"Evolution isn't science."
Really? That's got to be news to all of those scientists in the field and all the publishers and editors of the scientific journals devoted to evolution.
"It is a conceptual position, based mainly on lies."
Yeah? Which ones?
"You assume that evolution hasn't been proven wrong, which it has, several times."
Several you say? How about you just point me to one instance?
"While basing your conclusion on an idea that was never proven in the first place."
Evolution has been "proven" a number of times. In fact, pretty much every experiment conducted on the idea in the last 150 years has proven it.
"And, there is a flood of supporting evidence for the biblical account for the world."
Oh, I don't need a flood. Just a trickle would do. How about just a drop? Give me one reputable citation that shows any part of the Biblical account of creation is accurate in its description.
"In addition, everything in our world supports structured, intended design, not random assortment, as evolution suggests."
Everything? Are you sure about that?
Aside from that, evolution doesn't claim "random assortment".
"As for the rest of your post, you are wrong. Evolution is a very well funded, state endorsed religious stance to explain things."
Do me a favor. Find a dictionary. Open it up to the "R" section. Find the "Religion" entry. Read the definition. Now, take the dictionary and beat yourself about the head until said definition sinks in.
"But it has no proof and you equate any extent of dissent with stupidity."
It has vast amounts of evidence. Dissent in and of itself doesn't indicate stupidity but it generally points to it when you go around denying something so well supported.
"No one believes in evolution, it is a dead theory."
True. No one "believes" in evolution in the manner you're talking about. Just about everyone accepts it as an accurate description of the mechanism for the diversification of species on the planet.
"Evolution is not science, it is a fine concept if someone wants to believe it. But we don't and have no reason to."
Fine. Stop taking advantage of it then. That means no more pharmaceuticals for you. No more vegetables or grains either. You should probably cut back on your meat consumption too as the ability to produce so much of it is the result of evolution. You can throw away your cellphone too as many of the circuit designs and components are being designed with genetic algorithms which are based on evolutionary principles. Might as well stop flying too as those same algorithms are designing better planes. And your car. If the switch is ever made to biofuels you wont be able to take advantage of that either. And that's just a handful of things you can't have now.
Pity.
"We see the structures, laws, patterns and drives in science as a mark for design and support for intelligent design."
Define "design" and show an example of it. Show how this example could not have come about naturally. Show that this "design" was created by an intelligence. Show that this "design" was created by a god and not an alien species. Show that this god is your god.
Good luck.
"There are obvious, clear differences in the beliefs."
Yes. One is a prettied up version of creationism and the other is actual science.
"That leads you back to what is the trouble here. Evolution is state endorsed and taught in schools."
So are physics and chemistry. What's your point?
"My children won't be taught that garbage, No more than they would be willingly taught taoism."
Then your children are missing out on an important part of their education.
