FSTDT

Biblicism Institute #fundie biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com

See folks, this is what we’re talking about. See how convoluted they get in trying not to give a straight answer to a simple question. They can’t prove anything so they invent their own way of how evolution should take place. We love the part about there’s no such thing about partial evolution.

First, they said we were slimes that evolved all the way into a monkey which itself evolved into a man. But there was no partial evolution even though the evolution took place partially because ‘smooth gradients’ are themselves partial (it’s called bluffing in Poker). So, if there was no ‘partial evolution’ (we can’t even keep track anymore) the monkey just went poof and there was the monkey into a man. And notice when you ask for evidence what is said. Evidence is “NONSENSE”. So, he throws a red herring to confuse you (they love throwing red herrings) in order for you to look in another direction. And guess what that direction is: bones. Now, they’re grave diggers. :-)

And then evolution that could not be observed because there’s no partial evolution suddenly can be observed in bacteria in ‘real time’. But in real time, the other evolution where we want to see the mutant hybrids cannot be observed because it conveniently happens in ‘smooth gradients” which are in reality partial but to them are not really partial.

This is how messed up the thinking is. And then, did you notice on top of that the insults? Apparently, we’re the fools. Can you believe that? You’d need a full time staff to decipher the labyrinthine thinking of these monkey-upgrades. We need a vacation

Biblicism Institute #fundie biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com

["The first part of your article contains the shortest, and worst definition of theory i’ve ever read, and the whole concept of supposed unbiased writing goes straight downhill from t here"]

Folks, this is a perfect example how scientists manipulate the meaning of things to confuse you. They refuse to abide by logic and reason. They thereby convolute everything they lay their hands on to confuse and distort in order to better lie and treat you like idiots. In other words, first they change the meaning of theory to mean what they want it to mean. Then, they fabricate lies and call them facts because they want to dazzle rich folks with their ‘knowledge’ and ‘discoveries’ so these poor snobs can fund their ‘research’ and pay their salary. Something as simple as ‘show us the mutants’ that are in the process of becoming fully evolved and yet they can’t do it. Instead, they contort their way through a false paradigm and demand you bow to them.

["1) You’re right, it’s “just a theory.” Like the “theory of gravity” and the “germ theory of disease.” And we all know how wrong they are, right?

2) Look, unless you can acknowledge that the scientific use of the word “theory” is not the same as its colloquial use, then your whole argument is disingenuous. You’re equivocating. You’re lying to your readers. How desperate must you be?"]

1) “You’re RIGHT”! Yeah! Slowly they’re coming around. Anyway, it’s Newton’s LAW of gravity but the other theories are just that, theories. Germ theory has many detractors such as Antoine Bechamp. Booya!

2)You’re the desperate one going on tangent and throwing red herrings because the whole article is about how there’s no proof of actual monkey/man mutants running around and you can’t provide said proof.

Biblicism Institute #fundie biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com

Every living organism – including humans – is in a constant state of degradation or deterioration not evolution. From the moment something comes to be, it already is dying and will eventually die.

The entire living organic system is in a constant fight for survival. Unfortunately, there is nothing in its intrinsic composition powerful enough that would enable it to suppress the inevitable and fateful pull toward its own dissolution or death.

Otherwise, it would divert all of its energy into overcoming said fate by ‘evolving’ out of it, exactly like X-Men’s Wolverine manages to do. Why? Because the survival instinct is the most dominant one. Said evolving characteristic – if it were possible – would in turn be uniformly present in all of creation and entropy would be nothing but a bad memory.

[....]

On the surface, X-Men may appear to favor the theory of evolution, but once pertinent questions are asked, that whole facade crumbles like a butterless cookie leaving but a handful of apologetics that work in favor of creationism. [Emphasis added]

1) If according to evolution, mankind is the end result of animals evolving into a better species – hence the word evolution which Webster defines as a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state – how come many of the X-Men like Wolverine devolve into beasts? Let’s face it, that’s a step back. It’s no longer evolution, but degradation or devolution.

But, let’s just say that the X-Men are really in the process of being fully humans, then-

2) The writers of the series are absolutely right in parading these mutants amidst their fully human counterparts. It shows they have a good grasp of what true applied evolution would really look like. And said understanding raises the most obvious of questions: how come there are no evolutionary mutants running around for real?

The proponents of the Evolution Religion would quickly interject that it takes millions of years for any species to evolve.

How convenient! They can’t explain their cockamamy theory so they throw millions of years at it to confuse the poor-minded into believing a lie.