Untill this century it wasn't widely accepted for women to wear pants. It was considered improper. The awful feminist movement changed that, so young ladies our age don't have a lot of modest examples to look to, save godly women in our churches. Modest apparel meant long flowing garment. Pants, shorts, culotts, etc do not line up with this.
32 comments
What about all those men running around wearing tight pants that show off their butts or their package? What about the men who wear their pants hanging around their ass showing off their boxers? What about Tom Jones?
"Untill this century it wasn't widely accepted for women to wear pants
A Christian man sins by looking at a woman's knees? What if they belong to an old or fat woman? Is there any leeway with this? And what about men wearing shorts and exposing their knees to women's sinful gaze?
Yes, and up until the start of World War I, parents routinely dressed their little boys in dresses, with long, curly hair and even lipstick. Hmmmm....
The human body isn't inherently sinful! It's beautiful, and should be celebrated. We wear clothes to protect ourselves from the elements, not to cover our naughty bits!Don't pants make it harder for someone to accidently get a peek at her gentiles?
Hee.
In Genesis, when God made man and woman - they were totally nude. After they wore leaves (and ate that fruit), god was pissed.
Have you ever seen a Kammeez or Sari. Those are traditional indian garments for women,and are the most beautiful things you could ever wish to see. They consist of a calf length tunic, and *gasp* ankle length PANTS!!!
Actually, dresses were necessary because of menstruation, but now we have godly MaxiPads. But stay away from those sinful tampons! They're satan's little fingers! Well, at least www.landoverbaptist.com says....
Illuvatarwen: You're half right... salwar kameez does involve pants, but the sari does not.image
Sari:
image
Actually, I'd wear either one gladly, they're so pretty. It's too bad these aren't in fashion for American women.
Yet men can go around shirtless. What godly man wants to cause his sister in Christ to sin with her eyes by exposing himself? Oh, I'm sorry, it's only women who need to cover themselves because apparently men have the intellectual and physical capabilities and restraints of animals. Get a grip.
Exposing herself? In pants? Ever heard on mini skirts? Far more revealing if you ask me, plus, one good gust of wind will show you why women wear pants. Plus, these days skirts are generally worn by the more promiscuos females. Not all, but generally. Why? Because pants are more conservative! Jeez.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
