I can't help thinking about it when the gay community keep whinging for "equal rights". They don't want equal rights, they already have them. What they really want is to get their perversions legalized.
23 comments
Why not? Your sexual preferences are legal, I hope. Why should theirs not be legal? Or more specifically, why do you care? What business is it of yours? Have those nasty old gays been peeking in your windows to see what you do?
It's actually worse than Mark thinks. Being employed by Soros to help support the gay agenda (paid in chicken nuggets) I have it on good authority that we are not to stop until Mark himself is personally gay married.
P.S. - Also on the agenda is to make it illegal to get gay divorced. So I hope you like a lot of cock Mark or it's going to be a long and rocky union.
image
edit: Also Mark ....
But how can two people of the same gender mate? It's just impossible.
Well, you see Mark, when two grape Popsicles love each other very much ....
Let's go through this step by step:
Equal rights = Having the same right to marry, to adopt etc. as heterosexuals. This means legalizing our "perversion" as Mark calls it.
He then states that we already have those rights (which is at most partially true) and that we want more, aka the above mentioned "legalization of perversion" aka equal rights.
Which he said we already have. But which he also says we still want and that they are more than equal rights.
Which can only lead to the conclusion that Mark is actually stuck in an infinite loop of bigotry in which he constantly realizes what equal rights mean, then has to redefine it in his mind to be able to continue his paranoid homophobia, fails and falls back to his old definition, returning to the start of the loop. If he was my conversation partner during a Turing test I would probably conclude that he is actually a badly programmed VI.
Newsflash, Mark. What you call their "perversions" and the law used to call "the abominable crime of buggery with mankind" - that was legalised in my state way back in 1984. Which is appropriate because such laws were so Orwellian. It was legalised earlier in South Australia, the UK, Canada and some US states. Oh, and the French decided it wasn't a crime way back in 1791, during their revolution, then later Napoleon agreed.
Now, I suggest you get with the 21st Century.
If their 'perversions' are not legal, and what is not legal for them is legal for heterosexuals, then they don't have equal rights. Thankfully things like marriage and adoption are being permitted to homosexuals in more countries across the globe, so we're coming closer to a world where homosexuals will have equal rights.
Two off topic points relating to the comments
1) I didn't know the term, so I had to look up "Speidi". There's 40 seconds of my life I'm never getting back
2) To heleninedinburgh: "Homobius strip"? Again another term i have not heard until today, but that is going to make me giggle all through work
"What they really want is to get their perversions legalized."
A. Their "perversions" are legal.
B. Who cares? Let 'em!
@heleninedinburgh
"Homobius strip"
You are hereby awarded 10,000 Internet Points.
They don't want equal rights, they already have them.
They do now, after Obergefell v. Hodges . Well, to a certain extent. In many states it's still perfectly legal to fire an employee for being gay or deny them the chance to adopt a child. But marriage was the biggest hurdle of late.
Meanwhile, the Log Cabin Republicans...:
image
...what, they wouldn't let you join: because the closet you're in kept knocking over tables at LGR functions: and you considered their justifiable complaints of your disruptive behaviour 'whinging'?!
I can't help thinking that Freud was right about the likes of you, Marky-boy: when the Log Cabin Republicans are open about themselves.
They can't adopt children according to some states. They had to fight for the right to marry the person they love. Their perversion hurts none. I have LGBT friends and feel they should have same rights I do. I can say this, if we treated Christians like LGBT individuals the Christians would cry persecution at the top of their lungs.
"But I want chocolate ice cream!"
"But you *cannot* have chocolate ice cream! You can have any fruit-flavoured ice cream, like everyone else!"
Sorry, but today most people aren't going to stick with the "letter of the law" in regards to equal rights when there's a lot of people for whom it violates the "spirit of the law". Especially when the letter was written generations ago by ignorant people. Well-meaning, yes, but we know better today, so that's no longer an excuse.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.