[Emphasis in original]
Homosexuals are not called "dogs" by God in the Bible for nothing (Deuteronomy 23:18). Now you know the true origin of Aids among mankind. It had its origin from homosexuals who had and continue to have anal, genital and oral sex with animals. Now you understand one reason God forbids fornication. The next time you get ready to have illicit sex of whatever type, you might want to ask: "With whom or with what kind of animal did this person last copulate with?"
57 comments
Nothing to do with doing it doggy style at all is it!
Christ called a Cypriat woman a dog too partly because he didn't want to treat her sister, but mainly because he was a racist asshole, care to explain that one?
__________________________
Oh God it's this asshole again. How can you be so consistently stupid in print about something you claim to be enlightened on.
Well, technically, even heterosexuals are having sex with animals...
What, are their couples fungi, plants or what the hell?
Still, what the christ? I demand proof that homosexuals engage in sex with nonhumans. Asshole.
I am so thankful that I can enjoy a healthy sex life and I have NEVER ONCE thought to ask my partner if they had recently copulated with a sheep!!!
What a scary, delusional, and cold life some of these people must have.
FUNDIES, safe sex is good, normal and natural. It helps to spread our DNA around and releases all sorts of good chemicals in our body. Loosen up and get laid already!
Since humans are animals, some of this makes sense. Naw, just kidding. It's pretty fucked up.
God forbids fornication? Well he picked a hell of way to procreate then. We reproduce by a means that god forbids. So which is it; did god fuck up, was he just trying to be contrary, or does god not figure into the equation? I opt for #3.
ME: You sure seem to know a lot about homosexuals.
Robert T. Lee: I'm a big fan!
Listen darling, homosexuals don´t copulate with animals. Moreover, bestiality is performed, temporarily, that´s it, by heterosexual people because of their URGES. Second, dog is a common metaphore in the Middle East for outcast or miserable person because the dog is considered an impure animal(as if we say pig in the West). Second, that the Bible employs that metaphore DOESN´T MEAN AT ALL THAT THERE IS BESTIALITY ON THERE. AIDS, as a matter of fact, was spread through the eating of monkey flesh and the use of its injected blood for rituals and in Africa has been spread through heterosexual contact.
Okay, this is just a grammar thing, but...
"With whom did this person copulate" is correct.
"Who did this person copulate with" is correct by virtue of common useage.
but "With whom did this person copulate with" is redundant and wrong. This is what happens when people over-correct themselves.
/grammar nazi
If there is the slightest possibility in my mind that the person I'm with may have had sex with an animal...I doubt my meat and two veg would even be in the vicinity.
"Hmmmm, I really like her, but I think she may have buggered the dog...should I or shouldn't I...?"
Here, Crosis, try with this. It's designed to punch through armor, it should penetrate even a fundie skull.
image
"Dogs" in Deut. 23:18 has nothing to do with the canine species. It's generally thought to refer to male prostitutes. The preceding passage (23:17) forbids the keeping of cult prostitutes (female or male) in the temple. 23:18 further forbids the tithing of income from them. It refers to the females and males as harlots and dogs, both strong pejoratives.
It isn't specified whether the male prostitutes are homosexual or heterosexual.
"Stuart, you've been fooling around with Mister Snuggles again", sheesh.
Next time I fornicate with a Christian I'll have to ask myself "Who or what does he think I had sexual intercourse with last?"
"Stuart, you've been fooling around with Mister Snuggles again", sheesh.
Next time I fornicate with a Christian I'll have to ask myself "Who or what does he think I had sexual intercourse with last?"
Ok, so homosexuality and bestiality are apparently the same thing. And because of bestiality and homosexuality, "...God forbids fornication." Well, then your parents are going to Hell, Mr. Robert T. Lee. And I doubt (or at least hope) that no one is dumb enough to listen to you go on with this shpiel without kicking you in the nuts with an iron boot.
Actually, it looks like he has multiple sons. So sterilizing him won't help much. (Besides, he could adopt had he proven to be sterile)
Interestingly, he used to be an atheist. So as far as he's concerned, the law says that he deserves death (aside from the whole sinned-in-Adam conceit). I don't understand the whole point of glorifying God, admittedly. You're supposed to swear fealty to the ideal, not the teacher (the teacher swore fealty to that same ideal, anyway. What do you need to harass the middleman for?).
Since when did Gay = sex with animals?
Wait, damnit, I was béat to the punch...
Bi girl here, and I think bestiality is animal abuse. Though I am a furry. Yes, you can be a furry without fucking animals. Yes, guy who implied we do, I AM looking at you.
Last time I checked, homosexuals have whatever kind of sex they want with HUMANS of the same gender.
Isn't one of the theories for AIDS that some people ate ape brains? Layman's theory, that is, not a scientific one.
Not all "fornications" are illicit. A lot of what fundies call fornication is just boyfriend and girlfriend having sex for a few years before they decides to get married.
Or, as my brother and his fiancé; living together for years and years, having two kids, and no discernible intention of getting married anytime soon.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.