#homophobia

All about the Gay Agenda

Rodney Pelletier #fundie #homophobia #wingnut churchmilitant.com

Chicago in the 1920s — think Al Capone, gangsters in dapper suits, illegal gambling, bootleg liquor and Tommy guns. It turns out that in nearly 100 years, not much has changed in the Windy City except the new gangsters wear priests' collars and homosexuality and sex abuse are the currency and trade of this homomafia with Cdl. Blase Cupich as their don.

He's becoming a central figure in the American Church despite the warnings of Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, who maintains his appointment as archbishop of Chicago was personally orchestrated by homosexual-abuser Theodore McCarrick.

He rightly earned scorn for his comments regarding the Viganò testimony to an NBC anchor, "The Pope has a bigger agenda. He's got to get on with other things, of talking about the environment and protecting migrants and carrying on the work of the Church. We're not going to go down a rabbit hole on this."

He goes on, "The record shows that whenever there's actionable information Pope Francis acts. … Quite frankly, they also don't like him because he's a Latino."

The fact is, McCarrick's fingerprints are all over Cdl. Cupich, and now he's rising to prominence among American prelates to become the unofficial mouthpiece of Vatican policy regarding homosexual clerical abuse of minors and adults.

At the U.S. bishops' meeting in November, he, along with Cdl. Joseph Tobin and Bp. Robert McElroy, voted against the release of all documents regarding McCarrick. He also questioned whether clerics engaging in consensual sex — usually homosexual — should be treated the same way as rape or sex by coercion.

He's called the infestation of homosexuality in the priesthood a "diversion" from "clericalism," apparently having nothing to say about the two gay Chicago priests caught "clericalizing" each other in a car.

Cardinal Cupich is coming out more and more showing himself to not just be tolerant of clerical sodomy but one of the ardent promoters of homoclericalism in the United States with the blessing of the Vatican.

Roosh V #sexist #fundie #homophobia rooshv.com

[From "6 Signs That A Woman Is In Rebellion"]

Most women you meet are in a state of rebellion. They have rejected the natural order and God, along with the notion of biological sex roles. While in rebellion, a woman will not respect the authority of a man or submit to him for long. Such a woman will be the source of great misfortune and heartache. Below are the most common signs that a woman is in rebellion.

She rejects the natural state of her body
She does not want to accept the body that was created for her. It is not beautiful or capable enough, so she begins an intensive crusade to morph herself in what trend-makers—who are in rebellion themselves—say is beautiful or capable.

In the early stages of rejecting her body, a girl will apply profuse makeup, dye her hair, or pierce her body in areas besides the earlobe. Still unsatisfied—and there is no other option for her to be unsatisfied when rejecting God’s gift—she will then adorn herself with fake nails, eyelashes, and even eyebrows. Almost always, rebellion against her natural beauty takes the form of adopting plastic beauty that is cultivated, advertised, and sold by corporations and the medical industry. Adopting their commercial wares may get her more likes on Instagram, but decreases her overall beauty to any man who is not in rebellion himself.

[...]

Obese women are in indirect rebellion from being in a state of gluttony, one of the seven deadly sins. Their proclamation of “beauty at any size” is intended more as a comforting rationalization than an attempt to attack God, but the end result is the same: she refuses the natural body she was given and morphs into a different creation.

She idolizes herself
The rebellious woman wants to be seen as a goddess or queen, and may even use those terms to describe herself. She wants to be worshipped by men and admired by women. The quality of those who worship her is less important than the quantity: her goal is to increase the number of individuals who admire her or “follow” her on social media platforms, because it provides an objective number to her goddess-like status that can be compared to others (the analog for men is sexual notch count). To learn how to be a goddess, women will eagerly follow other popular women on Instagram, mimic them, and drool over the prospect of being as popular as them. She soon becomes addicted to compliments of her appearance.

[...]

She rejects her traditions, countrymen, hometown, or nation
A woman in rebellion will be eager to run away from who she is. If she was born a Christian, she will take up yoga or be sympathetic to Islam. If she’s German, she will bring home to mom and dad an African man named Mutambo who arrived to Europe by boat. If she’s from a rural Midwestern town, she will escape to Miami or New York City. A manifestation of rebellion is to seek out the extremes, far away from what is familiar.

Whenever a woman from a foreign country slept with me, she was passing up on countless of her native men—men who shared her traditions, language, and religion, and who would make a far better long-term partner than I could. In some cases, she was directly cheating on a native man with me, her enabler and tempter. Fornicating with me was a way to reject those men and the country of her father. It’s no surprise that many foreign women I’ve slept with possess multiple rebellious qualities. While abroad, I adopted the view that if a foreign woman was quick to sleep with me, she couldn’t possibly be a suitable long-term partner.

[...]

She prefers the virtual over the real
It’s hard to carry out a successful rebellion while fixed in the real world. There is a physical limit to how many men a woman can interact with at any time. There are bodily flaws that can’t be hidden no matter how much work is done to conceal them. But in the online world, anything is possible. She can be perceived as a goddess from a shockingly high number of men who covet her photoshopped images taken at angles that camouflage her flaws. She can easily play out the fantasy of who she wants to be.

[...]

She has completely divorced sex from reproduction
The way a girl in rebellion believes she will achieve enlightenment is through her vagina or anus. She owns several sex toys and masturbates to them often. She believes being penetrated by a sexy man who doesn’t love her will fulfill her or make her happy, but as sexy as that man may be, she fears being impregnated by him because her career is not yet “established.” She has been on birth control since she was a teenager and is in favor of abortion.

[...]

She trusts in her own abilities above that of a man who loves her
God created Adam. God saw that Adam could use companionship, so He created Eve from the substance of Adam. God intended Eve to submit to Adam who then submits to God. While God gives equal blessings to men and women, he intended for women to follow the authority of men. Women in rebellion barely respect men, let alone follow them. They won’t listen to their fathers, their boyfriends, or their husbands, and will only fake submission for a short period of time when they want to deceive a man to gain a material reward. They believe that through their own knowledge and confidence, they are deciders of their fate and must only follow the result of their feelings and unseen demonic influences.

If you get involved with a woman in rebellion, you will have to suffer her punishment, just like how Adam following Eve into sin caused him to be condemned alongside her. You cannot isolate the pleasure you experience from a bad woman without also enduring the negative effects of deceit, lies, cheating, and other forms of manipulation. If a man can’t find a suitable woman, he is better off alone, because at least that fate will not lead to spiritual death as it did for Adam.

She is gay
The most severe form of rebellion is homosexuality. Such a girl has completely refused the natural order and the authority of men to develop a deep-seated hatred for both. Since a woman cannot penetrate another woman without the use of a plastic toy made in a Chinese factory, she has essentially chosen a life of masturbation in place of genuine love and intimacy.

It may seem “hot” when you see two attractive girls in a bar, but such situational bisexuality is an effort to spite God to receive attention. Indeed, stay away from harlots you only noticed because they were committing a severe act of rebellion.

Conclusion
If a girl is rebelling against God, her Creator, she will rebel against you. It’s not a matter of if, but when. Many men foolishly think they can tame a rebellious woman, but this is the same as thinking you can tame Satan himself. It’s fine if a girl who chooses against rebellion requires additional guidance or knowledge from you to stay out of rebellion, but if she’s in active rebellion, I suggest you run away unless she humbles herself before God and repents.

Most men are tempted to extract casual sex from a girl in rebellion, since she so freely gives it up, but understand that that sex act will not be free, and may haunt you for years to come while risking your salvation. Currently, I am single and can walk with Christ in peace, so I don’t feel compelled to take a risk on a woman who spits on God and sees herself as a goddess. Choose the women of your life very carefully, because your very soul may depend on it.

Novuso #homophobia #wingnut deviantart.com

We have the votes to pass a Constitutional Amendment protecting the sanctity of straight marriage.

Marriage for whole of human civilization stretching back 6000 years was defined as a Union between a MAN and a WOMAN.

A small group of Liberal Judges have artificially legislated against the will of the people. Even the people California voted in 2008 to define marriage as a union between man and woman. The proposal passed 52% (7,001,84) YES and 48% (6,401,482) NO.

In total 31 states passed referendums against gay marriage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_constitutional_amendments_banning_same-sex_unions

These are the votes in favor of defining marriage as a union between MAN and WOMAN. This is the chart the liberal media does not want you to see. America by and large does NOT support gay marriage.
image

It is time to take America BACK from the gay mafia who have subverted the democratic process. They passed gay marriage through the courts what they could never pass through the legislature. The popular vote is against them. The silent majority cannot be silenced any more.

Pass a constitutional amendment to define marriage as union between Man and Woman.

WE CAN DO IT!
WE HAVE THE VOTES!
WE JUST HAVE TO RAISE OUR VOICES!

IT IS TIME TO TAKE THE POWER BACK!!!!

Scott Lively #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut #fundie scottlively.net

I am Dr. Scott Lively and I’m here to explain how the LGBT movement gained legal, cultural and political supremacy over Christianity in America in just 50 years. It advanced through five stages and four supreme court rulings.

The Five Stages of Homofascism are:

1. Tolerance
2. Acceptance
3. Celebration
4. Forced Participation
5. Punishment of Dissenters

The original goal of the LGBT movement in the 1950s was tolerance, what Dale Jennings of the Mattachine Society called “The right to be left alone.”

But exactly 50 years ago in the Stonewall riots, homofascism was born – when the movement set its sights on replacing family-centered society with sexual anarchy. Their detailed agenda was published soon after as “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform,” and they launched a united national campaign for “sexual freedom” to be recognized as a constitutional right.

In response, the pro-family movement arose during the Reagan administration in the 1980s to defend marriage and the natural family. In 1986, Justice Byron White (appointed by JFK) dealt a death blow to the LGBT “sexual freedom” strategy in the majority opinion of Bowers v Hardwick, expressly recognizing the right of states to regulate all sexual conduct in the public interest, but specifically homosexual sodomy.
<...>
Having fulfilled his globalist mission to establish “Gay Supremacy” in America, Kennedy recently retired from the court after (I strongly suspect) assuring that his legacy would be preserved by the nomination of his former clerk Brett Kavanaugh to fill his vacancy. I sincerely hope I am wrong about Kavanaugh and will apologize profusely if in future cases he shows integrity in helping to reverse Kennedy’s errors.

So here we stand in 2019, four years after Obergefell and the LGBTs instant pivot to “transgenderism” (and pedophilia), watching small children being deliberately infected with hypersexual transgender insanity to the applause of the entire leftist bloc, and Congress seriously debating the so called Equality Act to criminalize Christianity in America.

Throughout this decades-long process America has been pushed inexorably by the leftist elites through the five stages of homofascism until today celebration of all things LGBT is the norm, forced participation in “gay” culture is increasing rapidly, and punishment of dissenters is a virtual mandate of social justice in the minds of the Millennials. God help us!

Can this process be reversed? I believe it can, but only if conservatives, including our presumed five member majority on the supreme court remember what it is that conservatism exists to conserve: the God-fearing, family centered, constitutional republic our founders fought a bloody revolution to secure for us.

John Daniel #crackpot #conspiracy #fundie #homophobia amazon.com

Scarlet and the Beast, Vol. II: English Freemasonry, Mother of Modern Cults Vis-A-Vis Mystery Babylon, Mother of Harlots

Introduction: Ancient Mystery Babylon and revolution; westward migration of Mystery Babylon; Zechariah s four carpenters and Masonic revolutions; English Freemasonry, mother of modern cults; London sits on seven mountains. Chapter 1: Lucifer/Satan The Divided God: Lucifer and evolution; the Luciferian Rite; origin of Satan s divided nature; the angelic war in heaven; Freemasonry practiced in the Garden of Eden; Masonic All-Seeing Eye in the Garden of Eden; Adam and Eve s sin; Christ can break the curse of Eden. Chapter 2: The Hermaphrodite God: Ham, the first post-flood homosexual; homosexuality, a rite in mystery religions; homosexual gods and societies; the worship of the phallus in Freemasonry; is Freemasonry behind the homosexual lobby? Masonic judges protect sex deviates. Chapter 3: Order out of Chaos: Cush, the builder of Babylon; Cush, the god of chaos; Freemasonry identifies with Cush; liberty is chaos. Chapter 4: The Male God: Nimrod, the seed of the serpent; Nimrod, god of paganism; Nimrod, Freemasonry s lost name of god; Nimrod attempted world government; United Nations patterned after Nimrod s world government; Nimrod s modern New World Order Freemasonry. Chapter 5: The Female God: Semiramis, wife of Nimrod; Semiramis, seed bearer of Lucifer; Semiramis, founder of the Eastern Star; Christ s death on the cross conquered the seed of the serpent. Chapter 6: The Mystery of Secrecy: Shem, a type of Christ; Shem, God s battle-axe; Shem, the destroyer of Nimrod; mystery religions forced underground by Shem.

Colonel-Knight-Rider #sexist #pratt #wingnut #homophobia #transphobia #racist rottenwebsites.miraheze.org

1. Overall, FSTDT is similar to RationalWiki in that it's a left-leaning, mostly atheist and agnostic echo chamber where members more often act like petulant jerks who, by their own admission, love mocking and "calling out" people for saying things they don't like to hear instead of defeating others' arguments rationally. The key difference is that, unlike RW, FSTDT does not masquerade as an encyclopedia.
2. In 2014, a former 40-year atheist and blogger named Stan described the site as a place "…where Atheists and skeptics can have a safe harbor in which to ridicule that which they take out of context. Actually there is a link to context, but no one seems to have used it in my case. It's the sort of snake pit where the target du jour is countered with comments like "asshole", and the standard logic errors which they insist are the logical answers to the "idiot" they are trashing
3. The fact that many users choose to remain anonymous proves that they know what they're doing, while not illegal per se, is unethical enough that they don't want to get caught doing it, especially by the religious friends that many members claim to have in real life.
4. Their whole business model is flawed because, if there were no more writings they don’t like for them to quote on the Internet, the enterprise would lose its purpose and collapse.
5. Their arguments against whatever quotes they find are generally one-sided and full of logical fallacies, often as extremely ideologically biased towards the left as are those on RationalWiki or SJWiki, especially since quotes are taken out of context.
6. They tend to give tags to quotes that do not reflect the quote authors' original intentions, including giving the tag "#fundie" to quotes that have only minimal to no religious connotations. This makes it clear that they want their interpretations of anything they quote to be the only true and correct interpretations.
7. Although they aim to provide links to context for every one of their quotes, users don't seem to reference or pay attention to that context.
8. Many of their arguments amount to nothing more than argumentum ad hominems, or personal attacks, with childish insults and name-calling as well as lazy, unimaginative sex jokes solely to get a rise out of people.
This is often the case with their comments on many quotes under their tag "#dunning-krueger," which refers to people that they believe are "not nearly as smart as they think they are." It's another way of saying, "You're dumb because we said so!" and renders them guilty of the same sense of elitism that they condemn various quoting targets for showing.
The same principle applies to their tag "#pratt," an acronym for "Point Refuted A Thousand Times," which indicates a sense of laziness and unwillingness to have a civil debate and basically says, "We’re right, you're wrong, so shut up already."
9. The people running and/or contributing to it do a terrible job at sourcing for their quotes: many links to context are dead (happens a lot with links aged 10 years or older); image only; and unarchived social media posts that can be easily forged, deleted, or modified.
10. They hate U.S. President Donald Trump so much that they normally avoid saying "Trump" like the Bubonic Plague and do not offer any impartial criticism or say anything forgiving about him, believing that anyone who shows any sympathy or forgiveness towards him is a racist, neo-Nazi, or "wingnut" by association.
They like to whitewash originally well-intentioned but nowadays corrupt and violent groups such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and the feminist movement.
11. They deny that feminism in history has come in waves and that, in the recent past with third-wave feminism/feminazism, the feminist movement is now a shell of its former self. They even accuse anti-feminist women of being "hypocrites".
12. Anyone who does not support toxic modern feminism is automatically a "#sexist" in their eyes.
13. Anyone who does not support BLM's violent behavior is automatically a "#racist" in their eyes.
They mislabel people guilty of ethnic hatred or xenophobia as "racist" even though individual human races/skin colors are not one and the same as ethnicities or national identities.
14. Like many social justice warriors, they promote minority groups in ways that even minority groups themselves might find offensive. For example, they support LGBTQ2+ characters being inserted casually into entertainment regardless of quality or consequences, force everyone to accept them and condemn anyone who doesn’t accept them or care about their activism, and suggest that anyone who isn’t pro-LGBTQ2+ is automatically a homophobe. All of this essentially gives the LGBTQ2+ community in the real world a bad name.
15. They give credence to the idea that there are more than two genders.
16. As their Website's title implies, they have no qualms in using Christophobic (anti-Christian) language. For example, when discussing matters of Nazism and religion, they often go on screeds about how Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party were (allegedly) Christian. In reality, Hitler was staunchly opposed to mainstream Christianity, according to his Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, and saw it as a branch of Judaism, which he of course hated even more. He thus invented the false religion of "positive Christianity" to deceive German Christians of the day into thinking that they were doing "God's work" by serving the führer.
17. Though one of their tags is "#moonbat" for quotes composed by "left-wing nutjobs," this tag is hardly ever used compared to "#wingnut" for quotes written by "right-wing nutjobs." This makes it even clearer that they are biased towards the left.
18. They like to present readers with crudely-made conclusions instead of letting the evidence speak for itself. This is more of an act of insecurity as they fear that people will not see things the way they do and expect every argument they make to be taken seriously.
19. Many of its members act toxically and intolerantly towards anyone who so much as disagrees with them.
Although they claim to have Christian users, hardly anyone ever comments on quotes to offer a Christian perspective nowadays.
20. They are extremely pro-social justice: they are primarily interested in attempting to correct people and being right, aggressively attacking all who disagree. They claim that this is for their own self-amusement when they write like they would establish dictatorial control over what people say on the Internet if they could, believing that what they do to their targets is somehow "needed". They admit that the only reason they support free speech is so they can have something to attack!
21. It underwent a major revamp in 2019, but its basic, blocky, blandly-colored aesthetics without any modern graphics or features make it look like it's from the late 1990s-early 2000s era.
22. That said, it suffers from a poor Website design overall because it lacks many features and technical conveniences that would be normally present on a message board. For example:
- There is no menu to select how many quotes/comments can be viewed per page, including in search results.
- Search engine filters/results sorters are not always as accurate as they could be.
- The search engine only works with finding quotes, not comments; nor does it list the number of results per search query.
- Sometimes, the last page of a search results list, for whatever reason, turns up completely blank.
- There is no option to report comments (probably intentional, given how the site encourages people to be mean-spirited).
- User pages are nothing more than lists of quotes users have found and comments they've made (probably to preserve their anonymity).
23. Its painfully unprofessional and outright immature logo features a "sexy flying Jesus penis," a crudely-photoshopped devil version of pop singer/songwriter Taylor Swift practicing martial arts, devils in flying saucers, a reptilian alien-type creature with devil horns, a NyQuil bottle with devil horns surrounded by fire, and what appears to be a Biblical leviathan in a bathtub (in reference to one of their more popular and infamous quotes from 2009) eating fast food from McDonald's.
24. If anyone dares to object to the 2020 Coronavirus quarantine or criticizes how governments handle it or how the media misrepresents data and statistics surrounding it, FSTDT will surely go on a witch hunt after them.
25. They do not take responsibility for their actions: they blame others for getting themselves quoted by FSTDT, even if they realize that they have the power and the choice not to quote people they don't like and not to let silly things people write online offend them so much. Moreover, no self-respecting FSTDT user will ever admit to SJW-type behavior.
Likewise, in their FAQ section under "But You're Defaming Me!" they try to rationalize their efforts to defame people by arguing that their targets are sabotaging themselves, not considering the possibility that the quotes they find might have different intended meanings than what they read.
26. When people on other Websites criticize or counter-mock them, they do not usually take the criticism or counter-mockery well.

Joseph D’Agostino/PRI Staff #homophobia #conspiracy #wingnut pop.org

In its May 6 ‘Weekly Briefing,’ the Population Research Institute (PRI) warned of an obviously growing totalitarian trend among homosexual activists who wish to silence all freedom of religion and speech pertaining to criticism of homosexuality.

‘Joseph D’Agostino, PRI’s vice president for communications, writes in the briefing that ‘today’s homosexual ‘rights’ activists are determined to impose upon Western society a neopaganism that is anti-life, anti-family, and anti-religious, and they actively seek to punish those who disagree.’

‘PRI, a world leader in exposing the lies and manipulations of the population control movement, sees a clear connection between the ruthless depopulationists and the gay activism movement. Homosexuality and those who become involved in it are being used by population controllers, PRI argues, just as the Nazis also used homosexuals for their purposes, and then disposed of them when they were no longer useful.

‘D’Agostino notes that ‘obviously, homosexuality is opposed to the propagation of new human life, and the huge campaign in favor of it we now experience comes at a time when birthrates have already fallen below replacement in almost every Western country. In fact, as early as the 1960s, Planned Parenthood listed the encouragement of homosexuality as one of the methods for reducing human populations. And male homosexual behavior spreads AIDS, which increases the death rate.’

‘However, D’Agostino warns, as are many others today, that ‘it may be illegal to say such things in the near future.’ He then presents real cases of persecution of those who have publicly disagreed with homosexuality.

‘The PRI communications vice president adds that disagreement is warranted since ‘we all know how incredibly destructive active homosexuality is, spiritually, psychologically, socially, to families, and to health.’

Ping And Pong #sexist #homophobia incels.co

[Blackpill] Reminder that most "lesbians" are infact chadsexuals

Link to article: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/04/19022/

I've always had my suspicions but now after some research I have found statistical evidence that 'lesbians' get pregnant way more often than straight girls. What this means is that most of these women would rather fuck each other instead of a non-chad.

These are the consequences of promoting degeneracy like LGBT, super hypergamous foids have a great excuse to never interact and reproduce with non-chads and the pool of available women to date is even smaller.

image

EmpathicDesign #homophobia deviantart.com

Why it is important that children be raised by opposite sex parents rather than same sex parents:

1. Children can only be procreated by a man and woman; if same sex couples could procreate, this valid point would be invalidated.
2. Whilst not every child has a present mother and father, ever child has a biological mother and father.
3. Children know when a biological parent is missing; which is why it is the common case that children raised by same sex parents seek out their missing parent.
4. Same sex parenting means that one parent is always missing.
5. A same sex parent cannot supplant or provide the missing influence of the missing biological parent.
6. Opposite sex parents provide a full range of unique and important gifts, influences and experiences, where as same sex parents can provide only half.
7. Same sex parenting means children will always, always miss out a full and diverse upbringing unlike their peers who have a mother and father.
8. Single parenting and same sex parenting are contextually the same as there is a missing parent and a stagnation in the influences and raising of the children.
9. Social science affirms that the best outcome for children with the least upbringing issues, the least criminal outcomes, least drugs and best future is a non-combat, married household with their biological mother and father.
.0. Homosexuality is a confirmed mental illness, and the option of leaving a child within the guardianship of two mentally ill individuals always carries a risk of abuse, neglect and death.
.1. Non-biological parents are confirmed as raising their new children differently and inner a lesser manner than their own children.

This is why it's important for children to be raised by their mother and father; and though there are cases of children growing up to becoming good citizen by two same sex parents; however, every child with two same sex parents has another parent, and that parent is the other biological parent.

M.

Patriarche Comics #fundie #wingnut #homophobia #racist incels.co

image

Gay stereotype #1: Hi, can we order a cake that says “Happy Homoversary to the world’s gayest couple who love cocks in the ass and mouth 24⁄7″?

Gay stereotype #2: That won’t be a problem, will it? Also shape it like a dick because we’re gay. Have you gleaned that we’re gay yet? We’re gay, problem?

Straight stereotype: Oh my goodness! Look, I’m sorry fellas, but this is a Christian bakery and making a cake like that goes against our beliefs. But there are plenty of bakeries in this area who I’m sury would be happy to—

Goes out of business, and is heavily vandalized with obscenities.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Meanwhile, at a different bakery…

Gay stereotype #1: Hey sweetie! We’d like to order a cake that says “Happy year and a day to a queer and a gay.”

Gay stereotype #2: Also can you cover the cake in little marzipan men fucking each other in the ass? Oh gosh, I hope you don’t mind that we’re a couple of fa—

Muslim stereotype: fuming with anger

Gay stereotype #1 and #2 are given black eyes and cut lips, and are kicked out of the Muslim bakery

Bystander #1: Yeah, well maybe you should have some respect for their beliefs.

Bystander #2: Wow guys! Intolerant much?

Gay stereotype #2: There’s a bowling pin in my ass…

Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) #moonbat #homophobia #transphobia thecommunists.org

{from December 2018}

The following motion was passed overwhelmingly at the party’s eighth congress in September.

While being totally opposed to discrimination on grounds of race, sex or sexual proclivity, this congress declares that obsession with identity politics, including sexual politics, is anti-Marxian.

Congress therefore resolves that the propagation of identity politics, including LGBT ideology, being reactionary and anti-working class and a harmful distraction and diversion from the class struggle of the proletariat for its social emancipation, is incompatible with membership of the party, rendering those involved in its promotion liable to expulsion.

Andrew Anglin #homophobia #racist #conspiracy dailystormer.name

[From "Nigeria: African Lesbianism Rises, Courtesy of George Soros"]

You’d think that the masses of people would have caught on to the fact that entertainment media is used to transform society by emotionally manipulating the population.

However, you would be wrong.

As a rule, any time you imagine the masses of people catching onto any fact that isn’t fed to them by the media, you will be wrong.

Africa @ Random

A pro lesbian Nollywood film created and directed by Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim has is in the works and about to be released. The story is centred around the love interest between two queer women.

Uyaiedu said she created the movie to address the subject of LGBTQ head-on as it is more or less a taboo topic in Nigeria.

The title of the movie is “Ife” which translates to mean “love” in the Yoruba language, a dialect widely spoken in South Western Nigerian.

Uyaiedu said she made the movie as an opposition to the stereotypical way queer people were perceived in the Nigerian society as this also got transferred into movies where gay roles are often deemed to be troubled and problematic.

“I’m queer so ‘Ife’ is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them,” she explained.

Homophobia is a big thing in Nigeria and the larger parts of Africa. Stigma against homosexuals in Nigeria is particularly very pronounced considering that there are even laws in the country’s books that sentence gays and lesbians to long jail terms when caught and convicted.
[...]

Yes, the homosexual propaganda film is created by an NGO.

“Equality Hub.”

What is that, you ask?

If you go to their site, you find that they are a part of “The Initiative for Human Rights.”

If you go to their site, you find they’re just yet another subsidiary of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. Of course.

They have other patrons, including Elton John’s AIDS group, but I’d wager the most money comes from Soros (sometimes it gets passed around in circles, and I would imagine Elton John’s AIDS thing is also funded by Soros).

Again you have whites and Jews from the West going to a third world country to force homosexuality on them.

Why?

Part of it is just basic comic book villainy, and a desire to destroy everything in the world by making it sick and gay. But a much more practical and immediate purpose for this, as I mentioned recently when I addressed Mexico going full homo, is the globalist agenda.

You see: right now, the first world is being turned into the third world, rapidly. We are being flooded with third worlders, we are dipping into gross, third world style political corruption, and we are headed into a situation where there is mass poverty, no middle class, and the impoverished peasants are ruled over by an ultra-rich elite.

At the same time, however, we are not adopting the one thing that the third world has that is actually admirable, which is traditional family values. We’re staying totally gay, we’re keeping feminism, divorce, the whole mess.

If we want to combine with the third world then, by tearing down the borders, they must first share the Western fixation on anal sex, female empowerment and the rest of the program as regards to these things. So, right now, you are witnessing a massive push to turn the third world gay, in preparation for this great merger of the nations into a single mass of gay brown sludge.

This is exactly what was written about in 1925 by the founder of the European project, Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

[...]

We need to be aware of the fact that the goal behind the coronavirus hoax and the ongoing communist revolution is create a one world government run by Jews that rules over a mass of brown homosexuals.

sp8der #homophobia #sexist reddit.com

Single gay men, by and large, have absolutely no respect for others' relationships. This goes triple or more for your typical camp queens. They will shamelessly hit on anyone they want, even if that person is in a relationship, and try and fuck them with not a flicker of guilt.

Cheating is absolutely rife in the gay world. Epidemic proportions.

As far as I'm aware, the lesbian relationship stereotype is the opposite; they stop having sex entirely a few months in.

Linda Harvey #fundie #wingnut #racist #sexist #homophobia missionamerica.com

Black Lives Matter is a movement based on snot-nosed dismissal of American opportunity, history, affluence, and morality. Not only is the group financially connected to Susan Rosenberg, a domestic terrorist convicted in 1984 for bombing campaigns, but the women founders of BLM exhibit other serious emotional and intellectual deficits as they negatively mischaracterize almost everything in their path—men, the nuclear family, police, American heritage, capitalism, unborn babies, Western civilization, sexuality, Jews, and their white human brothers and sisters.

Oh, and they just happen to be black. But it’s the brat in them and in Colin that most people find objectionable. It has nothing to do with color. For these race-obsessed opportunists, darker skin color provides cover for a deeply destructive ideology.

People are now getting fired from jobs just for social media posts or reckless speech. Yet Washington Post has not fired opinion editor, Karen Attiah, who actually tweeted about “white women” being lucky that black people aren’t “calling for revenge.”

Is it too much to expect these people to grow up, stop whining, cut the threats, and cease their campaigns of destruction?

No one looking through an accurate lens of American history can claim with a straight face that there is more tyranny today, more oppression, fewer opportunities than in the past. The trajectory has been exactly the opposite.

These are infantile fantasies. And ironically, race is actually not the driver here. It’s adolescent rebellion.
<...>

I praise God for people who are in a unique position to speak the truth right now—Candace Owens, Ben Carson, Bob Woodson, Larry Elder and others.

The fact remains that this country is a beautiful beacon of hope in a bleak world. For the immature hearts incapable of recognizing this, there is a solution. They can grow up or get out.

Let’s pray for the former.

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #homophobia jesus-is-savior.com

ANTICHRIST BEAST SYSTEM WARNING: THIS MINISTRY IS BEING CENSORED BY GOOGLE AND YOUTUBE! (Google owns YouTube). Compare the below chart stats (look at the orange column for unique visitors between 2019 and 2017). In September of 2017 JIS received 364,372 unique visitors for the month, but by February of 2018 it dwindled down to only 180,672 unique visitors. The total number of web visitors hasn't been this low since 2011. There's proof of censorship!!! Land of liberty? Freedom of speech? I don't think so!!! Due to internet censorship by the now forming New World Order, the number of my web visitors has decreased by a whopping 50-75%. If you look at the total hits, I've lost 75% of my web visitors over the past 5 years. Google has the blood of millions of hellbound sinners on their hands! Google by far is the source of most of this ministry's web visitors. Satan is the God of this evil world, and he WILL have his evil way for now; but the Bible says the Devil KNOWS that his time is short, and he is relentlessly working to kill, steal and destroy the work of God. Revelation 12:12, “Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.” That's okay, everything's alright in my Father's house, where there's joy, joy, joy!!! The biggest hindrance to the Devil's NWO is the New Testament Church, i.e., born-again Christians! 2nd Thessalonians 2:7, “For the mystery of iniquity [NWO] doth already work: only he [the Holy Spirit in believers] who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way [the Rapture].” Even so, come, Lord Jesus!!!!!!!

Jesus-is-Savior.com received (with much thanks) the following worldwide visitors during 2019...

I Love You All, Whosoever You May Be! - Thank You Sincerely From My Heart!!!

Although 6,230670 total web visitors for 2019 sounds like a lot (and I praise God for each and every one of them), that number was 10,879,326 for 2017. The discrepancy is due to Google's ruthless censorship of conservative and Christian articles that criticize the LGBTQ agenda, expose the evils of abortion, and other sensitive topics of THE TRUTH. It is tragic that this type of communist oppression exists in America today, while sodomites online are completely free to express their degenerate deathstyle and views. We are at war over morality, righteousness and the truth in America today!

James Hawley #homophobia #transphobia gaytimes.co.uk

James Hawley has issued an apology for his recent anti-LGBTQ+ comments.

Earlier this week, the professional boxer responded to a comment asking whether he supports the community on his now-deleted TikTok account.

“I a thousand and million per cent do not agree with this, no,” he said in the video. “Listen, I can understand girls get with each other all the time at parties and things like that. I don’t care. It’s not a problem. I’d want ’em to get with each other in front of me, but boys on the other hand and transgenders… Something seriously wrong with you.

“What on Earth makes you want to change your gender and get f****d in the arse? What is up with you dirty c***s? I feel sorry for your families.”

Hawley’s vile tirade went viral on Twitter after Drag Race UK star Baga Chipz shared it with her followers, calling him “homophobic filth” and an “absolute piece of dirt”. Points were made.

Following widespread backlash on social media, MTK Global – “the world’s foremost boxer management company” – dropped him as a client.

“The management team have made the decision to terminate Mr Hawley’s contract with MTK Global with immediate effect and will no longer be representing him in any format,” they wrote in a statement.

Dr. Angela M Croone #fundie #crackpot #homophobia #conspiracy amazon.com

The Hub Of Homosexuality: The Hub of Homosexuality (Galgaliel Angels & Demons Book 2)

Description

Although God destroyed the antediluvians with a deluge, idolatry once again would reunite in the hearts of men holding its sway. The Israelites would fall prey, to the idols of Egypt, though they left Egypt, Egypt did not leave them, nor did they resist its cohabitation. The Israelites would reduce themselves to the works of Aaron’s molten calf; abandoning God before Mosses could step foot off the Mount; corrupting themselves before a chthonic effigy. The Israelites were naked before the idol shaming themselves before their enemies. Interestingly, God no longer refers to the Israelites as His people but Moses’ people! The people were stiff-neck, concreted to the flesh, and about to descend to the throws of hell with toll paid before their golden god. If it were not for the intercession of Moses reiterating the promises that God spoke unto Abraham, there would have been a nation of Moses, rather than Abraham. Alongside of the proceeding generations came new levels and realms of idolatry with a multidimensional assortment of wickedness, an infectious cross-trait of perversity, which is beyond the scope of their predecessors. Generations who has forsaken the Lord to serve gods such as Dagon, Baal, Ashtoreth, Milcom, Chemosh, Nergal, Ashima and alike, polytheism at its height. Israel substituted the Living God for a host of artificial gods (Polytheism), gods they have not known thus bowing the knee perpetually without pause. Israel’s spiritual adultery fuels the Lord’s anger against them for evil, delivering Israel unto the hands of their enemies

TN88 #homophobia #transphobia stormfront.org

At my school in a little white town in Tennessee, a school that has only 4 black kids in it, their is about 5 or 6 trannys. That's right their is more trannys at my school than blacks! Me along with others try to just ignore them, but they are the most annoying thing I have had to deal with in my entire life.

They just group up and be obnoxiously loud at anytime possible (In the mornings, cafeteria, hallways, etc.) Then when someone tells them to stfu or to quit blocking the hallways, they tell a teacher saying their being bullied for being trans.

They made a GSA (Gay Straight Alliance) club at my school last year, it's filled with every tranny at my school and I think 2 lesbians. Most homos at my school don't even want to be associated with them. It has caused alot of fuss from most of my classmates, people were tearing down filers for it, saying we needed our own club, etc. The principal even called it a distraction to the learning experince.

Do any of you have this problem at your school? image I want someone to relate to though I hope nobody else is going to a school like mine.

Matthew McLaughlin #homophobia #fundie #psycho metro.co.uk

[News story from 2015]

A Christian Californian lawyer has proposed a bill which would make it legal to murder gay people using ‘bullets in the head or any other convenient method’. Anyone who ‘touches another person of the same gender for sexual gratification’ would get the death penalty – administered either by state executioners, or members of the public. Attorney Matthew McLaughlin’s Sodomite Suppression Act would also make it an offence to campaign for gay rights, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine. Gay rights groups have called for McLaughlin to be disbarred after he filed his proposal, paying £135 for the privilege.

The bill says, ‘Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating-wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.’

BlackCel62 #homophobia incels.co

[Serious] The real reason why neckbeards at IT tell us to "JuSt HaVe SeX wItH eAcHoThEr BrO."

Because they've done it themselves. They couldn't cope with the fact no woman will ever touch them with a 10 foot pole. So the neckbeards resorted to fuck each other to cope with the fact they will never see pussy a day in their lives. Them calling us "closeted gays" is nothing more than projection, they're still ashamed to admit they resorted to faggotry just to say that they've had sex. And these same fags want to act like they're superior to us incels in every way because they "lost their V-Card's." These fags are even lower than the truest of truecels. They want us to sink as low as they did to "escape inceldom" because the more people that do it, the more they feel comfortable about the fact that they resorted to faggotry to finally have sex.

Launch_Day_My_Dudes #homophobia reddit.com

[Comment under "Poland's Catholic conservative President Duda re-elected"]

@WolviePL

To start of with: Media Polish State Media (TVP) is very biased. For example. Rafał Trzaskowski, criticised the plan to build massive airport tens of kilometres away from Warsaw, saying it would be useless, as there are already airports IN Warsaw that could be expanded, which the government doesn’t want to do, as well as a giant airport that was at the time being built in Berlin (it still is I believe) with which it would be hard to compete, as most connections would likely go through there. TVP made an article about it titled: „Trzaskowski nie chce 150 tys. miejsc pracy, bo mamy lotnisko w Berlinie”(“Trzaskowski doesn’t want 150k work places, because there is an airport in Berlin”). Do I really need to say more? My next point: Government’s Social Campaigns After Andrzej Duda was first elected in 2015 one of the first things he had done was implementing a program called “Rodzina 500+” (Family 500+). The idea of this campaign was to in courage Polish couples to have more children by giving monthly 500 PLN (112€, 127$, 100£) to the family for every child(basically all people under 18). Then there came Wyprawka+,Mieszkanie+, 13th and 14th pension, lowering the retirement age and more. All of those has led to drainage of the Polish budget, covered up by raises of taxes and printing more money. I think I don’t have to tell you what effect will this have on Polish economy in the future. Next:Corruption I am going to keep it brief and only give you one example. A few weeks ago the Polish government bought over 100k surgical masks for over 5 million PLN (50 PLN for a bloody surgical mask). The seller turned out to be a friend of the minister of health. Said friend is an skiing instructor. A FUCKING SKIING INSTRUCTOR. Not to mention that the minister’s brother turned out to be involved. To top it all of the masks turned out to be useless as they didn’t live up to the safety standards. No one was held accountable. Last but not least: Lack of tolerance. When I heard that the Andrzej Duda wants to change the Polish constitution to specifically make it say that Homosexual marriages are illegal I thought I was going to shit myself out of anger. Don’t get me wrong, I myself am a straight male and on top of that a catholic. Also, around to days before election, to many houses in my city, there has been delivered a letter from the Vice-President of the City. It heavily criticised the President for hanging a LGBT flag in the town hall. In conclusion I want to move out of Poland, believe me it hurts me to say it, because I love my country, as this country has no future. The corruption, regressive society, propaganda and an inevitable economic crisis has led me to this conclusion.

Edit: I forgot to mention how bad and corrupt the law system is.

Reply from Launch_Day_My_Dudes:

I understand and agree with your other objections, but why get particularly angry at discrimination against homosexuals?

They are not a particularly productive fraction of the Polish population (the Jews, Tatars, and recently Vietnamese have generally been beneficial to the country, but what good can come of some purse-collecting fashion queens? Indeed, they seem generally much less patriotic than any of those other minorities). They absolutely should not get tax breaks for marrying, since such relationships do not benefit the state in the slightest (so why subsidize them?). To be honest, many heterosexual couples should not get tax breaks or government benefits either.

Arson Greyer #fundie #sexist #homophobia returnofkings.com

AN IDIOT’S GUIDE TO NEW WESTERN SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS

Arson Greyer
Arson is an anti-SJW crusader and critic of sexual marketplace deregulation who has gotten filthy rich from the non-existent gender pay gap. He enjoys spending as much time as possible outside of America in places where short-haired women are viewed as social outcasts rather than strong and independent.

Up until a couple of years ago, my basic understanding of human sexuality was roughly as follows: there are men, and there are women. A person’s sexual orientation could be defined as one of heterosexual (being sexually attracted to the opposite gender), homosexual (being sexually attracted to others of the same gender) or bisexual (being sexually attracted to both genders).

Recently, however, I’ve been coming across a plethora of new terms in mainstream cultural commentary that purportedly seek to describe other sexual orientations. I quickly found myself coming across such terms as “pan,” “demi,” and even “homoflexible,” wondering what the hell they all mean.

Even the dating app OKCupid has recently broadened the options on gender and sexuality its users can display in their profiles. What was LGBT has now expanded even further, with seemingly new sexual orientations materializing out of thin air on the regular. I’ve written the following “Idiot’s Guide” to help my fellow men avoid the same confusion I’ve suffered in making sense of this new alphabet soup of sexual orientations.

But first, a disclaimer:

You’ll notice that I’ve titled the article as a guide to new “western” sexual orientations. That’s because one would be incredibly hard pressed to find terms like “asexual” or “sapiosexual” being used in any non-western context. In fact, I can’t recall ever even seeing one instance of a woman on a Russian, Ukrainian, Asian or Latin American dating site ever mentioning she identified with one of these new-age, alternate sexual orientations.

Interestingly, the usage of these new sexual orientation terms seems to be primarily restricted to the discourse of two basic areas of the internet:

1. Articles by SJWs and feminists on known manosphere-hating sites (e.g. Jezebel).

2. The social media and dating profiles of young middle and upper-middle class white women.

The definitions and examples I’ll provide below are more relevant to understanding these terms as used in area “b,” but nonetheless will provide clarity in other contexts also. Okay, let’s begin:

1. Pansexual
Definition: sexual attraction to all sexes and gender identities.

Famous Alleged Pansexuals: Madonna, Lady Gaga.

More Accurate Description: Bisexual. Proponents of pansexuality claim that it differs from bisexuality in that it is gender blind, so allegedly pansexuals wouldn’t know a cock from a vagina if it slapped them in the face. The queer “movement,” however, claims both pansexuality and bisexuality can mean attraction to not just the male and female gender, but any gender (whatever those others are). So, they’re essentially the same.


4. Demisexual
Definition: sexual attraction to another person contingent upon deep emotional and romantic connection.

More Accurate Description: Women who are approaching the end of easy riding on the cock carousel and desperately want to lock down a good man before the wall or have the “baby rabies.”

With these in mind, a demisexual woman has resolved to restrict future access to her worn-out pussy to only those who want a deep, romantic connection (read: beta-provider LTR) with her. This is, of course, until she meets the next alpha who suits her fancy and is good for a quick one-nighter.

5. Asexual
Definition: is not sexually attracted to anyone; doesn’t have sexual feelings.

More Accurate Description: A woman who has allegedly never experienced sexual feelings yet signed up for a dating site and posted several extremely slutty, suggestive photos under the guise of “trying this out” or “just to make new friends”.

All indications indicate this woman has had multiple previous sexual encounters (including gangbangs), but is using the “asexual” label to discourage messages from thirsty betas who will pass over her profile because “she’s asexual”.

Conclusion
What’s common among each of these supposed new sexual orientations is that we already have a term that has long-described almost exactly the same kind of sexual attraction. This raises an important question: why are people classifying their sexual orientation under new, buzzword banners when there’s already a well-understood term that describes it precisely?

The answer lies in the attention-whoring tendencies of the two groups – a and b – that use these terms the most. To be merely bisexual isn’t counter-mainstream enough anymore and calling oneself that doesn’t get the same kind of attention it once did, when few people identified as this. Therefore, to feed the egos of members of these two groups, new terms for already-existing sexual orientations had to be conjured up to maintain a fresh supply of new attention and coverage.

They’re new labels for the same sort of old sexual behaviour. The next time you see an American woman who is calling herself sapiosexual, heteroflexible, or whatever new term is invented next month to describe long-standing sexual behavior, the most prudent option is to ignore it completely, as a shit test, and game on as you usually would.

These new sexual orientations are, for the most part, nothing more than a cry for attention. They win if we if give it to them.

Linda Harvey #transphobia #homophobia #racist #fundie missionamerica.com

What does this have to do with the original goal of homosexual clubs -- to highlight the problem of bullying?

Sounds like the bullied are being tutored to become the bullies, drinking deeply from a poisonous brew of misinformation, resentment toward authority, unhealthy sexual attractions and gender delusion.

It’s not just in the GSA clubs where America’s schoolchildren will be corrupted in the new anti-American, Marxist orthodoxy. It’s also occurring in sex education networks where Planned Parenthood and its affiliates direct the action.

Advocates for Youth, a major promoter of “comprehensive sexuality education” (usually condom-obsessed and XXX-rated) recently announced an online meeting for students called “Mutual Aid,” designed allegedly to help black “LGBTQ” youth. One of the groups leading the meeting is “Freedom Fighters DC,” describing themselves as a group of “activists focused on change through organized actions while simultaneously advocating to #DefundThePolice.”

Yes, this has so much relevance to preventing pregnancy. And taxpaying parents are always eager to open the door to such influence in the lives of their 13-year-olds.

Advocates for Youth receives funds from the federal government through the Centers for Disease Control’s Division of Adolescent and School Health. Shouldn’t such funding end for any group training youth to hate the police?

Watch for “reproductive rights” to piggy-back on racial equality concerns. In the Cleveland, Ohio area, a website funded by the U.S. HHS Department of Adolescent Health is called 216Teens.org , which is adamantly pro-abortion and pro-“LGBTQ.” Recently a July 16 social media post advertised an online “summit” for teens ages 13 to 19 to learn about the intersection of “racial and reproductive justice.”

So what is imagined to be this “intersection”? It’s likely to teach that any limitation on access to contraception and abortion for minority students is now part of the definition of “racism.”

Of course! Corrupt children sexually by playing the race card. We need to be one step ahead of this devious betrayal of children.

Roosh V #homophobia #racist #fundie rooshv.com

[From "YouTube Banned Me… Now What?"]

On Monday, July 13, YouTube terminated both my main channel and Roosh Hour Clips channel, deleting all my videos even though I did not have any existing community strikes. They also deleted all my personal favorites and playlists.

Since I don’t glorify violence against any group, I presume I was banned for “encouraging hatred” (i.e. speaking the truth) about sodomites who groom children and those who worship in the synagogues of Satan. It seems that my coded means to discuss the current purveyors of evil was not enough to keep my account in good standing, and so I was banned like many other dissidents before me, including Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, Owen Benjamin, E. Michael Jones, Rick Wiles (TruNews), Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, and David Icke.

[...]

I choose the e-hermit option

When I originally joined YouTube, I never had to self-censor myself. I could say whatever I wanted as long as I didn’t promote violence. Once YouTube started partnering with Jewish groups such as the ADL, speech for everyone on the platform was progressively curtailed. Who is to say that won’t happen to another platform that today advertises “free speech”? Chinese-owned DLive seems fine now, but no one can make any guarantees of its future direction. Therefore I will not spend several years building myself up on a site that will arbitrarily cancel me.

From this point on, I intend to take the path of an e-hermit. I will hunker down onto my own domain and forum and host as much content as I can, including videos. There are dozens of cloud providers for video self-hosting instead of the two or three video platforms. Even if I get banned from every cloud provider in existence, I will simply rent dedicated servers from one of hundreds of hosting companies and serve videos that way. It will be significantly harder for them to stop me now.

To defray costs, I can take up the fashionable idea of charging $5/month for access. Perhaps I will leave my podcast free but save videos for members, and maybe I can throw up some bonus content as well. I’ll figure something out, but first I will begin work on establishing an archive for all my deleted videos (in the meantime, you can use Bitchute).

Shizuru-Minamino #homophobia #fundie deviantart.com

image
The Holy Bible makes this quite clear. The Bible is the law and the written Word of God, himself. It doesn't matter if something that is sinful is made legal. What is sin is the product of the Devil. God made us man and woman, for one man and one woman to marry and bear children. That's what we are intended to be.

The people who created the U.S, were Christians, following the Word of God. They used the Ten Commandments to create our laws and constitutional amendments. Our country was created with the love of Jesus in mind. He wants all of us to follow his Father's plans. There is no lie about this and it's not something ancient, because the Bible is never ancient. It never has set dates in history. It's written like the events in it are always present.

There's a man in prison for 15 years in Iowa for burning the Rainbow Flag that was posted outside of his church. He did the righteous thing, because the Rainbow Flag is really a symbol of lust. It's not love. It's not a Christian flag. Real love is about loving everyone, but also it's about a husband and a wife loving each other. What this man burned was a flag symbolizing lust. And Satan enjoys confusing people under this flag by saying it's love. He claims being gay and lesbian is the way to be. That we must accept LBGTQ for the new way. This is what Satan wants to trap us with.

But, LBGTQ is never the new way. It's just a way to sway people to the realms of Hell after death. The man that was sent to prison, will be receiving judgement from God, the real judge of this world. He'll have his place in Heaven for burning a symbol of lust that was forced upon the House of God. The real path to Heaven, is to stay with God's plans. Swallow your gay/lesbian pride and be straight. One husband and one wife creates children. One man and one woman creates a home for the presence of God to be made welcome. And one man and one woman at the time of death creates less to no sin that needs to be pardoned, in order to enter God's kingdom. You can't have anything sinful to hang off you. Being gay/lesbian is one of those sins. Claiming it as love is another. And saying, "but my country says it's okay" doesn't make it any less sinful. All that says to Him is "that country needs to be gotten rid of, if it's forcing my children to obey sin instead of me".

bestgoyever #conspiracy #homophobia #racist #quack #wingnut reddit.com

Facebook is currently undergoing a siege of advertisement boycotts because they won’t censor the platform enough, but for some reason, investors keep pouring money into the company. Basically, the Israeli group “Anti-Defamation League” is threatening to publicly accuse anyone who continues advertising with Facebook of supporting the Holocaust.

After stonewalling requests to ban Donald Trump and everyone who supports him, Facebook stonewalled. Now, they’re beginning to do categorical bans. They will no doubt just keep slowly doing more and more bans, all the while protesting that they support freedom of speech, like a woman protesting between giggles as you slowly tear off items of clothing. It almost seems like the whole thing is just a stage play being acted out for the edification of the audience.

The latest categorical ban comes against people trying to help homosexuals.

Male homosexuality is a vice and hygiene problem that has occurred in society for a very long time, primarily oriented towards pubescent boys. Historically, the men engaged in this behavior did not break away and form a degenerate subculture, or have this sterile aversion to women and family life. They had wives and families like everyone else.

This was a side behavior, not a lifestyle or an identity.

It was like this with the Greeks, Japanese and others, and is still like this with most Moslems and religious Jews.

Homosexualism, on the other hand, is a foreign ideology that was invented in San Francisco in the 1960s. It is an identity cult built around a pathological fixation on a sterile sexual hobby, to the exclusion of the principle function of sex. It is a rebellion against the natural family order – like feminism for men. Since it is a belief system and a cult, it should be curable by psychosocial intervention.

However, Mark Zuckerberg would rather that young boys be lured into this cult, get diseases, be psychologically destroyed, and die young with no children.

It is a disgrace to the medical profession that the American Medical Association would cite these over-the-top, holocaustic claims.

There would be no need to do anything traumatizing to confused teenagers in order to teach them to act normally. Like any other behavior disorder, this could be mitigated with individual and group psychotherapy and group activities reinforcing appropriate behavior.

Not only is it impossible to advertise these services, but it is increasingly impossible to offer them in the West – they were banned in Germany this year.

Anonymous #wingnut #racist #homophobia archive.4plebs.org

[Picture of a D-Day soldier from Call of Duty WW2]

OK boys this is it! This is what you were trained for. Raised for. What your fathers did, your grandfathers did for you - and what you are know tasked to do for your duty to your country - your family - your countymen. Do you men really want your grandchildren to be white? Can you men, in your heart of hearts as Americans look yourselves in the mirror and say that you fucked up the chance to have your 7 year old grandson not shake his ass for a mob of faggots waving money among a cheering crowd of cocksuckers? Private Smith! Could you stand to look a half retarded nigger named LaQuarvarious in the eye and tell him that he can’t fuck that little boy in his ass with his AIDS dick? Well, if not, then just go ahead and burn the fucking flag. Surrender to the krauts and let your seeds live without the enrichment of third world disease and violence you pathetic maggots. Alright! DEPLOY! MG42 at 4 o’clock! By god men this is for the extinction of our race! If we don’t take that pillbox then whites could be a fucking majority in a century!

Ethan Huff #transphobia #homophobia #fundie #wingnut naturalnews.com

Is it okay to call biological men who “self-identify” as “females” things like “gender confused” or “gender dysphoric?” How about people who decided to become “trans” and later reverted back to their original biological gender – should they even be acknowledged as existing? Not according to the Trans Journalists Association (TJA), which recently released a new style guide that pushes journalists to stop publishing “offensive” content that mentally ill transgenders say is “transphobic.”

According to the TJA, phrases like “biological gender” and “opposite sex” need to go because they supposedly exclude transgenders from the equation. Referring to one’s “biological sex” is also off-limits because transgenders want the world to think of them as actually being the opposite sex, even though their biological identities prove otherwise.

It is no longer permissible to write “man” or “woman,” either, because many transgenders do not consider such words to be “inclusive.” And instead of differentiating between “biological males” “trans males,” or “biological females” and “trans females,” the LGBTQ mafia instead wants journalists to write things like “people with ovaries” and “people with prostates.”

“The media bears a great responsibility when it comes to ensuring accurate and sensitive coverage of trans communities,” the new style guide states, adding that professional journalists have a responsibility “to begin to improve trans coverage” by using words that transgenders find acceptable.

“When you write the word women, are you including trans women?” the guide further asks. “Does it apply to non-binary people and trans men? Most reporting about health according to gender overlooks trans people and incorrectly equates anatomy to gender.”

Try as they might to redefine human biology, the trans cult is wrong in suggesting that “people with ovaries” can be anything other than women. The same goes for “people with prostates,” who are always men. If you are born a woman, then you have female reproductive organs. And if you are born a man, then you have male reproductive organs.

Sorry, LGBTQs, but that is an undeniable fact, no matter how much you try to bully the writing community into kowtowing to your delusions. There are only two genders: male and female. And there is no such thing as a transgender, which is just a mentally ill person with gender dysphoria who refuses to accept biological reality.

These statements alone are enough to get us banned from every major social media platform and search engine, but they represent the truth that the trans cult is unwilling to accept. In other words, this publication will not now, nor ever, take this new style guide seriously.

SmuttyTheClown #homophobia #wingnut deviantart.com

Smutty, like yourself, is on a never-ending quest to rid the world of degeneracy, and it warms his cold heart whenever he sees a few rays of nonrainbow-colored light!

Despite all of the nastiness that has shown its ugly gender-confused face, this "LGBT Pride Month" has seen some promising developments in the fight against gay aggression. Jack Phillips won his six-year fight against the fag couple that tried to force him to bake them a wedding cake. On June 4th, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the Christian baker from Colorado. Guess the lefties will have to go somewhere else next time they want a bakery of leftist culture, such as a man and dog getting it on!

That was followed today, June 27th, by an announcement that shocked many. Decrepit and pro-gay Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement. That means that Trump can name a replacement, and hopefully get him confirmed before the November elections or during the lame duck session. Baby killers and LGBT degenerates everywhere are shaking in their shoes.

A few weeks ago the LGBT community was humiliated by a more hidden foe, as the anons on 4chan's pol pulled their latest prank. Memes were spread for #droptheB, which confused many queers and "allies" into thinking that it was a well-meaning campaign. After all, does bisexual not imply that there are only two genders, and not 63? LGBT is then a hypocritical term.

Speaking of hypocrites, leftist cunt Kathleen Wynne, the Premier of Ontario, Canada, was absolutely shalacked in the election earlier this month. Warned to quit beforehand, the cunt thankfully decided that she wanted to bring her party down with her. They finished third with only seven seats and failed to maintain official party status! On June 7th election night she finally gave up and tearfully resigned as Liberal Party leader. An open lesbian, it looks like some schoolkids might soon be saved from her programs that intend to make them as sexually disturbed as she is.

Many other battles to defend our children against gay encroachment are still ongoing, some as ridiculous as the mental health of a fictional Disney character. There is a push to make Disney's Elsa be a carpet muncher in the upcoming kids movie, Frozen 2. Rather than shoot down the perverse notion, aimed at indoctrinating children into the gay sexual lifestle, writer and co-director Jennifer Lee told hate site HuffPost that "we have tons of conversations about it" and "We’ll see where we go".

Consider that Disney's Marvel Entertainment has already confirmed that outwardly faggy characters will soon appear in their films. Kevin Feige, President of Marvel Studios, just told The Playlist on June 25th that it will be "Both [characters] you’ve seen and ones you haven’t seen." So, there will be some newly invented superfags, and you might wake up to find that your favorite formerly masculine comic book hero now enjoys the intimacy of other men.

Drag Queen Story Hour, the American child abuse tour, continues to flaunt their sexual sickness in front of children as young as four and five years old. Forbes, which has become a fag news outlet lately, published an article on June 20th claiming "drag queens are the perfect people to read out loud to little ones" because they capture the "gender fluidity of childhood". Today, in fact, the kinder-seeking queens are in Beloit, Wisconsin, a town of 36,000 people. The residents have shown some fight by writing and calling the library, but in the end, their town's kids will most likely get their dose of gay sex propaganda.

That brings us to the latest joint venture between homosexuality and pedophilia which begins airing tomorrow. RuPaul's thinly-veiled young-boy-indoctrination cartoon, Drag Tots, will air on the World of Wonder channel. Today, Entertainment Weekly begins their congratulatory article about it with the following line, "It’s never too early to slip into your first pair of heels, contour your cheekbones, or learn the basics of drag culture."

On the contrary, Smutty encourages you to go out and win more victories for sexual sanity. The media is clearly trying to get your sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters to live a life of sadness and pain, probably culminating in an early death from drugs or disease. It is never to early to strike out in defense.

Carlos Whitlock Porter #racist #psycho #crackpot #homophobia cwporter.com

IN PRAISE OF AIDS

AIDS is a communicable disease of the Negro race, the non-white races, the racially mixed, and all persons that mix with Negroes (Hispanics, Jews, race-mixers, drug addicts, homosexuals, etc).

Among whites, it is estimated that 5% of Italians and 14% of Swedes are in fact racially immune to AIDS. They are said to possess the G2-fast gene, exclusive to certain members of the White Race and providing full immunity if passed on by both parents.

Since AIDS is a disease of minority groups, the only concern of the liberals, predictably enough, is to protect their "civil rights". Carriers must therefore be exempt from all laws applying to the carriers of other diseases (such as syphilis or typhoid). Insurance companies must be prohibited from asking any questions designed to determine whether or not an individual may or may not be a carrier. All laws against homosexual activity, no matter how lenient, must be abolished. Negroes must be encouraged to screw white girls at all costs. No problem!

Michael Bauman #homophobia #fundie theimaginativeconservative.org

You might recall the awful option faced by the title character in “Sophie’s Choice:” Pick one child or the other. It’s not a choice any mother wants to make. No matter what she chooses, her loss is unutterable.

Nor would any child want to make the same choice in reverse: “Mommy or Daddy, Sally. Pick one.”

But that is the ugly position into which same sex marriage plunges children, except that the children themselves do not get to choose. Someone else chooses for them.

No matter what you might think about same sex marriage, we know this: Any child raised under a same sex union faces a tremendous loss—either no Mommy or no Daddy. In a union where two men or two women are involved, that’s always the outcome. When Mommy picks a woman or Daddy picks a man as a life partner, the children always lose something enormously valuable and irreplaceable: a mother or a father.

That loss often has tragic consequences for a child. If, for example, you are raised in a home with no father around, the odds that you will drop out of school, that you will take or sell drugs, that you will go to prison, that you will be poor, and that your children will suffer the same fate you did all skyrocket. That same cycle of hopelessness and crime follows upon the absence of a mother.

When Mommy has sex with another woman, it doesn’t make that other woman a Daddy. Having sex with Mommy doesn’t make you a Daddy any more than drinking milk makes you a calf.

The point here is not remotely homophobic. The point here is not that Mommy and her lover, or Daddy and his, are to be shunned, much less hated. The point here is that mothers and fathers are fundamentally important to the development of children, and therefore to the future of the nation, which depends upon the development and maturation of the next generation. That works best when children have both a father and a mother.

I say so because, according to a recent groundbreaking study by University of Texas scholar Mark Regnerus, we discover this:

Compared to children who were raised in intact homes with both the biological father and mother present to raise them, the children of homosexual parents grow up to:

Be Much more likely to receive welfare
Have lower educational attainment
Report more ongoing “negative impact” from their family of origin
Be more likely to suffer from depression
Have been arrested more often
(If they are female) Have had more sexual partners—both male and female

If they were the children of lesbian mothers, they are:

More likely to be currently cohabiting
Almost 4 times more likely to be currently on public assistance
Less likely to be currently employed full-time
More than 3 times more likely to be unemployed
Nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than entirely heterosexual
Three times as likely to have had an affair while married or cohabiting
An astonishing 10 times more likely to have been “touched sexually by a parent or other adult caregiver.”
Nearly 4 times as likely to have been “physically forced” to have sex against their will
More likely to have “attachment” problems related to the ability to depend on others
Use marijuana more frequently
Smoke more frequently
Have more often pled guilty to a non-minor offense

None of these dire statistics seem to have much weight with the same sex marriage crowd. Rather, they argue that marriage equality is rooted in human equality. But that bogus argument does not work. It moves illogically from one kind of equality to another. The equality of all persons does not equal the equality of all lifestyles or all relationships. For example, the mere fact that all persons are created equal does not mean that polygamy or incestual marriage ought therefore to be made legal. You cannot move logically from the equality of persons to the equality of actions, choices, lifestyles, or relationships. It simply does not follow.

Same sex marriage advocates also argue that it is wrong to make value judgment about marriage. Yet they allow themselves to make value judgments about who should get to marry. Here again they fail logically. By insisting that same sex unions ought to be considered marriages on a par with heterosexual marriages, they make a value judgment about marriages, both their own marriages and those of others. If they are against making value judgments about marriage, then they have to stop saying what they say. But of course they won’t. Rather, they press their judgments on others while, at the same time, refusing to permit others to make judgments.

Let me clarify a point often misunderstood: I am not saying that marriages without children are not marriages. I never once said that or meant that. I am saying that marriage and family go usually together. I am talking about a common connection between marriage and family, not a necessary pre-condition for marriage. Marriage and family are simply the usual mechanism of creating and nurturing the next generation. But in the case of a homosexual union, that is naturally impossible. And if you try to grant them by some other means the children nature denies them, then the children are statistically more likely to suffer bad consequences as a result, which is not the case with a heterosexual marriage. Or, put differently, my wife and I have no children as yet. I obviously do not argue that we have no marriage.If we had children, it wouldn’t as likely damage the children involved as would being raised by two men or two women, a situation that entails the significant loss of either mommy or daddy. In short, wise governments and wise citizens do well always to remember that important and basic fact of life and to avoid making laws that undermine the traditional family and traditional family roles, which serve us and our offspring best.

Books mentioned in this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore.

All comments are moderated and must be civil, concise, and constructive to the conversation. Comments that are critical of an essay may be approved, but comments containing ad hominem criticism of the author will not be published. Also, comments containing web links or block quotations are unlikely to be approved. Keep in mind that essays represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Imaginative Conservative or its editor or publisher.

Theamdrag #homophobia #dunning-kruger gamefaqs.gamespot.com

Troy Baker is not Word of God. He's said he voiced Kanji from the mindset that he's gay/bi, but that's just how he got into character. Kanji is a complicated character just like Naoto, and just like Naoto, people misconstrue the meaning behind his characterization. Naoto is upset over not being a man, feeling that's holding her back, but through the game and her social link, she learns that it's not her gender that matters, it's that she's happy being the best person she can be, regardless of gender. It basically is a middle finger to transgenderism by saying that your gender means jack-squat. It's who you are as a person that makes you. If you're a sucky man, you're gonna be a sucky woman, and vice-versa.

For Kanji, it's very similar. It's not his orientation that defines him, or his hobbies, it's how he treats others and the person he is. He's confused when starting to interact with Naoto, which some people would like to chalk up to him liking a "guy", but let's remember science... Teenage girls, regardless of what type of clothes they wear, will exude female pheromones. Which attract guys. Kanji could easily liked a male Naoto as a friend, but those pheromones were telling him some other things and saying "You like this person", which confused this straight guy as he wouldn't like a guy normally. Which we find out, he never liked a guy there. He liked a girl.

If anything, the whole "Kanji is gay" argument is insulting to both tomboys and girls who wear their hair short and wear more unisex clothing. It's basically saying that you aren't a girl or that only bi/gay men will like you because you look like a guy. From everything we can tell from our available material, and with no Word of God to say otherwise, Kanji is straight. His sole love interest is a girl. He may be a softer guy under his hard exterior, but that doesn't make him gay either, just a sensitive straight guy. And there's plenty of them out there. Many just still hide it similar to Kanji because otherwise they'd be labeled things like feminine or gay, just like what incessant fanboys/girls insist on doing with Kanji.

Bruno Buscaroli #fundie #homophobia #sexist #racist #wingnut returnofkings.com

TODAY’S CONSERVATIVE HAS BECOME YESTERDAY’S LIBERAL

Bruno is a young man who used to dismiss red pillers as alarmists. Then he spent a semester in a college campus and became one himself. Now he educates himself through the internet and a library card.

With Donald Trump as president of the United States, it would seem as though traditional beliefs are making a comeback in the West. However, one only needs talk to the average ‘’conservative’’ for a while to realize they’re not as conservative as they think they are. Rather, they’ve accepted and integrated many leftist beliefs into their own worldview. They’ve become nothing more than yesterday’s liberals, and now defend ideas against which their predecessors used to fight. Let’s briefly look at a few examples:

Homosexuality
[Picture of Trump Holding the LGBTQ+ Rainbow Flag]
[caption: He’s cool with them]
The very idea of homosexuality used to be socially abhorrent during the early 20th century in the West. If you look at conservative politicians now, however, you’ll find they’re pretty okay with having gays around. We’ve reached a point where modern Western culture has become universally acceptant of homosexuals.

Donald Trump, for instance, ensured he’d do everything in his power to protect LGBTQ citizens from hateful ideologies (might have earned him more voters, but you get the point). Even allowing gays to get married is accepted among conservatives nowadays, and suggesting that it might be a bad idea gets you funny looks at best.

Women in the workplace
[Picture of Women in suits working at a computer]

Encouraging women to study and pursue long term careers damages the family structure by discouraging traditional gender roles. If women are busy working, they can’t focus on being good wives and mothers. Not only that, but it may even cause them to forgo marriage and kids completely.

Despite this, you’ll find almost no one on the mainstream right suggesting women should focus on the home. They believe that doing so would ‘’invite misogyny and sexism’’ or get them compared to ‘’crazy far righters’’. Denial of biological truths does society no favors. The longer the average citizen believes men and women to have the same roles in a family, the more damage will be done.

Sexual marketplace
[Picture of a Half-Naked Man kissing a Half-Naked Woman’s back]

Regulation of the sexual marketplace in the form of marriage and female chastity has long been central to the formation of healthy families in western societies. Without a strong and stable family unit, maintaining civilization becomes impossible. Since promiscuity is the opposite of chastity and monogamy, it naturally runs against family stability.

Characters like James Bond are looked up to as symbols of masculinity and role models for traditional men. While men should aspire to emulate his strong nature and character, emulating his love of casual sex is damaging to society in the long run. Sure, quick and easy sex can be real fun, but let’s not forget sexual liberation is inherently leftist and has done nothing but damage civilization.

Denying the importance of race
[Picture of an Anti-racist Protest]

Often seen as the most taboo of subjects, race gets ignored as much as possible by the mainstream right wing. Science tells us that human ethnic groups have genetic differences, ranging from physical strength to IQ levels. But to even speak about those differences in public is to invite an endless parade of comparisons to Hitler, so conservatives dodge the issue.

Instead, they often preach about civic nationalism, the idea of a nation being more based on its identity than it’s ethnicity. They say that as long as immigrants accept American values of Democracy and hard work, their ethnicity doesn’t matter. Sounds nice in theory, but a nation can’t survive once it’s demographic has been replaced.

You can’t win by defending alone
Conservatives nowadays don’t seem to know what it is they’re conserving. Their claims of standing for a traditional society feel empty when they also advocate for gender and marriage equality. As the culture war against leftists progressed, they slowly lost ground on almost every front. And as their image became demonized by the media, they conceded even further to try and appeal a bit more to the masses. After all, if the general public is okay with two men marrying, it’d make them the bad guys to say there’s something wrong with that.

Fear of being stigmatized makes them unable to push back, so they inevitably become weaker as time goes on. Even worse, the children of conservatives who were born into a watered down version of it don’t even realize it. A cycle forms then, in which the next generation is always more liberal than the next.

Mainstream Conservatives cannot reverse civilization’s decay, only delay it. Movements like Neo-Masculinity, the Alt Right and Alt Christianity lack the presence and member count of Conservatives, but are all better alternatives. Unlike the mainstream right, the dissident right isn’t afraid to push back against leftist narrative. One cannot win by defending alone. No matter how strong a castle’s walls, the stones that form it will crumble if it’s attackers aren’t stopped.

Conservatives are already thinking in the right direction, but haven’t fully taken the red pill. If the West is to survive, it’s imperative that we help these people fully wake up. They’re halfway there already, so hopefully they just need a few more nudges.

Illuminati Watchdog #homophobia #conspiracy #wingnut illuminatiwatchdog.blogspot.com

The discovery of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) in the 1970s provided that opportunity (History records that the virus itself was not discovered until the mid-1980s, just more brainwashing by the order). Knowing that the disease could be transmitted by few vectors other than sex, the Illuminati decided to deliberately infect America's gay population, including some of its own members. We know this sounds crazy but bear with us here, it will make sense.

By causing an epidemic among homosexuals (males in particular), the Illuminati was able to steer the media into covering this horrible plight, which in turn provided sympathy for gays. Instead of being viewed as deviants or perverts, homosexuals began to be seen as victims. Individual case studies telling the tragedies of numerous individuals began to pour into America's living rooms. Within a few years, Americans began to relent on some of its reservations about gay sex. By the 1990s, gays could openly flaunt their orientation in public. Ellen Degeneres came out on here show, and then there's the all too famous Seinfeld quote, "Not that there's anything wrong with that."

None of this acceptance would have occurred when it did if it wasn't for the AIDS crisis. While the Illuminati sacrificed hundreds of thousands of its own to pave the road to acceptance, the strategy was successful. AIDS forced America to focus on the plight of gays and see their lifestyle as non-threatening to their own. However, the Illuminati did not stop there. Instead of attaining mere toleration, it pushed (and continues to do so) to make homosexuality a mainstream lifestyle. Artists such as Katy Perry encourage children to experiment with bi-sexuality, and other programs such as "Six Feet Under" imply that everyone can be gay if they make the choice.

This revolution of homosexuality is now in full throttle, and it has been building since those very first AIDS cases were diagnosed over thirty years ago. That is the Illuminati's victory and its success after its failure in the 1960s.

Aussie Pete #conspiracy #wingnut #homophobia christianforums.com

I despise homosexuality. I would not want a gay teaching my children. If I say that publicly in Australia, I will be taken to court and sued for everything that I have. My kids are well and truly grown up, so it's not an issue for me now. I objected when the socialist greenies started brainwashing my 6 year old. That was 20 years ago. I was ignored but at least I was not punished.

Teachers are afraid to stand up for the truth. Men are avoiding teaching because they are presumed to be serial sex offenders, especially at primary level. Teachers here are constantly trained on the latest PC nonsense. George Orwell would recognise the approach. How teachers find time to teach is beyond me. That they are doing a lousy job is obvious. Kids struggle at the cash register to work out change. No wonder they want to eliminate cash. You need a degree in maths to subtract two from four. Don't start me on what passes for English these days. Even government data states that educational standards are in decline. The good new is that you can no longer buy a golliwog at the school fete. The world is so much better off. Not.

u/SNERG_Robot #homophobia #fundie reddit.com

[Before I start, as always, I apologize for any language errors. I am not a native English speaker, but I will try to write as correctly as possible].

I may be downvoted by liberal christians and non belivers, but i don't care :) Here we go.

Recently, I have often come across the view of liberal Christians that homosexuality is not a sin, not a mental problem or a perversion, and that homosexuals were born that way. They claim that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality at all, and we should give gay weddings in churches, appoint gay men as priests, church teachers, and preachers.

The Bible, however, leaves no doubt. And I am sure that quotations from the Bible were given many times on r / truechristianity, which clearly shows that homosexuality is condemned by God. Therefore, people with homosexual inclinations, if they believe in the biblical God and Christianity, should restrain themselves from homosexual acts, just like people addicted to alcohol or pornography, for example, should restrain themselves from their sin, even despite the powerful desire to get drunk or watch pornography.

I can present a broader scientific justification, but there is a lot of sexology and sex life of animals and human, so it should be read by mature people and I wouldn't like to behave improperly. If you want, I will upload this material.

------------------------

TLR: To sum up - Homosexuality is obviously a sin (clearly written in the Bible), it is not genetically determined, it can be treated as a mental problem, perversion, it can be caused by various causes, primarily due to the influence of upbringing and shaping a person, or as a result of perversion.

TFP Student Action #homophobia #fundie tfpstudentaction.org

1. It Is Not Marriage
Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.


2. It Violates Natural Law
Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union
Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage
One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society
By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution
In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

10. It Offends God
This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand
In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. We are not moved by personal hatred against any individual. In intellectually opposing individuals or organizations promoting the homosexual agenda, our only intent is the defense of traditional marriage, the family, and the precious remnants of Christian civilization.

As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against unrelenting and violent temptation to homosexual sin. We pray for those who fall into homosexual sin out of human weakness, that God may assist them with His grace.

We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weakness and strive to overcome it and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for these too.

We pray also for the judges, legislators and government officials who in one way or another take steps that favor homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.” We do not judge their intentions, interior dispositions, or personal motivations.

We reject and condemn any violence. We simply exercise our liberty as children of God (Rom. 8:21) and our constitutional rights to free speech and the candid, unapologetic and unashamed public display of our Catholic faith. We oppose arguments with arguments. To the arguments in favor of homosexuality and same-sex “marriage” we respond with arguments based on right reason, natural law and Divine Revelation.

In a polemical statement like this, it is possible that one or another formulation may be perceived as excessive or ironic. Such is not our intention.

Scott Lively #homophobia #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

“What does that mean when you’re walking around with your pants down like that?” Lively continued. “That comes from the prisons, and what that means is you have just raped someone. That’s how you crow that you have just committed sodomy on someone and you’re demonstrating that by your pants being down there. That’s what that means, so this homosexualization of the Black youth in that way was something that no one’s really talked about at all.”

“Bill Cosby, he stood up,” Lively stated.
“I don’t know that he was guilty of what he was convicted of, frankly,” he added. “I tend to believe him in all this, but he’s in prison now. He was taken down by 30-year-old charges just before Ferguson. … They went after Bill Cosby to silence him because the media would have gone to Bill Cosby — the conservative media if nobody else — would have gone to Bill Cosby if Ferguson had taken off the way they wanted it to. … Bill Cosby paid the price of being Bill Cosby I believe, and they got him out of the way before they did Ferguson and they had planned to do Ferguson in advance.”

Anonymous #homophobia #racist archive.4plebs.org

Are Californians the worst group of people alive today? And why do they insist on spilling into Oregon, Colorado and Washington like a puss-filled blister that's just popped?

I am very angry.
Very very angry about Californians.
Fucking Californians are everywhere in middle Tennessee now. I have Cali neighbors on two sides of my house now. They bitch about Trump. They bitch about confederate flags. They want to tear down confederate statues. They do weed and it stinks. They hate guns. A lot of them have no kids and push dogs around in baby strollers in below freezing weather. They buy 5 bedroom houses in my neighborhood to put all the kids they don't have in. They vote for democrats. They vote for more social programs and taxes. They are into weird new age shit. They are passive aggressive and put passive aggressive notes on your mailbox.They have excess money from moving to Tennessee because California is so fucking expensive because of all the taxes and social programs. They use the money to hire 12 spics to turn their whole yards into weird terraformed gardens. They also use the money to buy houses in cheaper neighborhoods and rent them to niggers. They also complain about the lack of niggers and spics. They look for bulls on craigslist, and not the animal kind. They hate animals that aren't yappy little faggot dogs or coyotes. "YOU SHOT THE INNOCENT COYOTE WHY... MUH WILDLIFE" They don't understand that suburban coyotes are bad and kill small yappy faggot dogs, chickens, and potentially childen. Although they might not mind if they killed children. Children cost sooo much money like OMG. They also bitch about Tennesseans all the time when they think you aren't listening. "In Cali we had X. Why doesn't Tennessee have Y, ITS CURRENT YEAR? I miss Z. Tennesseans are kind of bigoted sometimes. I'm glad your not like other "southerners". Of course I'm the REAL southerner, not these bigots. I've always liked country music. Ain't nothin' like fresh cornbread and sweet tea, YALL YEEHHAWW"
Faggots don't even know that "YEHAW" is a Texas thing, not a Tennessee thing.

Wolfblade111 #homophobia deviantart.com

Cldye with his two dads The dads called Howard and Harold and they are a homosexual couple


So long as they don't go shoving it down my throat I could careless.

However I am boycotting seeing the new Beauty and The Beast movie since it would seem that Gaston's sidekick is gay. (Shivers.) Figures Disney would do that shit. I heard tons of people are not gonna see it since it's pretty much forcing their ideals down our throats.

gmanpizza #homophobia reddit.com

This is going to be downvoted to hell, I know, but I'll give the truth. I just loathe gay ships. Every single one. I hate them.

Yeah, it's not like friends to lovers is a common trope or anything. Do you also hate Benny x Charlotte as much as you do the other ones?

not nearly as much (cause its not a gay ship), but I still don't like all that much. That never really seemed romantic at all. Just friends. I just really, really, really hate gay ships.

Gingor #homophobia #transphobia reddit.com

Can you envision a world in which mtf crossdressing is normalized

No.
That'd be a horrifying world
. You couldn't look at a high-heeled short-skirted figure anymore and go "I'd tap that" because it could be a feminine man.
That's a terrible thought.

I have nothing against crossdressing, as long as it is done at home, with the curtains closed.

Yeah, but if most of society has a problem with a tiny minority (and let's be real, if only 3.8% of people are gay, there'd be way less than 10% crossdressers), it's the minority's problem, not the majority's.

That's a remarkably relativistic way of thinking about something as inane as wearing a skirt.

What problems, other than mild discomfort, would this cause the majority? And also, who claims the majority has a problem with it?

It's not "mild discomfort". I'm close to vomiting if I notice I was mistakenly attracted to a woman that turned out to be a guy.

It would also cause much awkwardness when you approach a woman based on the appearance of her behind and then notice you just hit on a guy.

And it could cause sexual confusion in teens, that are still looking for who they really are.


It's funny to me that you are touting age-old conservative dogma.

Cause sexual confusion in teens?

Seriously?


Yes.
I don't believe gays are born gay. I think they become gay through influences in their childhood and teens.
Now, being gay isn't bad, but only as long as there are still enough hetero couples to produce children. And if you do that and confuse younger people, that could end up making more people gay.

Let me get this straight:
You don't think gayness is innate. But you don't think being gay is wrong. However you think we should protect children from "gay influences" to assure that there enough hetero couples?
These are astoundingly irrational statements

Exactly.
I don't see the irrationality though.

Let me spell it out for you. You're contradicting yourself.

If there really is nothing wrong with being gay then you don't have to "protect" children from themselves.

You attach the most ridiculous rationalization to it: to further the human race.

This is so simple minded it is stunning

I have nothing against gays because they aren't hurting anybody. Have consensual sex with adults, I don't care who they are.
But the fact is that they do not contribute towards the continuation of the species.

As such, introducing major things that could cause confusion should be avoided.

Always vague fears and no real argument. What about progress and education and acceptance?

I'm all for those.
I accept gay people. I don't have anything against them. I don't think they should be killed, or converted, or whatever other stupid shit there is. Let them live their lifes and fuck other dudes or girls or whoever they want.
I just don't think that we should unnecessarily create more of them.

"Progress" is hard to define though. "Progress" towards what? One person's progress is another person's regression.


The cross-dressers can live their life in their homes if they want to.
Outside of that, society has certain standards of decency that you need to conform to and I'm grateful for them.

Your fears are very telling

I am not gay and I'm most definitely not a crossdresser and I'd appreciate it if you didn't insinuate it either.