They can believe in evolution and still be a Christian, but that goes to show that they are: 1) In need of taking the Scriptures more seriously; and 2) In need of taking science more seriously (especially the laws of thermodynamics). Evolution is a philosophy and it is a religion, it is far from being a science. After all, it is the "theory" of evolution.
12 comments
You know, all fundies pick and choose what parts of the bible to follow, which good morals they’ll uphold, and which people jesus really loves. So, it is no surprise that they also pick and choose which parts of science they will follow, and which parts they will just plain make up.
@ BurntBush --
Actually, it's not the theory of creation, at least not in the scientific sense -- to be called a theory it would have to explain the available evidence and make testable predictions. As creationism ignores or denies most of the available evidence and goes to great lengths to be untestable, it's a doctrine, not a theory.
"2) In need of taking science more seriously (especially the laws of thermodynamics)."
I, for one, take science very serously including the laws of thermodynamics.
The difference between you and me, is that I actually know what the hell science is telling.
@Captain Klamydia: I'll do it for you then, it's not that long anyways :)
Since the other laws concerning thermodynamics have even less to do with evolution, I take it that Rev. G is talking specifically about the second law of thermodynamics, the one concerning entropy. Earth is not a closed system (see: The Sun, the space), hence the 2nd. law need not aply.
Non-literalism, Earth and bodies aren't closed systems, philosophy with empirical evidence is science, scientific theories aren't guesses.
It was a nice effort, but I'll only give your quadruple failure a 6 out of 10. Add some originality next time.
//"Evolution is a philosophy and it is a religion, it is far from being a science. After all, it is the "theory" of evolution."//
Ah yes, attacking the word 'theory' in the hopes of discrediting the whole thing. Please tell, do you also contest the Germ Theory of Disease and the Theory of Gravity?
“They can believe in evolution and still be a Christian,”
What if they do NOT believe in evolution just accept the evidence for it and understand the science? Is that allowed?
“but that goes to show that they are: 1) In need of taking the Scriptures more seriously;”
Especially that table in the back where God identifies which verses are literally true and which are metaphor. That’s why every believer holds the same opinion on which is which.
“and 2) In need of taking science more seriously (especially the laws of thermodynamics).”
IIRC, the bible says not to just parrot gossip but to actually look stuff up before you jabber away like a low grade moron, doesn’t it? Did you ever actually read the 2nd law of thermodynamics? And on a science site, not creationist?
Because right here you’re either parroting gossip or flat-out lying. God doesn’t like either one.
“Evolution is a philosophy”
Yes. I hold the philosophical position that evidence cannot be ignored.
“and it is a religion,”
PRATT.
“it is far from being a science.”
Just all the evidence for it and all the science papers and the books all being in the science section of the library… Other than that gossip, yeah.
“ After all, it is the "theory" of evolution.”
And a third time, gossip.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.