Translation: "My basis for irrationality is the Godly Law of Irrationality (GLI), therefore I will ignore and deny all irrationality. I declare that contrary evidence and non-evidence are 'positive evidence'!" - wishthinking, arrogance, denial.
If God were not logical
You mean ancient humans? Or crackpots today claiming to speak for deities? Is that even logical? Claims sure can be illogical. You have no evidence for a particular claim to be of divine origin and it being derived from an ancient writing is also not evidence of that. Even a claim claiming to be of divine origin is a circular claim without evidence. False premise.
and if the Bible really did have any inconsistencies
Some have compiled long lists of such and others like theologians and historians have explained the formation of the tradition which also helps to understand why it's full of not only contradictions but also falsehoods. These are evidence that contradict your claim of a divine "logical" origin.
then what would be the basis for saying that inconsistency is wrong?
Because erroneous, contradictory, false, of human origin is necessarily always "wrong"? Even if not harming others is human ethics, it's wrong? Is harm justified by appeal to false "divine authorities", "right"? What does it tell about your own morality?
https://fstdt.com/_S_4
The law of non-contradiction is epistemologically rooted in the self-consistent nature of God.
Translation above.
There is no rational basis for it otherwise.
A lie is still a lie even when it's by design and arrogance.
to accuse something of being wrong on the basis of inconsistency is to assume the truth of the Christian worldview
Absolutely not. False conclusions derive from false premises. Even "Christian worldview" is very subjective here. For you, it includes rejecting the age of the Earth, for many Christians it doesn't. Even restorationists have a different "Christian worldview" than that of the apostles, if they existed.
