Next Pope is John Paul II
Impersonated. Bible Prophecy Shows He Will be Last Pope. Learn more.
www.worldslastchance.com
27 comments
Ratzinger is a John Paul impersonation? Who'd've (is this even correct english? No matter, I like how it looks) thought...
And no way that he is going to be the las tone. There will be popes as long as theer are catholics, so only the end of the world or the extinction of the religion can stop anew pope from being appointed.
I love how these guys take the possible end of the church to signify that it may be the end of the world.
I happen to think it'll be the time where everyone just says, "Ok, this is a load" and the church collapses. But I hope for that daily.
No, guys, what the website says is that the one after the current pope will be the John Paul II impersonator. Go to the website and scroll to the bottom and there is a timeline there that shows this.
Still a bunch of bullshit, but hey, so's the whole religion thing.
I have no idea where this stems from, but I've heard many people say (before JP2 died) that there was some rumor that there would only be two more Popes before the end of the world. But as far as I know, none of those who mentioned it to me actually believed it.
Crosis wrote:
I have no idea where this stems from, but I've heard many people say (before JP2 died) that there was some rumor that there would only be two more Popes before the end of the world. But as far as I know, none of those who mentioned it to me actually believed it.
That would be from Malachy's Prophecy of the Popes .
Never mind that Sunday worship was already established long before 538 AD, never mind that "day=year" was only used in one specific instance in Ezekiel, naver mind that you've built a rather flimsy house of cards, just go ahead and confuse people. I've heard of nuts like these before, trust me.
EDIT: Actually, there was one more instance that"year=day" was used, but neither one had anything to do with what these people are talking about.
Axver: after reading that Wikipedia page I can't believe anyone would actually buy into that. Reading through the claims of fulfillment (where there were any - many of the popes after the 1500s don't even have one listed!), it's hard to imagine any way the prophecies could be more vague. It's also clear that the record on earlier popes (who had already served and been long dead by the time it was first published) is much, much better than on later ones, suggesting that the previous ones may have been subject to some "correction" before publishing.
If this is the same bible prophecy that has been predicting the imminent yet repeated destruction of the UN building, then I'm not holding my breath. BTW: the fact that there is a new pope (you might have missed this given your heads seem to be always shoved somewhere dark) would tend to refute your claim.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.