JohnDBaptiste #fundie

JohnDBaptiste #fundie baptistboard.com

Interesting how some "open minded" evolutionist audio bombed the video in the OP of this thread.

It's what people resort to when they cannot refute the point being made.

How many times are we told by evolutionists that black holes result from the compacting of stars many times larger than our sun into the size of a basketball?

The galaxy and the universe are far larger than the biggest star...

So we are supposed to believe that simply because everything is fanning out across the universe that it all started at a single small point?

This is where the fairy tale audio bomb needs to be!

Grab two handfulls of sand. Throw it up into the air and watch it scatter!

Now according to evolutionists... this is evidence that the sand you flung into the air started at an infinitesimally small point (smaller than one of the grains of sand) and everythi8ng else came from it...

Sadly they call this science.

Even sadder, they call what they force on everyone "education."

14 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

Conservative Christian Dr. Buzz Aldrin would no doubt acknowledge that black holes exist. He's been far closer to one than you ever will.

Education? He gained his Ph.D at MIT.

Keep banging those rocks together fundies who - unlike the Second Man on the Moon - can't reconcile their faith with proven scientific facts: perhaps you'll be able to replicate the construction of the computer you're using if you keep doing so long enough.

When he & messrs Armstrong & Collins relied on one in their Command Module with just 32K of RAM, you're in no position to think of questioning his perspective on things astronomical: and from his unique position, especially in history.

old comment by Swede

What is an "evolutionist", really? Is it a person with a doctorate in Biology? A child who goes through an evidence-based fifth-grade education? Any adult who accepts reality over myths and fairy-tales? A non-fundamentalist?

Points based on myths and fairy-tales can be hard to refute, dearie. There is nothing solid there to refute, really.

Evolution is the basis of Biology, not Cosmology, silly-nilly.

Yes, everything is moving away from everything else, so logic says that when that began, everything was just a tiny dot.

No, that is evidence that the sand was flung from a large body (the Earth) with not enough force to remove it from Earth's gravitation, so it fell down again. This is what we call science.

At least we are not forcing religion on everyone. The education is evidence-based. Your religion; not so much...

old comment by K'Zad Bhat

@checkmate

Even the idea of larger stars "increasing their survival chances" because their gravity is able to grab more mass isn't even correct. A much larger star does have a greater gravity force, grabbing more mass, but the star is also merely the object in the cloud that grabbed enough material to ignite. Many star systems have multiple stars. Much larger gas fields get larger, and more, stars, because more matter is there to work with.

Also, a larger star has a greater fuel store, but it burns that fuel at an even higher rate. Our star is estimated to be just over 5 billion years old, and estimated to have enough fuel to go another 5 billion or so years before it can no longer sustain fusion, begins to collapse, the greater density reigniting and expanding it to red giant status. Meanwhile, a more massive star, burning much more fuel at once, is also burning much hotter, and can maintain a fusion reaction beyond the state that our star could. Basically, it will keep burning until there's practically nothing left in the space of about 100 million years, and it's collapse will be with much greater mass, and much greater force, resulting in the reignition at greater pressure to result in explosive force. Most larger stars will flash very brightly and begin a recollapse. (A Nova.) Or, if much larger, explode with enough force to tear the star apart into a new nebula. (Supernova.)

The one way that cosmology is just like biology. It's a lot more frickin' complicated than people who even have a glimpse of how things really work realize. Case in point, my last paragraph is an extreme simplification, and a lot more than this can happen with same starting mass of hydrogen gas.

“Interesting how some "open minded" evolutionist audio bombed the video in the OP of this thread.”
Open Minded does not mean that you have to respect total bullshit. Just have to be willing to listen to the arguments made and teh evidence provided, you can still decide they’re fucking idiots.

“It's what people resort to when they cannot refute the point being made.”
It’s also what some people do when they lose absolutely all respect for someone flogging total bullshit.

“How many times are we told by evolutionists that black holes result from the compacting of stars many times larger than our sun into the size of a basketball?”
None. It’s not part of evolutionary theory.

“So we are supposed to believe that simply because everything is fanning out across the universe that it all started at a single small point?”
You can believe that Doctor Doom farted matter out a thousand times when he held the power of the Beyonder if you want. But if YOU want anyone to believe anything else, you need actual evidence for what you’re saying.

“Now according to evolutionists...”
Wrong AGAIN!

“this is evidence that the sand you flung into the air started at an infinitesimally small point (smaller than one of the grains of sand) and everythi8ng else came from it...”
Try it. See who says that.

“Sadly they call this science.”
You can’t really mock science when you have no fucking idea how it works. You just highlight your ignorance.

JohnDBaptiste #fundie baptistboard.com

14 comments

Confused?