"I have stated publicly and openly that the theory of evolution should be scrutinized along with any other theory that makes its way to the domain of scientific review."
It has been. For 150 years.
Now, I realize you're running in Kansas but even there this kind of ignorance surely wont fly.
"I can see no logic in attempting to isolate and protect this theory against the broad range of theories in science, economics, sociology, etc."
Protect it? It's constantly under scrutiny you jackass. That's why we know it works.
God damn you're stupid.
" On this subject, our standards appear to be out of balance."
The only thing "out of balance" is you.
"Theories are theories and facts are facts."
Actually, theories are facts and facts are facts but not all facts are theories.
Bet that melted your pitiful excuse for a brain, didn't it?
"While some would claim that the theory of evolution is ironclad and without fault, I respectfully disagree, and so do many individuals who belong to the organizations listed above."
And which qualified biologists are stating that the theory of evolution is ironclad? Surely not those who continue to research it, else why research it? And it can't be those who apply it as they know that new research is being done.
So then, who are these mysterious people who claim it to be infallible?
"I know because I’ve visited with them on this very subject."
Good. Name them. Give their qualifications to speak on the subject, their educational background and the institutions they're employed by and the positions they hold there. Cite the scientific journals they're published in for extra credit.
Go on. I'll wait.
"Therefore, it should remain open to criticism, adjustment due to new data and evidence, and overall improvement."
Uh, it is you knuckle dragging cretin.
If you're elected then Kansas should immediately be thrown out of the union on grounds of abject stupidity.