['What's the probobility of god existing', someone responds "0 or 1"]
Exactly! Subsequently 1 is at once both the highest number and the lowest number for you can have only one part on the low end even if minutely small or one whole on the high end even if immensely large.
So, with that being said the probability of 100% of everything coming from 0 is absolutely 0 and Likewise the probability of 100% of everything coming from 1 is absolutely 1.
There you have it, proof that God exist!
23 comments
Geek: The 0 and 1 seems to be referring to probability, not percent. Probability 1 = 100%, .5 = 50%, etc. And technically the original response is correct; the existence of god is predetermined, either god exists or god doesn't exist, which means the probability is either 0 or 1 (0% or 100%)
As for what Bodhitharta here is saying... it's utter nonsense :)
<<<Subsequently 1 is at once both the highest number and the lowest number for you can have only one part on the low end even if minutely small or one whole on the high end even if immensely large.>>>
Just what is he trying to say? I can't quite follow his logic/attempt at communication.
And the math for the existence of god... If it was this easy to proof god, god would have been recreated by man in our image and made to do the household chores.
Oh, Bodhitharta, this is just another way of saying god either exists or does not exist. It is nothing you can base a sensible argument on.
But the real premise of your argument is that God is necessary for anything else. If I'm not mistaken, having the premises and conlusion being identical is a sure sign of circular reasoning.
The original post reads more like someone having a laugh to me. (Except they seem to stand by it. Maybee just committed?)
The poster is absolutely clueless in mathematics and logic, of course, but what he says raises an interesting question as to the interpretation of the concept of "probability". Someone who is an "objectivist" about probability would say that as either God exists or not, without anything random in it, the probability is either 0 or 1 (StandardDeviant takes this position). A "subjectivist" (also called a Bayesian) would say that probabilities are degrees of rational belief, so for any proposition there is a probability which is a measure of the degree of confidence we ought to have in the proposition given all our available evidence. This seems to be Papabear's interpretation.
Aesmael: It depends on whom you ask. My impression is that most experts would say that yes, one approach works better in some areas and the other in other areas, but they are not exclusive.
There are some people though that insist that the only legitimate concept is the objective one (and that assigning numbers to purely subjective beliefs does not have anything scientific in it) and other people that claim that the subjective approach is deeper becuase it can apply to all cases in which there is an "objective" probability but to many other cases as well.
A somewhat technical review of different interpretations of probability is http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/
You, sir, are a certified ID10t. Probability makes no difference in this argument. It is either true or false, 0 or 1. I assert it to be zero, and my assertion has a greater probability of being true than yours (i.e. mine is much greater than zero, while yours IS zero). Numbskull.
<<< Everything comes from out of something and there is always something. There is never such thing as nothing. Therefor God is a much more rational belief than to believe in nothing. >>>
The second does not follow from the first. Why couldn't there have been matter for all time? Indeed, this is a more reasonable belief than a God who has existed for all time - we KNOW matter exists now, but we do not know if God has ever existed.
...and this alleged God of yours Bodhitharta, where exactly did he/she/it come from?
see science can explain that too. It's called anthropology, mysticism and pagan superstition.
Perhaps when you master 1+1, something you failed to grasp earlier, you can move onto real mathematics one day, and maybe even study physics and cosmology and quantum fluctuations and e=mc2.
What is god? If "god" is supposed to be a real, singular entity, god's existence is either "yes" or "no". But if "god" is something created in the mind of each believer, then god either is or isn't, times the population of the world.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.