Why do these atheists keep talking about the big bang as if it is fact when repeated studies show that it could not have happened and any search for evidence has only shown evidence against it? Atheists you are really annoying, shut up with your magic bomb creator theory already.
26 comments
I'm sorry, every once in a while the adults need to vacuum inside your imaginary fort.
And put the couch cushions back when you're done.
Let me guess. The only people with the "courage" to reveal these "studies" are the likes of Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, and Ray Comfort and they are sponsored by groups like AiG and whatever the fuck Comfort calls his partnership with Kirk Camreron. Do I win a prize?
Why do these theists keep talking about biblical creation as if it is fact when repeated studies show that it could not have happened and any search for evidence has only shown evidence against it? Theists you are really annoying, shut up with your magic sky-pixie creator poof everything into existence from nothing theory already.
What repeated studies? Who repeated them? Why didn't they do new studies instead?
We're not the ones mixing in magic, silly.
repeated studies show that it could not have happened
Answers in Genesis is not a scientific research organization.
shut up with your magic bomb creator theory already.
And they wonder why people think they are anti-science.
Cosmic backround radiation . CBR for short.
It wasnt an explosion so no magic bombs involved. (er, probably)
Could you name one of these studies?
Because I can guaran-damn-tee that I can get thousands more, that are better researched, better written, more thought out, actually have data and observations, have better experiments, and have passes peer review that disagree.
"...when repeated studies show that it could not have happened and any search for evidence has only shown evidence against it?"
Seriously? A citation or two would be nice.
The "Big Bang" isn't stated as fact. It is simply recognized as the inevitable conclusion given our current understanding of the evidence we have observed.
New evidence, or a better understanding of existing evidence, could change that. If you have either, we're all ears and so is the Nobel Prize committee.
Non-fundie quote from Daniel, for your delectation:
"I did have a hamster that I loved to death. I kissed it many times every day. She didn't seem to love me though and seemed not to bite me only because I gave her good food and drinks a lot. She often tried to run away into this hole in the wall and would come back out to stuff her face with food.
Her eyes stopped working and seemed to be getting infected and I could see she was often angry and depressed. So I did what I really really did not want to do and am very sad over her."
Except the Big Bangs been disproven in no way, the details are perhaps unreachable but that's no reason to quit speculating since much of the theory has been evident AND PREDICTIVE.
And the fact that Atheists don't remotely need the Big Bang Theory or the Theory of Evolution to discount stupid myths and imaginary Gods and ridiculous superstitious dogma.
How about that? You don't have to believe in it either, you also don't have to believe in theological bullshit as you have NO REASON to accept it. NO REASON, Not one single piece of evidence or logical reasoning to accept any of it.
Are science documentaries and news bulletins about new discoveries disturbing you from your Bible study? If your magic creator poofs Universe from nothing belief (tee hee) had any credibility to it you'd hear more accounts of that in credible sources and you wouldn't be whining so much. You'd then expect those that disagree to accept this, heck, you do now, so if you don't like the reporting of science then ignore it and tune in to the media that caters for your community. There's enough of it for you to enjoy, and you won't have to get outraged again from your little bubble.
We get it, Daniel, you don't understand cosmology or physics. We forgive you for not understanding it (perfectly natural, as it isn't an easy subject) but would you please stop whining about it. I don't know all about the inner working of my cell phone, but I'm not gonna insist it doesn't really exist.
Religion or lack of it is completely irrelevant to the study of physics.
“Why do these atheists keep talking about the big bang”
The Big Bang is not an atheist issue.
If you can’t grasp the science any better than ‘it don’t match Genesis’ than sit down and shut up.
“as if it is fact”
You mean the best supported theory of science so far?
“when repeated studies show that it could not have happened”
When you say ‘studies,’ do you mean ‘bible study?’ Because the science keeps coming up with a full house.
“and any search for evidence has only shown evidence against it?”
We used to have the ‘five minute rule’ on the sub. When you walk nto a conversation, wait at least five minutes beore talking, so you know you’re in the right conversation. I think you might need to make it the five hour rule.
“Atheists you are really annoying,”
Again, you’re talking out your ass, here.
“shut up with your magic bomb creator theory already.”
Nope. The fact that there’s no magic is how you would KNOW it was atheist, if it were, indeed, atheist in nature.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.