publications, but they fund so-called “gay pride” events and political organizations that are lobbying to legalize so-called “gay marriages.”

While some people believe Anheuser-Busch is just trying to make an extra buck, others believe their efforts to promote homosexual activities go beyond an appropriate quest for profits — to greed.

Exploiting people by encouraging vile and deadly perversions in a quest for greater profits is immoral. This website is an appeal to Anheuser-Busch to stop. Until they do, we’re asking their customers to tell them they’ve had enough!

Show post
Faulty #fundie #homophobia raptureforums.com

So, I'm sitting here in Iowa, watching the local nightly news.

First story, an overview of all the "happy" gay couples who were married in my state today.

Second story, the ever increasing spreading of the swine flu.

Third story, damage assessment of the tornadoes that struck nearby counties last night.

These people are staring Biblical prophecies straight in the face and remain completely clueless, and it really concerns me.

I would love for the rapture to occur at any time, but at the same time I have no desire to leave any one here in this world when the time comes to depart.

What's a believer to do? Time to get on my knees.

Show post
jayna #fundie #sexist #homophobia rr-bb.com

There is a guy at my church who is married with 2 children... HE IS NOT GAY, nor as far as I know ever been. However his voice and mannerisms are very, very feminine. There is no way you could look at this guy and think he was straight, yet he is. He talks against homosexuality and has even talked about where our country is headed with this and he doesn't like it. However he never mentions anything about his own highly feminine traits. Where do these traits come from? I'm sure he didn't practice and practice till he was able to act like a girl. I'm confused, how did he get to be so feminine? Where did these traits come from if he wasn't born with them? I don't understand this.

Show post
nododon #fundie #homophobia au.youtube.com

Dear Queer

This is your fate
to end all the hate.
Now lets close the gate.
Boys on boys dont equate
when you consummate,
at least in this State.

So, before its too late,
find an opposite mate.
Take her on a date,
you will feel great.
No need to masturbate.
Now vote YES on? Prop 8!