Japan, Korea, and many other countries today have a high degree of homogeneity, including the Nordic countries Sachs mentions, but none of them are engaged in wars of exclusion and violence against other ethnic groups in other places. Why then is everyone presuming that if Western countries decide to end mass immigration they are thereby engaged in acts of exclusion and violence? The evidence is clearly pointing in the opposite direction: violence and rapes against out-groups have increased dramatically in those Nordic countries that decided to "enrich" themselves with diversity. Britain was a very peaceful country (devoid of hatred towards other groups) when it was overwhelmingly populated by native Brits in the 1960s.
13 comments
I think Britain still is. I live part of the time in a very multiracial part of London. Crime and interracial violence is very rare. Obviously there are always a few violent extremists in any racial group, but these are only a small minority
At least you don't see signs in Windows anymore saying
@121
Well, there´s this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Investigation_of_Global_Policy_with_the_Yamato_Race_as_Nucleus
You could actually say the same about European colonial campaigns as well. They were territorially and materially motivated, but they took a racial slant when they needed to be justified.
Heck, you can actually apply it to pretty much any military campaign. Pretty much all wars start due to political, material or territorial reasons, and when they need to be justified to common populace, attackers paint themselves as inately superior to their enemies, to justify attacking them.
The only way to end mass immigration is to help make all countries in the world nice to live in.
Violence and rapes against orphaned refugee children have indeed increased dramatically in some of the Nordic countries. Lots of refugee boys have been called on the phones they were given by older men at the border, and then just disappeared from the refugee camp.
The Nordic countries didn't DECIDE to enrich ourselves. People needed help and we tried to give them that. We did it after WWII, for Italians fleeing Mussolini, for people fleeing from Franco in Spain, for people fleeing from former Yugoslavia, from Turkey and Greece, etc. The former "enriching"-people have more or less melted into our society and are now productive members. Most of the new refugees will too, in time. Right now, we have empty refugee accommodations, still costing tax-payer money, as almost no refugees are reaching Sweden any more.
Britain was peaceful? Which planet are you living on? Ever hear about The Troubles?
Britain? Peaceful? Are you just talking about group on group violence? Ever hear of The Battle of Cable Street? Mosley and his blackshirts made that shit happen expressly because of his racist hatred. Meanwhile, there are dozens of hateful racial slurs that get used against folks from every region of Britain, by every kind of Brit. What is a Native Brit? You mean Picts? Jutes, Angles and Saxons? The Normans hated the Saxons but they ruled. Are Danes native British? How about Hessians? And then what of the various others that are native to the landmass inasmuch as anyone is? Welsh, Irish, Scots, Manx.
Fuck you're stupid. Again, my pet peeve is ridiculous oversimplification of issues that have this much complexity, the idea that there is a simple homogeneous group when it's clear it's more a salad than batter.
Britain was a very peaceful country (devoid of hatred towards other groups) when it was overwhelmingly populated by native Brits in the 1960s.
Hahahahahahahaha!
Maybe you should learn a bit of history. A lot of it, actually.
Why do racists always think back decades, probably a time before they were born or were merely toddlers, and paint it as some sort of paradise? Do you know something that history and reality don't?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
