racist

How to Recognize a Jew
Most "big bad Whites" were and are actually Jews, most of them being secret Jews.
The first part explained will be physical features of the Jews. Remember that there are lots of Gentiles who have some of these features, so always put everything together before making a judgment, which includes name and character. The name, however, is only a clue, as the Jew is apt to change his name to counterfeit the resident flock; as an example, Jews in North America and England - especially Jews in noticeable roles such as marketing and finance, politics, pornography, etc. - often have surnames such as Smith, Thomas, Williams, Lewis, Taylor, Miller, Johnson, Jones, Adams, etc.
1. The most overlooked physical trait is the widow's peak as seen below.

Paul Ryan, Jew

Arthur Miller, Jew

Norma Jeane Mortensen (Marilyn Monroe), Jew

On t.v., movies, newspapers and magazines all of the supposed blonde Whites viewers see are Jews - most of them dyed blondes, and the occasional natural blonde which comes from the Jews' cross-breed ancestry. The Jews are a mixture of races (by this some do question whether the Jews form a distinct race, considering that their pedigree is a mongrel one to begin with) and therefore they possess the most disgusting traits, with the various European - including the so-called Mediterranean, East-Baltic, Nordic, Alpine, and Dinaric sub-races - in addition to the Araboid, Hamitoid, Armenoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid races characteristic of their make-up.

Marissa Mayer of Yahoo and Larry Page of Google, Jews

The hair of the Jews is usually dark and curly. This comes from the Negro blood, which all Jews have. Mayer's husband, Zachary Brogue, is an exemplary dark, curly-haired, low-forehead Jew.
Disharmonics are the key to recognition, such as curly-haired blond Jews with too-wide mouths, or many of their grotesque hooked noses flanked by slanting blue eyes.

Karl Marx, Jew

Brian Levin, Jew

Benedito de Espinoza, Jew. Those who have studied Jews' names, including the names of the African slave traders know that many Jews have Spanish and Italian names, and that many Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians look like Jews. The Jews - mostly Sephardic Maranos - possessed the slave trade.

Angelo Buono, Jew

Al Capone, Jew

Italy was a Jews haven after Spain and Portugal expelled many clerical Jews in 1492. For thousands of years, Jews have lived in Southern Europe, and members of the so-called Italian Mafia are not Europeans, but rather descendants of Jews and slaves from the Mediterranean.
As part of the Spanish Inquisition, the king and queen of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, signed an edict which left most Jews with three choices: To leave, convert, or execution. Sicily belonged to Spain, and it was governed by Viceroy Don Ferdinand de Acugna; thus, Jews living in Sicily were also affected by this edict. Jews had already blended into the Spanish Gothic gentry and introduced their religion as Christianity before 1492. The Gothic nobility of Spain was innocent of the knowledge that a Jew can be an atheist or be of any religion and still be considered a Jew, and that Jews had already infested the slave trade, crime organizations, the monetary system and the lawmaking bodies.
While many Jews stayed in Spain and Portugal and converted to Christianity, the fleeing Jews went to various places - among them Holland and Italy. Al Capones physiognomy alone suggests he was a Jew. High-ranking Mafia crime families Bonnano, the Gambinos, Romanos, and the Colombos, are all of Jewish blood. The photographs of Gambino, Luciano, and Genovese would indicate Jewish blood. Meyer Lansky once jested that he and Charles Luciano got along together so well because Luciano thought like a Jew. The Popes policy of Forced Conversion led to thousands of Jews in Italy and Sicily becoming Christians. Jews have lived in South Italy from the days of the Persian Empire. Indeed, in 1400 Southern and South-Central Italy and Sicily, an estimated 30-50% of the entire people were Jews. Jews inhabited Italy since the days of Ancient Greece in small numbers. By the time the Mohammedans overtook Sicily in the 800's, Jews had lived in Sicily for 1000 years. Most Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians are not White. Nor are the peoples of Southern Europe by any means of the same hereditary value as in Ancient times, having mixed with Jews, Arabs, Egyptians, Syrians, Turks, and other ethnicities of an inferior racial and genetic quality.

Girolamo Savonarola, Christian preacher and reformer, Jew. Severely low, slanting forehead, hooked nose, thick lips and eyebrows, high cheekbones, heavy jaw.

George W. Bush, Marano (Sephardic) Jew

Early portrait of George W. Bush, in which the common traits of his tribe are more noticeable.

Pietro de Silva, Jew

Ted Bundy, Jew

Aníbal Cavaco Silva, Jew

Jared Fogle, Jew

Emeril Lagasse, Jew

2. Attached earlobes: The ears of a Jew are often very large and low-set. They can best be described as similar to those of a rat.

Franz Kafka, Jew

Gwyneth Paltrow, Jew

Barbra Streisand, Jew

Barack Obama, Jew. The large ears, woolly dark hair, thick eyebrows, thick lips and low forehead were a giveaway from the beginning - but again, since every Jew has Negroid ancestry, the Jews have best been able to disguise within the African body.

3. Chins:

There are two chins most common among Jews. The above specimen has a feeble, receding chin.
Jews in t.v. and magazines tend to have pointed but weak chins. The specimen below has the heavy jaw - complete with thick lips and high cheekbones - traits which come from the Jews' mongrel ancestry, and which are popularized in the Jews' fashion market.

Angelina Jolie, Jew

4. Jewish lips are usually thick, with the lower lip often protruding.

Lisa Rinna, Jew

Megan Fox, Jew, photograph before surgical and cosmetic enhancement. Her surname is an adaptation of Fuchs (Fox in Yiddish). This photograph was taken when she was sixteen years old. Does she exhibit mongrelized Jewish features? Yes. The arched eyebrows, the lizard eyes, the narrow forehead, the full lips and the broad cheekbones.

Scarlett Johansson, half-Jew playing the role as Nordic woman.

5. Another obvious feature is the low, slanting forehead which is common among Jews as well.

Adolf Hitler, Jew. Short, angled neck. Dramatically low, slanting forehead. Heavy superorbital ridges. Thick eyelids. Ugly nose. Broad cheekbones. Dark hair. Ears of a rat. In combination, these traits add up certainly to a Jew.

Benito Mussolini, Jew, early mugshot in prison. Looking at this picture of grotesquerie, it's easy to see why there are so few close-up portraits of his face: Lips very thick (this alone excludes him from European status), eyelids thick, hair and eyes dark, jaw heavy, cheekbones broad, forehead low and slanting, back of the head flat.

Francisco Franco, Jew

Ante Pavelic, Jew

Emperor Hirohito, Jew

Joseph Dzhugashvili Stalin, Jew

Vladimir Putin, Jew

Zac Efron: Mischling Jew playing the role as White man. The low forehead, thick, dark eyebrows and full lips are clues.

Pat Buchanan: another Jew promoting the falsehood that "the problem is 'Israel' and the 'Zionists', not all Jews". Low forehead, dark hair, slanting dark eyes, broad cheekbones, convex nose, thin upper lip, ears of a rat.

David Beckham, "English" Jew. The most "White-looking" Jews are in Western Europe, where the Jews have been selectively breeding with Whites since the 19th century, and choose those Jews whose mongrel blood more often expresses White physical features to be athletes, doctors, politicians, lawmakers, actors, fashion models, etc. pretending to be White.

Tim Marlow, art commentator, Jew. Tim Marlow's career is an additional Jews-clue. Most of the Gentiles in dubious industries such as law, fashion, theater, psychology, print and electronic advertising, pharmaceuticals, art, journalism, sexual counseling, and so on are NOT Gentiles. They are Jews disguising as Gentiles. Being of cross-breed descent, the Jews incline primarily toward those careers that involve the domination and exploitation of peoples. All of these Jews have been employed to deceive us.

Bertrand Russell, Jew
Like most Jews, Russell had a family history of mental disorders, which included psychosis. He also was an atheist, and he wrote in his autobiography that his two main interests were religion and sex. He was another Jew who was an atheist and who had an obsession with religion and sex.
6. High and flat back of the head: This feature is often easier to pick up on if you spot the slanting head first.

Ludovico Sforza, diplomatist, patron of Leonardo, regent (1480-94) and duke of Milan (1494-98), Jew

Theodore Rosenfelt (Roosevelt), Jew

David Barger, Jew

Lancelot Ware, Jew

Ware was a lawyer - a clue. He was also the co-founder of Mensa, an elite society of people whose IQ's are among the top 2% in the world.

Edward Snowden, Jew

Skull of a fetus of Jewish lineage.

The high back of the head, just like many other traits frequently found among Jews, is very common in premeditative criminals and habitual liars.

Jews are more likely to bald as they age and their hairline recedes, giving the impression of a high forehead in frontal aspect. This false peculiarity is amplified by the high back of the head.

Francois-Marie Arouet (fake name "Voltaire", who also adopted the name "Rabbi Akib" at a later age), Jew.

Yes, Arouet was another name-changing Jew, and this is clued by his physical traits (an article will be published describing his deceitful life so as to confirm this claim). He did not "look like" a Jew, did he? Has not "Voltaire" been painted as an "antisemite"? Has Arouet not done more "good" for the world than "bad"? His forehead seems high, doesn't it? That's because a fellow Jew painted that portrait of him.

A side view of the death mask of Arouet ("Voltaire") shows his deformed head structure. The plaster moulding of his face displays a very low forehead and a slanting, high back of the head, with the great mass of the brain located in the animal region. That's the head shape of a criminal - the same case for most Jews.

Alan de Botton, Jew

Louis Sachar, Judeo-indoctrinating children's writer

Marc Randolph, Jew

Randolph co-founded the propaganda streaming service Netflix.
7. The most well-known feature is the convex nose.

Do not forget, with the vast wealth the Jews possess, many opt for plastic surgery in reducing the size of and changing the hooked shape of their noses. Also note, of course, that not all Jews have this nose shape. "Ashkenazi Jews", who generally have more of the Armenoid blood, from which this kind of nose among the Jews is largely derived, are more prone to have this nose type.
8. Thick eyelids: The Jews' eyelids are mostly thicker and more fleshy than ours. Their look is wary and piercing. One can tell from the eyes that the Jews are a deceitful people.

David Berkowitz, Jew

Elie Wiesel, Holocaust® survivor

Edward Goldenburg, Jew

Golda Meyerson, Jew

9. The arms and legs of a Jew are often very short. The body height of the Jews is usually large in proportion to the legs. Many Jews have bow-legs and flat feet. These qualities are result of the Jews' Mongoloid infusion.
On the stature of the Jews: It must be borne in mind that differences in human height are far more influenced by a subject's environment than other attributes hitherto mentioned. A much more thorough examination of the genetic disposition of the Jews can be treated through the shape, dimensions, and measurements of the cranium.
Other traits:
One can recognize a Jew from his movements and behavior. His voice is often high pitched and he tends to speak through his nose. We hear this very often in the debates and oral arguments on television.

The Jew has a very strong inclination to argue, and to lie, as well as to twist and pervert the facts, when they are presented in his disfavor. The Jew is a master of telling lies, and of twisting the truth in matters to his own convenience.

The Jew is extremely deceptive. The Jew's languishing desire for "empathy" (which is a term invented by the Jews) is unrivaled. The Jew is an unceasing beggar of empathy and plays the role of the eternal sufferer in order to gain the favor of others. The immense number of Jews one sees within the fields of politics, education, advertising, promotional marketing, psychology, theater, and other positions of authority, testifies to the Jew's fixation with controlling and exploiting the minds of the peoples of the land in which he resides.

The Jew often has a strong preoccupation with sexual intercourse, and other ill-bred or generally repulsive topics - hence, the extremely high prevalence of Jews within fields that involve allusions or references to these topics, such as gynecology, sexology, sexual therapy, and so forth.
The Jews often move their hands and head when speaking. They often have a shift or uncertain gait.

The Jew has endless genetic afflictions. Among Jews, genetic mental retardation (or "autism", as the Jews call it) is disproportionately common. Jews suffer from mental illnesses in very high proportion to their population. For example, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, histrionic disorder (a type of disorder involving excessive exaggeration, make-believe and a general inclination towards deception), and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, are rampant among Jews.

The White races intelligence and behavior has been under intense selective pressure since late medieval times. These new environmental forces significantly increased White resilience in the face of adversity. The first of these was the Black Death that ravaged Europe from 1347 to 1351. As one of the most catastrophic pandemics in world history, it killed off one-third of Europes population. The evidence of bioarchaeology, drawn from skeletal analysis of burial remains from “Black Death” cemeteries, reveals that far from being random, the plague was very selective in its choice of victims (DeWitte, 2014). The weak and the elderly were at increased risk of infection. Given the strong correlation between poor health and IQ, the Whites who survived were much stronger, healthier and smarter than ever before. The dearth of peasant labor led to an increase in wages, rising living standards and the invention of labor-saving devices. This greater wealth and prosperity liberated many from the common drudgery of daily life. A century after the Black Death, the Renaissance scaled even greater heights of intellectual and artistic achievement.

The 17th century colonization of North America also subjected Whites to strong selective pressure. The first Englishmen to have disembarked on American soil had survived religious persecution in England as Puritans objecting to the Roman idolatry of Anglican ritual; they had survived the perilous transAtlantic voyage, unaffected by typhus or scurvy. In New England, the Puritans still had to contend with disease, the harsh winters and the merciless Indian savages that lay hiding in the primeval forests of the eastern seaboard. If the weak and unintelligent managed to survive the voyage, they would eventually be killed off by starvation or Indian tomahawk. This pattern of eugenic selection affected all English settlers, including those motivated by purely secular and commercial interests. By the end of the colonial period, the Anglo-Saxon in the Americas had emerged as one of the finest and most evolved specimens of the White race.

The purifying effects of eugenic selection had rapidly accelerated the evolution of Homo sapiens in Europe and North America: the fittest White men had always left behind the most offspring, but after the ravages of bubonic plague and the hardships of American colonization, their broods became larger, healthier and more intelligent. White men of lesser ability, if they were lucky enough to find mates, typically left behind few descendants, with fewer still managing to survive past childhood.

A significant increase in the population of intelligent Whites inevitably led to a rising per capita rate of innovation. This peaked in 1873, during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), but declined rapidly after that (Huebner, 2005). With the new science and technology, the White man was able to raise incomes, improve public health and increase longevity across the Western world. Eugenic selection for higher IQ made it possible for the White man to develop more sophisticated military technology. This far surpassed anything that had ever been developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans or even non-Whites. By centurys end, approximately 84% of the earths surface was controlled by the colonial empires of Western Europe. Intellectual and creative development had scaled such heights that Europe even gave birth to a race of intellectual supermen. These were the Victorian polymaths, who numbered among their ranks the colorful Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890). He was a man who excelled at every subject that commanded his undivided attention. He was a brilliant writer, scholar, explorer, geographer, translator, diplomat and swordsman. A master linguist, he spoke an astonishing 40 languages and dialects fluently. This period of continuous White evolutionary development wasnt to last forever. By 1914, the golden age of White intellectual and creative superiority had come to an end.

II: Western Intellectual Decline from Late 19th Century to Present

The general intelligence of the Western industrialized nations has declined since late 19th century, according to a meta-analysis of over a dozen reaction time (RT) studies. A cognitive, but not an economic or thermodynamic, limit has apparently been reached. There are now fewer individuals with the intelligence to solve complex mathematical and engineering problems, which is why the rate of innovation has significantly decreased since 1873. Genetic g - g-factor in the absence of gene environment interaction - has decreased by 14 IQ points over the course of a century, at least in the Anglophone nations of the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. This means a decrease of 1.23 IQ points per decade (Woodley et al., 2013). To eliminate the possibility of overinflated RT latencies because of hardware and software lags (Woods et al., 2015), the meta-analytic findings were adjusted for lag time. The result was that the Victorians were still faster (and smarter) than modern Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

Measures of vocabulary, relatively insensitive to environmental influence because of greater overall gsaturation and heritability rate, provided additional evidence of superior Victorian intelligence. A study tracked WORDSUM item frequencies over the course of 150 years. For this, a database that stored 5.9 million texts from the 1500s to the present was used. The most difficult and therefore the most highly g-loaded WORDSUM items exhibited sharper declines in historical usage since mid-19th century, consistent with declines in genetic g observed among Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

After decades of massive IQ gains, cognitive reversals were observed in Norway (Sundet et al, 2004), Denmark (Teasdale & Owen, 2008), the Netherlands (Woodley & Meisenberg, 2013) and elsewhere. In one study, genes associated with educational attainment and cognitive ability had declined in frequency across birth cohorts in an Icelandic population. It was estimated that a loss of 0.3 IQ points per decade would substantially affect Iceland if allowed to continue for centuries (Kong et al., 2017). James Flynn, discoverer of the eponymous Flynn effect, has acknowledged the reversal of cognitive gains in certain Western countries, especially those of Scandinavia. At a 2017 conference hosted by the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), he admitted: I have no doubt that there has been some deterioration of genetic quality for intelligence since late Victorian times. Flynn has projected substantial losses of about 6 or even 7 IQ points for Scandinavia over a 30 year period. Such a reversal in intelligence would have catastrophic effects on the societies and economies of Scandinavia, now being flooded by hostile elites with Third World migrants.

A relevant question is: If the post-WWII consensus acknowledges the existence of massive IQ gains over the last century, how does one explain cognitive reversal in the most industrialized nations? This phenomenon is known as Cattells paradox and its solution is Woodleys co-occurrence model. Although phenotypic intelligence has increased since WWII, genotypic intelligence has decreased. The anti-Flynn effect is really a Jensen effect because it has resulted in losses on psychometric g.

III: The Role of Dysgenic Selection in Western Intellectual Decline

Mass immigration from low-IQ regions of the globe, such as the Middle East, South Asia and Africa, have no doubt contributed to declines in the average intelligence of the West. In one recent study (Woodley et al., 2017), Third World immigration was associated with IQ declines in 13 different nations. High levels of Third World immigration are always significant predictors of Western cognitive decline; its most pronounced effects are on IQ subtest batteries with the highest g-loadings. Nevertheless, Third World immigration does not fully account for dysgenic selection among Western populations. Declines in genotypic intelligence occurred long before the advent of Third World immigration, which only partially explains the Western worlds declining IQ.

The greater fecundity of intelligent Whites, compared to the unintelligent, had always been the norm, especially since the 1400s. This changed during the Industrial Revolution; more intelligent Whites delayed having children until later in life, through a combination of abstinence and contraception, to further their educational aspirations and develop their innate potential. Medical breakthroughs significantly improved general health and nutrition, which prolonged human lifespans. This allowed less intelligent Whites to survive childhood and have significantly more children than those who were more intelligent. The rise of social welfare liberalism in the 20th century merely exacerbated this trend. As Western governments progressively taxed their wealthiest and most intelligent citizens, their wealth was unfortunately redistributed to less industrious and less intelligent members of the White race, who squandered the money as they multiplied recklessly.

More recent studies have shed further light on the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility. In one study, the higher the intelligence and socioeconomic status of adolescents, the lower their likelihood of having offspring. This dysgenic effect was more true of females than males, indicating that women become choosier the more wealth and status they accumulate (Reeve et al., 2013). Among adults, a negative correlation between intelligence and odds of parenthood was discovered; every 15 point increase in a womans childhood IQ would decrease a womans odds of parenthood by about 20% (Kanazawa, 2014). The female role in the transmission of intelligence is a substantial one because the genes for intelligence are X-chromosomal; if more intelligent women since the late Victorian period have had less children than the unintelligent, one can only expect a gradual decline in the national intelligence of Western populations.

Analysis of a large genealogical database revealed that Icelands national IQ had decreased over time because more intelligent Icelanders were having less children. Although IQ declines per decade were small, statistical significance is attained when viewed from an evolutionary timescale. Dysgenic fertility may potentially undermine Icelandic economy and society within a few centuries, unless it is reversed (Kong et al., 2017). Polygenic scores, which capture selection against g (such as dysgenic fertility or immigration), are the most significant predictors of the century-long decline in heritable g (Woodley et al., 2018). The neurotoxin hypothesis, like all environmental explanations, fails to adequately predict temporal trends in general intelligence because cognitive ability is under much stronger genetic than environmental control. The worst environmental deprivations (i.e. severe malnutrition) or the most costly and ambitious environmental interventions rarely, if ever have a lasting effect on heritable g.

Most experts in intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement now attribute the anti-Flynn effect to dysgenic fertility, Third World immigration and worsening educational standards in Western countries; in contrast, they are far more unanimous among each other in attributing environmental causation to the Flynn effect, in striking agreement with Woodleys co-occurrence model (Rindermann et al., 2016). Based on the evidence, Western intellectual decline is largely caused by a negative IQfertility gradient, with Third World immigration becoming an increasingly significant contributor as time goes on.

IV: The Road to Idiocracy

Nobel laureate William Shockley proposed a Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan (1972). He presented this as a thought experiment. This would be open to all members of the American public, regardless of sex, race or welfare status. For each IQ point under 100, the recipient was to be given $1000, as long as he or she was willing to undergo vasectomy or tubal ligation. This was not an original proposal, as it had been first suggested over 40 years ago by American journalist and scholar H.L. Mencken, albeit in a rather humorous context. What all of these proposals neglect, and what modern eugenicists have failed to acknowledge, is the obvious sex differential in contributions to dysgenic fertility, probably because of the natural sympathy that men typically have for the opposite sex.

The low-IQ male, unless he is among the 20% of males considered physically attractive, is permanently excluded from the sexual market. This is because of his lifelong inability to acquire the material resources that allow him to compensate for his genetic inferiority. On the other hand, the low-IQ female poses a far greater threat to the mental hygiene of Western populations, by virtue of her role as sexual selector. For the low-IQ female, there will always be large numbers of reasonably attractive males willing to satisfy her many sexual and financial needs. If the low-IQ male must be handsome or rich, the low-IQ female must only be of childbearing age if she wishes to attract a mate of fairly decent genetic quality. The Industrial Revolution brought with it substantial improvements in public health and nutrition, making it easier for low-IQ females to survive childhood, only to breed as much as possible throughout their reproductive years.

When, in 1869, Sir Francis Galton made his famous scientific prediction of declining Western intelligence based on anecdotal observation of changing Victorian demographics, what he really observed was more low-IQ females than ever before surviving childhood to satisfy their instinctive desire for maternity. This trend has continued without interruption to the present, making low-IQ females the primary driving force behind the dysgenic fertility that has resulted in declining general intelligence in Western industrialized nations. No successful eugenic policy can exist without taking this into full account. In order for Dr. Shockleys proposal to have made any sense from an evolutionary perspective, the bonus for females should have been quadrupled or even quintupled for each IQ point under 100.

Into this volatile mixture was added feminism, a pernicious ideology that grants both unrestricted individual autonomy and reproductive choice to women who should not be allowed to breed for eugenic reasons. In recognizing that all women have the same rights, feminism reveals itself to be just as dangerous as the Third World immigration promoted by hostile elites. By encouraging low-IQ females to engage in promiscuity, march in slut walks, wear pussy hats, and breed prolifically - while high-IQ females delay parenthood because of their educational aspirations - feminism has merely accelerated the decline in general intelligence among Western populations, already well under way since the Industrial Revolution. As Whites get dumber, their Western uniqueness, including their high intelligence, creativity and ability to produce more geniuses than any other race of people, will disappear with them. This radical transformation of the underlying genetic structure of Western populations could take place within less than a 100 years. Few people recognize the fragility of Western intellectual gains because of selective pressures exerted by the Black Death in Medieval Europe and the 17th century colonization of North America. By undermining Western mental and racial hygiene, feminism threatens to return Whites to the way things were before the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic age.

Helmuth Nyborg, extrapolating from present trends and projecting them into the future, allows us to better visualize in concrete terms the post-apocalyptic scenario that awaits Western civilization (2011). He shows what happens when a racially homogeneous society like Denmark, with a population of over 5 million, is subjected to both Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (IRDS), referring to the preservation and multiplication of the genetically disadvantaged, and External Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (ERDS), in reference to super-fertile Third World replacement migration.

When both internal and external relaxation are combined, Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (DRDS) is produced, a clear and unobstructed path to Western idiocracy in Denmark. By 2072, ethnic Danes will be reduced to 60% of the population, from a high of 97% in 1979; minority status will be reached by 2085. In 1979, Danish phenotypic IQ was 98, but by 2072, it is 93, having dropped 5 IQ points in less than a century. As national IQ decreases, Denmark will be gradually transformed into a Latin American banana republic. Ethnic Danes, demoralized by feminism and social welfare legislation, will have no choice but to acquiesce to the destruction of their own country. Significant damage to the economy and educational infrastructure are to be expected; a 5 point drop in Danish IQ means a 35% reduction in the nations GDP. Democracy will inevitably become unsustainable as average national IQ plummets below 90; it will be replaced by the authoritarian political culture and religious dogmatism found in Middle Eastern, African and Latin American societies.

Belief that more White babies are the answer to dysgenic fertility among Whites is just as dangerous and genocidal as the liberal belief that Third World replacement migration is cultural enrichment. Since low-IQ females leave behind more offspring than those of high IQ, more White births would reduce high-IQ females to an endangered species. This would intensify the Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection already occurring in Western populations. As Whites devolve, they will no longer be able to maintain their own Western industrialized societies. A demographic transition of such magnitude would transform Western Europe and North America, the Occidental heartland, into a cultural and biological extension of the Third World. Since women are loyal to wealth and power, but not race, one can expect genocidal levels of miscegenation between White females of low intelligence and the non-White foreigners who have dispossessed Whites and conquered the West.

To reverse the process of dysgenic selection, the White man must do three things:

He must get rid of the hostile elite.

He must forcibly repatriate all Third World migrants, including their descendants. Forced remigration is not an unrealistic policy; mass population transfers have been successfully carried out before, i.e. deportation of Germans, 1944-50, from Eastern and Central European countries to Germany and Austria.

If selective pressures in medieval Europe and colonial America led to the steady eugenic improvement of Western populations, making it possible for them to conquer 84% of the globes surface, only their re-emergence will reverse the dysgenic selection that has bedeviled the White race since the mid-19th century. This can only be accomplished through a rigorous application of classical eugenic principles.

If the White race is to survive, only its strongest and most intelligent members must be prepared for the harsh Darwinian struggle that lies ahead. Wasting precious resources on mental and genetic defectives is sheer pathological altruism. Race-conscious Whites have a collective interest in raising healthy and intelligent offspring, but no such interest can exist when it comes to those who are weak and unintelligent. They are life unworthy of life; even they would not consent to such a truncated and meager existence if given full possession of their normal faculties. From a White nationalist perspective, to bring such children into the world is selfish and morally irresponsible; they impose unnecessary fiscal burdens on Whites and use up resources that are better invested elsewhere.

The race-conscious White man is faced with a dilemma: because of liberal elite hostility to his own ethnic genetic interests, any program of eugenic enhancement would be outlawed under the current totalitarian leftist order; at the same time, he cannot simply wait out the elite-managed decline of Western civilization. In less than a few generations, most of his race may become drooling mental defectives, if they havent already miscegenated themselves out of existence into the burgeoning mass of Third World migrants who now infest his homeland. If he must take action, he must take it now, otherwise all is lost.

Race-conscious Whites must abandon all leftist-controlled urban areas to live off the grid. By colonizing relatively unpopulated areas of North America and Western Europe, the White man will return to a rustic existence, filling the countryside, the mountains, the forests, the tundra with Whites only settlements, similar to the Boer-only settlement of Orania in South Africa. Living the way his ancestors did centuries ago will ensure that no Third World immigrant follows him into the mountains or the wilderness. Self-imposed hardship will further intensify Darwinian selective pressure on Whites, jumpstarting the process of natural eugenic enhancement, just as it did during the early colonization of the Americas. Once race-conscious Whites have become sufficiently numerous, they must embark on a program of state-sponsored eugenics. This will be used to strengthen the White population until they are able to wrest control of North America and Western Europe from the hostile elites and their army of greedy migrants.

The new ethnostate will be constitutionally grounded on Aristotelian political philosophy and neoDarwinian biology; it will be a meritocracy based on eugenic principles. Eugenics, the scientific ideological core of the new White nationalism, is easily reconciled with the aristocratic political science of Aristotle; both are concerned with the development and formation of the best possible citizen, one along genetic and the other along characterological lines. Aristotelian philosophy is based on a linear hierarchical conception of reality; this overlaps with the dominance hierarchies of the animal kingdom and of all human socio-political organization. Furthermore, the capacity for superior moral development is improved substantially by superior genes. In an Aristotelian political order informed by eugenic principles, the state would ensure that all citizens have both the mental and physical capacity to live the good life. Mandatory genetic screening would be one of the conditions of citizenship; those at risk of transmitting hereditary diseases or conditions, such as criminality or low IQ, would undergo compulsory eugenic sterilization. Only the best and most virtuous citizens, the biologically and intellectually superior aristoi or natural-born aristocrats, would be the ones allowed total freedom of action in the political sphere.

In the ethnostate, the aristoi of the White race will determine who must give birth and who must be sterilized. These men are not petty bureaucrats, but aristocrats selected on the basis of health and IQ. Their sole task is the promotion of White racial survival, whatever the cost. For those who believe eugenic sterilization is barbarous and cruel, allowing the birth of children who suffer from mental retardation or cystic fibrosis is much, much worse. For this reason, only the healthiest, high-IQ females will be allowed to breed, even being massively incentivized to do so. Encouraging the natural increase of healthy, intelligent Whites, at the expense of the low IQ and genetically unfit, is the most White nationalist thing a White man can do for his race.

Some will necessarily object: But state-sponsored eugenics will infringe on individual rights and freedoms! This is a common, but groundless objection. The right to procreate is not an absolute. In 7 utilitarian ethics, rights are never ends in themselves; they exist to maximize the happiness of the greatest number and must be tempered by social obligation. Furthermore, not all men have the capacity for individual freedom. The Greek philosopher Aristotle recognized the existence of natural slavery because of the inability of some to reason autonomously, even though they may be responsive to reasoned instruction. Whether a man is free or not must be determined by his capacity to reason (for us, his IQ).

Legislation regulating some of the most intimate areas of our lives is hardly controversial; if we allow government to enforce this legislation, ostensibly in the interest of public safety, why not allow government to decide who gets to reproduce and who doesnt? If the low IQ and genetically unfit are allowed to breed recklessly, as they do now, Western civilization will eventually be reduced to smoldering ruins. Unregulated breeding is far more dangerous than any black market specializing in the sale of illicit firearms or drugs. Society would be much safer if it allowed every citizen to acquire large arsenals of weapons without special licensing, but criminalized the marriage and procreation of the low IQ and genetically unfit.

If a large minority of race-conscious Whites emigrate, seceding from the leftist totalitarian state to independently pursue their own racial interests, reversal of dysgenic fertility and Third World immigration may be accomplished within a few generations. As race-conscious Whites strengthen their race through genetic enhancement, the totalitarian left will get weaker, forced to increasingly rely on low-IQ Whites and migrants for manpower. From their bases in the Pacific Northwest or Lapland, race-conscious Whites, stronger and more intelligent than ever before, would raid globalist-occupied territory, slowly enlarging their own dominions until the reconquest of North America and Western Europe has been completed. This is not without historical precedent. Medieval Spanish Christians, reduced to a small area of their own country, seized the emirates of Mohammedan Andalusia one by one, until the last emirate of Granada had been defeated, its Moorish inhabitants expelled from the Iberian peninsula in 1492.

Race-conscious Whites must live, think and breathe race, just as they did during the long and distinguished reign of Queen Victoria, when Whites were at the peak of their intellectual and artistic powers. In this age of drab multicultural uniformity, the White mans race is his most formidable weapon, a thorn in the side of those who wish to replace him with the low IQ peasant masses of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Nothing terrifies the hostile elites more than the prospect of encountering race-conscious White men bred for superior intellect and physical strength, able to aggressively pursue their own racial interests undeterred by elite and non-White hostility.