[Comparing the destruction of ancient artifacts by ISIS to attempts to remove Confederate monuments]
What, precisely, is the difference? There is no difference. It's just vandalizing history of which one does not approve.
image
24 comments
Aside from the obvious lack of genocide (no, failure to discriminate racially is not a form of genocide), those two pictures are very different. Isis is destroying unique works of art that are also irreplaceable records of th culture development of past peoples. The statue of Jefferson Davies is not: we have plenty of other examples for how to cast bronze statues in the late 19th century/ early 20th century style. There is no special artistic merit to that statue, and what it mainly represents is the desire of some people in the South at the time to own other people.
Did Vox Day have a problem with all those statues of Lenin, Stalin, or Saddam getting torn down?
Says the abrahamitic religious fundamentalist and creationist who thinks women should be slaves, loves rape, rejects all science he disagrees with, considers tyranny and war desirable, has repeatedly advocated terrorism...
@Yamamanama:
Yes, let's destroy the good of Syria because of what's going on right now. It's only going to make it harder for Syria to ever improve if you destroy its history. For one, this allows the Islamists to peddle their propaganda and oppress the minorities that they despise through erasure of historical sites deemed not Islamic enough.
Besides, I can't see many people, Assad apologists or not, wanting to travel to Syria to visit for tourism right now. Destroying these statues and historical sites and describing it as being for the best is frankly absurd and is nothing more than a feeble excuse for extremists who want to erase the country's past for the benefit of their own vile ideology.
@Yamamanama:
I still don't see how that justifies another evil destroying Syria's culture. Times change, despots and bloodshed don't last forever. South Korea was once run by a despot, now look at it. Cambodia was once a war zone torn by genocide and closed to the outside world (worse than North Korea probably). That has taken its toll, it's impoverished, but is now a tourist spot with some hope, and it's a tourist spot because its historical sites (e.g. Angkor Wat) weren't destroyed by the Khmer Rouge.
Look at Hungary and Poland reverting back to authoritarianism. Cambodia and Syria are different. Khmer Rouge pissed off Vietnam one too many times. Everyone tolerates the Syrian government despite their many transgressions.
Assad and Brunner must be punished. If that means destroying Syrian culture for hypothetical future generations, so be it.
@Yamamanama
You're basically saying that in order to save Syria, you have to destroy it. How is that logical to you? What concrete advantage does destroying cultural sites grant you? At that point, you're not saving Syria for the sake of it's people. You're doing it for your own sake, in which case I fail to see how your motivations differ from Assad's.
@ Yamamanama
You seem to be glossing over the millions of people living there.
As for the OP, last I checked, the statues there do not represent oppressors or their successors.
Confederate generals were oppressors, we still remember it and some still glorify that oppression, so putting up monuments to their glory is not something commendable.
(this one was a toughie - imagining what sort of Palace and Shadow Vox Day would generate...kinda freaky)
[Shadow Vocal Distortion]
What right do you people have to disrupt our hegemony? Everything was proceeding smoothly along for the right white people until all these disgusting children showed up shouting check your privilege and safe spaces, then, all of a sudden, I'm expected to hold my tongue and show respect to these indolent imbeciles...Guards, why don't we give our guests here a trigger warning, eh? Going to MY domain results in brutality and death!
[/Shadow Vocal Distortion]
Yama, Pepe, go take your bikes. Russia's plan or Mattis' plan, Syria will be made a loose union and Alawites can do fine with Bashar fucking off.
When Donald Fart falls , all Alt-Shitedom will be terminally butthurt, thus massacred clear of Alt-Shites. That's what your man wants: that's what Kek wants, a world free of shite-skinned Nazis.
Also, Mosul soon cleared of IS.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-escaping-chaos-washington-turmoil-abroad-022124410.html
image
Syria? How about the Laurentian Abyss: If it was good enough for Megatron...!
Meanwhile, enjoy your Erdogan, Tadpole. It is the will of the people of Turkey. Why do you hate Freedom : Democracy, Poopy...?! [/hyper-paradox]
You could always ask your 'Emprah' to let you into America, especially while he's escaping the 'Swamp' of his own creation becoming a flooded cesspit. Oh, wait...! >:D
Further proof that Kek now favours we left -wingers. The God of Chaos indeed. >:D
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.