Oh, its a good hypothesis, but its not a theory as it doesn't pass the scientific method. Evolutionists blur this by claiming you can observe and test aspects that you'd expect to be true if evolution were true. This IS true, but all this shows is what you are test ing may meet the scientific method standards, but that does not mean evolution does and therefore it is not a theory. Let me explain. IF evolution were true, you'd expect to find fossils of animals which no longer exist. You can now look for fossils and test them against existing animals and find they (to our knowledge) do not exist today. Then you can look at DNA and say you'd expect to find similarities between different species. And sure enough, tests show this. So evolutionists claim this qualifies evolution as a theory. But what is being observed and tested? Evolution or fossil records? Evolution or DNA? This is the case in 100% of their proofs that they say make evolution a theory. But as anyone open and honest can see, in no case is evolution observed, in no case is it tested, and in no case is that test repeated until it is shown to be repeatable. All three of these are necesaties of the scientific method for a hypothesis to become a theory. Now, I am going to get bombarded with protests on this, but again, only those people who are open and honest will see the truth. Those who are blinded by their desires and Satan's lies will protest until their fingers bleed.