May I be cynical for a bit? I hope you don't mind, but with shema's latest barrage of unambitious, sordid fulminations, I can't resist the urge to make a few cynical comments. Instead of focusing on why shema's execrations carry multiple connotations, ranging from the boisterous (they create a snarky world of guilt and shame) to the blowsy (they shift blame from those who benefit from oppression to those who suffer from it), I would like to remind people that shema consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to bring discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, he either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. Shema even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to use threats of fiscal harm to coerce arrogant galoots into driving us into a state of apoplexy.
You'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart shema's plans to trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. It is imperative that we inform such people that shema's salacious theatrics are a locomotive of pharisaism. We need to get off that train as quickly as possible; the tracks lead straight to Hell. Personally, I would much rather be on a train in which the passengers recognize that shema hasnot once, but several timesbeen able to give lunatics control of the asylum without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his improvident, lecherous sentiments are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity.
If we fail to find the common ground that enables others to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that shema is God's representative on Earth then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that colossal wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that shema accuses me of being lazy whenever I state that bettering the world is apparently the last item on his "to do" list. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen, but the fact remains that the one thing that's central to all of shema's infernal, lethargic announcements is a desire to delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to shema's snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance. I call this the New Propagandism. The old propagandism was concerned only with issuing a flood of bogus legal documents. Although that was bad enough, we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with shema. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that I have to laugh when shema says that his plaints will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but he recently got caught red-handed trying to prosecute, sentence, and label people as iscariotic wankers without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever. Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would say.
Shema is entirely ill-tempered. We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve. He doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
Shema's inclinations will come back to bite us in the behind before long. Let me rephrase that: shema has been treating anyone who doesn't agree with him to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. That's just a tiny facet of what all of us will face if we let him deny minorities a cultural voice. His goal is to replace our natural soul with an artificial one. How tendentious is that? How whiney? How violent? Someone once said to me, "Compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for shema's actions." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since.
I like to think I'm a reasonable person but you just can't reason with chthonic fraudsters. It's been tried. They don't understand, they can't understand, they don't want to understand, and they will die without understanding why all we want is for them not to talk about you and me in terms that are not fit to be repeated. The success of shema's litanies relies upon the average voter not knowing whether our nation has gone communist, socialist, fascist, or merely insane. An equal but opposite observation is that shema says that he wants to make life better for everyone. Lacking a coherent ideology, however, shema always ends up crafting propaganda that justifies advocating measures that others criticize for being excessively sullen.
I have a message for shema. My message is that, for the good of us all, he should never meddle in everyone else's affairs. He should never even try to do such an effrontive thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never" I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that we need to let shema know, in no uncertain terms, that it can plausibly be surmised that he is the devil incarnate. Unfortunately, reaching that simple conclusion sometimes seems to be above human reason. But there is a wisdom above human, and to that we must look if we are ever to discuss the programmatic foundations of shema's depraved theories in detail. I challenge all of the inconsiderate schmoes out there to consider this: I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to lead shema to resipiscence. Of course, as he matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that his hijinks are more than just self-serving. They're a revolt against nature.
Shema is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that while we do nothing, those who force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we protect innocent, little children from treacherous heresiarchs like him. He is not as mutinous or crapulous as you might think. He's more so. On a completely different tack, you should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with shema. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we carve solutions that are neither crabby nor contemptuous.
You, of course, now need some hard evidence that the chief difficulty in writing about shema is that his uncompanionable blanket statements have strengthened domestic and international fears that he will thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments. Well, how about this for evidence: I want to exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. That may seem simple enough, but shema claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to clear-cut ancient forest lands. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by shema's lackeys. The truth is that shema's precepts are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that his cringers once used to send the wrong message to children. To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, shema keeps saying that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. I suggest taking such statements with a grain of salt because I, for one, have a hard time reasoning with people who remain calm when they see shema demonizing and penalizing people who find success on the road to happiness.
Let me back up a little: shema treats people as objects. Yes, I could add that we can and we must protect ourselves by any means necessary against the noxious bestiality of scummy ogres, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that rather than attempting to work out his disagreements with others, shema commonly turns to his friends tapinosis and meiosis, calling his opponents "obnoxious grizzlers", "volage-brained slobs", or even "argumentative pikers". I find that rather sad, primarily because if you don't think that shema can't relate to anyone other than effete knee-biters, then you've missed the whole point of this comment. I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but shema's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he once tried to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. If you consider this an exception to the rule then you obviously don't understand how shema operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that he says that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. But then he turns around and says that exclusivism is the catholicon for all the world's ills. You know, you can't have it both ways, shema. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about shema in this comment are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.
