Due to treaty violations by the United States government and now United Nations support for indigenous peoples Lakota Nationalists are seceding parts of the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.
image

They appear to be falling prey to the pan-“American” identity—which denies the enormous genetic gradients between northern plains peoples and Mestizos—genetic distances which, according to Frank Salter’s “On Genetic Interests” represent the greatest genetic gradient with geographic distance in the world. Hence they are relying on recognition from South American countries like Bolivia for support of their legitimacy.

Adding to that the fact that they are preparing to place liens on real estate transactions throughout the 5 state region, there is a potential for imminent and serious conflict with the US Federal government.

With such dangers to their cultural, genetic and territorial integrity they need a more realistic approach to maintaining their territory—and such an approach may be offered by the following negotiated settlement between Lakota Nationalists and White Nationalists:

Those who have followed my writings on legitimate (in the sense of “human rights”) holding of territory understand that my primary principle is based on the Malthusian recognition of carrying capacity creation as the determining factor. This isn’t to say that legitimacy is a natural right, but it is to say that if we are to talk of laws and treaties at all, we need to start with carrying capacity creation or the entire edifice is rendered irrelevant due to Malthusian limits.

Therefore, the wheat fields of this region, which dramatically increased its carrying capacity, are most legitimately claimed by the pioneer families that originally brought those fields to production, with some substantial allowance for hereditary land rights granted to the bloodlines related to men like Norman Borlaug.

While the Lakota Nationalists are allowing all current residents of the seceded territory to remain and become citizens, even stating there will be no taxation, it is clear that they are hostile to the “homesteads” rights of the pioneer families that so increased the carrying capacity of the region.