first of all i hate how ppl act like evolution is a scientific fact when its only a false theory. Ppl who believe in evolution say that reptiles evolved into birds. But reptiles dont have the genetic information to make feathers. More specifically they say that birds ecvolved from dinasoars, but the same scientist say that the dinasoars got wiped out from a meteor. but if they died then how would they evolve in a bird? dont these two theorys contradict eachother. I personally don't believe in evolution, but in i.d. because there can only be a new species of an animal not a new type of animal. for example a cat can "evolve" in to a tiger,lion,cheetah,tabby; but it cant change into a completely new animal like a dolphin. people believe that dolphins evolved from a land mammal like a cow or something, but that's impossible. Because even if it was evolving its nose into a blow hole slowly over millions of years, the animal would have become extinct before the blow hole every had time to fully evolve, since a dolphins blow hole is not connected to its throat it has no problem using it, but a land mammal evolving a blow hole would drown before it every had time to fully evolve it. Also dolphins r completely hairless and have and oily skin to protect them. A land mammal trying to slowly evolve this would die before it could fully adapt. And y is there no fossil evidence showing dolphins ever evolving. Maybe its because they were always there? And yes chimps are similar to humans, but what about there differences, do scientist try and ignore this?
please reply-- this is my first post