Peter Rosa #conspiracy

Peter Rosa #conspiracy subchat.com

It concerns her recent baby. Most photos taken within a few months of his birth show a decidedly non-preggo looking Palin. She also was back at work three days after his birth. And in this same time period, one of her teenage daughters was out of school for months with "mono." You connect the dots.

29 comments

old comment by

The one who approved this is not an idiot. Nowadays, being pregnancies so monitored, nobody can fake a pregnancy. If there were the slightest doubt that she was pregnant, when registering her son(it's easy to check if he's registered at all), they just can press a key in their computer to check the database and check if the data the parents provide is accurate. With compulsory registration in the Census, children being born in hospitals and bearing in mind that she didn't know she was VP candidate until some days AGO, the whole thing conspiracy sounds ridiculous.
No matter what telenovelas say, you can't fake a pregnancy so easily, LET ALONE IF YOU'RE A PUBLIC FIGURE.

old comment by Languid

I am a mother of two. I was in school and military training (ROTC) when I had my first daughter. I was back in classes within five days and back in PT within three weeks. I was in pretty good shape and about two weeks after I had the baby I was back in "pre-baby" clothes.

With my second, I worked as a waitress. I was back at work in pre-baby clothes in two weeks. Just because it'd be nice to sit home and relax, and lounge around in baggy sweats, doesn't mean we can all do it. And just because some women don't lose their baby weight right away, doesn't mean that some of us are't blessed with shedding the waist with the birth.

For a more famous example, look up pictures of Halle Berry just after birth. Or Cindy Crawford. Or how many other countless models and actresses are back at work within weeks. And that's at work not in suits, but rather in swim-wear.

Give me a break... come up with another conspiracy.

old comment by

Which money can compensate the fact that, if caught, they will never be able to practice medicine?. In case you're wondering, if caught, the doctors who were her accomplices can be disbarred and unable to work any longer. Bear in mind that they have to forge analysis, scans, registrations, etc....... Which means that, with their reputation tarnished, they should be paid A LOT, that is, almost a wage for your WHOLE LIFE. And who will pay them, by the way?. Being a politician doesn't mean BEING A FUCKING RICH MAN.
And bearing in mind that she was not nominated as VP until three days ago, and pregnancy takes NINE FUCKING MONTHS, motivation is crappy, to say the least.

old comment by

Coming from a cousin of a gynecologist. Nowadays it's practically impossible, in a developed country, to fake a pregnancy.
Pregnancies are carefully monitored from the very beginning and if there is a miscarriage or a problem in pregnancy, is carefully recorded. For those who think that she may have bribed the doctors to do that, think twice. Doctors, if caught(and it's VERY EASY that they are), can be taken away their licence for life. In other words, they can't take up medicine again. Honestly, I don't think that Palin is rich enough to bribe so many people and make it profitable. The risk is too high, both for the doctors and the people living around(who have had to see her pregnant),and for her, for that matter. If there was no pregnancy, she could just shut up. The extra brownie points she could gain with that can be taken away as easily because, honestly, in those circumstances, it's easy to demonstrate that the baby doesn't exist and neither her pregnancy and her discredit and her party's is too much. It just doesn't compensate. No matter how much money they have, which wouldn't cover all the people they would have to bribe(and it just doesn't cover only doctors but also those civil servants in charge of the census bureau, staff in her post, neighbours, technicians and staff working in the hospital, etc..........)
Second, when a baby is born, there is an OBLIGATION to the parents to register the baby in the census bureau. So, it would be fairly easy to check out. At local level, still, papers may disappear but not at state level.
Besides, there is no motivation. She was nominated as VP just three days ago and MacCaine as president early this year. Pregnancy takes nine months to come into term and, if she wasn't pregnant, don't you think that people around her, those who don't sympathise with her, wouldn't have already spoken?. You know, how much money and influences can you move for such a trivial, relatively speaking, matter?. Sorry guys, conspiracy theories work that way.
It sticks out a mile that the guy can't get pregnant. To begin with, if wearing loose clothes(and, having been a mother myself, I can talk from experience, many women who have just given birth tend to do that), nobody remarks if you're preggo or not.
Second, three days is the time women spend, on average, in hospitals after giving birth. There is no obligation to take maternity leave inmediately. If she wanted to come back to work immediately, she could with no problem.

old comment by

Nope, we don't connect the dots. A child born by her daughter can't pass off as hers, specially if she remained in the state, unless everybody, from her colleagues to her neighbours wouldn't have realised she was not pregnant to begin with(and she's a public figure, don't fool us).
Besides, if a person is sick with mono during at least five months(and symptoms for pregnancy begin LONG before the tummy is noticeable), everybody suspects and it's very easy to find out if it's true or not. Bearing in mind that the interests of both the baby and the teenage mother would be at stake, social workers and protective services would have taken measures. If Nixon and Clinton, both presidents, couldn't prevent their little dirty laundry to be discovered, why on earth can you movilise and prevent people from all sort of strata to tarnish the reputation of a potential Vice President, specially if known only three days ago?, WTF?

old comment by

Because, no matter how conservative is this woman, it's very, very difficult to fake a pregnancy. Maybe it was in the nineteenth century, when children were not born in hospitals and often without the help of a doctor, birth certificates were not compulsory by law and women didn't have a very active social life. Besides, the baby(who, you conveniently ignore, has Down's syndrome, extremely unusual if the mother is under 35 and very if over 40)was born when not even MacCaine was candidate. She has already admitted that the said girl with mono is 5 months pregnant. Why would she go through that fanfarre for nothing, when she's not even a candidate, and suddently, in one of the most important moments of her life, she discloses such a vital info? Classic Conspiracy Theory inconsistency.
I think that the low punctuation it got is because people are a little biased because she's too conservative. And the guy who submited and the one who approved are RIGHT. That she didn't look very preggo, whatever very means in this context(WTF?, is there a pregnancy lie detector or what?), that the daughter was sick with mono(I prefer the classical "she's with some relatives")and ignore that happens to be five months pregnant now(after giving birth four months ago, three hurrays for the magic sperm)and that Palin went back to work three days after giving birth(exactly the time a pregnant woman must remain in hospital if the labour is natural), is weak evidence. Rather think critically, how was she able to obtain FAKE ANALYSIS, FAKE CERTIFICATES, FAKE SCANS.............and bribe so many people without being broke?.

old comment by

As the cousin of a matron, sorry, but she would have been extremely sexually active AND have died in the process. After labour, you have to stay in a quarantine because, otherwise, you die. Again, the burden of proof that the Republicans are lying lies on you(and this demonstrates that, as the administrator has indicated more than once, there are fundies of all colours).
And use logic, if Palin is willing to admit that her daughter is pregnant anyway, when she's in the peak of her career, it's absurd to asume that she's going to make such a dangerous maniouvre and risk it all when she was just Alaska governor. And remember, she has to find doctors stupid enough to lose their carreers for good(they would be ruled out of the medical bar association)for what benefit exactly?. Don't tell me money, because Palin, and not even Bill Gates, for that matter, can give enough money to compensate losing their wages forever. And not only doctors, but also to many other people involved in the plot who could risk the same fate.

old comment by

You can't pick and choose evidence if it fits your views and reject that which doesn't. If you think that the fact that Bristol Palin is pregnant is the proof that Paula didn't give birth is actually the opposite. It's the proof that the idiot who spread the rumors jumped too early into conclusions.
I don't know if the guys who think that this story could be true have been pregnant(if their gender is masculine, it's obvious that they haven't). A five-months pregnancy IS RECOGNISABLE. If she's pregnant of less time, everybody would have realised it by now. Second, a girl who has given birth can't get inmediately pregnant, as if the labour were the rabbit in the hound races.
To begin with, an unexpected pregnancy can be passed off ONCE, but not twice. Do you think that a teenager, who has demonstrated not being particularly gifted, can reasume sexual relationships in such a tiny margin that nobody realises?, don't you think that both parents are more aware of the facts and wouldn't let her go to bed so easily?. And even if it were true that she's three months pregnant, have you never heard the basics of what to do AFTER pregnancy?. A woman has to wait a time of quarantine after a labour because, if she reasumes sexuals relationships inmediately, she can die of complications arising from the recovery. Asuming that she was so lucky as to be ovulating inmediately(breastfeeding anybody?)and that his guy is quick enough to hit the jackpot, the timing is impossible for even a four month or three month pregnancy.
Maybe Republicans are lying. Yes, and maybe there are blue elephants in China, why not?. After all, a woman who has been unable to prevent to fall into a very real corruption scandal, a crime in other words, is neither rich nor intelligent enough to cover up a teenage pregnancy and make it pass as her own(honestly, nobody, not even the guys who have unmasked her former brother in law realised that SHE WAS NOT PREGNANT, to begin with).

Peter Rosa #conspiracy subchat.com

29 comments

Confused?