coffeecup248 #fundie

coffeecup248 #fundie antimisandry.com

First of all, and most importantly:

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because it is natural law. screw with nature law, and everything comes crashing down.

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because my gender has done everything to get us to where we are today. that progress would not have been achieved if left to women.

I also claim the right to superiority over women because of the selfish, destructive manner in which women (as a group) behave, and the kaos in society that follows. those womens rights that have negative effects on society should be removed from them.

78 comments

old comment by Serph-no-Okami

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because it is natural law. screw with nature law, and everything comes crashing down.

Humans have a tendency to ignore natural law and have compassion and empathy, all of which allow us to see people as people and treat all equally.

Well, some of us anyway.

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because my gender has done everything to get us to where we are today. that progress would not have been achieved if left to women.

That wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that women rarely have had the chance to show their worth throughout history now would it? And it surely took us big, strong men long enough to get as far as we have and it seems to me we got this far when we realised that women can just be as good as stuff as men. How about that?

old comment by Serph-no-Okami

Continued:

As if men aren't destructive. As if men haven't plunged a huge amount of societies in 'kaos' (really?). As if today, societies which allow women equal (or at least, supposed equal) rights aren't doing far, FAR better on alot of fronts compared to say, Saudi Arabia, where women are considered less then human.

I claim no superiority of my gender over women because I like woman who are my equal or even superior. I like the fact that my girlfriend studies medicine and has ambitions as a surgeon. I like my female friends, most of which are intelligent, witty and have individuality which they don't fear to share. I would far sooner prefer the company of a raging feminist (whose points on feminism have a basis in reality, what with the millennia long supression of women by men, even when her points border on misandry) then to be anywhere near you, who can't validate his own petty existence if he can't claim to have a superiority over women in name only, since he certainly wouldn't have an actual benefit over women.

In short, go fuck yourself, you microdicked misogynist asshat.

[/rant]

old comment by The L

"I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because my gender has done everything to get us to where we are today. that progress would not have been achieved if left to women."

Florence Nightingale, Marie Curie, Harriet Tubman, Hypatia, Ada Lovelace, and Rosalind Franklin would all like a word with you.

Or perhaps you don't consider competent nurses; knowledge of radioactive substances, their applications, and their dangers; action against racially-based inequality (in this case, slavery); education of the common people; the development of computer-programming theory; and discovering the structure of DNA to be "progress?"

And it's spelled "chaos." It's a fifth-grade spelling word, you ignorant twit.

old comment by

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because it is natural law.

Humanity is where it is by defying nature, not following it. For example; it wasn't in our nature to fly, or breath under water, or survive in space, heck, it wasn't our nature to even wear clothing, but we have been doing all of those things for millennia.

And the "natural law" that you speak of (men are "superior" because they are physically stronger and more aggressive), would suggest that since a horse is superior to you it should ride you instead, or surrendering to the superior might and aggression of a lion in your local zoo by offering yourself as its supper.

that progress would not have been achieved if left to women.

If women all through our history weren't oppressed by the sheer physical aggression of insecure, knuckle dragging, testosterone driven apes like you , then their list of achievements would have been significantly longer.

I also claim the right to superiority over women because of the selfish, destructive manner in which women (as a group) behave

Are you serious? What about WW1&2 (or any other war, for that matter)? Surely that wasn't a bunch of women who were acting in a selfish and destructive manner as a group.

those women’s rights that have negative effects on society should be removed from them.

And which ones are those?

old comment by dionysus

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because it is natural law. screw with nature law, and everything comes crashing down.

Then why are you using that very unnatural computer? Stop screwing with nature!

I claim the right of superiority of men over women, because my gender has done everything to get us to where we are today. that progress would not have been achieved if left to women.

Purely speculative drivel. Easily disproved by the number of female inventors in history (despite females being shafted for much of history).

I also claim the right to superiority over women because of the selfish, destructive manner in which women (as a group) behave, and the kaos in society that follows.

Oh you have some nerve to talk about others being selfish when you want complete dominance over more that half of the population.

those womens rights that have negative effects on society should be removed from them.

Citations, motherfucker, do you have them?

old comment by GodotIsWaiting4U

You disgrace the good name of coffee and should be ashamed of yourself for doing so.

You do not understand how every other natural law we know of works. Nobody is enforcing them or punishing people who break them, because nobody has to. Natural laws are descriptive, not normative. You are completely unable to violate them.

http://inventors.about.com/od/womeninventors/Women_Inventors.htm <=== To rebut your idiotic second statement. This includes Madame Curie, who pioneered X-ray readings allowing us to see your splintered bones after we beat the shit out of you for being a dipshit.

The ideal anti-misandry stance is not misogyny but equality.

old comment by Wozza

Quit riding on the back of others achivements just because they are the same sex as you.

The vast majority of men and women do fuck all apart from eat, sleep, crap, shag and die. A very small minority of people do something which changes history and progresses the human race.

You (and I) are not amoung that minority. You personally have nothing and have done nothing and will do nothing that would allow you to claim any superiority over anyone else.

Course, if there is something special about YOU which gives you some basis for superiority, and not about some other people with whom you can claim some distant relationship or association, then do let us all know. Somehow, i don't think we'll be hearing from you.

old comment by Shakespeare's Beatrice

I think almost everyone who has read this has made the decision that this is utter bollocks in every possible way.

Firstly: Who makes this "Naural Law" and who says that men are above women in this heirachy? (now that's a big word, which means a chain of order and power, in case your microscopic brain can't process it) Perhaps they are stronger but without women what you lot do... kill each other or fuck each other within days from sheer frustration. It might interest you to know that women can reproduce without men, in these modern times. Men cannot reproduce without women.

Secondly: Bullshit. When you compare someone like George Bush or Adolf Hitler (whom you probably admire as a short sighted, idiotic right wing, fascist toss mongerer) to the likes of Florence Nightingale and Marie Curie, I think you'll see my point. Perhaps there aren't as many women who have done great things, but this is probably because they have been under the oppression of a repulsive, slimy, egotistical waste of human life without the chance to prove themselves.

Thirdly: What war was ever started by a woman? What woman ever attempted to commit genocide? Men are far more violent, selfish and prone to irrationality than women. As a student of History, I can tell you that almost every protest throughout its course has been instigated by men (excepting the Suffragettes, of course) and as such, you cannot possibly make such an unjustified claim that has clearly just been made by some fat old misogynist prick in order to feel superior to someone.

Lastly: A wanker is all you will ever be, since no self-respecting woman will ever want to come within 5 feel of you. You always try homosexuality, but you're probably prejudiced against gays too.

old comment by Burning Stake

I also claim the right to superiority over women because of the selfish, destructive manner in which women (as a group) behave, and the kaos in society that follows.

Right, because that couldn't at least partially be caused by how those women are treated and so try to put each other down to get the "top prize" of a "great man."

And only women are destructive, because men never cause wars over whose dick is bigger (metaphorically, most of the time though).

It is true that men and women are different, but neither one could continue without the other. Have a society of only men (or only women) and the society would die out within a generation. Men and women evolved different strengths and weakness as a complement to help each other survive, not destroy (though sometimes unfortunately that happnes).

Oh, and hermaphrodites: where in your chain of superiority would they be?

While there are some far-right feminists who hate men, most of us (feminists) just want to be treated the same as men.

coffeecup248 #fundie antimisandry.com

78 comments

Confused?