As a nature scientist with profound interest in paleontology and evolutionary biology I see the immigration with great worries, even if it is well-founded. We do know from the history of the earth and that of humans, how these invasions impact us.

Let's start first with some biology: there is a law in biology that says that a species adapted to its ecological niche can't be erased by a new existing species, because it would also have to adapt itself to that niche. This can't happen, because the niche is already occupied. From this view nobody could fight against our niche.

Aggressive Immigration

There is also an exception to this rule and that's immigration. If a species (or fauna) lives in ecological balance and if strangers come from outside or get introduced, the local life can't resist against it. The new enemies don't get viewed as such, the local fauna goes extinct and new ones take over their niches. In the history of the earth this has happened a lot, normally by continental drifts and the lowering of the sea level and is the reason why there aren't any marsupials in South America with the exception of the possum. The specific South American fauna had no chance against the robbers that aggressively came from North America when North America and South America drifted together.

Doesn't it sound familiar if I changed some words?

There is also another biological aspect of the affair, where I am by the human animal; A fact, that everyone wants to hide and that has to do with how big the hormonely guided instincts are in the behavior of the Homo Sapiens. Our species isn't that old, with the civilisation being younger and that what we call civilized behavior being 250 years old. The definition of >>Decadence<< is something I don't want to tackle, because it leads to quarrel. Much more important is the question, on what our entire existence from 600 million years - where 250 years of European civilisation doesn't matter anymore - is founded. It is exclusively the reproduction. Meaning the production of the next generation by preserving the species. This is stuck deeply in our genes and can be whitewashed by education, but can never be erased.

The instincts of station bludgeressses

The mechanisms of reproduction are well-known since the dawn of time: A female exemplar that is ready to mate searches for the best possible male exemplar of the same species and produces with them the best possible offspring. This is in no way an aware, but a from instinct guided behavior. The from the female exemplar selected male exemplar has to make sure, that the mother and the child and the genes that have been given to the child maximal protection. Women are already unsuited to be biological protectors, because they can be made fertile by invaders and therefore can give over its genes just as much as the local inhabitants. The invader, that has shown itself to be stronger, is even more attractive than the loser. The female is automatically less willing to protect the >>homeland<< than the man (which explains the failure of female >>Defence<<).

And now we come to human history and it's not a logical, but a purely instinctively executed genocide of men. The last case in Europe wasn't to long ago and took place in Bosnia. Despite civilisation finding this behavior scary it is completely natural. Why women are never affected by genocide can be seen in the previous paragraph: Women will - again completely unaware - decide for the remaining conquerors and murderers, because there isn't anything else left, because they have to instinctively give their genes.

This is why I am worried; and not because of any diffused feelings, but because I see clearly what is coming to us. It doesn't matter, from where the collection of viril men comes, that come in our country in the hundreds of thousands. I only know that I, as a white man, am endangered and that I have to protect myself against them. Because I can't resist the invasion anymore with a spear, bow and arrows, crossbow or shotgun I must at least vote for the only party that has the confidence to say something against it. The other things of the AfD, such as the Euro, the GEZ and the fight against gender-idiocy are things I support too, but they are to me only secondary in the fight to survive.

But: the station bludgeresses do behave instinctively. This is how we can hold it tight.