[...] A creationist scientist is bound by religious conviction to be honest with himself and others about the evidences of science. For a creationist scientist, lying about or intentionally misrepresenting evidence for or against evolution would be a serious sin. However, there is no such safeguard for evolutionist scientists. Without religious conviction, they are left with only intellectual conviction, which the world demonstrates is often weak when passions come into play.
[...] We have seen a number of haxes generated by non-believer evolutionists. There has not been to my knowledge a hoax generated by a creationist scientist.
22 comments
There has not been to my knowledge a hoax generated by a creationist scientist.
I might ask who you think found out the hoax's. the scienices {sp?} you idiot. In fact,in one case that creationist use as a bad example a tooth that had been declared human turned out to be from a prehistoric wild pig. Who was it who figured it out? The man who had id'ed it as human in the first place. He went public and said, sorry about the, but I make boo-boo. You will find a creationist admiting to error.
Of course I believe in God.
I just had a word with him.
He says you are an idiot.
As far as I know, Creationism simply cannot exist because the huge majority of 'evidence' used by Creationists comes from the bible and largely false or outdated claims, or pu guesswork. The regular process scientists go through to present an idea, experimentation and peer reviewing, is non-existant for creationist theories and for good reason. Any tiny bit for the mountain of evidence supporting evolution can easily destroy creationism.
So no, Creation scientists are bound by the fact they must produce 'results' in line with creationist theories, whatever the cost, making them biased and unfit to be a member of any academic society.
This is one common habit of fundies that's always pissed me off.
"In theory, we should be more honest and good then you. So, we are. No need to look at the facts.
You've got numbers on this? Facts? *sticks fingers in ears* LA! LA! LA! JESUS! JESUS! JESUS!"
"We have seen a number of hoaxes generated by non-believer evolutionists. There has not been to my knowledge a hoax generated by a creationist scientist."
I can think of three off the top of my head:
1. The Bible
NEXT
" There has not been to my knowledge a hoax generated by a creationist scientist."
Yes, technically polished turds don't count as hoaxes. They've found the best way to not generate hoaxes: by generating nothing and being the hoax themselves.
> For a creationist scientist, lying about or intentionally misrepresenting evidence for or against evolution would be a serious sin.
> However, there is no such safeguard for evolutionist scientists.
> We have seen a number of haxes generated by non-believer evolutionists.
> There has not been to my knowledge a hoax generated by a creationist scientist.
"A creationist scientist is bound by religious conviction to be honest with himself and others about the evidences of science."
HAHAAAAA, pull the other one.
Kent Hovind
He tells scriptural stories that never happened.
There is no evidence against evolution, is there?
The Kitzmiller vs Dover trial found that cretinism isn't science.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
