(in reference to the woman who has taught her 4 year old child that she is a "wretched little girl")

A lot of atheists heaping condemnation on Jean, but nary a one giving a reason for their judgement! What she has done (we are told) is an evil, disgusting, downright evil, evil evil, disturbing, despicable, morally bankrupt, chilliing, selfish, irresponsible, abysmal, vile and wretched thing by an evil woman seeking to obey an evil god. But no one has told us how these charges can be determined, or, exactly how and why they are bad.

She's committed child abuse, but no one has given us a moral foundation for why child abuse is wrong. Who determines that it is? She's told that she should follow scriptural mandates and just murder her child, but with only a presumption that murdering a child would somehow be wrong. Who determines that murder is wrong? Who determines that Jean's god is evil? What exactly is the standard by which he is to be judged?

The hypocrisy of atheism in making these determinations is that it cannot be made without appealing to Jean's God. But because they cannot accept the reality of Jean's God, the only option left is for atheists to appoint themselves god and therefore the judge of everyone else. That's why Froggie assumes that he can call Jean to the dock and demand from her an answer. Froggie assumes that he is not required to answer Jean's God, but insists that she must answer his.

In the end, these atheists know their hypocrisy, which is why they travel together across the internet in a pack of cowards until they find a loving mother sharing a moment of tenderness with her child and cowardly atack her. When their cowardice is exposed, they can only express hope for their shining warrior and strongest expression of their folly, the intrusive and oppressive state, to intercede for them and save us poor, deluded, evil Christians from our sinful selves.