Of course we know something here that most people don’t: What this repugnant piece of excrement really means and is in fact very concerned about, is that if men have the option of sexbots, they will be far less likely than they already are, to ‘pursue sexual relations’ with horribly unattractive frumps such as herself!
If she seriously believed that we exploit women, surely she would welcome the sexbot technology, because we’ll be leaving the poor little ‘exploited’ and objectified princesses alone. Her reasoning is totally illogical – a paradox and equally as ridiculous as their voodoo magic theory of perverts repeatedly harming 17 year old children by looking at photos of them smiling provocatively while wearing short skirts.

Dr Richardson is a text-book example of a bitterly jealous femihag sexual trade unionist.
BTW: what is her doctorate? My guess would be ‘women’s studies’ or something equally as meaningless and useless.