"Atheists worship nature."
Setting aside the gross overgeneralization and lumping together of people into monolithic blocks, this might hold some grain of truth in it if you squint really hard. Speaking for myself (I consider myself an atheist) I would say I hold a great deal of awe and reverence for all the subtle intricacies of physics that permit the universe as we understand it to exist, and of chemistry that allow the tiniest pieces of matter to arrange themselves and interact with each other in specific patterns that we recognize as life, and of biology and evolution that arrange and mold that life into the array of forms on our planet that's so amazing in its diversity and complexity - "into endless forms most beautiful," to quote Darwin - including one particular form (Us!) that's capable of discovering and observing and contemplating all this as well as its own place in it. In this light, I find nature to be wondrously beautiful in its complexity and intricacy, entirely deserving of awe and reverence. (Nature, for me, consisting of the entirety of the universe and everything in it.)
This is about as close to worship of nature as I come, and even then, "worship" isn't the term I would use because, to me, that word brings to mind images of drooling knuckle-draggers intellectually shackling themselves and participating in their own willing enslavement to an Orwellian, Big Brother-esque invisible fairy in the sky. But this is my own particular view, and generalizing my particular outlook to include all atheists everywhere makes you an idiot.
"Everything they call science today is worship of nature."
Then you fail to understand what science is, and this makes you an even bigger idiot.
"Atheists worship a false miracle called the length contraction"
And you're an even bigger idiot still!