"Also, I am right, because if you believe in evolution, then the aquatic dinosaurs could have come out of a wormhole (since there is no basis for absolutes according to that theory),
Yeah, I remember a manga that used a similar premise (Blue Hole, by Yukinobu Hoshino, where an underwater time portal to prehistory is discovered), but that's just fiction. Of course, as a creationist the OP is no stranger to mistaking fiction for non-fiction...
Seriously, creationists, just because you use "Goddidit" and "Biblesaidso" as blanket (non-)answers for everything doesn't mean that scientists use the ToE the same way.
As for wormholes, if they turn out to actually exist, I strongly suspect that their proximity would do interesting-but-lethal things to the unshielded lifeforms (and probably to the planet) getting near one. Nevermind the odds of a traversable wormhole leading to a place compatible with the biological needs of said lifeforms.
and if you are a creationist, aquatic dinosaurs would have still survived the flood."
There are a few problems with that, chief: for example, that serious science tells us that the prehistoric marine reptiles you call "aquatic dinosaurs" had been extinct for about 66 millions of years by the time you lots claim the great flush happened. Or that (IIRC) for enough water to cover the Everest to fall in the timeframe given by your plotholy book would require such a throughput that the kinetic energy would cause the seas to boil. Or that such a cataclysm would fuck up the ecosystem something fierce, which would pretty much sentence top-of-the-food-chain predators like the plesiosaurs to death by starvation. Or....
