FSTDT

Should Evolutionists Be Allowed to Vote?

They do not and can not know the purpose for Man. In fact, all of them believe Man has no purpose.

Therefore, they cannot make informed judgments about how men should behave toward each other, or what would be "good" or "bad" for any group of men to do, or not do.

Thus, they have no sane foundation upon which to base “laws” or rational for insisting that other men obey the laws.

Thus, the religion they profess to believe renders them incapable of participating in any decision about what men ought to do. But, that is the purpose of all law.

Therefore, in a sane society, evolutionists should not be allowed to vote, or influence laws or people in any way!

They should, perhaps, make bricks to earn enough to eat.

Tom Willis #fundie csama.org

[Our buddy's Tom's thoughts on what should be done about "evolutionists" {PDF}]

?? Labor camps. Their fellow believers were high on these.
But, my position would be that most of them have lived
their lives at, or near the public trough. So, after their own beliefs, their life should continue only as long as they can support themselves in the camps.

?? Require them to wear placards around their neck, or perhaps large medallions which prominently announce "Warning: Evolutionist! Mentally Incompetent - Potentially
Dangerous." I consider this option too dangerous.

?? Since evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe evolution we could employ truth serum or water-boarding to obtain confessions of evolution rejection. But, this should, at most, result in parole, because, like Muslims, evolutionist religion permits them to lie if there is any benefit to them.

?? An Evolutionist Colony in Antarctica could be a promising option. Of course inspections would be required to prevent too much progress. They might invent gunpowder.

?? A colony on Mars would prevent gunpowder from harming
anyone but their own kind, in the unlikely event they turned
out to be intelligent enough to invent it.

?? All options should include 24-hour sound system playing
Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris
reading Darwin's Origin of Species, or the preservation of
Favored Races by Means of Natural Selection. Of course
some will consider this cruel & unusual, especially since
they will undoubtedly have that treatment for eternity.

Tom Willis #fundie csama.org

[Amother from Mr. Willis' brilliant essay]

Evolutionism was/is the apologetic foundation for the faith of predatory capitalism, Germany in WWI, the USSR (from 1918 to this day), NAZI Germany, Fascism in other European countries, and Socialism in all of Eastern Europe beginning about 1945. It was also a major justification in the defense of slavery in the 1800's against Christian opponents.

Tom Willis #fundie csama.org

[The number of strawmen, and other logical fallacies in this document should probably be used as a way to teach how "not" to argue.]

The arrogance displayed by the evolutionist class is totally
unwarrented. The facts warrent the violent expulsion of
all evolutionists from civilized society. I am quite serious that their danger to society is so great that, in a sane society, they would be, at a minimum, denied a vote in the administration of the society, as well as any job where they might influence immature humans, e.g., scout, or youth, leader, teacher and, obviously, professor. Oh, by the way— What is the chance evolutionists will vote or teach in the Kingdom of God?

Tom Willis #fundie csama.org

Should Evolutionists Be Allowed to Vote?
--They do not and can not know the purpose for Man. In
fact, all of them believe Man has no purpose.
?-Therefore, they cannot make informed judgments about
how men should behave toward each other, or what would
be "good" or "bad" for any group of men to do, or not do.
--Thus, they have no sane foundation upon which to base
“laws” or rational for insisting that other men obey the
laws.
--Thus, the religion they profess to believe renders them incapable
of participating in any decision about what men ought
to do. But, that is the purpose of all law.
--Therefore, in a sane society, evolutionists should not be allowed
to vote, or influence laws or people in any way!

They should, perhaps, make bricks to earn enough to eat.
Q.E.D. - Quod Erat Demonstrandum