[in a discussion about a website that accuses Obama of winning by election fraud]
This guy is way underestimating the fraud that took place. Half the Democrat votes could be fraud, not to mention the Republican votes that weren't counted or switched to Democrat votes. I knew they had the machines fixed when they started the business about Romney fixing the machines. If you are making the accusation, you are free to engage in that exact behavior because the opposition will be on the defensive.
It's easy when most of the Republicans charged with safeguarding the elections are actually Democrats in disguise.
'rats aren't gonna like the revenge.
17 comments
How fucking dare you use Noam Chomsky's name like that, you little shit?
Also, what revenge? I dare you to do something. I fucking dare you. I double dog dare you. Do it, if you've got the balls to make good on your little threat.
"I knew they had the machines fixed when they started the business about Romney fixing the machines. If you are making the accusation, you are free to engage in that exact behavior because the opposition will be on the defensive."
My, this is just what President Gore and President Kerry said. The difference is the Democrats came up with evidence; the Republicans came up with "unskewed polls" and a lot of wishful thinking.
Face it, your guy lost and you're stuck with that black guy in the white house for four more years.
Seeing as how all polls prior to the election showed Obama winning, I don't know why they would have had to mess with election fraud anyway. Oh, right, every single one of the polls was part of the conspiracy!
It HAD to be election fraud. There was no possible way that Mittens lost because the Republicans decided to run the most unlikeable, inhumanly sociopathic candidate imaginable. It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Rmoney was essentially a sock puppet for the richest hundredth-of-a-percent of the US population, a man who openly admitted he was a rich fuck who only had the interest of other rich fucks at heart. Surely there was no way that Mittdroid lost just because he was so clueless that he honestly thought he'd hit a home run just because he was born on third base, that he was largely incapable of comprehending that most other people did NOT have his advantages growing up, and was equally incapable of caring whether or not they did. He didn't lose because he was only concerned with increasing the value of his stock, because he put people out of work in the US by shipping their jobs overseas to be performed by sweatshop labor for cents on the dollar compared to their American counterparts, or because he viewed their plight--you know, the one he caused--with utter indifference, or even because he saw the same people he'd ruined as parasites and moochers. No, he only lost because the Democrats cheated. Why, that's the ONLY thing that makes ANY sense at all. If the democrats hadn't cheated, we would all be basking in the warm, comforting glow emanating from President Gordon Gekko's ass right now.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I actually love the Obama administration. It's like running a firehose under an old barn and watching as the rats come boiling out of the tunnels beneath.
So, I guess the video that was put on YouTube on election day by a voter whose machine was repeatedly switching his vote from Obama to Romney, and the fact that Romney's family owned an interest in Ohio's voting machines are just two more examples of opposite-day Democratic trickery, eh?
And of course you have actual compelling hard evidence that widespread voter fraud occurred and was responsible for Obama's electoral victory, right?
You don't?
Ohhh...that's very different. Never mind.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
